With apologies to the many fine folks at law that visit these pages, and those of my colleagues here on RedState that ply the law, today I am going to act the vulgar Shakespearian and advocate to “first kill all the lawyers.” Well, if not kill them exactly, then at least put many of them out of work — not that I am any expert on Shakespeare, he says to a chorus of “you betchas.” Still, the thought comes to mind because of a recent story in the Boston Globe that waxes pathetic over the many Bean Town lawyers that can’t find a job in this faltering economy.
The Globe piece starts out with a pity party for Boston lawyer Paul Semenza, a lawyer for 25 years that cannot find a job in his chosen profession. He now sells sofas and mattresses in a furniture outlet. And to that I say, good riddance to Paul… at least figuratively as Paul may be the nicest fellow in the world. But may he take several thousands more of his kind with him into exile. Let them get real jobs that are useful to his fellows at long last.
Oh, the Globe tries to ratchet up the water works for the lawyerly set to the highest levels, but I’m not buying.
After years of giddy growth in Boston’s legal industry, the party is over because of the recession. Many of Boston’s most prestigious law firms have frozen salaries, slashed bonuses, and cut positions in the past few months. Goodwin Procter eliminated 74 jobs for attorneys and support staff nationwide, Nixon Peabody axed 56 jobs, Goulston & Storrs cut more than 40 jobs, Choate, Hall & Stewart let go 38 people, and Foley Hoag shed more than 30 jobs. In fact, there were so many firms announcing staff reduction on Feb. 12, some lawyers called it “Black Thursday.”
Oh, the humanities.
OK, so its easy to go for the cheap dig at lawyers, I know. But it IS a time honored tradition, especially since we can find such sentiment in Shakespeare. And don’t give me this shyster spin that claims that The Bard was really saying that lawyers were bastions of civilization, either.
Lo, but ‘e t’weren’t.
His Dick the Butcher character in Henry VI Part II was not saying we need to kill lawyers to eliminate the rule of law and allow chaos to reign supreme. He was saying let’s kill the lawyers because they have been killing us for years. Dick knew a kindred spirit when he saw one.
Alright, so what am I getting at? Check out this from the Globe:
The downturn marks an entrance into uncharted territory for one of Boston’s marquee industries. For years, major law firms consistently reported higher annual revenue and profits and vied with Wall Street for Ivy League law school graduates… And firms had little trouble passing along the cost to clients, who needed lawyers to help handle a growing number of mergers and other key business deals. That’s all changed, as demand has slowed and clients look for ways to slash their legal bills.
Can we review why all this legal advice was needed in the first place, why the boom times came for these lawyers? It is nothing less than the exponential growth of regulation and the avalanche of laws piled on top of laws written to further entangle the business community in confusion and red tape. Laws sponsored and written by lawyers in legislator’s clothing. All aimed at making it harder and more complicated to do business.
The shysters were in charge of creating their own nirvana. The foxes were not only guarding the hen house, but building it too.
Shakespeare’s low-born villain Jake Cade may have boasted of his ideal world where he would enforce “seven half-penny loaves sold for a penny” once he became King, but he was never going to be handed the keys to the kingdom. Unfortunately, we did just that for far too long — handed the keys to the kingdom to low-born villains. The plethora of lawyers in this country is no sign of high civilization but a national embarrassment.
Finally, let me assure the reader that I am not an anti-intellectual, anti-rule of law sort of fellow. I no more want Jake Cade’s anarchy and capriciousness than do the most law-loving jurists among us. I really don’t want to kill all the lawyers. But neither do I want to be ruled by those that seek to “interpret” the law to self-enrichment as opposed to living by its spirit. And, in this day and age, we have lost much of that spirit.
So, I rejoice at the troubles seen by Boston’s legal eagles and I hope their discomfiture is felt in every city of the land. I further hope that many of them find useful work in some furniture store or perhaps a nice Taco Bell somewhere. At least they’d finally be serving the public instead of milking them dry.
Anyway, let’s not kill all the lawyers in literal fashion. But let’s encourage them to seek a new profession, shall we?
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
There's plenty of work for them
bk (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 6:44AM EST (link)If they’ve ever cheated on their taxes I’m sure there’s some gubmint job to be had.
There have been too many lawyers in this country for 30 years - But I wasn't one of the too many!
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:50AM EST (link)But I wouldn’t start celebrating so soon. I suspect that once Obama’s stimulus, budget, omnibus spending bill and carbon regs kick in government bureacrats and lawyers will be the main jobs saved and created.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
If it was not for Lawyers,....
briefsynopsis (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:58AM EST (link)Would we need Lawyers?
Have you Hugged a “Special Operations Warrior” today?
yes, in a society based on the rule of law
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 10:04AM EST (link)And I am not sure if lawyers were the chicken of the egg re our society’s obcession with rights and risk aversion
great book on this
LIFE WITHOUT LAWYERS
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1874370,00.html
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Warner check your spelling.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:09AM EST (link)Unless you really mean to kill all lawyers by pounding them with your fist.
I normally wouldn’t say anything, but the title of a front page article is pretty noticeable.
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
and NEXT
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:12AM EST (link)kill all the grammur nahzies.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
It was a case of the pot and kettle.
Brian Hibbert (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:19AM EST (link)I’m one of the worst at spelling and proof reading. But the headline of top story on the front page….. I couldn’t resist. 8*)
Candidate for Trustee of Illinois Central College
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Take back our party!
Check out Unified Patriots
LOL
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:26AM EST (link)Seriously, thanks for seeing that. You know how it is when you write something. Oftentimes it’s easier for someone else to see an easy and obvious mistake.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
A Legal Education is a Wonderful Thing
Steven Willis (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:33AM EST (link)but, I should sooner clean toilets in the bus station than practice the profession.
In the past 30 years we have more than tripled the number of lawyers per capita and we have, in so doing, destroyed the ethics of them all. One cannot make a decent living as an honest, ethical, moral lawyer.
Ok . . . I exaggerate a tad, but not much. As a social science, the education is great . . . well, it once was . . . now it has been taken over by crazy people with left-wing agendas, but if a law student picks classes, he can still obtain a good degree. Then what?
“Let it be said, I fought the good fight, I finished the race, I kept the faith.”
Paul, Second Timothy 4:7, The New Covenant.
Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law
Now there
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 7:37AM EST (link)Now there is exactly what I was getting at.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Steve Willis
zeebeach Saturday, March 7th at 8:14AM EST (link)I have a child starting at UF this summer. She wants a law degree. She’s a conservative. I hope she meets you, as conservatives are a rare species on campuses.
Please have her come by my office
Steven Willis (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:42AM EST (link)Engineering and business have some conservatives. Law is about 1/3 apolitical, 1/3 liberal/pragmatic/reasonable people (who need to learn some economics and work for awhile), and 1/3 crazy.
“Let it be said, I fought the good fight, I finished the race, I kept the faith.”
Paul, Second Timothy 4:7, The New Covenant.
Steve Willis
Professor of Law
University of Florida College of Law
Why we go in the first place
sloeride Saturday, March 7th at 8:17AM EST (link)I can admit it….went to law school to feed the old ego. And then when you get there, you have a school pushing a cult that feeds your ego. It was ok if I had to supplicate to some J.O. big firm recruiter, as I was better than the population at large. Luckily for me, it was while a 2L I found riding my bike with my friends a lot more interesting. And then suddenly, my life got better. Gone were the cultish study groups. Gone the cultish studying. Gone was this strange desire to impress people I neither respected or liked.
www.irsmedic.com: Real tax attorneys for tough tax problems
Rejected it.
Scipio (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:03AM EST (link)I rejected the legal cult of personality like a splinter in healthy flesh. I took up hiking and photography on weekends, to avoid the drinking parties. I studied at home and before classes to avoid the study cults, and to keep control over my own time. It hurt my grades, but kept me human, and I still graduated and passed the MD bar first try, so it is possible. Then again, I went to a smallish southern baptist private law school, so the cult was a little different. There was the cult of legal personality, but there was also a second cult of old money, and that made the rejection easier. When your classmates are needlessly displaying their wealth with a new Mercedes from daddy, and you are racking up a house worth of debt to get the education, its easy to decide you’re not one of the crowd. I survived by staying on the fringes, sticking to a few similarly-minded friends, and making sure that my professors knew I wasn’t an idiot, I just wasn’t playing the rigged game. I adored the professors who treated us all like idiots, and dispised those who gave passes to the self-proclaimed elite. The education was totally worth it. I know the intellectual tar knocked out of my by a few professors I now deeply respect, and surprisingly it helped my thinking in all realms of life. It was the education I didn’t get as an undergraduate.
Then again, I’m an unemployed licensed attorney 10 months post-graduation, so YMMV.
This was supposed to be a reply to Sloeride, "Why we go in the first place"
Scipio (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:04AM EST (link)n/t
The fact that,
USNJIMRET (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:15AM EST (link)Seemingly everyone will need the ‘services’ of a lawyer some time in their life, should tell you all you need to show there are to many lawyers, writing to many laws.
I may need the services of a heart surgeon some time in my life, but I might very well might not, either. And, except for born with defects, there is much I can do to lower the ‘need’ even further.
Not so with the “law”. Which seems to grow more and more daily, often written for the sole purpose of clarifying some previous law that was itself written to correct a previous law.
I completely agree with the concept embedded in “kill the lawyers” idea.
The fact that,
USNJIMRET (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:15AM EST (link)Seemingly everyone will need the ‘services’ of a lawyer some time in their life, should tell you all you need to show there are to many lawyers, writing to many laws.
I may need the services of a heart surgeon some time in my life, but I might very well might not, either. And, except for born with defects, there is much I can do to lower the ‘need’ even further.
Not so with the “law”. Which seems to grow more and more daily, often written for the sole purpose of clarifying some previous law that was itself written to correct a previous law.
I completely agree with the concept embedded in “kill the lawyers” idea.
If Law School Education is So Wonderful,
papalee Saturday, March 7th at 9:43AM EST (link)why is it that so many judges and especially Supreme Court Justices simply can’t read and understand what what plainly intended by the framers of our Constitution?
And why is it that those who study Constitutional law do so largely for the purpose of amending it via the courts and political judges than by the method provided in the Constitution itself?
Everyone hates lawyers until you need one
red4ever (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 10:56AM EST (link)Sure, you say that means there are too many laws and regulations. On the other hand, when the idiot runs a red light and totals your car, and his insurance company won’t pay, what are you going to do?
That said, as a lawyer who opened her own practice to help those who can’t get BigLaw to notice them, I find these “oh the poor out of work lawyers” story hilarious. Once you have that license to practice, you can work for yourself if you have the gumption to do it. But, so many of these lawyers are so used to someone else taking care of them, they have no clue what to do when fired. Biglaw paid their bar study expenses, for computers, even a clothing budget. When fired, they expect these benefits to continues for several months and are quite upset when they don’t. They are SHOCKED to discover how much healthcare costs when expected to pay for it themselves. Then, never think of adjusting how much they really need (I kid you not, healthy 25 year olds that want everything in the world covered). They are ready to curl up on the floor and give up when another BigLaw firm doesn’t immediate hand them another job. They have almost zero coping skills. Hence, the guy in the story going to work selling sofas rather than taking the risk to go out on his own. These are supposed to the best and brightest lawyers in the country. Would you want someone who falls apart like this representing you in court?
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante
I agree
mom2oneson (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 11:06AM EST (link)I don’t know about how big law firms pay or anything about practice, but lawyers help so much when you need them. It just amazes me how the other “side” when you are having a problem acts differently when you have a lawyer speaking on your behalf or just present.
There is that Bible verse about bearing one another burdens and lawyers really do that when they help you. It’s really amazing to me how easily they take care of situation that is really bad without them.
I knowthe OP point was something else, but I don’t have a negative view of them, it’s wrong to judge someone by their profession anyway, and in this society there is so much evil and people try to take advantage of weaker people, we need good lawyers.
What I think is dumb though is you basically need a laywer to get a shot at fair treatment.
That's another point
red4ever (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 11:31AM EST (link)When you are dealing with some legal problem yourself, you are emotionally involved. It is really hard to see the problem clearly and deal with it in the best way. After all, it is your car that was totalled, or your kid hurt, or your house damaged. But, the lawyer is one step removed from that. We still care. But, the remove gives us the dispassion needed to solve the problem.
It takes the client’s mind off the problem, to let that person get on with life, while the lawyer gets to participate in what can be a really intellectually interesting profession. I get paid to argue with people and I get paid to reach a reasonable resolution.
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante
Unfortunate, reductionist thinking
JonC Saturday, March 7th at 11:07AM EST (link)As a practicing conservative lawyer, I couldn’t disagree more with this short-sighted, broad-brush thinking. I’ll be the first to agree that American culture has become over-legalized, with an attendant strangling of innovation and over-employment in the legal profession. And I won’t plead for special sympathy or argue that my profession should be immune from the corrective forces of the market– the same gales of Schumpeterian creative destructive that affect everyone else.
But that doesn’t mean I subscribe to the small-minded school of thought that says “kill all the lawyers” and argues that all of us are a drain on society. Many lawyers do a great deal of good in promoting free enterprise and American liberty. When unscrupulous plaintiffs’ lawyers target businesses large and small with frivolous lawsuits, the defense bar is there to beat them back. When the District of Columbia infringed its citizens’ Second Amendment rights, a determined band of lawyers stepped in to vindicate those rights all the way to the Supreme Court. When Al Gore tried to steal the 2000 election, respected legal advocates like Ted Olson fought to make sure he couldn’t. And all of this ignores the many small, un-sexy ways lawyers contribute to society, like preparing wills, advising businesses, prosecuting crimes, and yes, defending the accused.
Lastly, it makes little sense to indict “lawyers” as a whole for supposedly writing laws that helped us “create our own nirvana.” To pick one example, I was in college when Sarbanes-Oxley– an odious law, to my mind– was passed; I had nothing to do with writing it. But when a SOX-affected company, perhaps fearing the ire of the Obama DOJ, comes to the law firm that I work for to ask our advice as to whether it’s in compliance, what should the firm do? Say “no thanks, you’re on your own?” What should I do if the firm accepts– refuse to work on that matter, because that could be construed as somehow benefiting, in some odd, indirect way, from the passage of SOX? Realistically, I don’t see why I should. Yes, we live in an over-legalized world, but in this circumstance my refusal, or the firm’s, would do nothing to change that.
Rejoicing in the present misfortunes of lawyers might be fun, but don’t forget that we’re human beings with families, just like you. And in today’s raging political battles, many of us are on your side.
true
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 11:28AM EST (link)True and any lawyer worth his alt would have seen that I DID cover my bases well enough not to make my piece an unthinking diatribe.
On the other hand, all I can say to your comment is…
kill joy.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Agree with you.
Lords86 (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 2:28PM EST (link)This post is unfortunately way off the mark – myopic and shortsighted. There are far more conservative lawyers who are regular posters on this site than Mr. Huston is apparently aware of, including this poster.
And, while my chosen profession earns much ridicule, disparaging this person’s misfortune is unnecessary and regrettable. His avocation makes his hardship no less difficult or real for him and his family. As a partner of mine once cautioned me in a moment of my arrogance, Mr. Huston, sometimes it pays to know your audience.
How about
Warner Todd Huston (Diary) Saturday, March 7th at 9:30PM EST (link)How about… lighten up Francis?
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Who's Francis Here?
Lords86 (Diary) Sunday, March 8th at 8:41AM EST (link)You’re the one talking about “killing” all lawyers. So, let me suggest you are the one who needs to lighten up.
You want to comment on lawyers? Have at it. But using this guy’s misfortune as entre to do that was unnecessary.
Here’s to you never having a copyright issue or getting arrested for urinating in public.
Peace,
Sergeant Hulka
Let's send more people to college?
innocbystr (Diary) Sunday, March 8th at 10:20PM EST (link)This is what makes Obama’s new proposal to send more kids to college so perplexing.
College graduates are being laid off in record numbers. Currently there are 4.1 million out of work.
Most of the jobs that the stimulus plan creates are general construction or data entry and nothing on the horizon to employ the out of wok college graduates that we have already….