There is a website in Illinois called Illinois Review that often has some of the best coverage of Illinois Republican happenings. It’s usually a good source for GOP info statewide. But today’s entry is just another example of Illinois Republicans eating their own. And in an unfortunate turn of events, it involves me.
Over the past weekend I was a visitor at a planning session for the Republican candidate aiming to take Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s 5th Congressional District seat. I wrote about my impression of the meeting and headlined it Planning to Turn Rahm Emanuel’s Seat Red.
But, Illinois Review got its tinfoil hat screwed down a little to tight and revealed a bit of arrogance that pervades so much of the Illinois Republican Party. This time imagining that Illinois Review was more important than RedState,com and deserved special attention.
In a fit of pique befitting a 10-year-old’s temper tantrum, Illinois Review excoriated candidate Pulido and RedState’s Warner Todd Huston (hey, that’s me) for engaging in “secret efforts” and going out of the way to exclude “widely read conservative sources such as Illinois Review” in the candidate’s planning meeting.
Sure beats us as to what point Rosanna Pulido’s supporters are trying to make by keeping their efforts to win Rahm Emanuel’s congressional seat a secret from like-minded and widely read conservative sources such as Illinois Review, but being open and giving interviews to national political sources such as RedState.org. What’s up with that?
From RedState we learn that Tom Roeser hosted an exclusive secret meeting on winning back the seat April 7. We’ll stand by and report from afar….as Pulido and Roeser obviously want it…Good luck with that, folks!
Geeze, cry me a river fellas.
But, here is the thing. Illinois Review’s claim that there’s was an “exclusive secret meeting” where a special interview was granted to a “national political source such as RedState.org” (hey, that’s me again) is misinformed and a mischaracterization of what really happened.
First of all, meeting organizer Tom Roeser advertised the event openly on his own website on March 9 about the meeting being planned for March 14. And second of all, there was no special consideration or secret invitation to RedState. I (yes, that’s me, your super secret RedState correspondent) found out about the meeting like everyone else by seeing it posted on Roeser’s site. Then I asked THEM if I could come out to cover it.
They didn’t even know I existed as an interested party in the candidacy until I contacted them and asked if I could come out.
Secondly, Illinois Review could have done the same thing. All they had to do over there was send an email to Roeser and inquire.
Lastly, I am not merely a “national political source” as Illinois Review wants to color me. I LIVE in Cook County! I’m an Illinoisan just like they are. It just so happens that I also have a national audience.
So, this temper tantrum is misinformed and petulant. Apparently, Illinois Review imagines themselves to be as “special” as RedState,com and deserves the same “secret invitations” afforded us. Unfortunately, the tinfoil hat brigade running Illinois Review didn’t do much investigation before launching into conspiracy theories and excoriations of a candidate they should be supporting.
This, folks, is an example of the Illinois GOP piranha at its most common. This, my dear reader, is why we have a President Barack Obama.
Vladimir
Mark Impomeni
Neil Stevens
James Richardson
Let's bring back the 11th commandment!
Brian Hibbert Monday, March 16th at 11:43AM EDT (link)Thanks Warner. Your title says a LOT. It was a prevailing theme at the Lincoln Day dinner I attended on Saturday. An oft repeated phrase was “Let’s pledge to not do negative ads during the primaries because we’ll need to support the victor in the general.”
That said, the process is a two way street. You are right to point out that the cries of Illinois Review are, well, stupid based on the evidence. But don’t label them the “tin foil hat brigade”. I know they attacked you first, but we have to resist the urge to retaliate in kind.
The same kind of thing is happening over SB600 (Sen Rutherford was at a different Lincoln Day dinner so I didn’t get to discuss it with him.). We’re attacking the people that are on our side over disagreements in a few policies. We have to stop it. We should question their decisions on issues we care about, but we shouldn’t do it in a way that harms the party.
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Join the RedState Strike Force
Keep Your Eyes on the Ball
EzOnTheEyez Monday, March 16th at 11:52AM EDT (link)I don’t know what’s more juvenile – Illinois Review’s bruised feelings for being shut out of a planning meeting or your response – filled with histrionics – to their bruised feelings. I’m thus inclined to conclude that Illinois Review might be a juvenile boy and you’re a juvenile girl. Or maybe you’re both just run-of-the-mill drama queens.
It seems that a simple call to the editor of the magazine would have been more appropriate than this – which I think likely only exacerbates the situation.
After reading the reproduced comments from Illinois Review on this entry, I think that your title and response both are WAY over the top. It almost makes me wonder if you aren’t trying to foment a larger controversy because you’re just so tickled that you’re a part of it. That’s certainly the way it seems to me just based upon what I’ve read which, in turn, is based exclusively on the writings that you have provided.
Rahm Emanuel’s seat is never going to turn red if the people working on the campaign can’t keep their eyes on the ball.
Yeah, right
Warner Todd Huston Monday, March 16th at 1:34PM EDT (link)Insert rolling eyes smiley here.
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
BTW
Warner Todd Huston Monday, March 16th at 11:14PM EDT (link)By the way, I wonder how you intellectually justify saying I should not “attack” Illinois Review in the same reply in which you attack me? If you are against “attacks” shouldn’t you refrain from them, as well? Doesn’t it make you… well, a hypocrite?
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Warner was this aimed at me?
Brian Hibbert Wednesday, March 18th at 6:17AM EDT (link)If so, I was merely suggesting that you be the bigger man in this situation. Yes, call them out for making false charges and poor reporting. But don’t call them the “tin foil hat brigade”.
This was intended as constructive criticism not an attack on you. If it reads that way, I apologize for poor wording.
Your front pager this morning is wonderful. That’s the type of attitude we need to have towards all our party members. Now we have the harder task of trying to live up to it.
Socialism doesn’t work. It looks nice on paper, but it’s been tried and it’s failed miserably every time (usually accompanied by widespread death and suffering).
Proud member of the V.R.W.C.
Join the RedState Strike Force