« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Comprachicos

This will not be one of my typical long explanations as to why the Left does what it does.

On April 19th (Hitler’s birthday) 27 year-old Timothy McVeigh blew up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. 168 died. A cold chill ran up my spine. This was the first time a home-grown American had taken innocent lives to make a political point.

Then on April 20, 1999 (the day after Hitler’s birthday, and two days before Lenin’s) 18 year-old’s Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 13 at Columbine High School near Littleton, Colorado. Unlike McVeigh, both boys came from the best of families, so President Bill Clinton rushed to the city…not to grieve with the families, but to grant them all absolution.

Finally, Yesterday, a 22-year old kid killed 6 in a shooting rampage in Tucson, leaving behind his “political” manifesto, a la Ted Kaczynski, on video.

To be sure, we’ve had other “massacres-of-indifference;” Bath, Michigan in 1927, the Texas Tower sniper in 1966, and Virginia Tech in 2007, but all those killers were certifiable in one way or another.

I know, to many of us, all mass killers are insane, but not all do we allow to escape the gallows on that account. Only McVeigh survived to stand trial, until this young man in Tucson. So we will see.

But yesterday should have proved to us that something vile, other than mental illness, is in America’s water.

The Comprachicos, as you will soon see, were a group of 17th Century nomads who bought children for the express purpose of deforming them so that they could then sell them as circus freaks. They were good at what they did.

I ask you simply to read this essay by Ayn Rand, (1970). She had never heard of video games or avatars or social networks, but she certainly did know “alienism.” Even if you’re not a fan…as I am not that big a fan, myself…you will find her analysis compelling.

After you have read it, then you will know that the course should be clear for us;

…politically, philosophically and morally.

COMMENTS

  • rbdwiggins

    I supported the elimination of the Department of Education in 1980 (From its beginning.).

    The longevity of our Republic, and quite possibly the “free world,” has become wholly dependent on the wholesale destruction of our failed government schools.

    We can begin by returning God to the classrooms and the kitchen tables…

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      even those not reared under the influence of leftists in academia and given the openness of our society and the relatively few assassinations and mass killings, many of which occurred during times of little or much less influence of the Left in schools, I would say that America stands pretty well among other nations in this regard and also think it is best that both left and right not seek to place every such crime into a political context.

      One of the tendencies of the left is to be aghast at all crime and use their instances as occasions for more laws to control us, as they think man’s nature can be changed. Whereas the Biblical world view is that man is lost in sin and his nature can only be changed by God from within.

      Hence, no matter the laws etc, men will commit murder.

      • rbdwiggins

        One must first be able to distinguish between good and evil.

        • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

          to overall cultural trends but that I do think that the breakdown of the home and lack of fathers in the home is the clearest example of how one can explain higher murder rates since the late 60s and during much of the past 40 years.

          But when it comes to assassination attempts, given how they have been spread around from Jackson thru this past week, the argument is a much harder case.

  • mikerazar

    that I have ever read. The beauty of Rand’s essays is how fresh and relevant they remain to this day.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

    I might be still pushing the socialist-union screed.

    Although Atlas Shrugged was her crowning literary achievement, so much of her other writings are equally important. Specifically, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.

    Thanks for the post, Vassar. I had forgotten about The Comprachios.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …and then afterward, assess. Eh?

    • Mike Ferguson
      • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

        http://www.facebook.com/photos.php?id=144777702200729

        It is slated for an April 15 release and is part one of a three- or four-part series. I haven’t heard of any of the actors in the lead roles. I hope that they can act their parts as well as they look them.

        The movie sounds very promising, from the video clips I’ve seen; it’s being made outside of the regular studio system, and hopefully it retains Rand’s original ideas. Here’s one that Reason TV did a few months ago: http://reason.tv/video/show/atlas-shrugged-the-movie

  • JadedByPolitics

    there are classes on the evil White man being taught to Hispanics. It is the evil in the classroom that parents must fight daily. They think they are so slick teaching our children liberalism to use against us but we are on to them and we teach them Conservatism is the future of this great Country!

    BTW Vassar, that is a pretty ghoulish excerpt of her writing but the truth is in there.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …sorta like you, someone who never sugar coated it. We need that dash of cold water now,, don’t you agree?

      • JadedByPolitics

        I think the purpose of the Media Wing of the Democrat Party is to slow our roll but I refuse and I hope others refuse to fall in line to their propaganda attempt. I expect all the talk show hosts to address the hypocrisy on Monday and to not shy away from any of the rhetoric they have used, because they have used nothing that is out of bounds in the political arena, not this election year or any election year.

        I of course expect the lib teachers to propagandize our children throughout the week in schools across America, and so parents better be on the lookout for the lies and be prepared to counter. Heck, they ought to be countering it with the TRUTH in their homes today. I did so with my 22 year old, after Meghan Kelley’s interview with the lying, political hack of a Sheriff on her show. I explained to him why it was so important for her to pull the truth out of his lying lips.

  • penguin2

    She had an excellent analysis of the human mind and interaction with society. But this is telling:

    Does a child learn to identify, to categorize, to integrate
    his experiences and thus acquire the self-confidence needed to develop a long-range
    vision? Or does he learn to see nothing but the immediate moment and the feelings
    it produces, never venturing to look beyond it, never establishing any context but an
    emotional one, which leads him eventually to a stage where, under the pressure of
    any strong emotion, his mind disintegrates and reality vanishes?

    As children grow, even to the stages of adolescence, they are very susceptible to external messages. Their own ego strengths and identity are being formed during these years, then solidified. So, the messages given are very important. Not only that, but this is also the way they are desensitized to moral concerns and behaviors.
    IMO, not only is the first 6-7 yrs of development important, but in adolescence some of this can be reworked, repaired, or further destruction can occur. That is why young people are so susceptible to the advertisers, the entertainment world, and the video game universe. At a most vulnerable age, they are being influenced.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …with the deeper skills of psychology would find a gold mine in this essay.

      The ugly truth is that the Left has been “brain-washing” our kids for almost two generations, deforming them mentally and spiritually. The shooter in Tucson is but one manifestation, as some are naturally going to fall thru the cracks, as were Harris and Kelbold. The far greater number are those thousands and thousands of hate-filled, angy tweeters we’ve been watching at the Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin twitter site, or on Kos daily.

      We need to seriously consider a rescue mission for those lost souls.

      • penguin2

        the quote I noted. Maybe I am overstating it, but I think there are a significant number of young people today that fall into mindset of immediate gratification, and don’t have the survival skills to withstand the knocks that life eventually brings them.

        Also found this statement by Rand interesting:

        “The practice of degrading man leads one to the practice of deforming him. Deformity
        completes the task of political suppression

  • http://www.redstate.com/etcartman Kenny Solomon

    Y’all best be completely and one-hundred percent on top of your kids’ schools and what’s going to be said in classrooms tomorrow and going forward.

    • lineholder
    • Mike Ferguson
    • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

      Homeschool or private school. No matter what the cost personally it will be worth it.

  • speciallist

    that was enlightening

  • lineholder

    I like Rand’s writing. Her style can be difficult at times and I have to keep a dictionary handy, but she had a LOT of insight.

    I haven’t finished reading all of the essay yet, but it sounds much like our modern day idea of “acclimation” that is used as a technique in behavioral modification theory.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      Reading other people’s hard thoughts

  • Scope

    apparently to prove the point that the Leftists have been trying to control the mind of our children forever. That’s a fact.

    Ayn Rand was an atheist, and coined the term “objectivism.” In other words, if something wasn’t in your face, or provable by science, it didn’t exist, including God. All of her writings were based on that premise.

    With the essay you link to, on page six, one of her paragraphs include-

    “He does not know what to do; he is told to do anything he feels like. He picks up a toy; it is snatched away from him by another child; he is told that he must learn to shatre. Why? No answer is given. He sits alone in a corner; he is told that he must join others. Why? No answer is given. He approaches a group, reaches for their toys and is punched in the nose. He cries, in angry bewilderment; the teacher throws her arms around him and gushes that she loves him.”

    Rand talks about the will of the pack.

    For me, this is Rand shouting out for the omnipotent individual. As an atheist, she apparently doesn’t acknowledge that God has any say, nor should he in any discussion about morality amongst the human race, because there is no absolute proof that he ever existed.

    There were some arguments that home schooled children lacked the abilities of being socialized with other children, probably by the left. Many of us socialize our dogs for God’s sake, so that they have an ability to interact and know that there really is an interactive society, with other beings in society. Rand purports that the child needs alone and quiet times, that is true. The amount of alone time that children should have needs to be monitored.

    Rand talked about the Will of the Pack, as though it was a negative. I’d prefer to concentrate on the Will of the People, before I’d accept Rands scripts for our society.

    • Scope

      which has made her a hero of the Libertarians.

    • aesthete

      is an awfully precarious basis on which to base validity. If you’ll recall, “the people” of Jerusalem welcomed Jesus with palm leaves one day, and condemned him to death over a known criminal the next. The “solid will of the volk” was a common theme in Nazi Germany, and several of the European countries voted themselves not only into soft democratic socialism, but also into hard, soulless communism in the Balkans and among the states that comprised the former empire of Austria-Hungary.

      Suffice it to say, mere democracy isn’t enough: people are fickle and imperfect, and oftentimes do brutish things when organized as a group to minorities. There has to be a principle above simple democracy, or we must accept the democratic results in the Palestinian Authority, Venezuela, and other Middle Eastern countries as equal to those of any other democracy, so long as the results were legitimate. The right to an insignificant vote among millions of others to decide on which of your masters will take away your liberties hardly qualifies as a right at all. I don’t agree with Rand on everything (or most things as pertain to philosophy), but on the “right of the pack”, she has a pretty good point.

      • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

        she’ll convert me. Besides, I didn’t find any real proselytizing in this essay. Atheists are like most gay people, unless you hang a sign around their necks, most of the time you never even know.

        But if it will make you feel better, “This essay by an atheist is the best description of how the Left is trying to mangle and deform our children that I have ever read.”

        There.

        • Scope

          my reply in some negative way. I acknowledged, right off the bat, that you were using the essay to show how the Democrats were trying to control the minds of our children. I said that is a fact.

          I brought up some portions of the essay that I questioned. She talks about a child having a toy taken away from him, and he is told he needs to learn to share. Then she asks why? I believe she is talking about a school or nursery school setting, not the child being in his own backyard with his toys that have been taken away by another. Haven’t we always taught our children to share, as a charitable effort? From my experience, many children are “willing” to share, even if it’s two for me and one for you. Being “forced” to share is another thing, and that is where the Socialists come in. The other examples in that paragraph are similar. I may be wrong, but, it appeared to me that she is trying to make each child into an island, rather than to teach him the skills necessary to integrate into society. Of course I am referring to a time in our society when traditional moral values were still prominent.

          My comment didn’t have anything to do with my feelings, and, I’m not sure why you found it necessary to make that comment.

          As to Rand still being dead, so she has no ability to convert you, her books are still widely sold, and there is an Ayn Rand institute dedicated to keeping her works and writings available. She remains a very popular writer still today. If the fact that she is still dead, and therefore has no ability to convert anyone, that would be the same as saying the Founders are still dead, therefore they have no ability to convert anyone either. Or Russell Kirk for that matter.

          • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

            Everyone here knows Miss Rand was an atheist, although I don’t think she was plugging it in this particular essay. I knew she was anti-Christianity, but not anti-Christian. I don’t read that much of her, but I do know that I am pro-Christianity, but am also put off by some types of Christians myself.

            What I’ve always found interesting about true atheists (most are not) is that they are always seeking the light, only, looking in all the wrong places. Mortimer Adler didn’t finally find the Light until he was 87 or so, when he declared himself a “theist” of some sort. I hope God looked kindly on that.

            But true atheists such as Rand bring a lot of people out of the dark, and have them also looking the for light, some of which ultimately find The Light. While this is probably not Miss Rand’s intention, and there is no way to count them, I’d wager that Miss Rand has brought more people to God than she ever turned away from God.

      • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

        Ayn Rand was an atheist, but she was a more effective spokesman for moral absolutes than almost anyone else in the twentieth century. She did an incredible job illustrating the psychology of wicked men, but her characters (heroes and villains alike) were cartoonish and not very realistic at all. She correctly diagnosed much of what is wrong, intellectually and morally, with modern man, but her prescribed cure (Objectivism) was pretty wacked out. In many ways, she is an ironic figure, because she wrote a lot about

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          in your last paragraph, (except that I am a moderately observant christian, and like the Paul’s I am pro-life.)

          • aesthete

            Though I’d qualify myself as pretty observant, and probably a bit more libertarian on social issues than either of you. Ayn Rand had several personal and political flaws that make her something of a fringe character, and her fiction was terrible (though We, The Living was pretty good). That said, we can and should take the good ideas from her political philosophy; in particular, her dogged commitment to Western values and individual liberty over majoritarianism and moral/cultural relativism.

        • Scope

          Very interesting read. I latched on to this one statement-

          “I can

          • aesthete

            like Murray Rothbard and Ron Paul, who prevent libertarianism from being more widely accepted in mainstream political thought, not its position on social issues per say. Particularly in the Western US, many (if not most) conservatives have views approaching right-libertarianism already.

          • http://www.thejoyofreason.com Greg Garrison

            I don’t think that it’s the fringe elements exactly that limit libertarianism. Or perhaps it’s a number of conflicting fringe elements. The Libertarian Party (of which I was a member for about six months) just isn’t very realistic (Here’s their platform). I think that it’s a bit self-serving and, at best (or worst) can only serve as a spoiler. Cato and Reason do good work, but I think that they undercut themselves sometimes with utopianism.

            I used to think that it was just sort of a misunderstood philosophy, but after reading the first half or so of Brian Doherty’s excellent book Radicals For Capitalism, I started looking at it in a different light, and eventually I came to my current position: Given a slate of candidates, I would prefer the one who is the most libertarian while still being electable, but I will almost always support the Republican who wins the nomination.

            I want to be careful not to threadjack, especially regarding social issues. E-Mail is probably better: thejoyofreason at gmail dot com.

        • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

          You edified.

          It’s always nice to be complimented and educated in the same sitting. You’ve added much to our collective education.
          Cordially

    • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

      But for human nature in general she was very observant.

  • bobmontgomery

    ….why atheists bother to care. Simplistically speaking, they should have no “issues”. But they appear to be useful on occasion. Wasn’t it Christopher Hitchens who argued the campaign against Saddam Hussein was…..righteous?

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      …only in all the wrong places. I bear them no malice. They even stole our profanities.

  • bobmontgomery

    I had a good funk going on here.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      . He has a fine Christian brother, so all the support he can need, in his last days. I’ve always like that impertinent sob a lot.

  • Read Chesterton

    She’s not as easy or enjoyable to get through as Chesterton either.

    Man’s spirit is the reason these “incidents” are the exception not the rule. We are not machines.

    “The state did not assume as much power sending men to the stake as it did sending them to the elementary school.” – G. K. Chesterton

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      She diagnoses well, but cure poorly.
      Agreed

    • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics
  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    I’m still traveling in Tulsa tonight NM by Friday.
    Will try to read your Cain pieces later.

    Asimov came from behind the curtain as a great writer (fiction) that also included perceptive glimpses at human nature. Atheist to the core as well.

    As the Jesuit and Hitler and Stalin and others have said. Give them the children for a few years and it cannot be undone.

    “To make you unconscious for life by means of your own brain, nothing can be more ingenious.” Rand

    Even understanding the nature of the prison she died in captivity.

    Have not seen this essay before. Thanks.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      though, didn’t you? We’re both blessed with good friends we haven’t met yet.

  • kestrel

    acquainting me with Rand’s essay. I wasn’t able to read it in a timely way, but I’m printing it so that I can finish it and make notes. School choice is important to me. I voted for Pete Hoekstra in our gubernatorial primary, partly because he was endorsed by a homeschoolers legal defense group (I don’t homeschool, but know people who do) and he seemed like the best person to bring about more school choice (as well as being conservative on other issues). The Rand essay is meaty reading, but worth the effort. Thank you.