These headlines only scare parents that are married when it seems like a majority of the time they come out of custody/divorce cases. I wish they would point out upfront how the case got before a judge in the first place.

it’s not letting me reply to this under my comment.
My kowalski is that the “GAL” is another one of those things involved where someone has no qualifications whatsoever to be making decisions. I see this a lot with programs for the poor too. I’m not equating academic credentials with good judgement or common sense and we all know how liberal the fields of psychology and social work are but GAL are basically off the street. I see ads all the time at the community college to sign up for it.

Et tu, New Hampshire?

that prompted the judge’s decision but the conspiracy theorist in me thinks custody is being used here to further diminish home schooling as a viable option to the public indoctrination centers schools. It’s why I think Obama was so quick to cancel the voucher program in DC. BTW, anyone else notice how quickly that faded from the headlines? No word on if the parents are trying to get it back or not. There were a few voices of protest about it then… nuthin’. Of course, I usually don’t see much local DC news, just the BS that comes off Capitol Hill and the White House.

It just seems someone is afraid this girl won’t be getting her mind right politically now that she’s getting closer to her teens (Liberalism Progressiveism is good, Republicans are bad. Here, sweetie, have some Kool-Aid).

in NH would fall under the heading of “not [having] the opportunity to seriously consider any other point of view.”

But what small jurisdiction judge wants to fight with people who might want to cut off his head? And who teach how to do it in their schools.