Obama was supposed to have energized “the youth” of this country like no other presidential candidate ever. We were assured that with Obama as president we’d see a revitalization of “the youth” that would respond by streaming to volunteer for public service. And, in expectation of this avalanche of volunteers, and in build-it-they-will-come mode, Obama had passed through Congress his brown-shirt-like Serve America Act that pumped some $6 billion of our tax money into an upgraded national and community service program.
But the youth have failed him. According to Peter Levine, director of Tufts University’s Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement (CIRCLE) youth volunteering has dropped for the first time sine 9/11.
Of course, I am making light of the situation, here, admittedly. But, let’s look at something that goes against the Obama line of mythology as far as his real support among America’s youth goes. Let’s face it, it isn’t just Obama. The vaunted youth vote has been in steady decline since 18-year-olds were given the vote by a mistaken act of Congress in 1972.
Just before the elections in 2008, Gallup found that there was no increase in the proportion of first-time voters. It also discovered that young voters were still less likely to vote than older voters, at least if their polling can be believed — granted polls have been notoriously unreliable the last few elections.
According to the first poll, Gallup found that a mere 13% of registered voters said that this election will be their first presidential election, a percentage that matches what they found in 2004. Even worse, using an expanded model, that number fell slightly to 11%. Now, these numbers matched the higher than average first-time voters from the 2004 cycle, but it still seemed to say that Obama had not brought any great wave of new voters to the polls.
As to the tsunami of new, young voters surging to the polls that the conventional wisdom claimed was happening, Gallup didn’t find the prospect likely. Gallup summed up its survey on the youth vote for 2008 as such:
Gallup Poll daily tracking suggests that 18- to 29-year-olds are not nearly as likely as older voters to be registered to vote, to say they are thinking about the election, or to express strong intentions to vote. Thus, as of mid-October, there is not convincing evidence in the Gallup data that young voters will in fact vote at higher rates than in past elections. But even if things change over the next two weeks and many more young adults do become motivated to vote, turnout alone would do little to change the candidates’ overall support, according to Gallup’s likely voter models.
So, this would seem to comport with the decline of the youth vote from 1972 to today.
Now, add to that Obama’s proposed attack on charitable giving. If his plan to lower the tax deduction on charitable giving comes to fruition this would also negatively affect the volunteer rate in this country today. If less money is given to charitable causes, fewer programs that spawn volunteerism will be able to be initiated and, obviously, fewer volunteers will be needed.
Finally, we also need to realize that this country does not have a great tradition of giving free service to its government in the form of volunteerism. In fact, the general feeling about government is that it should leave us alone. So, unless Obama’s new volunteer program begins to impress people into its ranks, it will fail to thrill as has every other president’s push for an Americorps-like program.
The fact of the matter is that The Obammessiah is no different than any other president as far as the youth vote and volunteers are concerned. They just don’t care to put their own bodies on the line for him. Americans just do not like the idea of volunteering for government service (military service aside). Nor should they necessarily.
So, we can dispense with this myth that the kids will flock to this president’s side. Some will, of course. Maybe even a small percentage more than past presidents. But thus far there is no reason to believe it will be a youth avalanche for him.
The Decline of the Youth Vote
1972
18 to 24- 49.6%
25 to 44- 62.7%
1976
18 to 24- 42.2%
25 to 44- 58.7%
1980
18 to 24- 39.9%
25 to 44- 58.7%
1984
18 to 24- 40.8%
25 to 44- 58.4%
1988
18 to 24- 36.2%
25 to 44- 54%
1992
18 to 24- 42.8%
25 to 44- 58.3%
1996
18 to 24- 32.4%
25 to 44- 49.2%
2000
18 to 24- 32.3%
25 to 44- 49.8%
2004
18 to 24- 41.9%
25 to 44- 52.2%
2006
18 to 24- 22.1%
25 to 44- 33.5%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
bs
Caleb Howe
Vladimir
And, this is why
Paul_In_Houston Friday, April 24th at 9:25AM EDT (link)“for their own good”, volunteering will eventually have to be mandatory.
-
And THEN
Warner Todd Huston Friday, April 24th at 9:35AM EDT (link)And THEN we have major trouble!
———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!
Don't worry -- if our Dear Leader can't....
furious Friday, April 24th at 10:04AM EDT (link)…enlist them, he will conscript them via the brownshirt Civilian Security Corp or ‘Reserve ACORN Training Coirps” (RATC) whatever non-threatening nomenclature the Dear Leader adopts. And then we can add “compulsory volunteerism” to the Newspeak Dictionary.
–furious
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.” — Darth Vader
Please clarify
The_Gadfly Friday, April 24th at 12:33PM EDT (link)Do the numbers being reported indicate the percentage of people in the age group who are likely to vote, or do they represent the breakdown by age group of voters? If the former, these are useful statistics because they won’t have underlying forcing elements. If the latter they are nearly useless without accounting for our aging population. From your post, I’m not clear on what numbers are being reported.
We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.
-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463
If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?
inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156
A product of my generation...
nonsequitur Friday, April 24th at 12:57PM EDT (link)The 9/11 generation, my own, is most likely the most apathetic generation when it comes to public service. A tradgey that should have galvanized my peers into action has instead bred sloth.
I was starting my second week in junior high when I was pulled out of class. My dad might be in trouble they said, and something has happened in the city. I had to wait for my mother to show up to find out. I wasn’t the only kid in the office. Most of my friends were waiting there too.
My dad worked in Grennich village as a executive chef, and he watched the towers fall. He spent the rest of the day walking over a hundred blocks to make it off the island and to my aunts house in Westchester. I remember that night vividly, as it was the first time I saw my dad cry. I had dinner waiting for him, but he didn’t eat. We have since moved to Texas, and I left home for college in Louisiana.
As I grew up, my entire life has been defined by the acts of that day, and the constant war on terror. I have no memories of adult life without the patriot act, or increased government security. Terror colour codes and no gels on planes.
It is easy for the adults today to point to my generation and say you don’t care. But its not that. The government has been a bigger force in my life that any other. My generation is one who has yet to leave the nest, smothered by the increases of government power and abuse.
My peers have come to see government as something more than the will of the people. It is no longer a product of our service, but the dark knight of our Saturday morning cartoons. And when government becomes something no longer grounded in reality, when the White House is seen as “their” house and not “ours”, you forget what service really is.
This is a war without sacrifice. Government will fight the war, government will keep you safe, make no personal sacrifice, carry on your lives. That is what my president told me after that day, and that is how my generation has lived.
Veritas Lux Mea
nonsequitor...sorry but I don't think that is entirely true..
Aaron Gardner Friday, April 24th at 1:07PM EDT (link)The drop in service is mostly in the community style of service. Your generation has actually done well when it comes to military service. In fact one of your generation took my place in the military and sacrificed his life in Iraq just last year.
The call to service for your generation should have been implicit… Blaming “W” for the lack of service is a cop-out. Where was your sense of individual responsibility for your nation? ( I mean this in the broad sense…not specifically you)
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
To be clear
nonsequitur Friday, April 24th at 1:43PM EDT (link)I don’t mean to pin in all on W. Sorry for the implication, I should have been for specific.
My point is that this should have galvanised us, but it has done the opposite. Government in general, both Republicans and Democratics, have not moblized the youth outside of the military. This has been a war without sacrifice, not in the military sense, but in the civilian one.
Where are the war bonds, the rubber donations, the collective spirit? When government asks nothing of its people it breeds apathy. All levels of government, Republican and Democract, told us to live our lives, we will protect you. Don’t mind the man behind the curtain.
Perhaps this doesn’t have as much an effect on the adult population, but when this type of father knows best, support the troops (but don’t volunteer) and swipe your credit card mentality has been the norm sense your maturation as an adolescent, it changes the national paradigm when it comes to service to your fellow citizen.
In short, we are the over protected children who are given too much allowance money and not asked to do any chores.
Veritas Lux Mea
nonsequitor...I do agree with you there...
Aaron Gardner Friday, April 24th at 1:53PM EDT (link)Though I kinda disagree with some parts.
I don’t think we needed war bonds or rubber donations (obviously), but you are correct that the nation basically took a position of non-involvement.
I would blame on those people who fed the discontent with lies about torture and wars being lost. I would lay blame on years of anti-Americanisms spouted by the likes of the Kerry’s and Kennedy’s and Clinton’s and Obama’s. They told us for years that America was the problem…so the effect is a generation of citizens who don’t believe in the moral superiority of our nation.
Very sad indeed.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
Indeed.
nonsequitur Friday, April 24th at 2:39PM EDT (link)The war bonds and rubber drivers were meant as a metaphor. I’m not even quite sure if there ever were rubber drives….
Regardless, the problem is more extensive than simple anti-Americanism. Youth have a choice between left and right wing, when neither party really presents a unified American ideal. There a plenty of conservative issues even my most liberal friends are pro-ponents of, such as gun rights or a balanced budget. There are liberal issues my conservative friends are pro-proponents of, such as gay marriage or abortion. The problem is the pidgen holing of American politics. You can’t support an issue without being labeled as a Republican or a Democrat, which is a problem if you don’t like either.
Who represents someone like me who believes in all 10 Amendments in the Bill of Rights, limited government and low taxes, but who is also pro- gay marriage (more specifically against government involvement in marriage all together), pro-choice and an Atheist? Certianly not Democrats, who want to tax me to death, take my gun, and make my personal choices. And certianly not Republicans, many of which who see me as amoral because of my lack of religion or my stances on social issues.
The point is, I know anecdotally a lot of people my age who buy into the anti-American rhetoric because of a lack of real identification with government. Nothing to do with Clinton or Ted Kennedy. I would suspect the popularity of Obama amongst my peers has more to do with his lack of clear articulation on many major issues rather than support for his few stated positions.
Its easier to identify with a figure who doesn’t stand for anything because its hard to get offended by nothing.
Veritas Lux Mea
Your last sentence is priceless...
Aaron Gardner Friday, April 24th at 2:56PM EDT (link)and disturbingly true.
As far as your beliefs…well I think with more time and study you would see that the arguments for abortion and gay marriage are actually counter to the actually words in the constitution and other founding documents.
On abortion, it is counter to the fundamental right of all to have life…if you don’t protect innocent life the other rights enshrined in the constitution become moot.
On gay marriage, my problem is that the courts have conflated sexuality with other things like race, ethnicity and what not and created a protected class based upon how people use there procreation equipment. Although I actually agree that marriage shouldn’t even be within the realm of the Federal Gov’t.
The best bet for our nation remains Federalism with a healthy dose of conservatism as well.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!