« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

On Sustainability.

“Sustainability” is something of a corporate fad.

Shell Oil has a sustainability policy. So does ExxonMobil.

Dow Chemical. Walmart. Mattel.

Even Ben and Jerry’s has a sustainability policy.

Even though “sustainability” may be interpreted differently in different companies, sustainability is something that corporate boards have come to expect of their managements.

Is it too much to expect our government and the people who run it to act as if they’re conscious of its sustainability?

Corporations usually put an environmental spin on sustainability. Broadly, their sustainability efforts would lead them to recycle, not make too big a mess, and not kill their employees, customers and neighbors.

Our government, though, threatens to kill our economy. The hungrier it gets, the more it grows, the more the engine that ultimately feeds it — the private sector, and specifically entrepreneurial capitalism — shuts down.

Common cuckoo being fed by its warbler host-parent. Wikipedia image.

I am reminded of two images. One is the “brood parasite” strategy of the common cuckoo, which lays its eggs in the nest of another species. The host dutifully raises the baby cuckoo as its own. The voracious cuckoo nestling demands more and more of the host until it crowds its nest mates out and works its host-parent to death.

The other image was a graph from a freshman-year Engineering 101 project on population growth. We were given the historical population figures for the City of Houston and for the United States up through 1970. Population data often plot as a straight line on semi-logarithmic paper; in this case Houston had a 12% annual growth rate, and the U.S. a 3% growth rate. When the curves were extrapolated, the conclusion was inescapable: by 2040, the curves intersect, so 100% of the U.S. population will reside in Houston.

The growth of government is unsustainable. In spite of high marginal tax rates on the wealthiest (and the poorest!) Americans, Government revenues are 15% of GDP, while Government spending is 26% of GDP.

Healthy corporations are forced by competition to trim deadwood. The alternative is a drag on earnings, reduced competitiveness, ultimately leading to bankruptcy or acquisition by a stronger competitor.

Government doesn’t know these market forces. Every single dollar of Government expenditures has a built-in constituency who will fight to the death before letting go the teat. Have you ever known a Government program to shrink? More commonly, the bureaucracy spends money lobbying to expand its sphere of influence.

To make matters worse, we’ve become conditioned to expect Government to provide the ultimate solution to all problems, from providing us jobs, to making the air cleaner than Yellowstone, to making our kids stop eating so much junk food and making our toilets not waste water. Excessive regulation is strangling the host.

The only possible fix for our economic woes is to unleash the mighty pent-up engine which is the American Capitalist Economy.

I’d do this by:

  • Reforming the tax code. President Obama favors high tax rates out of “fairness”, even if it can be shown that lower rates increase Government revenues. The increasingly progressive income tax may make us feel more “fair”, but it is why tax revenues lag. The “rich” will always be willing to money on lawyers, accountants or moving vans, if that’s what it takes to avoid what they perceive to be excessive taxes. The tax code needs to be flatter with fewer (or no) loopholes. The capital gains tax needs to be intelligently-structured to encourage innovation, capital formation and job growth, class envy be damned.
  • Reforming entitlements. That may mean means-testing or it may mean increasing the age of eligibility for benefits. But most importantly it means no new entitlements until we figure out how to pay for our current obligations. Period.
  • Reforming the Federal budgeting process. Start with -10% as a baseline, not +8%. Cut departments and regulation wherever possible. Reconsider the role of the Departments of Energy and Education, for starters. Take away EPA’s trump card to stifle development wherever it strikes their fancy.

The warning signs are there for anyone who cares to pay attention. Government has grown beyond the economy’s ability to sustain it.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.


Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • kowalski

    It’s a corporate buzzword because so much of academia has adopted it specifically. There’s no turning back from this path.

    The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University is all about sustainability and Dean Blount’s blog entry from September 9, 2010 is about shedding materialism to its barest essentials.

    When Barack Obama told the Chinese that they couldn’t count on America as a consumer nation any longer, it was with the full weight of American academia behind him. Unfortunately we also not a producer nation any longer, either. So what are we? We’re neither consumer nor producer, but our national debt and our entitlement expenditures keep rising…

    http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/Dean_Blount/blog/reconciling-sustainability-and-economic-growth.htm

    This makes me think about the issue of sustainability and the challenges facing business and political leaders in the 21st century. I hope that, with our faculty?s research and guidance (see for example, Klaus Weber’s recent paper on sustainability as a team effort), the generation of students we?re educating today can help us find new ways to promote economic well-being and growth?ways that don?t require over-consumption and the constant accumulation of things.

    America isn’t just deleveraging, it’s de-materializing and the de-materialization is being taught as a necessity at our best Universities.

    • kowalski

      And you can view their membership page here:

      http://www.aashe.org/membership/member-directory

      Green thinking and sustainability and the continued move to more technocratic and “sustainable” green economies have passed the point of tentative acceptance in America – they are now official pedagogy at most universities around the country, so get used to that.

  • kowalski

    Far from what you’re saying, continued growth of government regulation is fairly widely accepted as a precondition for “sustainability”. Among deans of universities, you would be one a very, very small minority of people to argue it differently.

    Myself, since I have no credentials to argue it (which means my voice is useless) I am going to have to accept whatever the Sustainability people have decided is the right thing to do.

  • kowalski

    But that doesn’t really matter. The model for the real “sustainability” people is a combination of much higher tax rates and much greater government regulation and control of the economy. They’ve got about a 20 year head start and frankly, that’s where we’re going.

  • kowalski

    Right around the time McNamara went to talk with Deng Xiopeng about sharing American’s manfacturing know-how with China, it became increasingly apparent to a lot of American intellectuals that a liberalized China with really, really large numbers of people who would want cars and washing machines and television sets and roads and all kinds of consumer frou frou was going to cause what they believed to be a catastrophe in the world.

    China is more liberal than ever and so is India and there are literally billions of people who want Western lifestyles based on consumption, which “thoughtful” Americans now consider to be the First Horse of the Apocalypse for our planet. When you start thinking about a billion and a half Chinese and Indians who want affluence and then you throw in the global warming fear, the most important thing in the world becomes having the moral high ground in saying “NO” to materialism and being able to enforce that as a matter of economic policy. It’s a profound shift.

    Unfortunately we’ve got an entire generation or two of people who are retiring and getting more and more expensive to care for who want the best of the best no matter what the cost. It’s impossible to ask them to trim their benefits and what is going to happen is that everyone’s tax rates in America are going to rise precipitously and their opportunities are going to go through the floor.

    • kowalski

      nt.

      • acat

        (should have been done when obamacare passed .. if not earlier)

        Mew

        • kowalski

          (nt)

      • dennism

        I actually downgraded the debt BEFORE S&P did.

  • ohiohistorian

    Can’t you find one of a white bird that is sitting there demanding that it be fed? Maybe a polar bear sitting up and begging?

  • persiflage

    Whenever I find myself being lectured by a government-paid (or supported) busybody about “sustainable development”, “sustainable agriculture”, “sustainable industry”, “sustainable energy”, etc., I always note (loudly) that their “sustainability” plans all appear to require increased government intervention, control and cost! I demand that they apply their “sustainability” principles to their employer, i.e., what (in all earnestness) is the size and cost of governent which can be sustained by the ecology (taxPAYER class) before the whole system collapses in catastrophc failure?
    They don’t seem to appreciate my scientific inquisitiveness.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    Not to stray too far from the actual topic of economic sustainability but I work for Walmart at the Home Office in Bentonville and every time I hearth term “sustainability” I want to punch someone. Walmart started down this path when Leslie Dach was hired as EVP of corporate affairs. He was a Ted Kennedy staffer and is a big time Leftist. Look him up for a full measure of his Leftism. Another truth about Walmart’s sustainability efforts is that we wouldn’t do any of them if they didn’t either reduce expenses or increase customer traffic. If some green initiative were proposed that didn’t meet one of those criterion it wouldn’t happen. And that’s the way it should be.

    • rightwingmom52

      My husband and I went to the uptown farmer’s market that’s in downtown Birmingham a few weeks ago. It’s been all the rage for the yuppies and restaurant owners for the last few years. Most of the local farmers bring their wares, and you can get some really good cheeses and Alabama honey.

      As we walked along, we kept hearing those who’ve never been within 10′ of a farm ask if the produce was grown on a “sustainable” farm. We imagined that the son of a farmer asked his dad what that meant, and the farmer’s reply would be something like “That means the farm’s been in our family for generations and we’ve kept it going all this time without the government. It also means these yuppies will pay triple the price.”

      • DerKrieger

        …are a big problem and their ignorance of what it takes, for example, to get food to their Whole Food’s store is going to drive American farmers out of business. It’s these darn fools who vote for Democrats who then empower the EPA to regulate dust on our farms. They think food comes from the grocery stores.

  • fibgirl

    Just attended a conference on sustainability today…will share some of my notes:) It was quite a wake up call.

    Some links first:

    Freedomadvocates.org
    look up Post Sustainability Institute
    U.N. Agenda 21

    One global vision to limit your freedom.
    Multi-faceted oppression.
    Humans to take on lifestyle of livestock.
    Stacked and packed housing.
    Monthly allotment of carbon credit.
    Everyone equally poor.

    Tear down dams, farms, get used to shortage of water, food and power. If we don’t speak up soon, we will be controlled. Already happening through smart meters. Surveillance, tracking usage, then control. This is being implemented through ICLEI, the UN is reaching out to American cities (unconstitutional) and helping them build sustainable cities with grant money. Move people in from the open spaces. Let animals roam free, cage the people.

    Wake up people, and get involved. Pilot program starting up in the bay area in California this year, called One Bay Area.
    Please join us!!
    Obama’s executive order last month for Rural Councils will destroy family farms, take away property rights in rural areas.

  • skorrent1

    That the best method for determining what is “sustainable” is the price mechanism of the free market? “Sustainability” becomes more difficult to determine when government interfers to distort prices.

  • dennism

    more than four hours, call a doctor.

  • dennism

    more than four hours, call a doctor.