Why actual ‘Mumbai style’ attacks have not taken place inside America. Was Bush that good.

The veracity of this story doesn’t pass the smell test.

as soon as I read it this morning. I am still naive, however, because I didn’t figure out why it was even being reported. I still can’t get used to the constant barrage of propaganda from our MSM.

… that would not use the word “terrorists” to describe the 9/11 hijackers.
–
http://www.chl-tx.com (Thanks, BHO, for the fantastic stimulus you gave *MY* business)

Makes the bad guys in SW Asia pee their pants. Silent, deadly and can see in the dark. Definitely a midnight mortarer’s nightmare.

…. with that stretch! Most of us knew/know the CRIME committed by the lunatic at the Immigration center would be used for ANTI-GUN and PRO-AMNESTY (wait for it, it is coming - the “Immigrant” angle will eventually be twisted and played up as ANTI-IMMIGRANT even though the perpetrator was an Immigrant himself - apparently “blaming” those at the Immigrant center for his “poor English skills,” one of the latest items added to the narrative and attacking those who gave their time and energy voluntarily to help him when he came from Vietnam), this was a (as Marty Johnson would say) “very interesting, but Stupid” linkage for the Taliban to even make (if they indeed even make it - if it is to question the Reports “obvious,” from our perspective, intent) who knows if this hadn’t been manufactured by some loon within the news-agency that parades around in Code-Pink garb on the weekends!?!?! Have other news agencies, or the US Government, confirmed that some LAME ATTEMPT TO LINK THEMSELVES (TALIBAN) TO THE SHOOTING?? Confirmation could/should be given from someone/somewhere else BUT WITHOUT giving any further credence to the content of the communication.

THE “COMMUNICATION” CANNOT BE CONFIRMED!!! SUSPICIOUS, ISN’T THAT — as the (Reporting by Alamgir Bitani; Writing by Kamran Haider; Editing by Robert Birsel) is based on a PHONE CALL (from an undisclosed location, probably phone call from a Lefty-loons imagination) TO RUETERS. How many people actually heard this call? and how did they have any PROOF/CONFIRMATION it really came from the Taliban!?!? Was the call reported to the NSA?

It is NOT as if this would be a Conspiracy Theory… A Conspiracy takes more than one in on it to perpetrate… One or two morons willing to just take-the-bait from another is just really-moronic group-think and a willingness to provide AID AND COMFORT TO OUR ENEMIES!

This story has no substance. The lack of any real information in it would have it BANNED here at Red State as a Diary as “SUSPICIOUS” speculation needing more substantiation.

So, the upshot here is that Reuters posted a story that it knew was a lie and a story that had no value as news at all. The only purpose it served was as anti-American propaganda.

Since you apparently find this worthy of remark, I must assume you have been either in a coma or on an expedition beyond the reach of modern communications for the last ten years or so.

In either case, welcome back!

One of the many scientific advances we’ve made is the discovery that there is no intellectual, moral, or nutritional benefit to be gained by reading anything with a Reuters byline.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512560,00.html

“Obama has said he respects Americans’ constitutional right to bear arms, but that he favors “common sense” gun laws. Gun rights advocates interpret that as meaning he would approve of curbs on ownership of assault and concealed weapons.”

Translation: Even though these murders were committed with rifles or assault weapons, Obama favors a ban on handguns.