« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Cantor vs Gregory, An Observation about GOP Congressional Messaging

Watch this YouTube presentation of Eric Cantor’s contretemps with NBC’s David Gregory last Sunday.

It’s a good teaching lesson for the GOP Freshmen Class. It’s about the resurfacing of the Barack Obama-Hawaii birth certificate issue when the mayor of Honolulu said he had seen it, but suddenly can’t find it. Limbaugh made light of it on Friday, which apparently piqued Gregory’s “fears”. I doubt Cantor got a heads-up that this would be discussed.

\http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J9GU5TYgmc

Now, no senior member of the Washington Press Corps such as Gregory, who thinks he outranks God anyway, is going to sit down with any ordinary member of the Freshman unless he has in his hands 8 x10 glossies showing an illicit relationship with a 14 year old. But there are copy-cat journalists back home trying to make points, so you need to study this kind of thrust-and-parry, where the inquisitor starts out on top and always…always…ends up there.

You can do better than this, so study it.

You need to become good, no better, for in less time time than you think, several of you will be in the leadership and the day will come when you will be out there fielding fastballs aimed at your heads from the Washington press corps as well.

With the media this sort of thing is a turf fight, i.e., who’s on top. Ideology and politics come second, and I think many of the GOP leadership, Cantor included, don’t quite get it.

It started out well enough, as Cantor laughed off the opening question. Reagan was always good at this, only his was a kindly chortle immediately putting the inquisitor in a junior position. “Well…” (unspoken term, “Junior” or “Skippy”). Reagan could talk to anyone as if he were a kid, which is pretty disarming for vanities like Gregory’s.

Anyway, Gregory quickly parried, putting Cantor on the defensive, a position from which he never recovered…over a subject as immaterial to Republicans as who fired the first shot at Ft Sumpter. Rat-a-tat-tat, Gregory badgered Cantor with questions he’d pre-practiced and which Cantor didn’t know was coming.

Of course it wasn’t fair, and while I never hold it against a man because he can’t think as fast as the other man in a debate when that man is holding a crib sheet, what worries me about Cantor’s performance is that I think he took comfort in knowing that he would come off as the victim of yet another mean old media attack, and get all sorts of “Poor Eric’s” or “Mean Ol’ David Gregory” as a reward.

To too many this has been some kind of victory for years. So take note:

The people did not send its new Congress, including its leadership, to win our pity for standing their ground without crying while being bullied. We wanted, and quite frankly expect “attaboys” instead of “poor Eric’s”. We want bloody noses distributed, not accepted with stoic dignity.

The truth is, guys like Gregory are easy, for even a man his own age can talk down to him, for vanity is a form of immaturity. Find a vain man, or a narcissist, and you can speak to him like a 16-year old. The birth certificate issue is a line of questions that could easily have been turned back on Gregory, and it does not require, as many of the lawyers in Congress believe, that they must constantly cram factoids, and practice, practice, practice how best to respond to these kinds of questions from the press.

The better way is to 1) know how an ordinary adult citizen might reply (minus the cursings), and 2) learn the latent bias in their questions, for most of their attacks are based on their own fears. Then respond to that.

Take the birth certificate issue. The truth of that issue is that of an underlying fear among the Left that Obama may not have been born in Hawaii, thus throwing a cloud upon his presidency. Their purpose is to thwart legitimate inquiry and even the tiniest bit of suggestion that this could become a legitimate issue. In other words, having not done any homework at all, they are afraid of what fact “birfers” might find, while totally ignorant of the law.

(Note: this is no different than the Left and the media’s obsessive behavior about race, for it is they who are the racists, and not the millions of people who go around never thinking about it one way or the other in the course of their day.)

So, in a case such as this, it should be easy to let the TV audience know who’s really tied up in knots with this “birfer” issue. Good God, when you find a person like that you can own him…a thing Eric Cantor obviously doesn’t know, for it would have been so easy to answer David:

“Shoot, David, to me where a person is born matters less than who he is born to. A child born to an American citizen is an American citizen in the eyes of most Americans and me too. He could have been born on a freighter crossing the International Date Line and he’d still be an American citizen.

“But your questions, David, tells me you’re worried. If it turned out that Barack Obama had been born in Indonesia or Kenya and not Hawaii, would you feel differently about his legal qualifications to serve?

“I wouldn’t, but would you?

“It seems that you’re the one who is worried here. Not me.”

At which time Eric rises from the table, and goes back to his office, with David Gregory’s head nicely displayed on a brass platter.

This was not a Left-Right confrontation in the classical sense they want to win every skirmish, for clearly the Left, from Kos to HuffPo to Soros, no one takes any special delight in seeing this sort of NBC-Takedown. Arianna didn’t pour herself another glass of that awful Greek swill, Kasnaya Argyros Santoriniand, then cheer. This does not advance their cause. it only keeps their enemy on the defensive. Ho-hum.

This was about territory, the Media vs GOP Congress. Gregory just re-marked his territory on Cantor’s ass one more time, while Eric went home thinking he’d gotten some real good points with the pity & outrage crowd.

I couldn’t live like that.

But Cantor seemed to be content to be the victim. For him this was a win, but for the new wave of voter outrage that started this revolution, it’s a lose-lose, and it’s up to the Freshmen to start training so as to end this sort of stiff-upper lip weekly smack-down. We don’t want out congressmen going off to Washington and begging on the mercy of the court of public opinion, portraying themselves as poor innocent wanderers just praying for any old bone the media will deign to hand under the table.

Eric Cantor strikes me as dullard in the arts of Queensbury, but like Paul Ryan, very important to the Cause nevertheless, only perhaps best serving the Glorious Fight by being stuck over in a corner with green eye shades.

The people expect, not hope, but expect to see just a little more gravel in the gut and spit in the eye (John Cash, Boy Named Sue) from their elected members of Congress.

OK, they can’t behave like me, I’ll agree. I’d be banished in a week. But Michele Bachmann seems to be getting pretty close without pulling out her switchblade. Not so sure about Pence yet. But he has other attributes, and besides, we’re talking about regaining lost territory in the Congress, not becoming president. Herman Cain is the only candidate out there who (and this I believe) would take David Gregory out in the back alley if he tried such an ambush on him.

Faking it

Back to Cantor’s uncomfortable laugh. I know age matters, but I wonder, with Cantor, is this genuine? Is it in character for him to be glib? In fact, his laugh reminded me of Russians when I made fun of Lenin back in the 90′s. Sort of like chuckling past a graveyard.

The reason I raise this is that last week the comment was made here by someone that perhaps the GOP should “fake out” the Democrats and the media. Be syrupy, bend over backwards to appear nice before the microphones and cameras, while hammering the hell out of them in conference, committee and on the floor. For a lot of people there’s much to be said for this.

But being an old southern lawyer who’d watched other old southern lawyers for years spoon out the molasses by the jarful with the right hand, while sharpening a dagger with their left hand behind their backs…to me it sounds just a little too much like what the Democrats have been doing for years and years, and with much more practice at it.

There’s a “business as usual” air about it, as well, along with the risk, as we’ve seen the past 40 years, for style to completely engulf substance. It’s also a signal that the victimhood of Eric Cantor will be about as good as it gets for our side…forever.

I have to hold to yet one more rule: When in doubt, always take the high road. Be yourself.

The good news is, that’s a winner in this new political climate. It will take awhile but the way we will defeat the seeming omnipotence of the press will first be in throwing down that shield of superiority that their acknowledged “best gladiators” carry onto the public stage. If David Gregory goes down, a dozen toady NBC bloggers go down with him, not like Keith Olbermann, mind you, but by being whipped publicly just as if James J Braddock has just whipped Max Baer. (Don’t worry, Olbermann will get his chance..if he ever bothers to get in the ring. His kind are about to become mere echos.) If Gregory is any indication, it shouldn’t be difficult. They haven’t confronted honest men since 1988, so it may be fun to watch them first squirm, then react, then lose.

But you Freshmen, you have to know how to beat these guys. And for God’ sake, don’t let Eric Cantor be your tutor. There’s a better way.

Dare I say it, Luke, look to the Force.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Common_Cents

    do they not care?

    I see a problem in being too much celebrity in DC now. Access to TV is what they want, and they are willing to pay the price of being ambushed and lampooned to get it.

    Notice the LSM picks on what they perceive as the most genteel and weak prey? Couric attacking the old Palin, Chris mathews fav target is Michelle Bachmann, etc….

    All of our side need lessons in media savvy, seeing the media as hostile, and recognizing they are being cross examined to be discredited instead of being interviewed.

    Without being challenged the LSM gets bolder and bolder. Look what happened to Bush? Without engaging and showing them to be immature, Bush allowed the whisper “bush is dumb” chants from the fringe to grow into a huge roar.

    In evaluating candidates I will place HIGH value on the ability to slap down the idiotic hostile lame stream media like a Reagan could do. It is imperative. A quiet nice person, no matter how smart and qualified will get chewed up if they don’t engage. Period.

    People on our side that have that quality that should be studied and tapped to help would be a Christie, Rudy, Gingrich. They have that ability to not get cornered in the trap set by the media and turn it back on the biased idiot. Not that they are the short list for candidates but rather the quality they have in smack downs should be adopted.

    I am especially worried about the new candidates that benefited from the backing of the Tea Party. They can be ambushed very easily if not aware. Do you think the establishment Republicans threatened by tea party movement will give them a heads up? heck no. They’ll look to the left wing media to take down their own internal threat.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Cantor also said, agreeing with Gregory, that

    • nessa

      …that the GOP STOP appearing on or giving interviews to the Lame Stream Media? Force them to publicly sign an agreement to provide news NOT leftist slanted bs and if they don’t agree simply don’t speak with them. That would be something the Freshmen could start without the old Rinos.

      • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

        Make the bias of the Democrat Media the issue.

        There are plenty of ways now for Republicans to get their message out. They don’t need ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC.

        But, just start with one.

        For example, they could target MSNBC. (Ooooh, I said “target!”) Put a bull’s eye on MSNBC. (There I go again.) The next time MSNBC calls, just tell them they’d be happy to come on IF MSNBC’s producers and on-air talent would sign a contract pledging to be “fair and balanced.” If they sign, great. Then go on and pull a copy out every time they egregiously violate the agreement. If they don’t sign, then don’t go on. And then the Republicans can go public, when asked, as to why they won’t go onto MSNBC.

        I outlined this to Kyl. HIs response was he couldn’t control a lot of the new people. So? He, McConnell, McCain and as many ofhers as possible could do it anyway.

        I outlined this to McCain. He said he already does not go on MSNBC. I don’t know if that’s true, because I don’t watch MSNBC much, but that’s what he told me, publicly, about six months ago.

        Make the obvious bias of MSNBC the issue. And then watch MSNBC try to do “news” without the appearance of Republicans on their “news” shows.

        Make MSBNC’s obvious bias the issue. Talk about that. Make them actually be the objective journalists they pretend to play on television. And if they won’t pledge to be “fair and balanced,” then tell them they can go play with themselves.

        Preferably in traffic.

        Thank you.

        ColdWarrior

    • leonidus2010

      Cold Warrior is right Eric Cantor has lost his mind. but it isn’t the first time this guy went off the reservation he also voted for the Sociailist TARP program when he was in Congress. Eric Cantor may be a “Republican” but he IS NOT a conservative. Maybe Jim DeMint or Rand Paul can have teach him about being a Conservative?

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        that they are doing what is best for the country as they see it.

        Obama thinks it best to cut America down to size much like what we call enemies do! Hence my statement for 10 years that Dems have done and said for free re oil drilling repression, appeasement etc what the USSR, bin Laden and Iran’s mullahs would have paid them to do.

  • fpete13527

    That interview made me want to vomit. It would have been so easy to be on top of that interview instead of at the effect of it. Cantor certainly wasn’t though, for all the reasons you stated.

    As I stated before I believe it is absolutely critical to take on the LSM. I also agree that there are currently very few old school Republicans that can effectively engage the LSM. The freshmen MUST do better and they must learn to be the exact OPPOSITE of the smokescreen that the left bamboozled them into over last two weeks.

    Aside from that though, and aside from the ground up personal responsibility that needs to happen, I absolutely agree that the new Republicans MUST learn how to speak…strong and effectively.

    Here is an example of how I would like to see the new freshmen handle the media, especially against a tool like this guy.
    Best parts around 3:30 to end. http://bit.ly/b0iTFj

    Another great example by same person against two examples of the lowest forms of (criminal) interviewers on the planet and still coming out ahead and with alacrity http://bit.ly/hzEY5e.

    I am obviously a big fan of the lady who in both cases sets an excellent example:) Seriously, I would have her be one of the persons in charge of training the freshmen to talk. My two cents.

    I hope your strategic project is moving forward well and I think even a few tactical mid-range additions would be enormously valuable. Whereas, I agree that a jumbo strategic addition is what’s really needed, even ONE more RedState, Breitbart, Malkin, Loesch, Human Events, or American Thinker would go a long way.

  • rbdwiggins

    Unabashedly, unapologetically and steadfastly… Conservative.

    Never answer a question based on a false premise. There is no “right” answer. Correct the narrative, immediately, then make a factual response. Do not offer an opinion at that time.

    Answer subsequent “leading” questions which obviously seek an opinion with another correction and factual response.

    When the tone of the interviewer interrogator changes abruptly, you are now in control.

    Be comfortable in the knowledge that the “three legs” of Reagan’s stool are firmly rooted in the core constitutional principles of our Founding.

    • fpete13527
      • rbdwiggins

        “Conservatism wins every time it’s tried.”

  • redneck_hippie

    getting the pit bull treatment. I don’t have a tv, so if I happen to catch a clip like that, it somehow still shocks me.

    Like the Brian Williams attack on Boehner re: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO CUT. TELL ME RIGHT NOW ONE THING YOU WILL CUT.

    Then the Rep. reaction. Hardly a freshie mistake.

  • Superheater

    The people who care about Obama’s birth cert are of far less consequence than people who think government healthcare is a good idea,

    Gregory really needs to see a vet, he’s desperate need of a distemper shot. How does he keep that drool of his suit with all that snarling?

    • rbdwiggins

      Could be all of the hot air…

    • momma

      _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfQrOrD4yTg

  • barleycorn

    He got his start in politics based on who Daddy knew instead of his own ability and smarts. He is a decently qualified representative, but nothing more. I’ve known him since he was in the Virginia House of Delegates and it seems the higher he rises the smaller he gets.

    Anyone expecting him to take chances and be a dynamic force for change is doomed to disappointment.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      I never feared meeting him in a back alley. I would just spank him like a bad, bad schoolgirl. For all my disagreements with John Boehner, I would not lightly tangle with him .

  • bobmontgomery

    …”…not going to Washington to seek their good opinion”, it is also “…not going to Washington to be their victim.”??

  • Ann_W

    They need to say, “You guys in the media are so obsessed with the birth certificate, I think he was born in the US, but if you are so concerned about it why don’t you go do some journalism and find out?”

    Obama is clearly keeping this alive to keep birthers alive and try to make Republicans looking crazy. It’s so stupid that people can’t turn this back onto the reporters, they are the ones who still bring it up.

  • http://www.buckforcolorado.com bjwilson83

    Chris Christie. You could have a guy up there accusing Christie of just about anything and somehow he turns it around so the questioner is at fault. Somebody should make a training video out of Christie’s appearances.

  • 1689

    Gregory and Matthews love to act the part of cross-examining attorneys. They ask leading questions, and go on, and on, and on, and keep talking, and their voice gets angrier & angrier, their face gets red, and then when the person starts to speak, they immediately interrupt with anger, and self rightous indignation.

    Any RINO stupid enough to want to sit through that ought to a) practice his zingers ahead of time on every possible subject, and b) be mentally alert enough and have his dander up ready to forcefully respond and put these phonies in their places. They are hacks for the Democrats.

    He should have said, “Well David, the President is doing this to himself because he hasn’t actually produced his birth certificate. I believe the President is a US Citizen, but why is he spending millions of dollars on attorneys to supress a silly run-of-the-mill document? Ordinary people don’t understand it. Attorneys who litigate all know that when you spend millions to suppress a document, there is ALWAYS damaging information in it. So the President is doing this to himself. Don’t know why. Ask him, not me. He shouldn’t be hiding something so basic. I can see why ordinary people are suspicious.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      certificate. Now, the Dem Gov of Hawaii has made it crystal clear what is the difference between one’s original Birth Certificate and the form Hawaii issues that they named a “certificate of birth.”

      Moreover, it is also becoming clear that it is Obama and his lawyers that are suppressing it.

      It was always a mistake though for the PLACE of Obama’s birth to be questioned given the evidence of a contemporaneous Honolulu newspaper birth announcement.

      I wrote three years ago that it was likely that Obama’s BC doesn’t list the Kenyan that Obama dreamed of as the father and that it either lists no father or lists Communist Frank Marshall Davis as daddy, which fact Obama probably didn’t discover until the 90s or early 2000s.