Death By Cafe


No, this is not about drinking too much coffee.  This is about Americans being able to drive the cars they love.  Americans love big cars.  They allow us to haul our families, our cargo, and even our sense of freedom where ever the open road leads.  There is a great sentimental attachment to big cars but very practical reasons as well.  My family SUV is nearly overflowing when loaded with 2 adults, 2 car seats with munchkins, and the necessary luggage for a simple overnight trip.  Big cars are safer too.  Studies by Harvard and the Brookings Institution found that for every 100 lbs you shave off an auto, 780 more people die each year in auto accidents.   The lefty Prius apologists argue that once everybody is driving a Styrofoam matchbox green car, big SUV’s will no longer pose a threat to the eco-friendly.  However, at highway speeds, your green conscience will not save you from tractor-trailers, jersey walls, trees, or the edge of the bridge on your way home from Chappaquiddick. 

More and more Americans will have to drive the green deathtraps in the near future since Obama mandated stricter CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards by 2016.  For every SUV an auto maker sells, they’ll have to sell more green deathtraps to bring the average mpg down to Obama mandates.  Let’s apply some basic economics to figure out how this all plays out.  Americans want big cars but supply will have to remain low in order to meet CAFE standards.  Demand for little green deathtraps will remain low even though car makers need to sell more to meet the standards.  Apply basic supply and demand principles and large cars will be priced much higher (high demand low supply) and green deathtraps will have to be priced much lower (high supply low demand).  Most automakers will probably have to absorb much of the cost of the costly-to-produce green deathtraps except GM and Chrysler who will still be getting Govt subsidies. 

 

Obama’s Earth-friendly policies will mean that more poor and middle-class Americans, who can’t afford to bid on the few large cars still on the market, will die at a much higher rate in auto accidents than wealthier Americans.  It’s certainly change, but I’m not sure where the hope comes in.

The supply and demand analysis will change if Obama engineers higher gas prices to make green deathtraps seem more appealing but he’s still making bigger, safer cars cost prohibitive to the average American so the net result is the same.


RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments Leave a comment

There's a fairly dangerous intersection

Lammo Wednesday, June 3rd at 2:13PM EDT (link)

on the highway I take to get to my house. Last winter there was a collision between a full size GMC pickup and a Plymouth Breeze which killed the 16 year old driver of the Breeze. Five weeks ago there was another collision at the same intersection - - Mazda pickup v. Kia. In that one, the 18 year old driver of the Kia survived. Unless and until they outlaw full sized pickups and SUVs, these little tin CAFE standard created boxes will continue to be deathtraps.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

do not be giving them ideas, lammo.....

chuckie Thursday, June 4th at 1:19AM EDT (link)

….or reasons to outlaw full-sized pickups and SUVs…i think the point here is that even without the pickups and suvs, there are still quite enough obstacles available with which to collide that will not yield to our “kindler, gentler” obamobiles…….such as deers - sic on purpose - or, as pointed out, chappaquiddick bridges, etc…..it has always been true that the rich could afford safer cars, but it is a new thing that the government is trying to force everyone into less safe cars…..and then even more less safe cars next year….or is it lesser safe cars….well, i may not know the correct grammar for “more less safe cars” but i do know the correct grammar for MORE DANGEROUS cars…and then even more dangerous cars next year..and then the year after that….

…and the worst part is, that this is all to save us from the non-existent threat of CO2 and “man-made climate change”….

….hooray!!!!……

 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.