If you would like a great example of how the Old Media takes a story that has no legitimacy at all and uses it as the basis for a smear job, the Associated Press offered a wonderful sampling of the tactic for you on June 8. From a headline that makes the issue seem more weighty than it is, to the lack of competent reporting from both sides of the matter, AP employed this favorite Old Media tactic by taking another swipe at Governor Sarah Palin with little by way of substantive evidence. It’s another “seriousness of the charge” story despite the complete lack of evidence as well as a lack of any gravitas on the part of the original source of the charge.
At issue is the false charge leveled by a Huffington Post blogger that Governor Palin “plagiarized” a section of her speech as she introduced talk show host Michael Reagan in Anchorage, Alaska on Wednesday, June 3. The HuffPo blogger charged that Palin lifted several sections of Newt Gingrinch’s work without attribution, and AP gleefully repeats the blogger’s claims despite that the truth turns out to be a far different case.
The headline is particularly interesting in that it seems to imply something far more formal than a mere HuffPost blogger’s blather. The AP headline screams, “Palin Slapped With Plagiarism Charge.” After reading such a headline the “slapped with plagiarism charge” almost seems to say that some legal body had “charged” the Governor with some violation of the law. But the truth is the “charge” is more like a claim and the claim is not backed up even by the person that was supposed to have been plagiarized — not that AP reports that, of course. Let’s not let facts get in the way.
AP lays out the charge in its first few paragraphs.
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been accused of paraphrasing at length from an article co-written by Newt Gingrich when she gave a speech, but her lawyer says proper credit was given to the former House speaker.
…Dunn compared Palin’s speech introducing conservative talk show host Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, to an Anchorage audience Wednesday to the article urging Republicans to study Reagan, written by Gingrich and Craig Shirley in 2005.
Despite this blogger’s claims, Palin did mention Gingrich as the source of the words at the outset of the speech. In fact, Palin mentioned Newt twice during her remarks the first time saying, “Recently, Newt Gingrich had written a good article about Reagan,” and the second time she said, “what Newt had written in this article…” What more do you want in a spoken address to indicate a source?
On top of the false charge, AP notes that the blogger is writing a book on Palin and from his work on her thus far, no doubt it will not be a flattering look at her career. So a blogger accuses Palin of stealing from Newt Gingrich and AP reports this story despite the fact that this blogger has no legitimacy on the matter and is writing an adversarial book on her that he is hawking.
Also, notice how AP gives us the “but her lawyer says” line? Well, it turns out that through spokesman Rick Tyler, Newt Gingrich says the same thing as Palin’s lawyer. Newt’s own people say that no plagiarism occurred. Unfortunately, readers of the AP account were not informed of this fact.
The upshot of this whole deal is that AP used a flimsy charge made by a biased blogger and reported it as a serious matter and then didn’t fully report that even the person that was supposed to have been plagiarized said there wasn’t any plagiarism.
Now, don’t get me wrong, here. I am not charging that a blogger is an insubstantial source merely on the face of it. I am saying this blogger lacks any serious gravitas. I am also saying that the charge itself is silly, flimsy, and foolish made solely to get the blogger attention as opposed to revealing any deep, dark Palin misdeeds.
Sadly, AP uses this bad source anyway and presents it as if it had veracity. And thus we have another smear job on Governor Palin based on unsubstantiated claims from a biased source presented to us as if it were news.
And the hits just keep comin,’ folks.

Huff makes a good case
llgm Wednesday, June 10th at 8:37AM EDT (link)The Huffington post link was pretty convincing. Yes, she mentioned Gingrich in a general way. But she did not attribute the specific language to him. Politicians get caught doing this all the time. “Ask not what your country can do for you…” is from Cicero.
Hope you liked your brief stay at RedState
civil_truth Wednesday, June 10th at 9:03AM EDT (link)I can’t ban, but the enforcers will be around soon enough, I’m confident.
And Rightly So!
Never fails. You guys drop 20 IQ points every time her name comes up.
Moe Lane Wednesday, June 10th at 9:06AM EDT (link)Sorry to break it to you, Johhny, but out in objective-reality land Gingrich himself finds the whole thing nonsensical.
Now shoo. Grownups talking.
Check out my new blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (blogging-related) wish list.
At what point do we start hitting the AP where it hurts?
civil_truth Wednesday, June 10th at 9:07AM EDT (link)As in filing a multimillion dollar slander (or perhaps even libel in this case) against the AP. They’re not going to stop with this character assassination until their lawyers get into the act, which won’t happen until they start facing some lawsuits.
And Rightly So!
Don't play that game
Duke Wednesday, June 10th at 9:19AM EDT (link)Let the government-run media tell it like it isn’t all they want. Once you go down that road of slander/libel litigation for saying and writing opinions about others in public life you’ve gone into Harry “Let’s shut-up Rush” Reid territory.
My hope is that the emerging blogs, legitimate news agency reporting (currently mostly Fox), and talk radio will ultimately beat back the insessant and mainly unbelieveable tripe of the cheap headline grabbers.
If you once say, “Let’s sue the bastards,” the libs will gleefully say “OK - now you’re talking!”
You've certainly got a point
civil_truth Wednesday, June 10th at 10:28AM EDT (link)…but essentially you’re arguing that we repeal all slander and libel laws as a violation of free speech - or as a gateway for muzzling conservative speech. And given the trendline today towards muzzling speech, you have a valid slippery slope concern about bringing the power of the state.
I guess what I’m fearing is that if we don’t reverse the electoral trends, conservatives are about to become powerless to oppose radical Democrats who will use the power of the law to silence us - we already see the legislation in Congress to do that.
And we can’t reverse the electoral trends if we don’t elect more conservatives to office (which means electing Republicans as the only feasible surrogate).
So at what point do we fight back with these perilous tools of slander and libel to prevent our people from being outshouted and destroyed by vindictive personal attacks and false accusations, leaving us defenseless against being silenced in the public arena.
In the long-term, the press will lose credibility. The other problem is that, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, we may be politically dead before then. So I’m not sure we have the luxury of waiting.
Probably this story is not the line in the sand to draw - although this story certain appears to fulfill many of the difficult-to-meet criteria of libel of a public figure - especially given the slowness of the legal process.
I’m not sure I have the answer. It’s just that I hate to stand by while an auto-da-fé is in progress. And while our ranks are being reduced one-by-one towards the point of collapse.
And Rightly So!
I really miss the *old* UPI
NightTwister Wednesday, June 10th at 10:02AM EDT (link)They kept the AP somewhat honest in their reporting…
Get Connected in Colorado.
Good case? Got caught? Not!
mriggio Wednesday, June 10th at 9:18AM EDT (link)How can you convincingly charge plagiarism when: a) attribution was given, and b) the ‘victim’ calls the charge silly? It’s just more over-the-top Palin Derangement Syndrome, this time to stir up sales for an (bet me!) unflattering book. Dunn and the AP should be writing for Letterman (unfunny slut bits) or Biden (an actual plagiarist).
It's AP's business
Duke Wednesday, June 10th at 9:25AM EDT (link)Just like all the celebs show up on the late night talk shows to hawk their mediocre million-dollar flesh fests - most of which go almost directly to DVD - the AP needs to hawk a book that otherwise would go straight to garage sales.
I’m not sure who said it, but “any publicity is good publicity.”
None the less, watch this guy’s jaded book cause a backlash among mainstream America, where Palin is VERY popular.
The more they attack Palin, the more it's clear
icbm Wednesday, June 10th at 9:48AM EDT (link)that she’s a grave threat to them, and the more I think that she should run in 2012.
Phew...
clement Wednesday, June 10th at 11:34AM EDT (link)We sure dodged a bullet there, almost having a VP who plagiarizes.
That was a close one! /sarc
I can’t believe the dems would REALLY want to go down this path, given Biden’s history.
Oh, I'd say the AP commits journalism on a regular basis
The_Gadfly Wednesday, June 10th at 1:00PM EDT (link)What they don’t engage in is news reporting. But than having taken that introductory journo course at college 20+ years ago, and having dealt with blinders of the journalistic community, I have a somewhat different view about journalists. And frankly, describing that opinion as jaded would be too generous to me. And Moe would probably need to blam me if I tried to find the right word to describe that opinion.
We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.
-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463
If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?
inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156
Decline of morality in the name of politics
Common_Cents Wednesday, June 10th at 1:11PM EDT (link)They can publish any rubbish and if called on it, they point to the real source and claim “don’t shoot the messenger”. Typical lawyerlike manipulation of letter of the law.
Secondly, the left knows that big media smear campaigns work and go unpunished. The biggest punishment they get is a fine print retraction buried deep somewhere. Meanwhile big broadly distributed headlines cause tremendous damage.
“Never interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake.” Napoleon - Well, unless he is ruining your country! Common Cents
A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader uses mass media to create a heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.[1] Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships.