Hatin’ On the GOP, The National Council for a New America and YOU


Listen up conservatives, time to soften that spine just a tiny bit.

Yeah. I’m as mad at the GOP as you are — then again I have been for a long time, not just lately. So, in the hope that something good could come of our losses, I listened in on Eric Cantor’s conference call launching the National Council for a New America (NCNA) project and you all saw my immediate report. I patiently listened to Representative Eric Cantor and Senator John McCain and heard the vague overview, I took note of the names that were attached to the project, and I realized the import of the five basic issues that they wanted to address. And I just knew what the first reaction to the idea would be. Certainly, I was not disappointed.

One commenter on my piece reflected what seems to be the most common reaction: “If John McCain is in, I’m out.” The same sentiment was expressed about Romney, but to a lesser degree. And I’ve heard this dozens of times over the few days since my report. That and much more, and scarce little of it has been complimentary.

As I said, I feel your pain.

Granted my work appears most often on conservative sites because, after all, I write from the conservative viewpoint. So, it is to be expected that John McCain would bring out the beast in my readers. We all know that it is McCain that thrills in repeatedly sticking his finger in the eye of every conservative in the country, not to mention the poor campaign he ran. If he expects all to be forgiven, he’s got another think coming.

Oh, I could lay out all the conservative objections to Mitt Romney, McCain, or a few of the other names currently connected with the project, for sure. But is there any value in doing so? In fact, is there any value in turning away from this idea without giving it any chance at all like so many are vowing to do?

Until something actually happens with this effort, I am going to have to say no, there is no value in not giving it a chance. In fact, I am going to have to say that we should encourage the conservative members of the effort to stick with the thing regardless. And we should not attack them for doing so, either. Yes, even if this thing turns into just another example of Romney flip-flopping or McCain eye poking we should support the conservative members of the thing and encourage them to stick it out.

Now before you get your conservative spine stiffened, or your conservative spleen all in an uproar, I am decidedly not saying we should support any mushy moderate, non-conservative ideas that might be expressed in this effort. What I am saying is that we should push the members of this thing that are conservative to speak up and not to allow themselves and their conservative ideas to fade into the background. I am saying we should stick with this thing and push the conservative message to be heard here.

Many of you will throw your hands up and say we should not even entertain any effort that allows the mushy moderates to have a forum. When it comes to debates on the floor of Congress, when it comes to crafting legislation, when it comes to pushing the conservative message, I am with you there. In those areas we should work hard to push our important principles.

But, here is the thing: If we leave the discussion to the moderates, will it be any surprise if our voice is ignored? In fact, if I were a moderate, I’d be happy if the conservative voice would walk away from the debate and give me the floor! Well, that is what we will be doing if we decide not to participate with the NCNA project. We will be giving the moderates the floor free and clear of any of our own ideas. And that would be a silly thing to do, don’t you think?

We need to remember one important point with this NCNA effort, folks. This national discussion IS the arena of ideas. It IS a debate. It IS a discussion. If we don’t participate at all, whose fault will it be if our ideas never get a fair hearing? It sure won’t be the moderate’s fault, it won’t be the Democrat’s fault, it also won’t be John McCain’s fault. If our ideas never get brought into the discussion it will be OUR fault for abandoning the field of battle for our safe, conservative enclave.

Also, do not expect this NCNA effort to be a conservative effort. It is a Republican discussion with America, not a strictly conservative effort and it isn’t meant to be a singularly conservative effort. Granted, none of us on the conservative side like it, but the simple truth is that there are many moderates in the GOP and they have every right to have their voice heard during this national discussion.

Let’s take some stock of ourselves and this effort, shall we? Think about yourselves for a minute here. How often do you consider yourself a Republican? My guess is that you consider yourself an American first, a conservative second and a Republican by default. So, now place yourself in context with this NCNA discussion and ask yourself a question: if you don’t consider yourself a Republican, why, exactly, should the NCNA cater only to your side of the issues?

You see, if the folks at the NCNA see that you have no real loyalty to the GOP and that you are going to walk away from this effort merely because you don’t like a few of the personalities included in the discussion, why should they bother with you? Were I them, I’d say good riddance to you.

Lastly, the NCNA is being called a discussion with America. This means that they are purposefully searching out the moderate’s opinions here. Moderates are being included by design (hence the inclusion of Romney and McCain). Like I said, this is not a conservative effort, it is a discussion seeking to hear from all corners of the country.

The final analysis here is that if we eschew this effort, if we walk away, we will be excluding our voice from the debate. We must stick through this thing and fight to get our ideas included in it by consistently urging the conservatives involved to speak our viewpoint. This does not mean that we have to accept the moderate voice, this does not mean that participation is bowing to their wrongheaded views, and joining this debate does not mean that we are turning against our own principles.

It means that we are proudly taking our rightful seat at the table and having our voice heard by the citizens of the nation. After all, should we be so stupid as to prevent the nation from hearing our important viewpoint by not bothering to speak up in a national forum?

Walking away would be self-destructive. It’s just that simple.

Category: , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

57 Comments Leave a comment

As I have said before if they would just...

JadedByPolitics Monday, May 4th at 6:36AM EDT (link)

have these “townhalls” and LISTEN instead of rushing out to TELL US what they are going to do….the RNC did the same thing last year on their website remember? and they brought up all the liberal agenda in their questions WHY? because they are NOT listening!

There is NOTHING new in their elite agenda it is a liberal agenda with tax cuts that is all. If they really want to win they NEED to just go ALL SMALL GOVERNMENT and take themselves and their lobbyist friends and business friends out of the equasion.

Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy

That's why

Warner Todd Huston Monday, May 4th at 6:44AM EDT (link)

That;’s why we need to push the more conservative members of this thing to PUT the conservative view in the agenda whether the rest like it or not.

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

Well argued Warner! We're winning

red_oakster Monday, May 4th at 10:30AM EDT (link)

The “take my marbles and go home” reaction is misplaced. This forum is a place to nail down consensus on whatever issues we can get. If conservatives can get moderates to sign on to lower taxes, missile defense, and free market health care, let’s pocket those gains. Let’s establish and celebrate consensus where the agreement is on conservative positions. Of course we disagree with them about abortion or embryonic stem cell destruction. Agree to disagree. And don’t forget foks like Boehner and Cantor and Pence and Kyl are much more conservative than their precedessors (Gerald Ford, Bob Michels, and Howard Baker).

Primaries are the place for promoting conservative principles and candidates. Sometimes we should challenge incumbents. Former Cong Gilchrest was a major league porker. So Harris won the primary, but lost the general in a Democratic year? It’s only a big deal if Harris doesn’t try again in a normal competitive year. And when retirements open up GOP seats in red states, or when Dem incumbents run for re-election in red states, push hard for conservative candidates.

Who cares if some bureaucrat at NRSCC or some member of NCNA doesn’t like Pat Toomey? Their precedessors didn’t like Reagan. Ignore them! And where we have a blue state contest like the Illinois senate contest in 2010, where a national security hawk/social liberal like Mike Kirk is the only GOP candidate with a remote shot at winning, take the half loaf. Kirk will vote for most if not all Republican judicial appointments in any event.

Conservatives are winning. Welcome moderates and half a loaf when it’s the best we can do. And fight hard to add conservatives in solid red territory whenever the opportunity presents itself.

 
 
 

It's the name...

rabidf16 Monday, May 4th at 7:00AM EDT (link)

A National Council for a NEW America.
I don’t want a NEW America.
I want the America that became the greatest nation in the history of the world in a mere 200 years.
I want the freedom that the ORIGINAL Constitution afforded.
Yeah, we need to change some things. Pull back in some places and improve things in others.
But, we DO NOT need a NEW America.
Sounds a bit too much like “Change we can Believe in.”

Push it up!

 

I seldom disagree with your articles.

Steph C Monday, May 4th at 7:20AM EDT (link)

And… I may not exactly be disagreeing with this one but the problems are more than just those who have said, “If John McCain, Romney, et al are in, I’m out.”

Okay, they’re moderates. Big whoop. At least they walk their talk. Gingrich, on the other hand, talks conservative but walks moderate, as do some others.

You can’t walk in the middle of the road but they keep trying. Sooner or later, they’re going to get hit when the line in the middle gets crossed by traffic on either side. More often than not, it’s the left that crosses the middle line because the left has little regard for the rule of law because they can rewrite it at will and even less for the Constitution that is supposed to define what should and shouldn’t be under the law.

When given their choices without persuasion that borders on seduction, people trend toward conservatism, even in countries we can point to and say are as socialist as they come. Instead, we’re given empty promises not just from the left but from the so called right as well.

It’s the lack of distrust. We tell them what we want and they say, “Okay, we’ll take that into consideration, ” and then, once they no longer need the support, they ignore us. Why is this time any different from any other time before?

Even the words you used tell the story, when you say conservatism is being given a “seat at the table”. Putting it that way says, we’re supplicants to the ones in charge who may decide that anything we have to say has no merit.

I’m not saying it’s not worth trying but I am saying that right now, that I don’t trust it or them because it’s been done before and all we got were words and no actions that matched.

The real questions are:
1.) Is trust broken beyond repair?
2.) Are those who broke it really willing to try to repair it?
3.) Will it be another half-hearted attempt so they can have an excuse for not doing anything?

No matter what name someone pulls out as the example of their ire, it still boils down to words and actions.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

Seriously

Warner Todd Huston Monday, May 4th at 7:36AM EDT (link)

I hear you.

We need to go forward with our eyes open.

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

Reading that letter from them with a critical eye,

Steph C Monday, May 4th at 7:51AM EDT (link)

they’re not saying what it might sound like they’re saying on the surface. All they’re saying is they want to know what to tell us to win elections but not that they’re going to use any of it to really return America to greatnesst. In essence, they’re saying “we want to ride the coattails of the tea parties” and little else.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

There aren't enough 5's to say how dead on you are with this..

Michael Dugas Monday, May 4th at 11:30AM EDT (link)

I believe 110% that their intentions are wholly selfish and that looking
“material” to use to win their fiefdoms.
Actions baby that’s what I wanna see! Not a bunch of “I feel your pain” and “I know where you’re coming from…” . I don’t want to
HEAR them agree with us I want to SEE them agree with us! I want them to FIGHT DAMMIT and stop what’s going on. I want our stinking representatives to represent us ALL the time and not just election time! I want them to use every dirty trick, loophole, rule
tv camera, radio station they can beg borrow or steal to stop the
ruining of my country! It’s time WE used the courts and the Constitution to OUR advantage in this fight. And it’s time to make sure that every politician and person on the Right, or Conservative or Republican or Libertarian…whatever, hears the call and knows that it’s time to fight this with all we have. We have to make a non stop deafening noise by any and all means possible and MAKE them listen to us…….make them represent US!

Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”

I’m an embarrassment to Barack!

I only scored 17 on the Obama Test




 
 
 
 

I have nothing against the organizers of NCNA, Warner. I'm worried about its timing and the message it's bringing.

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 7:29AM EDT (link)

NCNA is asking the wrong question at a very wrong time.

My impression is that it certainly is an attempt to refocus the GOP, maybe not necessarily “re-brand” it but certainly re-introduce Republican principles to the people.

Not “rebranding” may be. But it’s still about “about GOP” and that’s the problem.

That’s what the con job of the MSM. The MSM wants the GOP to be “self-conscious” - making it sound ridiculous and untouched.

It seems like narcissistic. It’s asking the question “what’s wrong with the GOP?” Instead, these Republicans should be asking “what’s wrong with Americans today?”

There are so many people with real problems out there. The people should be the focus of the alternatives of the Republicans, not the Republican Party itself:

- Not the generic working paper of Cong. Ryan more than a month ago.
- And certainly not the Republican Party itself ( I repeat: narcissistic.)

The last general election was only 5 months ago. It’s still fresh from the memories of many Americans. Many moderates are currently expecting solutions and answers (sadly from Obama) . . . not POLITICS.

Discussing the problems of the Republican Party to these kind of voters would be construed as off-beat and out-of-touch.

NCNA is looking for inputs?

Look, Cantor and the rest of the Republicans are representatives of ordinary Americans, the voters. There are still 170+ Republican representatives in Washington. Did they stop consulting their constituents (republicans, democrats and independent alike) in the last 3 months? I assume that the answer to that question is NO.

So, what are their constituents saying? What are the problems of their people? What specific programs can the Republican leaders do for their respective states and counties?

These are the only way for the Republicans to get close to the people. Know their problems. And if possible, given them some advice and encouragement, if not actual solutions.

Most importantly: timing the NCNA with the defection of Specter is also bad. It means a total surrender of the Republicans to the MSM meme that the Republican Party is dying. Are Cantor and the rest admitting now that we are now the party of losers? That’s totally wrong. Rasmussen statistics are saying NO.

Cantor et al should be careful: Last time I looked, Americans don’t want to be associated with the losers. But …. but Americans love to feel good by siding with the victims.

Siding with and offering actual help to the People is the key. Offering a non-partisan solution to the problem by a Republican will do the Party good. Asking the people on how to resurrect the Party is just plainly incoherent…. as if the Republicans are worrying more for their Party than for the ordinary Americans.

As for Obama, 50% of the Americans “adore” him. We can’t do anything about that. The only chance for us is to allow him to SELF-DESTRUCT. The Republican Leaders can help in destroying the Myth of Obama by “strongly” rebuking his Anti-American policies. The Obama phenomenon is now bordering between JFK and the FDR lunatic phenomena.

And please. Tell these Republican Leaders to coordinate their efforts with the RNC. Some are really thinking that this is just like another “internal dispute” between the R Leaders vs. the Party Chairman.

 

Destined to fail

DerKrieger Monday, May 4th at 8:00AM EDT (link)

“In fact, if I were a moderate, I’d be happy if the conservative voice would walk away from the debate and give me the floor!”

If conservatives did walk away from this group it would collapse or continue with no one listening because the GOP cannot move forward if the base doesn’t believe in the effort. I want conservatives with spines willing to go toe to toe in the trench warfare of the Dems. I don’t want anyone who starts their floor statements with “my friend”. I’m tired of the GOP getting its ass handed to them by the Dems who play for keeps and frankly many of the people involved with this project are the ‘go along to get along’ types that continue to cause us to fail.

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” - Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence (OBAMACARE – mine), the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

 

Excellent piece, Warner Todd Houston

zeebeach Monday, May 4th at 8:11AM EDT (link)

You are right. We can’t just take our ball and go home. This discussion is too important. We must be heard and we must also listen. I don’t doubt there’s plenty of common ground. Let’s fight for our piece of it.

 

We mushy moderates thank you---I guess

smagar Monday, May 4th at 8:13AM EDT (link)

And, we’ll understand if you wear gloves when you shake our hands

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

LOL

Warner Todd Huston Monday, May 4th at 8:28AM EDT (link)

Oooo. Icky moderate cooties!

Ha, ha.

Well, as long as you don’t try and run anything, we’ll get along fine. LOL

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

I'm not sure if smagar qualifies as a moderate.

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 8:35AM EDT (link)

He smells “red blood” to me.

I think his comment is a sarc.

There's a fine line between "hug" and "strangle"

smagar Monday, May 4th at 8:42AM EDT (link)

My sister-in-law sent my wife a birthday card, with that line on it. To be precise, the exact quote was “Only sisters know the fine line between hug and strangle.”

I think that line applies well to the uneasy—but very very necessary—alliance between conservatives, moderates and libertarians that (hopefully) will reemerge in the months before November 2010.

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

hug vs. strangle... LOL!

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 8:52AM EDT (link)

I rest my case, bro. Please don’t strangle me. Besides, I like alliances. He he he!

 
 
 
 

Moderates

youngsouthernconservative Monday, May 4th at 9:22AM EDT (link)

Moderates are people who, if one party advocates a 1000 foot bridge across a canyon and the other party says “no we don’t need it,” will stump for a 500 foot bridge that goes to the middle, and then pat themselves on the back for being “unifiers.”

 
 

National Council for a New America?????

USNJIMRET Monday, May 4th at 8:16AM EDT (link)

Do they have plans for cool and hip looking muted blue and red posters also?
I’d point out that when the Democrat Party fell out of favor and lost the House, Senate and eventually the White House, THEY didn’t go looking for all the “moderates” they could find. Oh they said they were a big tent party and all the pablum we’re hearing from the Republicans now.
But what they really did was go further left then they had been, and called anyone not as far left as they were, radical right wing extremists.
And they stuck to that message, wrong thou it was/is.
And the Republican Party answer when faced with the same potential of permanent minority status?
Well, don’t just include moderates in the party, make them equal partners. Heck, put them in the ‘leadership’ roles! Act as if the conservative point of view is something to be tolerated and ‘listened’ to, while the party moves to the left.
As someone else said, why vote for a squishy liberal Republican when you can have a real liberal Democrat?
The two party system assumes some pretty stark differences between the two parties.
Not so much a reality anymore.
Anyone who wants to declare that there is no workable alternative, that the ship is to big and cumbersome to change direction quickly……Barack Obama, President of the United States.
Considering his, well…everything, who would have placed the “sucker bet” 8 years ago that the above would be true?
Half steps to the left and socialism/fascism STILL gets you to socialism/fascism.
If that’s all that the NCNA (Who came up with that anyway??) is offering, then the Republican Party is truly becoming nothing more then Democrat lite.

Actually, they didn't

smagar Monday, May 4th at 8:47AM EDT (link)

I’d point out that when the Democrat Party fell out of favor and lost the House, Senate and eventually the White House, THEY didn’t go looking for all the “moderates” they could find. Oh they said they were a big tent party and all the pablum we’re hearing from the Republicans now.But what they really did was go further left then they had been, and called anyone not as far left as they were, radical right wing extremists.

Emphasis added

In the formerly R districts they won, they preached a message of fiscal discipline and responsible government. Kay Hymans, NC’s new D Senator, quoted the Bible in campaign ads.

In so doing they pulled in a lot of moderates and won seats.

Yes, they are governing to the hard left. But, they didn’t win elections with a hard-left message.

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

Actually, it's Kay Hagan.

skorrent1 Monday, May 4th at 10:01AM EDT (link)

I get the snark, but it’s likely she hasn’t had one of those for decades. ;>)

 

My point exactly. The left "said" the correct words to get elected, then governed from the far left. NT

USNJIMRET Monday, May 4th at 10:11AM EDT (link)
 
 

WTH...

Josh Painter Monday, May 4th at 8:22AM EDT (link)

I have nothing against the GOP big tent. I don’t want anyone to be “thrown out” from under it. I simply want the GOP, the RNC, the NCNA to try it the conservative way for a change.

Conservatives have watched in horror as the Republican Party keeps trying things the moderate way. That got us Bush41 and the defeat which put Bill Clinton in the White House in 1992. The moderate way got us a toothless Bob Dole candidacy, another defeat and four more years of Bill Clinton. It got us “compassionate” conservatism and spending run amok, which lost the Congress in 2006. It got us a John McCain candidacy which stabbed its own VP candidate in the back, yet another defeat in 2008 and a socialist in the White House.

Every time we’ve tried it the moderate way, we lose. And we keep losing. When we’ve tried it the conservative way, like we did in 1980 and 1984, plus in the House in 1994, we won. Every time we try it the conservative way, we win.

Those of us in the grassroots are not prolitical professionals. Be we have the presence of mind to be able to observe what works for the GOP and what does not work. Conservatism works, and moderation does not work.

So let us welcome anyone to come in under the big tent. And let everyone have a voice. But it’s time for the gavel to be passed to the conservatives. It’s our turn now.

- JP

“An armed society is a polite society” - Robert A. Heinlein, “Beyond This Horizon” (1942)

Hear hear

Warner Todd Huston Monday, May 4th at 8:27AM EDT (link)

Couldn’t agree more.

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

 

Not just the GOP, Josh

Steph C Monday, May 4th at 9:18AM EDT (link)

It’s what works for PEOPLE. People, no matter what their registration cards say, use conservative principles every day in their own lives. They are the solution givers, not government. Government creates more problems than it will ever solve. Conservatism gives the power to the people to make their own solutions for their own particular circumstances.

That’s the message that resonates with people: Having faith in their own powers of reasoning and creativity to find the solutions that work for them not some one size fits all solution because that one size never fits all. That’s why we have state governments in the first place being that the governor and state legislatures are supposed to be closer to the people being governed.

The problem with that message is that it puts the federal government on notice that it must needs remain limited in power and there are always those who want power beyond all else. They will use pretty words, wrapped up in an even prettier package, and deliver nothing of any merit to anyone but themselves.

It is at a point now, where I’m wondering why we even need state governments anymore. The Constitution has become an article of convenience. When it’s convenient to whip it out to support some point they do so. When it’s inconvenient to grabbing more federal power as they dictate what states can and cannot do according to what the pols in D.C. want instead of what’s right, they ignore it.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

 

amen

snewb098 Monday, May 4th at 9:37AM EDT (link)

“Every time we’ve tried it the moderate way, we lose. And we keep losing. When we’ve tried it the conservative way, like we did in 1980 and 1984, plus in the House in 1994, we won. Every time we try it the conservative way, we win.”
In a nutshell.
That’s it folks.

 

Even a moderate should understand this

Scott Mustian Monday, May 4th at 10:01AM EDT (link)

Josh, In five paragraphs you summarized the clear reality that is there for us … only thing missing is the number of conservative democrats (dare I say Reagan democrats or their children) that would return to the party if the message was just on point.

Scott Mustian

 

I agree 100%

kat Monday, May 4th at 2:27PM EDT (link)

But the conservative voices on talk radio (I’m looking at you Laura Ingraham) don’t need to make a joke of this. We all need to get involved, bring people under the big tent and rule from the conservative viewpoint. But, and it’s a big but, laughing this kind of effort off nationally undermines the entire right.

I like this idea (although agree that we don’t need a NEW America, my old America is just fine - as long as BO isn’t leading it) and think it has potential. Is it where it needs to be? Not yet, but I think if we get conservative voices behind the idea and help mold the message, we’ll get somewhere positive.

“Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” Thomas Jefferson

 
 

No compromise

1stRichard Monday, May 4th at 8:40AM EDT (link)

It went from bad to worse, yelling at the television and now organizing “Tea Parties”. Look at what they have done to me. Conservatives marching in the streets with protest signs, what am I nuts. I hear this “big tent” talk and all I can think of is how conservatives were out in the cold and alone for too long. To add insult to injury I hear all this talk about more pandering to the left, move that tent to the left some more? Hell no. And now RINO Romney and poke in the eye McCain, please spend some of that pork on anger management for Conservatives. We were yelling, screaming and now protesting in the streets, what more is it going to take for them to hear us? I believe that I am way past the spine stiffened, spleen all in an uproar part as most are. Heck, I am working on some “Tar and Feathers” for the next project.

We should have one message for the NCNA project, make a sharp right turn. The two party system has become socialism or socialism light and that is simply wrong. You want me to work with this NCNA project, OK. But I am bringing my pitchfork….

 

Do they mean it?

Karina Monday, May 4th at 8:46AM EDT (link)

I read that there were about 100 people at the pizza place. 30 were from the press and the rest were from Cantor’s office or Romney/Bush entourages. Who were they talking to? The restaurant’s owner?

I’d really like to believe that they are interested in listening to us but I’ll have to see it to believe it. Can we get some fresh blood in this party? Will someone from redstate please stand up and run for office???

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

 

Here's where I save the party a bunch of money

mbecker908 Monday, May 4th at 8:51AM EDT (link)

and time.

Buy each Senator and Rep a copy of the Constitution. Include a note that says kill all federal programs that don’t conform to this document. Pay special attention to the 10th Amendment.

This stupidity, headed by McCain, isn’t the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard of but it’s in the top five. The “problem” folks is that we have no leadership and precious few elected representatives who actually stand for anything. I’ve said over and over that McCain, who purportedly is “my” Senator, doesn’t represent the people of AZ he just gets reelected here. He represents the interests of the people who commute into Washington DC. As do damn near every other elected official.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Don't forget an economics book

Karina Monday, May 4th at 9:01AM EDT (link)

Better be macro AND micro. They don’t have a clue!

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

 

Send along a copy of

deevee Monday, May 4th at 9:14AM EDT (link)

In this case Wisconsin. These are resolutions that the grassroots conservatives spent many hours and days to pass. This is what we the peolpe want our America to look like.

Send a copy of the Republican Party State

deevee Monday, May 4th at 9:15AM EDT (link)

Resolutions

 
 

You can get them free.

Steph C Monday, May 4th at 9:21AM EDT (link)

Heritage.org has pocket Constitutions they will send you by request. I ordered 20 of them myself not long ago. Of course, a donation is always helpful, too, :-)

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

 

mbecker, 2/3 of them are already too old to read the archaic Constitution and college textbooks. nt

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 9:59AM EDT (link)

5^5 mbecker!

azaeroprof Monday, May 4th at 12:47PM EDT (link)

Anything that has McCain as a leader is doomed to ultimately be a stick in the eye of conservatives. He may wrap the stick in pretty pastel cloth, but it hurts just the same when it penetrates your eyeball!

 
 

It Matters Who Governs

crux Monday, May 4th at 9:44AM EDT (link)

I want the GOP to grow. Strike that. I want the party who believes in the Constitution to grow. I want the party of smaller government, lower taxes, a stronger military, a belief in free speech, religion and adherence to justice, grow.
I want Supreme Court Justices who believe in interpreting the Law, not socially engineering America from the bench. Many of the issues which create the need for the term “moderate” are social issues - abortion, gay marriage, the environment. I contend that those issues should be side issues: they have nothing to do with the nuts and bolts of governance. So let’s have a “big tent”! Sort out those social issues later. When I first heard the name of the organization I groaned, I don’t want a “New America” I want an “OLD AMERICA” - OK that sounds a bit stodgy, but what I want is a return to the Constitution, rule of law and first principles that made this country the envy of the world.

We should not be apologizing for being the party of “NO”. We should not be apologizing for being the party of belief in God and Justice. We should not be apologizing for believing in conservative principles that made this country great.
We should not be knee-jerk reacting to the MSM. Who cares what they think? And why don’t we have the courage to say that CONSERVATIVE principles are what made this country great and are what we need now?

Whoever owns the microphone is in charge. So, it matters who governs the “new “GOP”. I still want an elelphant in charge, and not a RINO.

McCain, Romney and other moderates need to step aside. They may talk like a conservative, but those moderate ideas, and catering to moderates is not a winning strategy. If they are in charge they will guide the agenda, and shut out the voices of the conservatives.

I have to disagree with...

skorrent1 Monday, May 4th at 10:56AM EDT (link)

“Many of the issues which create the need for the term “moderate” are social issues”.

I’d have to say that the most numerous GOP “moderates” are those who hate the “pork” but love the “bacon.” Remember the “9000 earmarks” that cluttered the budget that just passed? 40% of them were inserted by Republicans. We have one principled conservative on our local city council who votes against the “free” money that the state and feds want to “give” them. The vote is always 6 to 1. Don’t assume that the fiscon message is an easy winner. How many state Republicans salivated for the Porkulous bucks?

Don’t assume that the defcon message is an easy sell, either. There are lots of voters who are getting the attitude that “terror”, Iraq, Afghanistan are just so “yesterday.” Can’t we all just get along?

But we should drop traditional marriage, that has overwhelming popular support? That draws majority minority support — in California?? Just because the 2% gay population has a disproportionate voice in the MSM and Hollywood? I don’t think so!!

Yes, but...

crux Monday, May 4th at 1:09PM EDT (link)

I see your point. In my opinion, the social issues I mentioned should be state issues, not in the national platform. I agree with you - life, marriage, and other social issues are paramount; but should those issues keep the GOP divided right now? I would be happy, no happier, if our GOP legislators and reps, quit spending like the dems! I see no real difference between the DEMS and the REPUBS. Thus, my extreme frustration. Which is why the Repubs keep loosing.

 
 
 

Why didn't they just attend tea parties?

Scott Mustian Monday, May 4th at 9:52AM EDT (link)

Warner, I appreciate the point you are trying to make. I am the one who stated if McCain is in I am out. Every time I see the man on the Sunday morning shows, I just know the democrats and the media are having another good day.

The beltway Republicans like government and are perfectly happy marginalizing the conservative message …take our votes and donations and assume we will be satisfied with scraps. Year after year with GW Bush, I kept waiting for his domestic agenda to turn conservative. We finally had both the Congress and the White House and yet there was no agenda to change the direction of big government. Spending was on autopilot … I was so frustrated reading the press releases from my conservative Congressman Geoff Davis proudly announcing the latest federal fire engine for his district. Then to add insult to this, the primary process led to the nomination of John McCain. Most conservatives had not even voted by the time he was anointed.

There is a golden opportunity just waiting to be take by the Republican party. But to do this, but the Party is going to have to give up their desire to run and grow government. The tea party message laid out a road map for the Republicans. These were not attended by political activists or even Republicans. These are people who are tired of the failure of politics as usual in Washington. They want honest answers from their elected leaders … not focus group tested pablum. We all instinctively know that the growth of government to this extreme is going to lead to disaster … who is going to stand up and scream stop!

I don’t think conservatives will walk away from this effort. I think the bigger question is will we ultimately be excluded?

Scott Mustian

Warner, hear! hear! nt

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 9:57AM EDT (link)

They didn't attend tea parties because

Steph C Monday, May 4th at 10:15AM EDT (link)

they had no control over the message. They weren’t specially invited, especially not invited as speakers, and they didn’t expect them to be the big events they turned out to be.

The message they’re sending out, via the letter they wrote, is saying much the same. We’re going to listen but not guarantee anything. It’s all about them and winning, not about what’s right for the country or its people.

I didn’t single out any one person and say if they’re in, I’m out. I simply said they have to prove something to me about being serious. So far, they haven’t, not with the message they’re sending because it says, simply as you put it, they’re going to pay us lip service.

There’s a lot of chatter about third parties and the like. Some are poo-pooing the talk and attacking it. I can’t say it’s a viable solution, myself, but to denigrate it as unthinkable is going to keep us right where we are today, supporting what the elitist Republicans in the party deigns is best for them, not us.

Plus, they’ve got this big tent Republican Party message bass ackwards. It’s not about who’s right or wrong for the whole but who is right for whom… back to the one size does not fit all message. That’s why we have states and states rights because: One size does not fit all. If they’d start living that message and get back to Federalism, they can have their brand of Republicanism in their little part of the country and we can have ours in our parts. And that’s the message that answers social issues at the root rather than the top down. No two states are exactly alike. While those within regions share many similarities there are profound differences between regions. It is these differences that truly underscore the importance of states’ rights.

But that is something the federal government doesn’t want to hear so they continue to attempt to control the dialogue thus control the message.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

Djemi, I agree. NCNA message is somewhat narcissistic. Cantor etal should focus on real problems/worries of the people instead... not the Party itself.

Rod_Patrick Monday, May 4th at 10:21AM EDT (link)

BUT NO.

INSTEAD OF LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE, THEY LISTEN TO MSM.

 
 
 

Warner,

texas214 Monday, May 4th at 10:40AM EDT (link)

You’ve written this before and I couldn’t agree with you more. Political parties don’t equal political purity.

Yeah

Warner Todd Huston Monday, May 4th at 11:23AM EDT (link)

Yeah, I know, but the battle never ends, ya know?

———-
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius’ Forum. It’s what’s happening NOW!

 
 

Liberty is the answer; not "heroes" of the past

madnorskie Monday, May 4th at 11:34AM EDT (link)

Those who led us to failure in the past will not be the leaders who can recapture disillusioned conservatives, Libertarians, and conservative Democrats. The GOP must continue to be a “Big Tent” party, but the underlying principle of the party, which connects all those within the tent, must be its dedication to liberty. McCain, Romney, Bush, and many of the others “leading” this organization have proven that they do not default to the principles of liberty, but to the concerns of their own political careers.

LibertyLives.org

 

I'll get on board when they do

jimmuy8 Monday, May 4th at 12:02PM EDT (link)

Until they do something, I’ll regard them as toxic waste.

You want to be a “leader?” Then: Lead! Put your reputation on the line, go after oh-so-popular “Dear Leader.” Take down a Democrat–any Democrat, anywhere.

Take on a leftist group, any leftist group–pick a fight and show no mercy–I don’t care if it’s the Democrat Grandmas for Hot Fudge Brownie Kindergarten Snack-Time. Take them down.

This Democrat party and it’s money-men have poured millions into every little left-wing outfit they could find, they have cultivated a weed garden of thousands and thousands of foot-soldier–make them howl in silence as the tentacles are cut away. What are they going to do, go public with the fact that they’ve indirectly funded some kooky group? Let them bring in their reinforcement of ACLU lawyers and media “watchdogs”–then drag them down into the mud and slop, too.

There’s a lot of targets out there, and some have some awful skeletons in the closet–rattle them bones and tie the carcass to the Democrat Party.

Show me there’s some fight in your belly, not a desire for more grapeshot in mine.

If this is to be a fight, if this it to allow you to lead–then show me you understand someone has to lose and that you have no problem making the loser the Democrat; that you can’t wait to make that loser the Democrat. You’ve got the money, you’ve got the reputation: You’ll find plenty of soldiers when you start fighting.

 

No, not at this time, not with that name

The_Gadfly Monday, May 4th at 12:42PM EDT (link)

I usually agree with you, but not this time. If THEY want a seat at my table, they can ask nicely, and then THEY can listen to what I have to say. One of the first items on the agenda is a name change, because I’m not looking for a new America, I’m looking for the one I enjoyed under Ronald Reagan. “New” as in “New and Improved” was never a phrase that crossed his lips. The closest he ever came was “Morning in America” and even that was designed to invoke remembrances of things that have gone right in the past.

Next up would be the point which is repeatedly made on this site that elections have consequences. You guys lost badly in the last election. It was your ideas that failed. Man up to it and step aside. Let new leaders with different ideas take the stage. Notice I didn’t say “new” because they aren’t new. They are older than the country, possibly older than man himself. And when we provide the public with a choice not an echo, they seem to like those old ideas. That they just happen to be the ideas you keep pooh-poohing might be what has led to your failure.

We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.

-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463

If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?

inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156

 

It's not the who...

NightTwister Monday, May 4th at 2:51PM EDT (link)

…but rather the what. When they start out with a liberal agenda right from the start, it just doesn’t bode well for the future of the group.

 

From a non-conservative

joeyjojo72 Monday, May 4th at 2:54PM EDT (link)

I think people on both sides can agree that Mitt Romney is big fat phony. See, common ground!

As trolls go, you're pretty boring. n/t

janis Monday, May 4th at 2:59PM EDT (link)

Oh, we have plenty of common ground

bs Monday, May 4th at 3:10PM EDT (link)

All of us here think you’re an idiot.

See?

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 

You're skating on thin ice, here

civil_truth Monday, May 4th at 3:10PM EDT (link)

We do allow liberals to post in comments, but they do have be well-behaved, which comes down to 1) rational and informed commentary; 2) keep out of internal Republican party matters; 3) no put-downs on Republicans (which is different than respectful differences - and if you don’t know the difference, you won’t last long).

In brief, don’t take a dump on our living room carpet if you want to remain welcome as a visitor.

We do have a few who keep in line, and they can provide us with a good challenge and some insights as to how we come across.

Your comments today are violating these guidelines. Keep this up, and one of our moderators will be showng you the door before long.

 

From a non-liberal

Jack_Savage Monday, May 4th at 3:42PM EDT (link)

I think we can all agree that Barack Obama is an incompetent lightweight who is obsessed with celebrating himself. See - common ground!

 
 

Complete disagreement

Eric Fletcher Monday, May 4th at 4:31PM EDT (link)

I believe that we are at the point where we as conservatives can no longer give up any ground. We are always the ones who who are told to keep quiet, make concessions and agree to everything and then the party will maybe listen to us. I say NO MORE! Victory cannot be obtained through concessions. Victory can only be obtained by a complete take over of the party. I for one do not wish to agree to any moderate view of anything, because that is what we have been doing for more than eight years now. Look where that policy has gotten us Nowhere!No power in Congress or the White House.
It is now time to make a stand and take the party back. We need to tell moderates like McCain to sit down and shut up because they do not speak for us.
I think that the only way the Republican party is going to listen to conservatives is if we do withhold ALL of our support unless the party’s views agree with our own (that includes candidates).

Eric Fletcher

Don’t Tread on Me!

The joker in the pack is "agree with our own [views]"

civil_truth Monday, May 4th at 4:55PM EDT (link)

We all have our views, and even as conservatives we’re going to have differences. Nobody is going to line up 100% with your views, or mine, or whoever.

That means, we have to learn to work together and find a way to finesse our differences in views. And to be a coherent party, rather than just a coalition of expediency - we need to determine what is the core set of principles/views that defines us and around which we can rally and work with each other.

Of course, coming to agreement on core values is itself a challenge. And priorities can change depending on the world we live in. What was key 10 or 20 years ago may not be key today. And you also have to be able to recruit enough people to make a party viable.

But in any party, we’re not going to get everything our way. We have to engage in “delayed gratification” on some of our issues - not that we shut up about them, but that we subordinate them to the priority, trusting that their time will come.

And in particular, given the dangerous turn our nation has taken under Obama and his cohorts, I would argue that our priority and unifying focus has to be on fiscal conservatism and small government. That’s where the fire is.

That’s also the issue where too many of our “moderate” party leaders are pouring gasoline instead of water. Which means that I agree with you on the end - but the means has to be feasible to. Splintering is the last thing we need - but selling out first principles is just as bad or worse. Finding the sweet spot between is the challenge

 
 

Losers Losers Losers

tedpomeroy Monday, May 4th at 4:50PM EDT (link)

Spending time on Jeb Bush’s alleged statements reported throught the press filter.

Shame on all of you, Rush & Sean.

We are losers as long as rise to this bait.

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.