« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Time For Another Tea Party Backlash [Updated]

By: westcoastpatriette (Diary)  |  June 28th, 2012 at 10:43 AM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

The Courts have failed us again, and, of course, no one has been able yet to fully digest what just transpired, but at a minimum, our judicial overlords have failed to protect Americans from the Obamacare travesty.

I can barely think straight or comprehend how the Courts used the “it’s a tax” justification to uphold the individual mandate.  All I know is I am just as furious now as I was when the Dems first rammed this monstrosity through Congress.  No, I am more furious now than I was then because it is incredulous to me that the Courts could betray us as they have done.

I pray the Tea Party arises again, gains many more warriors, and we deal with this in November.  It’s all on us now, people.

 

UPDATE 6-30-12  3:18pm EST:  It has now been over two days since this bizarre decision was handed down and I am able to think a little more clearly and am better informed about how the nine justices of the Supreme Court arrived at their decisions.  I have also listened to those who think this was some brilliant chess move by Roberts that would ultimately benefit conservatives in achieving our goals, and I reiterate that I completely reject those arguments in terms of excusing Roberts from his cowardly conduct.  I also adamantly reject any attempts to blame the electorate for Roberts’ abdication of his responsibility to legally protect the citizens of this nation from an illegal and unconstitutional law.

And I do not consider this whining.  Roberts (as well as the other four justices who upheld the law and whom we sometimes let off the hook because we already expect partisan lawlessness from them) caved and failed in their basic judicial duties and, as a result, they are inflicting further pain and suffering upon this nation.  Incredulous and cowardice.  That is how I see it.

 

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • avgjo

    it had better wise up, quick. We utterly failed in (a) choosing our candidates and (b) holding them accountable.

    They did nothing to cut off funding. They put Boner in as Speaker. Many support ethanol subsidies.

    they don’t fear us because we’ve given them no reason to. No major conservative blogger, radio show host or talking head has called for Boehner’s primary challenge. The efforts to supplant people like Orrin Hatch have failed.

    Something’s got to change. I suspect it starts with a spiritual revival, and then Divine Inspiration will follow.

    • checkmate2012

      And patriots did noy utterly fail in (a) choosing our candidates and (b) holding them accountable. Not every race is winnable but we’ll always try regardless of the outcome.

      We have this thing called Congress and rules and we don’t get to change them UNTIL we have a majority. We need to get to work. BTW, many radio hosts I listen to have called to remove Boehner, perhaps you have mis-dialed.

      • avgjo

        thanks for that deep insight!

        I said they put him in as speaker. He had been ‘serving’ there for a long time. They made him top dog. Read my post again.

        Go back and see how many of our teaparty superstars are either amnesty squishes (Rubio anyone?) or like their ethanol subsidies (Noem, the nest Palin, right?) and on and on and on.

        We held them accountable? Why is Obamacare being funded? Why did we get screwed twice on the budget?

        We have a majority enough to cut off funding. Read your Constitution.

        Really? Who? I talked to a guy from Heritage ( I think it was Brian Darling) on a local radio show and asked him why no one was calling for Boner’s primary. You know what he told me? We don’t want to do that because we don’t know who will replace him.

        Cowardice and incompetence abound on the right in America.

        This pollyanna, ‘we can’t criticize our guys’ mentality has gotten us here. Count me out.

        • checkmate2012

          as a newly elected group of individuals with no power. Boehner needs to go no matter what happens in the next election but don’t think it will be easy unless we have way more Conservatives elected.

          I agree that B is squishy but also know that a bill has to pass thru Reid (impossible to even get a vote) and O for a veto. So the House does not have free reign- I’ve read the Constitution. If wishes were…

          • avgjo

            I will have to point out one thing, though. IF the GOP in the House had guts, they could have shutdown the gov’t by tying the purse strings, as allowed by the Constitution. And I know about the concerns about image. But hell, look what’s happening to the country.

            Roberts put image over country, just like the GOP has for two years now. That’s killing our precious land. It’s killing the future of the children and of unborn generations. It’s time to take a stand. that includes no longer tolerating squishiness. And to the devil with image.

          • checkmate2012

            and agree with all you’re saying in that we’re at a tipping point. I just don’t know how much effect the TEA voices could have effected electing Leader B becoming the speaker, but know that he bowed or maybe listened to them in any case: Read this as proof, when we were on the 1st brink of a gov’t shutdown:

            I’ve been looking back and found this:
            http://www.humanevents.com/2011/04/08/boehner-wins-historic-spending-cuts-and-no-government-shutdown/

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            It would take an act of God or a massive uprising of the citizenry to primary Boehner out. He raised $14 million – MILLION in 2011-12! His challenger in the primary raised $8000. The Ohio Republican Party (Ohio Mafia) would never defy him and actively campaigns for him, which includes campaigning against primary challengers. Apparently, those in his district like the idea that the All Powerful Wizard of the House comes from little district and they continue to elect him.

            Our best bet is electing a more conservative House that will stand up to him and elect a more conservative leader.

            Though term limits would also do the trick.

          • garfieldjl

            Boehner is speaker of the House, however he has literally no control over the Senate. Top that off, the Speaker before him was arguably the most corrupt Speaker in our lifetime. We have a President of the United States that is willing to withhold people’s social security checks (money that those people paid into when they were in the workforce) to get his way, and a media the is willing to lie about whom is responsible.

            Boehner is no Newt Gingrich, but I hate to break this to you, nobody in congress currently is either. We need to get realistic instead of armchair quarterbacking. If Boehner was in bed with the liberals he wouldn’t have let Darrel Issa’s push to hold Holder in contempt go forward.

            Boehner is no Newt Gingrich, however people must also take into account that Barack Obama is nothing like Bill Clinton either, Clinton wasn’t an ideologue like Obama is. If Boehner was dealing with a Bill Clinton as President, I seriously doubt many of you would continue to hold the opinion you currently have of Boehner.

            Obama is more than willing to let the American people suffer hardship in order to get his way, something Clinton wasn’t exactly willing to do. Clinton let a lot of the Federal Government close down, but he never to my knowledge threatened to withhold the Social Security Checks from retirees that had spent years paying into it.

            We do not have control of the Senate, and Obama has no intention to compromise on anything, his idea of compromise is that those against his agenda cave in to his demands. If Boehner was caving to someone more like Clinton all the time and we had the Senate, then yeah I would say he would need to be kicked out of leadership, but that isn’t the case. So we need to give Boehner the benefit of the doubt for the time being considering the Dems control 2/3s of the legislative process.

      • Dave_A

        The ‘In the primaries, vote for anyone who sings the tune over the electable incumbent’ thing cost us control of the Senate and removed any chance of winning the debt/budget fights…

        Christine O’Donnel should never have been let on the ballot.
        Sharon Angle should never have been let on the ballot

        And there are more – along with quite a few house races sacrificed in the name of un-vetted candidates who figured out that being rated ‘severely conservative’ by their state’s TP crowd was their ticket to a run at Federal office that they had no chance of winning…

        1) Candidates need to be vetted before they are endorsed. Candidates with moral turpitude, ‘serial-runners’ who can never close the deal, or just plain nuttiness need to be rejected no matter how conservative they talk.

        2) Candidates need to be regionally appropriate. Scott Brown is not the right man to run in Texas, and Richard Mourdock (of IN) would get his clock cleaned in Massachusetts… However, Brown is perfect for MA, and there’s no such thing as too conservative for TX.

        3) In the vein of #1, we have to be careful about infiltrators – The TEA Party movement had a significant Paulistine Insurgent infiltration in many areas… Anyone who criticizes the Federal Reserve or talks about a gold standard in a good light is unqualified for federal office.

        • bbjaylive

          I don’t think criticism of the Federal Reserve should be taboo, I just think that any critique of it must be coherent and substantive, instead of the nutty and paranoid critique of the Fed we have been hearing over this GOP primary.

          I agree on gold though, any goldbug or anyone even pretending like they favour a gold standard should be disqualified.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            I would consider RedState a good cross section of the GOP. I have on several occasions given support to both Federal Reserve and how Ben Barnacke in particular has handled the recession. Wrote extensively about how the Fed has been hamstrung by the Obama Reign and the monstrosity of Dodd-Frank (seriously Chris Dodd and Barney Frank should be investigated for treason;they couldn’t have done more damage to the economy if they worked for Vladimir Putin).

            I have found nearly unanimous support from RedState nation with the exception of Paultards who get banned on site. GOP voters had the opportunity to accept the nuttiest of Fed bashers and rejected him in every election, in every state. When you hear likes “Ron Paul on domestic policy” what most are saying is “would like government to be smaller” not “Thinks Congress should have oversight over money supply”.

          • bbjaylive

            I’m talking about the GOP and how many of their premier members make such comments like the “Fed shouldn’t be printing all this money” represents the kind of sentiment (and unintelligent argument) that both Jim DeMint and Paul Ryan have expressed during the past year or so . Perry made his ridiculous argument that Bernanke was being treasonous for “printing all that money” and Gingrich said that Bernanke should be fired, which whipped up the crowd into a frenzy. Gringrich also made the nonsensical notion that he was rather pro-gold standard, a ridiculous and unashamed attempt to siphon off Paul votes

            I’m not really sure how you think the Fed has been hamstrung by the Obama administration. I think you are correct in your last sentence but you do get quite a lot that say that they think the Fed should be abolished

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            What is the goal of QE (i.e. providing cheap money)? Bernacke is pretty clear his goal is to provide the banks with Capital that can then be loaned out in the credit markets to loosen up the crunch and get new business startups, established business expansions, home building, etc. What has the representatives of the people and their King done? They passed regulations that made loaning money more difficult and heck mostly unprofitable. A classic paradox, Bernacke does the right thing to relieve the credit crunch and the government makes the crunch worse. This is what Bernacke meant when he said, “Congress needs to do it’s job” and Dick Bove wrote about the same issue at CNBC. QE is a waste of time, energy and money if the banks are forced to hoard the capital or turn themselves into stock market traders. Unless that monstosity of Dodd-Frank is repealed in it’s entirety and the Consumer Protection Bureau is abolished; we won’t move very far of this intrepid growth.

        • otis1

          Boehner is not of the TEA PARTIES,he is either a rino and or an elite like Teddy K’s best buddy John McCain?

    • Dave_A

      That was some really BAD primary targeting…

      As for Bohemer, the point is to replace him as Speaker – he doesn’t do much harm as a yes-vote for whatever the new Speaker puts on the agenda….

      • acat

        not sufficiently removed himself from the D.C. GOP “gone native” club.

        He’s one of the better D.C. insiders, but I’m not convinced he’s as conservative a Senator as Utah could elect.

        If the primary challenge, and the fact that Hatch has to look at Mike Lee every now and then, stiffen his conservatism, then it was worthwhile.

        Remember the first half of the quote. “The most conservative candidate…..”

        Mew

    • Donald Ayotte

      Roberts’ comment about his not wanting to correct election mistakes is advocating just exactly what?
      Is he advocating violence at the ballot boxes, national dissent, or outright revolution?
      Statements like Roberts made, confuse citizens laying down a foundation for violence.
      We expect more common sense from people in position of power.

    • http://markdavis.660amtheanswer.com/ Producer Susan Cloud

      … continues.

      I appreciate the value the Tea Party brings, but I absolutely cannot stomach the nomination of candidates like Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle. I simply do not understand how a group that delivers such substantive, savvy candidates as Rand Paul and Marco Rubio, could then rally around a person like Sarah Palin who abandoned her elected duties mid-term and then decided to star in a reality show.

      William F. Buckley, Jr. had to be rolling over in his grave.

      I realize that the American experiment isn’t a terribly complicated thing, but still … I want candidates with intellect, substance, and presence.

      Please read my recent post:
      http://www.redstate.com/producersusancloud/2012/06/29/we-deserved-this/

      • westcoastpatriette

        substance, and presence”? If you’re expecting perfection, that’s not very helpful. The Tea Party will continue to be the fuel for the conservative movement for years to come. Be grateful.

      • acat

        what sank Angle was the lack of support from .. the state-level GOP.

        Mew

        • Donald Ayotte

          Acat
          The fact that then, Delaware GOP Chairman, Tom Ross made disparaging comment about O’Donnell, (she couldn’t be elected as dogcatcher in Delaware). She braved on in her election bid to unseat Delaware’s lone Congressman, Mike Castle.
          Tom Ross was so infuriated that he offered absolutely no support to the newly elected Republican Senate Candidate, Christine O’Donnell
          When she was beaten by Chris Coons in the General Election, Ross was Censured by Delaware’s Sussex County GOP Committee and eventually lost his seat as GOP Chairman.

      • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

        that you have a love/hate relationship with the GOP. The party that brought us Lugar, Graham, McCain, Dole, Lamar, ………………………

        At least the tea parties are trying to effect change, and we brought Lee, Rand Paul, Nikki Haley, Rubio, West, ……………………..

  • funwithknives

    for all of 2011. This is the Catalyst to create The Substance seen lacking.
    All the Other parts of The Formula were already there.

    Now, mix until frothy………. and do not stop.

    This IS our future. Right here, right now.
    “It was a new day yesterday,but it’s an old day now”
    We got 4 months of New Days. Time to make a few calls…….

    • mikeymike143

      go ted go!!!

      • mikeymike143

        cruz is a man with a bright political future ahead of him. if the tea party is to awake, lets start in texas.

  • bk

    The lefties have been saying, “We’ll probably lose at the SC, but this will really fire up our base.” I suspect this will really fire up our base now, and the GOP will be glad to paint Obamacare as the largest tax increase in the history of the universe, which should resonate with independents.

    • mikeymike143

      now the dems and obama are going to be running on obamacare. LOL.

      • acat

        Florida, for example – seniors on fixed incomes ought to both like that the Fed can’t cut medicare and ought to be offended by the tax increase that Obamacare represents.

        As I’m not a Floridian, I defer to your judgement on this, but .. seems to me, the ads almost write themselves.

        Mew

        • macphisto96

          Not only will this hurt Obama in Florida, it will hurt Bill Nelson who will now be attacked.

          We can now say that Bill Nelson voted to raise taxes on the middle class by $1.7 Trillion based on what the CBO says. Same for Obama. Medicare is still getting $500 Billion in cuts and the poor now have at least $695 in extra taxes that they must pay.

          This will not only help Romney, it may also push the GOP near to 60 seats in the Senate. But they no longer need that many to repeal thanks to Roberts.

          Romney and the GOP now have a major political football. They can accuse the President of raising taxes on the middle class as he promised not to do and they can fight against an immensely unpopular bill that hurts the economy.

          I think it became far more likely today that Florida will send two Republican Senators to DC in January between Rubio and Mack.

  • audax

    Can we say Romney landslide type backlash?
    Can we say U.S. House GOP landslide type backlash?
    Can we say U.S. Senate GOP landslide type backlash?
    Can we say GOP Governor landslide type backlash?
    Can we say State Legislature GOP landslide type backlash?
    Can we say local offices GOP landslide type backlash?

    YES WE CAN!

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      It is questionable that this will help Romney to be elected and even if he is elected and we get a Senate Majority,

      The Bill will NOT BE removed. Not any more than they are likely to remove social security or Medicare.

      The most that will happen is they will tinker with it and say look we fixed it.

      We are stuck with socialized medicine. Get used to it. From this moment forward the quality of Healthcare will begin a slow decline.

      • audax

        It was a HUGE loss for conservatives and will generate a HUGE backlash! Please do not put words inmy mouth! Thanks Greg

      • littlehouse18

        We will need to hold the primary club over their heads big time, but we MUST not give up!

        I believe President Romney will repeal it. He has said it so many times there is no way out for him now.

        That said, the ruling was indeed a disaster for America and beyond.

    • WA_Cowboy

      well, and we can work harder

  • westcoastpatriette

    many more people into our camp, he has confirmed many people’s suspicion of and distrust for many lawyers who think they are above and smarter than their fellow Americans.

    Only a buffoon could twist himself into a pretzel, come out looking like a moron and blame the American people for his dereliction of duty. That is how much respect I have for this idiotic ruling by the so-called “Chief Justice” of the Supreme Court.

    At this point, my faith has reached a crisis point for I am encouraged in scripture that “all things work together for good to those who love God…” I hope this means that the Roberts abdication ruling will result in a repeat of the 2010 elections fueled by an increase in the fury of Tea Party activists.

    • jamesm

      starting with “Only a..

    • sulmak

      I know how you feel.

      But this wasn’t completely unexpected. This wasn’t the first bad decision by the supreme court, it wasn’t the worst, and it won’t be the last. I’ve been waiting for Romney to come out saying that he will appoint justices who oppose this decision, but he has so far avoided the issue of appointments today, and he needs to have his feet held to the fire.

      I hear you on lawyers, especially trial lawyers, over represented in every branch of government, and it shows.

      • poorwilber

        Assaulting the 10th Amendment recently on Arizona’s ability to protect its borders probably counts.

    • dansvan

      neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. (Isaiah 55:8)

      I’m really upset today too, but I think God has been listening to so many of us who have been crying out to him for America.

      Once my initial frustration with today’s ruling subsided, I could not help but think how this will definitely fire up the Tea Party. 2010 was nothing compared to the backlash the libs will see in 2012.

      Not that I think God is a Republican, but I do think He is a conservative. :)
      (Ecclesiastes 10:2 – A wise man

      • westcoastpatriette

        and the reminder from Isaiah. Nothing like scripture to soothe the soul in troubling times.

      • checkmate2012

        Recco if you approve to fire up the TEA party in our desperate times.

    • avgjo

      two more Scriptures to fuel your activist vein…

      And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.

      Matt. 11:12

      For as he thinketh in his heart so is he…

      Proverbs 23:7

      • westcoastpatriette

        and another one comes to mind…”Trust in the Lord with all thy heart and lean not unto thine own understanding. Acknowledge Him in all your says and He shall direct your path.” Amen?

        • avgjo

          We have to remember that the LORD is in charge and He’ll set things right. Thanks for reminding me of that tonight.

        • westcoastpatriette

          sosorry

  • hunter

    I will be very happy to drink some tea with some good Americans.

  • wintermute

    I too am not even able to think straight yet, I am so full of rage over this ridiculous decision. WCP I read your posts a lot and I know there is a ton of stuff that you and I disagree about but I can tell you right now that this mess just made me adjust my cadence, Im pretty much in lockstep with everyone else. This is it, its this election or its disaster for this country.

    I can only hope that theres millions more out there like me and that we keep the fire raging.

    Good luck America.

    • westcoastpatriette

      and I can only surmise that it must be my strong positions on so-called “social issues” that you so disagree with me about. And if that is the case, I share the frustration you must feel when you do not view these issues with the same sense of urgency that those of us like myself do. And I am trying to find ways for us all to make peace so that we can work together — as we need every one of us to win this fight.

      Or, am I completely off-base and are you referring to something else? Please say more with respect to the “ton of stuff that you and I disagree about.”

  • WmCraig

    I understand your anger. But the problem isn’t that Washington doesn’t support us, but that we invest too much in Washington. There is a lot of good stuff in the rulings on the Arizona SB 1070 and Obama Care.

    Not the least of which is the admonition that it is not the courts responsibility to protect us from our own political foolishness.

    In my lifetime I have seen the country go from a land that respected the intent of the founders to a land being dominated by an imperialist Washington government.

    The problem isn’t that Washington or SCOTUS let us down. The problem is we allowed them too much influence. Some of that has been reigned in by Roberts decision.

    I think Roberts is trying to do exactly the opposite of what the Dred Scott decision did. In that decision the court tried to save the country by finalizing a stand on Slavery, only to lead to a war between the states. Roberts recognizes that this issue is so volatile that it threatens the very fabric that holds us together. So he went the opposite way, indicating that this fight is a political fight and that the government in Washington will not come down against either side for acting politically.

    The solution isn’t more power for our side in Washington.
    The solution is reduce the power and influence over domestic policy that has accumulated in Washington over the last fifty years.

    So, yes like you I do hope there is a tea party resurgence. But my hope is that it will focus on dental work for the dragon in Washington, and pull it’s teeth. As long as the power exists sooner or later someone will abuse it. Our focus, and the direction from Roberts is, that we should take the power back ourselves. And that is what the tea party movement was about.

    As for the fact that Washington has the right to control anything and everything through direct taxation, that right only derives from the 100 year old 16th amendment.

    It can be repealed.

    • westcoastpatriette

      And I understand what you are trying to say, I think. But, there is no way to excuse a Supreme Court Justice essentially abdicating his legal role in this in order to punt the mess back to the nation.

      Twenty-six states sued to stop this massive power grab by the feds and, in my view, the Court essentially rewrote the statute in order to uphold it. How is that not becoming part of the politics rather than addressing the legitimate legal issues before them?

      There is still a role for the judicial branch to play and that is partly to stop illegal and unconstitutional actions taken by the other branches. Justice Roberts further eroded respect for the court by this bizarre ruling and has opened the gates to more bizarre legislation by essentially saying that Congress can tax us for not engaging in any thing they decide we should engage in.

      In my view, Roberts made himself a player in the game rather than an umpire.

  • earlgrey

    Pretty despondent and unbelievably angry. Definitely feel betrayed. I dont’ know what it is, but I guess you expect men of this position to be great., and to see them cower and whimper because they have no guts is unreal to me.

    We really need more testoserone in our society. As a lady, I don’t mean to bring down women, after all we seem to have more guts (and you know what I really want to say) than most men. Bachmann, and Palin come to mind.

    We really need to stop being afraid to tell the truth and to challenge poeple. I had someone hit me with their sob story on a blog the other day in what I see now was just her move to gain some kind of moral high ground over me (whom she does not know– I could be in a wheelchair for all she knows).

    Libs will stop at nothing to keep conservaitve from standing up for our principles and I guess even the CJ isn’t man enough to take it.

    • westcoastpatriette

      And they are not necessarily experienced in that order as you can go back and forth between the different stages as you are struggling to come to terms with a loss of some kind — in this case — one more loss in trusting the integrity of our judicial and political system.

      I keep this in mind as I watch people go through the stages in different ways. For example, a lot of the rationalizing of Roberts’ ruling is a form of denial as well as bargaining (desperately trying to find the pony in a deep pile of doo-doo.) We protect ourselves from the shock of the betrayal by minimizing and rationalizing its meaning and impact on our lives.

      • AnnaD

        (1) Denial, (2) anger, (3) sending money to and making calls for my preferred candidates (as much as I can), (4) writing letters to the editor exposing the liberal lies and (5) voting. It’s the only way to make my feelings productive.

  • http://hughcpeconjrs.blogspot.com/ hughpecon

    SCOTUS cannot be held solely responsible. Some, well actually most should be laid at the feet of the average intellectually lazy voter.
    http://hughcpeconjrs.blogspot.com/2012/06/tocqueville-warned-us-about-170-years.html

  • westcoastpatriette

    were drafting and debating our founding documents — with the seemingly indomitable Great Britain breathing down their necks and blocking their attempts to win our freedom at every turn. When I read the federalist papers, they almost sound like us talking about the left and those on the right who are full of iniquity and thievery and are wholly bereft of any kind of statesmanship. The founders were keenly aware of the dangers inherent in government power and agonized over how to protect the people from abuses. And now that we have allowed too many abuses and violations of the Constitution to go on for so long, the wisdom for why they structured America’s governments as they did is even more apparent.

    Americans have failed to appreciate our wonderful freedom and through neglect and apathy we now find ourselves backed into a corner by the kind of creeps whose end affect is tyrannical — just like the King of Britain in 1776.

    God help us. Forgive us for our apathy and help us heal our land.

    • americanviewpoint

      I think we should be closer to the latter than the former

      • Dave_A

        They were the practical refutation of minarchisim.

        We should be pretty much where we are now, minus a few egregious budget-busting liberal programs.

        If you turn back the clock on the Constitution, you also have to give up the global power & related global economic dominance that the Federal system has produced…

        Confederacy is for tribal primitives – it would be a great government for Afghanistan… It is NOT a system that you build a world superpower on….

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          Because right now a weak quasi-nation would be a vast improvement over the evil leviathan that has trampled our liberties.

  • Common_Cents

    It is the duty of every citizen to be involved and “keep their boots on the necks” of the DC elected elite.

    Nobody will save us from ourselves. Our GOP dc elite will not do it w/out constant pressure and new conservative blood. They have openly shirked their responsibility and we do not hold them accountable.

    We ultimately get the government we deserve or allow.

  • westcoastpatriette

    This is going to get interesting. Here’s part of a piece at the New Republic about Republican Governor’s next strategy to resist implementing the unconstitutional law:

    The Nullification Project notes:

    After today

    • westcoastpatriette

      http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/11912-high-court-ruling-will-provoke-states-to-nullify-obamacare

  • Pingback: read more

  • Pingback: Theron Rosenthal

  • Pingback: Claud Sabino

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: maid service business

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes en kukuli

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: skype

  • Pingback: Portal randkowy

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: Wedding fashion

  • Pingback: garden landscaping

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes 0 12 meses

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: επενδυσεις πετρας

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: jesus adrian romero karaoke

  • Pingback: KoiWeb

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis 7 latinos

  • Pingback: gameplay

  • Pingback: check my weblog

  • Pingback: headshot

  • Pingback: how to get lighter skin tone

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: foreclosure lawyer

  • Pingback: Payday Loans Online

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: dallas furniture repair

  • Pingback: Pool Shop

  • Pingback: fuente oficial

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: magiczna randka

  • Pingback: หอพัก

  • Pingback: navigate to the website

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: aquarium filter

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: Wai Youngren

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: final cut pro x tutorial

  • Pingback: credit card machine mobile

  • Pingback: emdr psychotherapist

  • Pingback: top online survey

  • Pingback: Explore Talent Auditions Singer

  • Pingback: app advertising services

  • Pingback: Au Pair Agency

  • Pingback: My Site

  • Pingback: home care

  • Pingback: You Can Try These Out

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: fix pc

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: Arkadaslik

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: hip hop beats

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: I considered this

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: home brewing supplies

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: pay day loan

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: almost all of the explanation

  • Pingback: internet marketing methods revealed

  • Pingback: distilling alcohol

  • Pingback: turf resultat direct

  • Pingback: girls in white dresses

  • Pingback: profits noob

  • Pingback: Computer Repair

  • Pingback: Virus

  • Pingback: dig this

  • Pingback: Look Here

  • Pingback: our latest small article

  • Pingback: your ex explanation

  • Pingback: Forest

  • Pingback: Delano

  • Pingback: Charlene

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: skachat igru karos

  • Pingback: property in delhi

  • Pingback: How to carve a turkey

  • Pingback: jobs working from home uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Morton Faries

  • Pingback: Markita Pardee

  • Pingback: Beverlee Anidi

  • Pingback: alfileres de novia

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installations

  • Pingback: She or he

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: growing aloe vera

  • Pingback: Tyree Pascal

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: cv

  • Pingback: Tyree Pascal

  • Pingback: find a date

  • Pingback: Alcohol Detox

  • Pingback: antispam

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: Compare Payday Loans

  • Pingback: raspberry ketones review

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: spirits drink

  • Pingback: website

  • Pingback: Work at home jobs

  • Pingback: reverse directory phone

  • Pingback: uniform specialist

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: Dedicated servers

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: kids bikes

  • Pingback: Latesha Smalley

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami