« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Competence 2012

Maybe I’m all alone here, but I’m thrilled with the way the Republican field of candidates is shaping up for 2012.

Of course they all have faults. But there is one trait common to the three who have risen to the top: proven managerial competence.

I have my favorite, but I think we can agree that each can boast of considerable achievement. Among these guys, you can back the flavor of competence that’s important to you.

Herman Cain represents turnaround CEO-competence. He knows about structuring a balance sheet, cutting costs, trimming staff in a downtrodden organization and hiring and empowering winners. He knows how to keep underlings accountable.

Mitt Romney offers investment banker competence, the ability to choose between winning and losing ideas, and the ability to identify the key strategic elements of success. He’s also been the Republican governor in a very blue state, and a successful Olympic organizer.

Rick Perry has demonstrated his competence in the public arena, as a candidate and governor of a vibrant and diverse state, one of the few success stories of recent years. Just as important, he understands that government has its limits and that any economic turnaround must be rooted in the private sector.

Any of these candidates will offer a stark contrast with the incumbent in November’s election.

From his first days in office, Barack Obama’s incompetence has been on stark display.

All of his probable challengers would have realized that a true leader does not blame his (or her) predecessor for his challenges, he rolls up his sleeves and gets to work.

A true leader does not go out of his way to pee on his best friend’s shoes, as Obama did with the U.K.

None of the challengers would have made the rookie mistake all of exposing the office of the President to humiliation, as Obama did when he put all the chips on the table in a failing bid for the Chicago Olympics.

Obama was handed an overwhelming majority in the House and a virtual free hand in the Senate, and the result was the unilateral debacle Obamacare, and nothing else.

Obama only understands political power as a cudgel. A leader knows that sometimes a scalpel is called for. Or a paintbrush.

As a political leader, Barack Obama would be eminently qualified to lead the Occupy Wall Street crowd. That’s his experience, and that’s his vision of where the country is headed.

While there are policies and issues that differentiate the Republican frontrunners, any of them would be a vast improvement over the incumbent.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    To the contrary, they would all get government out of the way to great degrees and unleash We the People to pursue liberty and happiness pursuits.

    • aesthete

      Because I keep hearing the Republican candidates play the little game where they are against “waste, fraud, and abuse” or “big government” in the abstract, and then turn around to start singing the praises of entitlements and *their* pet programs. I’d agree with you that the Republican base is in the mood for government cuts, but I’m not convinced that our candidates are onboard.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        i.e. not hostile to business and wealth creation. And yes, to the degree they don’t cut government, some hostility would remain as would the debt and its effect on keeping us poorer. But the contrast with Dems would be stark and I do think that no matter which of the 3 and most of the others would unleash us to have a real recovery.

        But I do share your concerns even against Cain and Perry and obviously Romney re how much they would really cut government. I keep waiting on intense cross-examination of them on specific pledges to cut departments, programs etc.

        • aesthete

          You’re a pretty optimistic guy, Mike: I like your take on things and I hope your hopes about Republican candidates are on the money.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            like this cycle where the ObamaDems are are so exposed as responsible for the mess and esp after they were held accountable in 2010 and even more esp since the GOP from Inauguration Day thru now have been near unanimous in saying to ObamaNomics.

            Reminds of the Carter super-majorities that left the economy in a wreck in 1980.

      • defenseconservative

        And what their “pet programs” are (other than entitlements)? Don’t even try to claim that defense is someone’s pet program..

        • aesthete

          but I think that there’s a lot in the Pentagon budget which could classify as a “pet program”.

          More specifically:

          “Energy independence” programs, which (in Romney and Cain’s case) are made up of subsidies and taxes.

          Agriculture subsidies (’nuff said)

          “Repeal and replace” Obamacare nonsense (covering pre-existing conditions, for example)

          War on Drugs localized funding (again, ’nuff said)

          Bailouts for connected corps

          The list goes on… (especially for Rick Santorum)

      • JSobieski

        Nobody is really talking about cutting anything specifically. Maybe it is a good campaign strategy (I disagree), but it will be an extra obstacle when we win and there is no concensus on what to do.

  • mtbrimstone

    I especially liked the way you portrayed Cain, Romney, and Perry’s “flavor[s] of competence”, then juxtaposed their competence with Obama?s incompetence. It would be nice for conservative reporters to take this approach while covering the debates, instead of pitting one against the other and picking out favorites. It is getting both old and too distracting. The focus needs to remain on Obama’s performance (actually, lack of), and how the individual Republican candidates are able to overcome the problem Obama has created while in office each in their own unique way. Well written…

  • anxious4change

    Well said, and I hope to see unity like this at the debate. I’m really sick of the GOP candidates attacking each other and giving the Obama ammunition for their campaign down the road.

  • aesthete

    the reason being that, while these people might be competent (the jury’s still out on that one), and are certainly more competent than Obama, they haven’t made it clear *what*, if anything, their competence will be put to use for. I have no interest in Romney using his business acumen to line up subsidies for winners instead of losers, for example. 2008 proved that competence in an executive is a necessary quality, but if one of our competent candidates wins, I believe that conservatives will come to find out that it is not a *sufficient* quality in and of itself.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      and our guys could be quite competent in the abstract and get nothing of consequence done.

  • JSobieski

    I’m not thrilled either.

    Competency as an executive in government is different than in other contexts. I love Steve Jobs, but he would not have make a good president. Clinton had solid executive competence, but he would have made a horrible CEO.

    Being President of the US is one of the most unique and challenging jobs one can have. When I hear the word “competence” in this context its make me think “where are the policy ideas that prove it”.

    If someone tries to set someone up on a blind date and they talk about how pretty so and so is, it makes me suspicious because a photograph is worth a thousand words.

    Instead of talking about how competent everyone is, I would rather make that conclusion on my own after hearing their policy ideas.

    I give Cain and Huntsman some credit for putting ideas out there. Newt has some really innovative ideas for getting the EPA under control.

    I am not otherwise impressed in any way by the competency of any of the other candidates. The fact that people have to keep bringing up that word reminds me of Dukakis.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      to fight for and implement them are more important for a President than competence in the abstract.