« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama: A Study in Presidential Arrogance

The whole world was supposed to fall at his feet. He was supposed to spend the next four to eight years (or four to ten as he once said during the late campaign) just making airy pronouncements while everyone danced lemming-like to his tune of hope-n-change. It was supposed to be easy. Heck, The One himself even pronounced that he enjoyed being president. “And it turns out I’m very good at it,” he assured everyone during a luncheon with TV anchors a few weeks ago.

Obama simply didn’t imagine that he had to worry too much about those nagging details like making sure his nominees were vetted and had paid their taxes. He didn’t think that those silly 8,500 earmarks in his budget needed eliminating like he kept talking about in the campaign. For that matter, he didn’t even realize he was supposed to become involved in creating that stimulus bill. And foreign policy? Why our enemies were supposed to want him to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony while our allies were supposed to simply take it all on faith that we still love them like bosom buddies. Move along. Nothing to see here.

You see, Obama is a campaigner. And, him being the Obammessiah and all, he thinks that all he has to do is be there, his God-like presence healing all rifts, fixing all errors, causing the sun to shine. He is the change he has been waiting for, after all. I mean, he didn’t imagine he’d actually have to do anything once he got to the White House, to be sure.

Sadly, he’s more like Chauncey Gardner than Jesus Christ, quite despite the constant religious iconography lovingly bestowed upon him by the lapdog media.

But the bill is soon coming to be paid.

Washington’s Newest Reality Show: Taxes Paid or No Taxes Paid

So, Obama started off with his nominees for various government positions. Vetting? Don’t worry. He won, remember? Whoever he announces, the Senate will confirm. It’s a done deal, a piece of cake. We all loves us some Barack.

Then came Geithner, Daschel and a host of others that didn’t pay their taxes. Some nominees even had to drop out of consideration over this tiny, insignificant, uninteresting error. A black eye for team Obama? How could it be? But does Obama blame himself? Sort of. He pretends at saying “I goofed” but never really says what he goofed up on. The real blaming from team Obama is for the Senate, Obamsters saying it has been far harder for him to get nominees confirmed because three years of tax records demanded of nominees is excessive.

Turns out, the truth is a tad different. According to Charles Grassley (R, Iowa), the Senate hasn’t changed a thing. The requirements are the same for Obama’s nominees as they had been for Bush’s.

Regardless Obama pushed nominees that he knew had tax troubles anyway. Why? Byron York addresses that:

I asked a Senate source close to the nominating process why the troubled nominations kept coming, in spite of the tax problems. “I think it was the administration underestimating what the grassroots folks who elected President Obama were going to object to,” the source told me. With the out-of-touch White House firmly behind the nominees, Senate Democrats got the message that they, too, needed to line up in support. So they did — until they started hearing from outside the Washington bubble. “If you look at Daschle’s experience, he came out of a meeting with members of the committee, and the Democratic members said they supported him,” the insider pointed out. “But on the next day he withdrew.”

It was arrogance. Obama assumed that because “I won” he’d be able to get anyone he wanted in any position whatsoever.

LOOK, Nuthin’ up My Sleeve… What Earmarks?

The stimulus bill was also a surprise hit against team Obama. The president didn’t waste any time involving himself in crafting the legislation, leaving the whole thing to Nancy Pelosi (D, CA) and her wild spending House cronies. The Democratic House leadership excluded Republican input, but Obama had drinks with some Republicans, so everything was cool. And, then the GOP began to win on the earmark issue causing public opinion to turn against the stimulus at least on that issue. Still, he got his stimulus if only begrudgingly.

Now, can anyone say that his economic plan has met with approval by the markets, though? Since he took office things have gotten far worse it must be noted.

What happened? Hadn’t The One made his proclamation that this was an emergency? He had spoken, dang it all! Without it NOW we are doomed, he told us… on the other hand the economy is “fundamentally sound.” I seem to recall Obama ridiculing McCain for the very same statement back in 2008 when the economy wasn’t in nearly as bad a shape as it is now.

Yes, a head spinning about face in a matter of days, that.

Ally, Ally, Whose Got The Ally?

Obama is making also making major mistakes with foreign policy. His arrogance is costing us precious time lost with allies and enemies alike. In fact, he can’t seem to make up his mind which is which. Are enemies allies or are allies enemies? Is he ambivalent to allies, keen to make friends with enemies, and ignorant of security all at the same time? The Eight Ball says “yes.” He is being seen as weak to enemies and entirely unconcerned with allies — a dangerous combination. And enemies are rushing in to fill the void during Obama’s foreign policy dithering.

In an effort to distance himself from Bush policy, Obama has sent signals to America’s Middle Eastern allies that they are on hold or not as important as they once were. Leaders in Israel, Iraq and Afghanistan went weeks without being contacted by Obama’s foreign policy team (or Obama himself, for that matter) and when they were they were treated coldly.

According to Amir Taheri, this has emboldened our enemies many of whom are rushing in to claim a newfound sense of power over American interests in the Mid East.

Taheri says that Obama’s disinterested treatment of allies, his aloofness, has caused “concern that the US may be abandoning its allies” and that this “has led to a number of panic moves” in the region. In most cases, our allies are being targeted for political destruction since it appears that the US is no longer strongly backing them.

And why is Obama doing this? Because he is holding out for those famous “no preconditions” summits he ballyhooed during the campaign. As he waits to see who bites on his diplomatic cotton candy first, he’s allowing allies to lose stature every day. Apparently, he assumes that they will still be there once he deigns to pay attention to them. On top of that, those enemies he is trying to buddy up to are putting him off as long as possible while they solidify their newfound power right under Obama’s upturned nose.

And Obama’s mishandling isn’t only with Mid East allies as we saw with his many diplomatic blunders with the British last week and now the Mexicans this week.

It’s all born of arrogance. He doesn’t have to work on anything, you see? He’s The One, don’t you know? Success should be showered upon him like it always has. Work is what other people do.

Obama better get his house in order and soon. As Fred Barnes said recently, “at some point, reality will intrude, followed by accountability.” But how much damage will occur before that political bill, that accountability comes due?

COMMENTS

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Ask him if he’s filed.

    • USNJIMRET
  • Jeff Weimer

    We need to hang that around his neck like an albatross, because he has NOT been very good at it.

    Come to think of it, from a purely political standpoint, those 10 R Senators hung Geithner around his neck pretty good. He can’t fill the rest of the positions purely because of Tim and his tax problems.

    • red4ever

      Just like they hung “Mission Accomplished” (even though he never said those words) and “I have no regrets” around Bush’s neck.

      Just keep saying “Turns out I’m very good at it” while juxtaposing soundbites of the all the failures. Short, memorable, accurate.

    • 6eorge Jetson


      Turns out I’m very good at it.

      • 6eorge Jetson


        Turns out I’m very good at it

        • 6eorge Jetson
  • http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/ franklinslocke

    Obama is a narcissist. Check out the definition, denotes vanity, conceit, egotism or simple selfishness. It is sometimes used to denote elitism or an indifference to the plight of others .

    Wow! Does that fit with this post or what? All these blunders are all about what HE thinks is important and what interests him and not what is best for the country or even his Party. Think about how he treated Britain, Czech Republic, and other allies. All about HIM, not them.

    http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/

  • Sharp_Right_Turn

    What is the difference between President Obama and Jesus?

    Jesus knew how to put a cabinet together.

  • reddog53

    Today the President trotted out before the press to challenge his critics to come up with substantive alternatives and to go beyond “Just Say No” to his budget proposal.

    There are three problems with this:

    1. He submits what is known as the President’s Budget, with which Congress either agrees (Just Say Yes…which is what he really wants), disagrees (Just Say No…which he doesn’t) or modifies (another chance for pork!). So just saying no, is in fact, part of the correct response.

    2. House Republicans and Senators have in fact attempted to offer alternatives. If the traditional processes of committee hearings and floor debates are allowed, they will be able to do more. If, on the other hand, Rep Pelosi and Sen Reid continue their ‘ram through’ approach, without hearings and amendments, there can’t be any modifications, and the President is crying crocodile tears.

    3. The President seems to forget that he’s not part of the Senate any longer. He isn’t the head of the budget committee, and so he shouldn’t be too put out by the critics.

  • Paul_In_Houston

    Although I’ve long considered him as a narcissistic, feckless, arrogant snot, I believe it goes way beyond that.

    I suspect that he has a sickness typical to these types; a sort of disconnect that doesn’t allow him to see any contradiction between what he says and what he actually allows. Try to ask him about repeatedly appointing tax cheats to positions involving the collection of taxes, and he would probably look at you as if you were speaking in South Martian; he genuinely wouldn’t have a clue as to what your point was.

    It’s just the way he is wired, and is very unlikely to change.

    -

  • Alberta

    All Sacred Bovine
    We Build An Alter For Thee
    Washington D.C.

  • azaeroprof

    Conservative pundits on TV/radio/web (and the rest of us in everyday conversation) need to find a way to interject the word “arrogant” every time they bring up the Obamessiah. The cartoonists constant portrayal of GWB as a chimp and those “Somewhere in Texas a village is missing its idiot” were very effective in getting a significant portion of the population to view Bush as an idiot and a dunce. Repetition is the key to learning, so the more the average American hears the words “arrogant” and “Obama” intermingled, the more it will stick in their mind. Then they might start to see through the hype and glimpse his arrogance for themselves.

  • creativeguy

    that picture if of obama. Just saying, looking at it closely it doesn’t appear to be him at all. In any case Obama never said he would ban earmarks, that was McCain who hyperventilated about the huge evils of the 1% of the budget that is in earmarks. From the debates he and Obama argued about this and you look at Obama’s quote saying he merely wanted “to go through a closer examinations of earmarks” and cut back wasteful, Which is kind of consistent with his explanation here that he did not cut many out because the economy needed the local spending.

    Earmarks aren’t neccessarily bad, other than inducing corruption in some instances. Most of the time however they are very helpful for local projects and most people in state and local governments want them and depend on them to get big things done, regardless of their party affiliation. McCain’s stance is mystifying to me especially since his state exists because of one of the biggest earmarks in history, secured by Mo Udall. All McCain’s and Franks and Sahdegg’s stances have done though is hurt their state.

    Oh well. I’m a paradox, people will soon find that out here. I used to be a conservative Republican and now I moved to the center a bit more where I tend to whiplash liberals and even conservatives occassionally. I can be rather dangerous and irritable to both sides on occassion, hahaha. Anyway I’m sure most people here will probably disagree with me on this take.

    • randy streu

      Heh.

      • creativeguy

        the first time i didn’t think that is. lol.

    • itrytobenice

      He and Michelle were reading to school kids that day. I understand he felt like he needed to escape the WH.

    • http://www.publiusforum.com Warner Todd Huston

      Earmarks only exist because the federal government steals our money in the first place and doles it back to us as if it were a gift. It’s our money, not theirs.

      I’d sooner see ALL earmarks eliminated no matter WHO they “benefit.” In the end they benefit NO ONE. It is legalized theft.

      So, yes, earmarks ARE “necessarily bad.” Anyone interested in the proper role of government SHOULD disagree with you. But, for you giant government lovers, well, earmarks are the way to control the states from Washington. For those like yourself that don’t have any interest in the Constitution or the proper American system, earmarks are da bomb.

      • creativeguy

        a reinvestment. The money is taken and reinvested and through this sparks more spending and more is done and it speeds up the growth. But like I said, few local leaders, whether conservative Republicans, or Democrats, would agree with you, I know this for a fact among the conservative Republican leaders in my midsized North Louisiana city.