« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Newt Gingrich, 1995 Time Magazine Man of the Year and quite possibly 2012 American Man of the Year!

After some very serious thought, I have decided to write a Diary on why I think Newt Gingrich’s record, skills, vision, and ability uniquely made him the most qualified person to take on this gargantum task of turning around USA, Inc. My objective is not to tear down any of the other candidates but to shed light on Newt’s past record and to defend those record against all comers. I would strongly suggest that supporters of Ron, Romney, and Rick do the same. There is enough negativity here and I am not convinced that is the best way to go through the rest of the primary.

I strongly encourage other Newt’s supporters to add to this diary.
Newt ran for congress twice before succeeding on his third try in 1978. Following Reagan’s Presidential election in 1980, Newt and a few of his colleagues in the House formed the Conservative Opportune Society (COS) in 1983 and took it upon themselves to defend the President against a fusilage of criticism from his enemies. Back in those days, Newt and
his colleagues would take turns to speak on the House floor, frequently to an empty audience. CSPAN will telecast the entire speech to the nation. It is believed that Newt and his young colleagues became known as Reagan’s young lieutenants because of those speeches to the empty House Floor. Unfortunately, it was during one such speech in March 21st, 1986 that Newt was caught lambasting Reagan’s reaching out to Gorbachev. Critics of Newt, including Romney’s super PAC friends used that little segment and took it out of context to assail the Speaker as being anti-Reagan when in fact in the very same speech, he was highly supportive of the President. The same critics failed to mentioned that most conservatives of that day were on Newt’s side. On January, 26, in an orchestrated move, the Drudge Report was flooded with a deluge of headlines lambasting Newt’s anti-Reagan speech, including a piece by serious conservative writer Elliot Abrams. Despite attempts by Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh to correct the error, damage was done and Newt paid the political price at the Florida primary a few days later.

While in congress, Newt

  • Founded the Conservative Opportune Society which met weekly to discuss ideas many of which were adopted by Reagan during his second term supporting the group’s conservative goals on economic growth, education, crime, and social issues.
  • Co founded the Congressional Military Reform Caucus and the Congressional Aviation and Space Caucus
  • Led charges against the Democrat Speaker of the House Jim Wright
  • Became House Minority Whip in 1989
  • In 1990, he came up with a paper titled  ”Language, a Key Mechanism of Control”, that encouraged Republicans to “speak like Newt” and contained lists of “contrasting words” – words with negative connotations such as “radical”, “sick,” and “traitors” – and “optimistic positive governing words” such as “opportunity”, “courage”, and “principled”, that Gingrich recommended for use in describing Democrats and Republicans, respectively…Now we know why he is so good with words during the debates.
  • Gingrich and several other Republicans,  in an effort to offer an alternative to Democratic policies and to unite distant wings of the Republican Party came up with a Contract with America which laid out ten policies that Republicans promised to bring to a vote on the House floor during the first hundred days of the new Congress if they won the elections. The contract was signed by Gingrich and other Republican candidates for the House of Representatives. The contract ranged from issues such as welfare reform, term limits, tougher crime laws, and a balanced budget law, to more specialized legislation such as restrictions on American military participation in UN missions. In the November 1994 elections, Republicans gained 54 seats and took control of the House for the first time since 1954.
  • Congress fulfilled Gingrich’s Contract promise to bring all ten of the Contract’s issues to a vote within the first 100 days of the session
  • Legislation proposed by the 104th US Congress included term limits for Congressional Representatives, tax cuts, welfare reform, and a balanced budget amendment, as well as independent auditing of the finances of the House of Representatives and elimination of non-essential services such as the House barbershop and shoe-shine concessions.
  • Newt led the Republican majority to an re-election in 1996, the first time Republicans had done so in 68 years, and the first time simultaneously with a Democratic president winning re-election.
  • In 1996, Newt pushed for the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act which was intended to reconstruct the welfare system. The act gave state governments more autonomy over welfare delivery, while also reducing the federal government’s responsibilities. It instituted the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, which placed time limits on welfare assistance and replaced the longstanding Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. Other changes to the welfare system included stricter conditions for food stamp eligibility, reductions in immigrant welfare assistance, and recipient work requirements. The said act was signed into law on Aug 22, 1996.
  • Pushed Clinton for a Federal Balanced Budget- The plan included a total of $152 billion in Republican sponsored tax cuts over five years. Other major parts of the spending plan called for $115 billion to be saved through a restructuring of Medicare, $24 billion set aside to extend health insurance to children of the working poor, tax credits for college tuition, and a $2 billion welfare-to-work jobs initiative. Plan was to have a balanced budget by 2002 but was achieved in 1999, three years ahead of schedule.
  • Through the Contract with America, Gingrich was credited with the largest Capital Gains Tax Cut in US History with the 1997 US Tax Relief Act
There is a lot more to say about the life and achievements of Newton Leroy Gingrich during what can be considered the first chapter of his life including his struggles with Clinton, the Government Shutdowns, the 84 politically motivated ethic charges, of which 82 were discharged and two upheld on a technicality. Bill Clinton’s IRS formally exonerated Gingrich of any wrong doing in 1999. An objective study of Newt Gingrich’s history will give the reader a very strong impression that the man has incredible leadership qualities and an unquestionable record of conservative achievements over a 30 year period. Love him or hate him, the man is uniquely qualified to be the 45th President of the United States. Some may chose to nitpick on his record and his personal failures but it is ultimately undeniable that he had proven himself capable of doing great things and God willing, he may be called upon for his greatest task yet….the task of turning this great country around and pulling her from the precipice that three years of Obama had brought the country to. I strongly encourage all of you to join me in saving our great country. May God Bless you all.
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • demsaresatanic

    Those without much knowledge of history don’t understand that Newt is a giant in the conservative movement. Beyond that, he certainly has more guts than the others, even I was surprised to hear that those three cowardly lions ran away from the debate. I think their strategy may well backfire on them, particularly if Newt supporters set up more debates and those sissies run away from them also.

    Thanks for pointing out time and time again the truth about Newt in your posts. Perhaps you are as surprised as I have been that Romney got so much traction with the negative ads and how petty so many people are about Newt’s personal life.

    • WillWong

      Newt had done all the things he is promising to do if elected. The other three have not. Aesop once said, “a bird in hand is better than two in the bush”. In this case, Newt is like two birds in the hand versus one bird in the bush for the other three candidates.

      While liberals and progressives might be blinded and can’t see, conservatives should be able to discern that when it is all said and done, Newt had done far more for the conservative movement than the other three combined!

      • youngthegiant

        Newt rankles many Christian conservatives. He’s a free-spirited swinger and, according to Rush Limbaugh, there may actually be voters out there who relate to that and will vote for someone like that.

        However, should Newt get the nomination, be prepared for some vicious parody on SNL and all of the late-night talk shows. Bush somehow survived their viciousness in 2000, but he had nothing to hide with regard to his one and only marriage.

        Newt is extremely off-putting. I loved his book, “Winning the Future”. But I can’t stand seeing him on TV. He’s hitting all the wrong chords.

        • WillWong

          His aforesaid problem aside, are you with Newt?

          Granted, there will always be some who will never vote for him, no matter what, even if they can be convinced that Newt is the only one capable of turning this ship around, which I truly believe.

        • JSobieski

          Newt has a checkered past, but being a swinger is not what he was.

          He was a sequential adulteror with long extra-marital affairs in which he appears to have been exclusive to a particular mistress.

          Newt is a complicated guy, but there is no evidence that he was ever a swinger.

  • JSobieski

    In that respect, the 1995-1998 DC Republicans were even better than the Reagan years.

    Newt wants to shake things up more than he wants to be President.

    Romney clearly wants to be President more than he wants to accomplish any particular thing.

    Santorum has not spent decades focused primarily on reforming the structure of government.

    Santorum has far fewer ideas on the subject than Newt.

    Santorum has always been more of a team player than Newt, which gets in the way of these reforms.

    Given Obamacare, the National Debt, and the Tea Party movement, 2012 is our best and maybe last opportunity to fundamentally attack the structure of government in DC.

    For the reasons specified above, Newt is superior to Santorum, and Santorum is better than Romney.

    • Common_Cents

      We’d rather rearrange the deck chairs while the profligate spending statists play their violins.

      Gingrich has nailed it when he says, “Others just want to manage the decline.”

  • Seedyrom

    the progressive Romney and its damn right pathetic that weak republicans and conservatives think Romney could beat Obama. Dems want Romney so they can foster the 1% attacks and they will win.

    Most don’t get it, dems are winning the contraception argument because the right is ball less in DC and they can’t seem to counter with better arguments. Romney is a one trick pony who will buckle as dems sink their teeth in him. He can’t even convince us he’s conservative.

  • WillWong

    Just keep focussing on his past record of shaking up government, tax cuts, welfare reform, jobs creation, bold ideas, etc. We don’t need to tear down any of the others. Newt’s record speaks for itself. I believe with persistence, patience, and hard work, the rest of the conservative movement will gradually coalesce around our one and only real hope. I really like our chances! Thank you all!

  • jamesm

    Adelson just gave another 10 million to Gingrich Super Pac,

    • WillWong

      I am so happy that I want to hug all you Newt supporters out there! Here you go! Smile!

      • xymbaline

        We’re with him all the way.

  • joayn

    changed Romney’s “electablility” factor once parroted by the conservative pundits and others. Romney’s scorched earth tactics used against Newt in Iowa and the overkill in Florida (“we don’t want to just beat him, we want to destroy him”) have pretty much changed that meme. A lot of the discussions about Romney now are much more critical, a marked improvement, IMO. It’s ironic that all these tactics to smear Newt have actually backfired on Romney.

    One more thing. Newt and Perry challenged Mitt’s Bain experience, resulting in the end of Mitt’s “I created 100,00 plus jobs” fake out. Added to that, after much knashing of teeth and the outiest outrage by conservative pundits et al, conversations happened and people actually seem to understand the difference between destructive capitalism and constructive capitalism and are asking: Do we want this to be the face of Republicanism? Isn’t this exactly what the Democrats have been saying about us and we’ve fought against for years?

    I guess my point is that Newt has actually affected and changed the narrative of this primary. Nobody else has.

    • WillWong

      I shared the same thought but was lambasted by many here that I was using anti-capitalist talking terms. But you are right….Romney has stopped talking about his 100,000 jobs!

    • demsaresatanic

      Romney is the perfect target for the Obama class-warfare campaign, a multi-millionaire corporate raider. The democrat attack ads almost write themselves.

      • jamesm

        that Dems want Romney for this and several more reasons.

  • Rudy

    Great Post!

    • WillWong

      nt

  • brand

    A few additional points.

    Romney touts his “Outside the Beltway” credentials. Problem is, that’s basically what Obama had, since he’d been a Senator for about 10 minutes before he started running for President, and he’s famously said that he belatedly realized the truth about “shovel ready jobs” (to paraphrase).

    My point is, Newt KNOWS what it takes to get things done in Washington. Politics may not be bean bag, but neither is getting a bill pushed through Congress! Note, it wasn’t Obama who even wrote Obamacare, it was Hill staffers! Even the Pols didn’t know what was in it!

    To cut the budget and spending it takes serious, experienced people in government like Paul Ryan, Tom Coburn, and yes, Newt Gingrich.

    In reading a biography of Reagan, I was stunned by just how hard he WORKED to get legislation passed. Phone calls to individual Congressmen.. can you imagine Pres. Golf-o-Rama taking time out of his busy schedule to call a few hundred Congressmen to get a bill passed? Far easier to be petulant behind a teleprompter.

    In keeping with WW’s desire not to denigrate other nominees, I will just state that Newt is far more likely to do the legwork necessary to get an agenda passed than anyone I’ve seen in government in decades. Why? Because he DID IT ALREADY.

    In any case, getting a bill passed is more than just phone calls – it’s knowing about legal precedence, parliamentary procedure, budgeting schedules, federal government regulations, personality conflicts between various political figures, and a host of other things that your average laymen would never think about – nor do you learn except by experience.

    Santorum’s a great social conservative. But I don’t recall him being all that much of a leader in the Senate. Speaker Gingrich was the third most powerful person in the country and led the Republicans for half a decade or more. I mean, face it, he’s the guy that got a liberal like President Clinton to utter the phrase, “The era of Big Government is over.”

    One last point. Speaker Gingrich’s House cut taxes, balanced the budget and then eventually tossed him out. When he was replaced.. that same bunch of Congresscritters did what, exactly? They expanded government over the next six years, abandoned the principles that got them there, and proceeded to hand us in 2006, a Democratic Congress and in 2008, President Obama.

    So, with Newt Gingrich, we got Pres. Bush and balanced budgets. Without him, we got Republican Congress-types who couldn’t say “NO!” to expanded Government.. and oh, yeah, President Obama.

    Why isn’t every Right-minded person pulling for Gingrich again?

    • WillWong

      Newt reminds me of the Duracel Bunny that keeps going and going. Looking at his accomplishments over the years wears you out. Most politicians can boast of one or two landmark achievements in their lifetime. Newt had several….balanced budgets, tax cuts, welfare reform, plus numerous electoral landmarks like winning the House for the first time in 40 years, winning reelection of the House majority for the first time in 68 years…the list just go on and on!

  • tomrt

    at every level to produce a modern, lean, effective federal government.’

    That’s worth repeating over and over!

    Great post, WW! Newt is fortunate to have a supporter like you :)

    • WillWong

      Something tells me that Newt will work very hard to justify the faith we have in him if he does indeed become the President. The Bible verse, he who is forgiven much loves much talks of a person who messed up in his early life doing his best to redeem himself when given a second chance.

    • lineholder

      I really respect the fact that this is the approach Newt has been taking.

      We have an excessive number of department performing the same functions. And just about every function is top-heavy, i.e. too much administrative influence. Even for the functions that are necessary, the processes are fat. They’ve thrown in elements that aren’t in the least bit necessary for the sake of expanding the scope and role of government, and increasing dependency on government in the process. There’s a lot of redundancy that increases operating costs.

      Stripping it down to identify functions that are genuinely necessary and then defining a “lean” operating process for each of those functions is an excellent place to start!

      • WillWong

        the Federal Government has been the only sector that added significant jobs in the last three years! Newt said it best…we cannot just manage the decline….we need bold changes! Hopefully, God willing, more of us gets it than those who don’t! And I know He is willing!

  • lastgopinillinois

    Of the three candidates, which one do you believe will be most effective in shrinking govt, empowering the private sector and reducing the debt?

    Newt has detailed plans based on conservative principles for the economy, major tax reform and energy independence.

    Newt will begin shrinking govt on the first day. Then he will sign the repeal of 0bamacare (with Steve King breathing down his neck), and repeal Dodd/Frank financial deform, as well as other BS financial bills of the liberal ilk. Maybe we can even talk him into repealing the Community redistribution Act.

    Newt will work with Gov Rick Perry to return power to the States.

    Newt will push for a balanced budget, and reform govt to reduce costs.

    Newt will reform social security and medicare and help put them on a sustainable fiscal path long-term.

    Newt will lead the way on all these initiatives and get consensus. Newt knows his way around Washington politics, knows the people, knows who to contact to get things done. Romney and Santorum wouldn’t know where to begin if they did want to do any of these things.

    Newt passionately believes in the need to change Washington DC and he welcomes the fight from the establishment. He has had major opposition during his time in congress. It didn’t stop him then and it aint stopping him NOW.

    I dont care that his campaign is running on fumes. I dont care that he is on his 3rd wife. I dont care that he is a grandiose narcissist. I think I’d actually prefer to have a narcissist on our side for a change. And as an added bonus, he is an excellent public speaker with an excellent ability of delivering the conservative message and how it BENEFITS EVERYONE.

    NEWT, if nominated, WILL mop the floor with 0bama even if there is only one OPEN debate between NEWT and 0bama. It will be all over for 0bama. Period.

  • WillWong

    I have posted on more than a few occasions about the similarity between Newt Gingrich and Winston Churchill.

    Both were not very likeable and had personal failures in their lives. Both were rejected by their parties. Both had outsized egos. Both were brilliant.

    Churchill was called upon to lead England through her darkest hours. Could it be that Newt would be called upon to lead America through her darkest hours as well?

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/the_gingrich-churchill_comparison_1.html

  • LDahl752

    why so many congress critters, both current and former, have spoken against Newt. Newt gave so much credit to Dick Armey for pushing through the Contract. Yet, Dick Armey is now critical of him. Newt gave credit to Santorum for helping write the Welfare Reform legislation, so Rick now takes all the credit himself, as if Newt wasn’t even in the same city.

    My only theory is that anyone still in Congress just doesn’t ever want to work that hard again, and those out of Congress think back to the 16-hour days and see all the hard work and have forgotten the accomplishments.

    The GOP establishment, the elitists, don’t want their power diluted by this “reformer.” He bucks their beloved “system” of controlling the country and they don’t know how they will handle a diminished role in the spotlight directed elsewhere. All the elitists, including in the MSM and academia, probably sense that he will be getting more of the attention and they don’t want that, even if he’s in the process of saving MY country.

    • lineholder

      We have both Republicans and Democrats in Congress who have become of the “aristocratic” mold, forgetting that they are elected to Congress on the good will and faith of the American people. They’ve become slack and lazy, taking the path of least resistance for the sake of what is politically expedient to themselves first more often than not.

      With people like Newt in high places, it won’t be about “politics as usual” to the extent that it has been during the past decade or so. Every other word out of the man’s mouth indicates that he is fully aware of the long-term implications our country is facing. With the attitude he has displayed, he’s more likely to push members of Congress to pursue long-term solutions rather than simply kicking the can down the road for the next administration. And there’s likely to be greater accountability for those who aren’t willing to step up and do what is right on behalf of our nation in this regards.

      Oh, yes, the man is definitely “obstinate, stubborn, argumentative, and opinionated”, to the point of coming across as being as cocky as any one man can be. But if we stop to consider what he’s being “obstinate and stubborn” about, i.e. finding long-term solutions and changing the way DC operates…isn’t that something our nation badly needs?

      • WillWong

        Congress should be part-time and they are required to go back home and get a real job!

        • lineholder

          in playing a proactive role in streamlining government. It won’t hurt them one bit to apply some time management to their activities. And we’re going to be paying them anyway. Channel the employment resources to a specific goal that would ultimately limit the size and scope of government.

          Here’s a simple example of what I mean. We have 81 duplicate departments that deal with teach quality. How is quality defined? Are there quantitative objective outcomes that have been specified? Where are those departments similar? Where are they different? How do they operate? What kinds of activities are involved? Can the activities be justified economically based on accomplishing the defined outcomes? If the activities can be justified, is there any means available to streamline operations into one department? Can greater access to technology reduce operating costs? Of the job functions that are necessary, can any of them be performed remotely? (Overhead and administrative costs of so many of these departments being totally outrageous, remote employment could be a methodology that would significantly reduce costs)

          What we have now in many cases is work that is done with a “spoon” when utilizing advanced technology would serve as a “frontloader”. We need to go with the more effective and efficient front-loader. Some functions would be eliminated as unnecessary. Others would remain. But if it is approached with “government going lean” in mind, the left won’t have the argument of “depriving people of such-and-such”. The functions would still remote. They would just be accomplished and achieved differently.

          By taking a “lean” approach, we have a LOT more options open to us than we might think we have! Put our people in Congress to doing real work, practical work, gathering data and performing analysis of operations that could directly influence a reduction in the size and scope of government. They aren’t “too good” for common work! They’re not “above it” by any stretch of the imagination.

  • recentlyenlightened

    I was for him after the debates in SC but it was his CPAC speech that put me over the top and it was then that I decided that if the MSM and talking heads were going to ingnore him, I would start my own campaign via email for my family and friends. Here’s what I told them,

    ” I know, I know…………baggage. I?m a Conservative, Christian woman and I?m over it. I don?t want to marry the guy! Judgment is not mine to pass. He says he has confessed, asked for forgiveness, repented, changed his ways. If he?s lying I trust the true Judge will deal with him accordingly. But he?s an arrogant jerk! Good. That?s exactly what we need. The other team had an arrogant jerk and look how much they got done! Our arrogant jerk believes in the Constitution, limited government, free markets and states? rights. But he?s a narcissist who?s only in it for Newt! Great. What will get him the most notoriety, the fame, the admiration of those around him? What will feed his ego? Turning this country around and pulling it back from the brink of destruction, that?s what! Doing what some say can?t be done. At this juncture it seems that what the egotistical, arrogant narcissist wants and what this country desperately needs are one and the same! As Speaker of the House he accomplished more than any other that has held that position in modern history to further the Conservative cause. He?s bold and he has a concrete plan. Years from now, when the tough choices have been made and the ship has been righted we can elect a good looking, nice guy. Not now. Now is the time for a__-kickin?, not a__-kissin?! Watch the clip and then show me a plan from one of the other (sane) candidates that is as specific and detailed as Newt?s. Bear in mind that this is just what he plans to do on day 1!

    I forwarded the clip of his CPAC speech. I got a ton of positive responses! I even converted my father in law who voted for Romney in SC! Just with the CPAC speech. I have vowed to keep forwarding articles and clips that show Newt at his best. Most of my friends and family don’t want to do the legwork, but if you put it in front of them, they’ll watch and forward. This is what we must do! Keep posting links, fellow crusaders, I am devouring them and forwarding them on to all my “people”.

    • WillWong

      And it is stories like yours, recentlyenlightened that continues to make us believers that our crusade here is working. Keep up the good work and continue to keep updated with good news!

      Join www.newtgongrich360.com for more videos that can be posted on FB or forwarded to friends and families.

    • demsaresatanic

      You are not electing a husband, and I wish more women could also put their emotions aside about Newt’s personality and look at his ability. It is not surprising that it took awhile for Newt to find a wife who would accept him for what he is; a demanding pain in the A to those unable to appreciate his intelligence and breadth of knowledge, and the smartest man to ever run for president in our lifetime, and quite possibly all time.

  • acat

    the media hate machine.

    He knows what’s coming, and I suspect his response will be epic.

    Mew

  • WillWong

    Wonder what is stopping Sarah from endorsing Newt outright? Contract prohibition with Fox?

    “You know that is what I’m saying today. I’m saying that David because Newt has learned through that school of hard knocks. And you know that is where character is shaped and that is where character is revealed. In times of controversy and conflict. Not at a time of convenience and comfort. I see that in Newt that he has learned, that he has been sharpened and strengthened through all of that and I think that would bode well for what it is that we need in terms of fighting that Obama machine that we’ll be up against.”

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49632

    • clowngirl

      and the possibility of being handed the nomination without having to run in the primary?

      That’s not intended as a slam on Sarah Palin, who I like and who I would love to see officially endorse Newt and start campaigning with him — but I do wonder if some of the big name candidates who haven’t endorsed are holding back (maybe with party encouragement) because they don’t want to lose the chance to become consensus candidate if none of the current candidates win on the first vote.

  • clowngirl

    Newt has quite a bit of executive experience. Aside from being Speaker of the House, he’s run several companies. That’s a glaring difference between the preparedness of Speaker Gingrich and Senator Santorum..

    Since being out of office Newt has spent massive amounts of time studying issues of national importance. I joined his “American Solutions” mailing list back in 2008 and I remember one article that he wrote after traveling to China to look at what was going on with their economy. How many of the other candidates (now that Huntsman is out) have bothered to travel to China to get a first hand look at things?

    When TARP was being proposed and hurriedly rushed through, tons of people on the right were blasting it – but Newt was the only person I was aware of (certainly the only person running for President) who actually offered a specific alternative. He sent out 6 point plan to address the crisis without resorting to a bailout — and I think he actually sent it out the same day.

    I remember thinking 2 things: 1. Newt is setting himself up to run for President if McCain doesn’t win and ….2. I hope he does.

    As Leon Wolf pointed out, Santorum said nothing while TARP was actually under discussion.

    We need a President with the breadth and depth of knowledge and the ability to quickly come up with practical solutions.Newt, alone has demonstrated that knowledge and ability. It would be worth a separate diary (or a book) looking into the many things Newt has accomplished since he’s been out of office and the many ways he’s prepared himself for the Presidency while a private citizen.

    Another thing Newt has over the others: A profound ability to multi-task. Just a very few that come to mind: running several companies and think tanks, writing numerous best selling books, traveling to China, “Drill Here, Drill Now” – which transformed to “Drill Baby Drill” the most galvanizing slogan of the McCain/Palin, writing (I think) weekly articles taking on current issues (often in some depth), while also being a commentator on Fox News.

    I saw Santorum speak in Colorado — and rather than arguing that he’s not only strong on social issues he also has profound understanding of the economy — he talked exclusively about how social issues effect the economy.

    While he is correct that things like children out of wedlock, deadbeat dads, etc, etc. do have an impact on the economy — it’s pure fantasy to think that the President preaching to young people about avoiding pre-marital sex, etc. would:

    a) put a stop to it. (though I agree with Senator Santorum in saying that teaching the importance of being married before having children is something that schools should be doing)

    b) would solve all our problems.

    I’m not saying Senator Santorum is suggesting that it would but, in the stump speech I saw, he didn’t speak of any other solutions and came off as basically a one issue (or one genre of issues) candidate who overestimated the impact of his pet topic.

  • WillWong

    The more I think about Newt, the more impressed I am with him….his vision, ideas, record, and last but certainly not least, his boundless energy and breadth/width of his platform.

    Anyone who tries to listen to the 2-hour video listed by duramater will certainly come away breathless! Please check it out!

    • clowngirl

      will have to make time for the video you suggest.

      Thanks for the excellent diary reminding and/or informing folks some highlights of Newt’s past record and showing continued enthusiastic support!

      I’m hoping for another stellar debate performance Wednesday night. Newt needed one in South Carolina and boy did he come through! He needs another one now.

      A candidate shouldn’t have to come through with multiple game changing debates — but Newt is running under much more difficult conditions than any other candidate this year — or perhaps ever (in a Republican primary)

      It’s good practice for the general election though!

      • WillWong

        On the day of the debate, my wife and I said a prayer which goes like this, “Dear God, May You watch over the debate and give the candidate of your choice the wisdom to do well!”

        As much as we like Newt, we felt that we should let God be God and let Him do what He does best, giving grace and wisdom to those who needs it most and at the right time. We were literally dumbfounded when Newt hit a home run and got the first standing ovation in debate history according to Frank Luntz!

        • WillWong

          Same results! Newt won!

  • WillWong

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOImnCrKPZ8&feature=player_embedded

    • WillWong

      while I have only been able to add the link.

      Can someone show me how to post the video directly?

      Also, in order to view my links, I have to cut and paste into the task bar. Is there a better way to do it without having to cut and paste. sorry this civil engineer is too old school! LOL!

      • Common_Cents

        hit the share button
        then hit the embed button
        copy/paste the embed code

  • WillWong

    Great article on Real Clear Politics! Here is a little except for teaser!
    ————————————————————————————————————–
    “Pundits and Mr. Gingrich’s opponents have not shied from pointing out his flaws and the lengthy parade of people who wish him ill. But it is worth considering that these are the scars you get if you actually take on the Washington establishment. That willingness to fight has been lacking in our capital and our party. We need it badly in order to prevail in the struggles our country must now face.”

    http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2012/02/20/newt_gingrich_foreign_policy_99911-2.html

  • Ann2012

    WillWong I enjoyed reading your post about Newt and commend you on the comprehensive summary of Newt?s accomplishments. I started writing on RedState in January to support Newt. But since that time have now come to support Rick Santorum. I would like to express some of my reasons for the change in support.

    I too have a tremendous admiration for Newt?s accomplishments in the conservative realm as well as his unique ability to discuss history and political science in such an informed and interesting way. I?ve often thought that someone with his intellect and encyclopedic knowledge should always be in a governing position. My hope was as president but now with all that has happened I believe that the best way to utilize his gifts is to have him create, implement and manage what appears to me as one of the things that he is the most interested in, reforming government.

    One does not have to be president for that, but one does have to be in the inner circle of a Santorum administration and be given the monumental task of completely restructuring the federal government. He mentions lean six sigma quite a bit in his speeches.

    http://www.newt.org/leansixsigma

    His genuine interest in the subject, his knowledge of government, and his managerial ability makes him uniquely qualified for such an important role.

    I do not want to see Mitt Romney as our nominee or our president. However, he did accomplish one important thing with all his money and misleading attack ads on Newt. He demonstrated that Newt?s background can be exploited so easily that Newt?s high poll numbers can plummet almost overnight when attacked with a cash-rich and unscrupulous opposition.

    Romney showed us what Obama would do in a general election. You and I may know the truth about the Democratic payback operations in the 1990s (ethics charges, etc.) after Newt showed how effective he could be with his strategies against the Left. But every action has a reaction and the Democrats when after Newt, his own Republican party did not stand with him, and the rest is history.

    Also, Marianne Gingrich (second wife) made it abundantly clear that she would do what it takes to make sure that Newt and Callista did not get to the White House. Since she did that interview before the South Carolina primary I think it?s safe to assume she would do similar interviews near the November election. As they say, Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. He won the South Carolina primary because of this strong response to the moderator, but some think that subsequently the more the story circulated, his support especially among women, diminished and he then lost Florida.

    We need a candidate that cannot be attacked the way Newt can in the general election. Rick Santorum is not a target-rich environment. Just watch what Romney can do to Rick Santorum and you will see the extent that Obama can attack him, which is to say there is not much to choose from in the way of criticism.

    Rick Santorum has many qualities that are perfect for the Republican nominee. He is a genuinely good and decent man with conservative credentials, he worked on many of the same issues as Newt during their time in Congress. He is a strong social conservative, which can bring to the party what was missing in the Bob Dole and John McCain campaigns, the grassroots enthusiasm and volunteering that is needed to win.

    He does not have the myriad of issues to attack as Newt does, in other words the election will not be about him or his personality, it will be about ideas and trust. As much as I love Newt?s combativeness (for lack of a better word) his personality can become the issue instead of what he is espousing.

    Rick Santorum is very knowledgeable about foreign policy and a very good debater as well. And one thing that I think will make all the difference in November. He is the only candidate that relates with and understands the plight of the workers in manufacturing states.

    He is one of them in a very real sense. They believe his authenticity in that area, he can win the so-called Reagan democrats because his zero corporate tax on manufacturers is an idea that no doubt will bring manufacturers back to the United States that are now in other countries such as China. That idea alone could turn around the manufacturing sector and from that the economy as well.

    One thing that we all must remember, we can talk about all the problems, entitlement reform, nanny-state, etc. But in the end human nature will never, I repeat never, change. When people are scared, hungry or sick they will vote for people (i.e. Democrats) who they think will help them and we will ultimately lose. They may intellectually know their policies will eventually ruin the country, such as what?s happening in Europe, but in the here and now they are desperate and don?t care about the future.

    If Republicans were smart enough to find solutions that met the needs of people, alleviated their fears and at the same time made them self-reliant and kept taxes low to encourage economic growth we would never again have these close elections.

    To win in November, I think Rick Santorum has the best chance of defeating Obama and reigniting our economy. I?m hoping that if Newt continues to trail Rick that he will at some point, behind the scenes, work out an arrangement with Rick that Newt will be an important part of Rick Santorum?s administration in exchange for leaving the race and endorsing him for president.

    • WillWong

      Doubtless, tnere will be many who disagree with you and will chose to respond accordingly on this thread which will go against what I had in mind, which is a thread to build up Newt Gingrich. If people starts to debate Santorum versus Gingrich on this thread, the potential no doubt exists that negativity will creep in which I am trying to prevent. So I will just nip this in the bud by saying that I agree with some of your rationale, I do not agree with your conclusion that because Newt is so capable of being attacked, we should chose Santorum. This is akin to saying we cannot pick the best candidate and instead pick a good candidate in the hope that the good candidate will not be attacked as much.

      Again, I hope that you can voice your defense of Santorum by starting a new diary with perhaps the lo g and detailed piece you had posted here.

      Cheers!

      Will

      • Ann2012

        Hi Will,

        I thought your topic was the place to put my response since I too used to be a strong Newt supporter and wanted to explain why I think that Newt could be an important part of the administration but not necessarily be the president.

        I wish I could start a diary of my own as you requested, but am unable to do so. Even though this is a bit off-topic I may as well use this time to post this problem. When I first started writing here it was to express my support for Newt. In fact I started my first diary with a post of Newt?s donation page link and explained how I had just donated since they were trying to reach the 10 million dollar goal. Right after I posted that my diary was deleted by someone and now all I get is Error 404 ? Not Found.

        I?m not able to start a new diary, and the website won?t let me start a new account. When I try to create a new diary entry this is the reply I get: You do not have sufficient permissions to access this page.

        I wrote to tech support but have not received a reply. So I would do as you asked and repost this into a new diary if I could, but unfortunately the system won?t let me. I thought they deleted my first diary because I posted a link to a donation page on Newt?s site and maybe that was against the rules.

        Anyways, I will just say here that at your request I hope no one responds to my post so we don?t end up with a debate about who has a better chance of beating Obama, Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum.

  • kukeeamerican

    I listened intently to the top three candidates? speeches at CPAC 2012. And here is my humble summation.

    I must say that Rick Santorum brought a fire-in-the-belly speech that excited the crowd and displayed great potential to the forefront of his run to the White House. I listened further but only heard a few solutions and many general promises.

    I listened to Mitt Romney tell us how he was a severly conservative candidate in an indigo state. I was not impressed and he proved to me once and for all that he is not conservative at heart. And with tepid response from the crowd I don?t think he convinced them of his severly conservative stance either. There were no solutions presented only a promise to eliminate Obamacare. I wasn?t convinced that that would happen either.

    Then I listened to Newt Gingrich and I felt like I was listening to someone in-tune with my ideology. The same ideology that is imbedded in our Constitution. Newt was filled with specific solutions that need to happen. He promised that before the end of the day of his inauguration that 40% of Obama?s failed policies would be wiped off the annals of American politics. He spoke of defeat of the liberal control of the bureaucracies and courts. He spoke like someone I would be proud to be my President; someone who would make me proud of my country?s government again. He truly reminded me of Reagan.

    I know that the polls have turned against Newt but that is because of the lies that have come from the Romney organization. I was quite alive and knowledgable in what was taking place during the years that Reagan lead our country, and even more so while Newt was Speaker of the House. What is being spewed forth by those in the Republican establishment is just like what was being spewed forth from the liberals about Reagan and George W Bush. For Bob Dole and John McCain to claim that it is someone?s turn to be the nominee is evidence that they don?t care about We the People. Since Conservative America lost to both the democrats facing these two Rinos should we heed their words? I say yes, heed their words and pick someone else.

    I have my candidate for 2012 and that is Newt Gingrich (just like I had my candidate back in 1980) regardless of the (R) establishment?s edict.

    The Hope and Change we received from Obama is really only a Hammer and siCkle.

  • WillWong

    Not sure he will do that but I thinkk he was trying to make a point and it is entirely in keeping with his earlier proclamation that he will support Newt as long as he wants to continue his campaign. This is good news. Now Newt can rest his mind and plan his campaign and do the best he can!

    Casino/hotel titan Sheldon Adelson isn?t fazed by complaints that he?s trying to buy a victory for Newt Gingrich in the Republican presidential race.

    The $25 billion man and his family already have committed $11 million to the former House speaker?s super PAC, Winning Our Future, and are expected to put in another $10 million soon, Forbes reports. That may just be the start of it, Adelson tells the magazine.

    ?Those people are either jealous or professional critics,? he said of the complainers. ?They like to trash other people. It?s unfair that I?ve been treated unfair, but it doesn?t stop me. I might give $10 million or $100 million to Gingrich.?

    Adelson doesn?t necessarily approve of the way campaign finance works, but he?s going to do what he has to do. ?I?m against very wealthy people attempting to or influencing elections,? Adelson said.

    ?But as long as it?s doable, I?m going to do it, because I know that guys like [George] Soros have been doing it for years, if not decades. And they stay below the radar by creating a network of corporations to funnel their money.?

    Adelson will maintain transparency in his activity. ?I don?t want to go through 10 different corporations to hide my name. I?m proud of what I do and I?m not looking to escape recognition.?

    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Adelson-super-PAC-campaign/2012/02/21/id/430022

  • WillWong

    Not sure what is Rush’s motive! Since he has been quite enthused with santorum, is it possible that he is talking about Newt’s third comeback in order to pre-empt it? Just a thought!
    ————————————————————————————————————

    Rush Limbaugh predicted Monday that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich could make what would be his third comeback in the GOP presidential contest.

    Telling his listeners that the polls indicated Mitt Romney would likely lose the Michigan primary, the conservative icon said he wouldn?t be surprised if Romney?s demise gives Gingrich yet another opportunity to be frontrunner. Another great performance by Gingrich in a debate could turn the race around once again, Limbaugh said.

    ?I think there’s a possibility of something happening nobody’s talking about — and that’s the reemergence of Newt. Keep a sharp eye. Anything’s still possible,? Limbaugh said.

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/limbaugh-predicts-gingrich-comeback/2012/02/20/id/429984

  • WillWong

    Newt running a balanced campaign…alternating between an issues oriented campaign, contrasting himself from the Mass Moderate, and attacking Obama!
    ————————————————————————————————————–

    President Barack Obama is running a feckless foreign policy of appeasement that endangers the nation?s security, says Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich.

    Obama is ?the most dangerous president in modern American history,? the former House Speaker told CBS Tuesday. And defeating that president is ?a duty of national security,? he said.

    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/gingrich-obama-dangerous-president/2012/02/21/id/430016

  • tomarch

    The left wing media has been wallowing in the hostility of Mitt’s mega budget ads attacking – to date mostly – Newt Gingrich.

    They believe that Mitt Romney cannot beat barack, so they support him.. They are really afraid of the real change that Newt can bring. Has proven to bring.

    They did this exact same thing to McCain / Palin. At first they honestly said they didn’t like John. Fair enough, they’re entitled to their opinion.
    ( If only there were papers not controlled by those who control those media, so we’d get second opinions).

    Then, when Sarah looked like a major draw, they went into slander and name-calling mode, taking advantage of her admittedly newby rough edges. She’s a quick study, and ethical, but they didn’t want to hear that.

    Then, when they figured they had trashed those two enough, to figure they had no chance, they jumped on board and transparently spoke highly of John’s honor, good guy standing, etc.

    That is: after John and Sarah had done a number on the other candidates, looking like the nominees, the media – with several candidates down – then felt it was safe to laud him (them?) as candidates.
    That is: to make sure they would be the nominees, as the media really felt that whatever popularity they did have, that obama plus their mind control media could handle.

    That they then just had to switch back to their “Katie Couric moments” fixations during the election. The media felt their former trashings would still hold. I. E., they supported them not for the country, but for the Republican nomination. The old gangster movie motto “keep your friends close, but your enemies closer”.

    That way obama would, they felt, be sure to win. And they were right.

    During today’s cycle we saw the radical media first berating everyone. Equal-opportunity hostility. On all the – “rich people’s party” etc.

    Then as individual candidates started pulling ahead the media attacks (camouflaged as article titles) upon those, started.

    Then Romney gave them a real gift with his historic volume of negative high-cost ads against Newt.

    Thus they saw that Newt had been taken care of. Then, now that Rick is ascending, out comes the media hosility toward him.. And Mitt’s negative ads on him..

    Thus they have about come full circle on today’s candidates. Now they have thrown mud on them all. It may be possible, now that they have spent all of their ammo, and people are tired of Mitt’s and media hostility, that Newt can ascend again. This time tested by fire – and slimers – as no one has been left intact, and may have a shot at being the party’s nominee.

  • WillWong

    Elliot Abrams’ article in the NRO took clips of Newt’s speech out of context and excoriated him for relentlessly attacking Ronald Reagan.

    Jeffery Lord and a few others have pointed this out but the smear remained and need to be countered with all our strength!

    I am curently reading the same speech and am impressed that Newt did attacked Reagan’s lack of policies to back up his anti-Soviet rhetorics but his attack is clearly from the Right. In other words, Newt thinks, rightly or wrongly that Reagan should add more anti-Soviet policies rather than just talk. Conservatives at that time, including George Will, Krauthammer, and Irving Kristol made the same observation according to Newt in his speech, a point which Elliot Abrams deliberately excluded because including those guy’s view will render Mr. Abrams’s central message/purpose to smear Newt as anti-Reagan indefensible!

    • honoraryintern

      The Clinton’s destroyed him once. Do you believe he has gotten all the bad stuff out a head of the MisMedia wave that will come if he is the candidate?? It’s not his personality to self incriminate…Wave after wave of ‘October surprises’. How does he worm his way through? I supported Newt, too. Can we afford him as the candidate?

      • acat

        We’re still left with four possible candidates.

        Mitt Romney:
        Supported Romneycare,
        Won’t promise to remove Obamacare,
        Presided over rising taxes and fees,
        Couldn’t win re-election,
        Nominated Dem judges at twice the rate of GOP judges
        Waffles on social issues including abortion, gay marriage, etc.

        Rick Santorum:
        Supported by unions
        Opposed overturn of Davis-Bacon
        Opposed nationwide right-to-work
        Voted for a number of tax-increases
        Voted for a number of increases in the size of the nanny-state
        Has allowed the media to construct an unflattering image
        Has failed to change that image

        Ron Paul:
        Brain eaten by the spiders from mars

        Yes, Gingrich has his faults, but .. compared to the above, I don’t see how we can afford *not* to make him our candidate.

        Mew

        • honoraryintern

          Eating, spider-brain-food, you really are a cat…had to clean the screen. coffee even went out my ears…

          -Governor who was his own 1 term actor.. Puts MA, MI, Ut or ID in play!?

          -Senator who was ‘part of the team’ WAS supported by unions, well rated by conservative ranking Pac’s. Marginally different on positions that Newt as an independent actor. Puts PA and rest of rust belt + SW in play. Only day 2 on image, maybe on a different one of those 9 lives?..

          -Ex-Speaker 1998 phara. Don’t want to know any more about Callista, open marriage, bs. BC now has good things to say, previously said they would always destroy!? In the face of attacks becomes Mr Hyde. Has the same states as McCain, how better? Would be a trash can – telephoto lens campaign. No issues just personal garbage.

          I’ll leave the cat food to you.. Only to say last night, Did he really say an Iran with an atomic bomb is ok…. radioactive glass…. only here, now, not in the middle-east.

          • acat

            Guzzardi is biased, of course, but .. he’s also *very* familiar with the State. Even when filtered through a shaker of salt, it’s still not apparent to me that Santorum can retake PA .. and that puts his appeal in the rest of the rust belt in question.

            Second, all the Gingrich baggage you’re mentioning is both old news and less germane in the general… sub-point a, we elected Bubba Clinton despite bimbo eruptions… sub-point b, do you *really* think Obama will risk going there? (there’s already rumblings about Obama infidelities that I’m quite sure Gingrich wouldn’t hesitate to exploit)

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            .. it gets the women back. Is there a female feline in your life?

            The Callista thing is death to Newt with women voters. it will be hammered on Halloween, Callista costumes? Hate is not the right category. There would be sofa sleeping positions if I were a Newtonian. I’d suggest that it took a week or so after SC for the ladies to get the message through to their so-con men and Newts poll numbers to fall.

            If there are some o’bimbo’s on the back 9 somewhere they need to be flushed out now… But if true it just makes Rick that much stronger with + women independents.

          • acat

            Gingrich did well enough among women in the primaries… he’s weaker than the others, but .. given the choice between Gingrich and Obama on *pocketbook* issues, I don’t see ‘em choosing Obama in significant numbers.

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            support. Mitt won FL on the ‘Sofa sleeping position Poll’. Not very scientific, but very effective.

            Newt had the majority of so-con women voters until the interview came out. Just watched the energy speech. That kind of thinking is why I love Newt. How does he gain the trust back of married so-con voters?

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/31/florida-exit-polls-women-abandoned-gingrich_n_1245805.html

            Ask a woman and stand back!

          • acat

            Quite a nothingburger.

            Mew

            p.s. citing HuffPo? Really? Well .. I suppose that’s Romney-land… for now…

          • honoraryintern

            .. you would have a personal conversation about this and not public. Just because you don’t like where the results are reported doesn’t mean the results are wrong. 10% less for Newt than Mitt against o’. 24% margin in women vote in FL Mitt vs Newt.

            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095276/Donald-Trump-endorse-Newt-Gingrich-women-shun-love-cheat-Speaker-new-poll.html

            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095080/Newt-Gingrichs-problem-women–Time-unleash-Callista.html

            http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/01/can-newt-gingrich-win-gop-nomination-without-women.html

          • acat

            All doubt that you’re a fool, that is.

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            … in the intern realm.

            I believe you said, “p.s. yes, there is a Mrs. cat, but she won?t start paying attention to politics until early October.” Only you can decide that counts as involved or not.

            I’ve seen you claw others over ignoring the primary point, so might I try again to heard Acat?

            Newt has a giant problem with Women. Unwind any of the polls above. Independent women run away. So-cons do to. How does he get them back?

            I try to make logical decisions understanding the field and the moves my opponent may make. It’s a very pointy headed process. Very few women make a decision like I, or I suspect, Mew do.

            Newt doesn’t have the repub nomination. There are 3 other candidates, 2 of which are polling above him everywhere but GA. The energy video was great, but Energy, Jobs, Debt, aren’t on most women’s radar in deciding. What can Newt do to emotionally deal with their disapproval?

            “I’m not going to comment beyond that because I’m focused on the big issues that concern the American people, which are the current challenges we have, largely because of the failure of the Obama presidency,”

            There is no medicine here that reconnects him with those women, so-con voters. There has to be an honest mea-culpa, otherwise he won’t lead again and may prevent the only other so-con from getting the nomination.

          • acat

            I’m not “missing your point”, I’m telling you that you’re off on the wrong errand. There is a very simple home remedy that connects Gingrich with the disaffected – the choice of Gingrich, or four more years of economic stagflation.

            Right now, people can pretend that they have other choices, and they can fool themselves into making stupid statements like “I’ll never vote for a clown like Romney” or “Santorum is a hypocrite, I could never support him!”

            After the conventions, or after the economy scales back a *lot* of summer vacations, after we have both nominees, those false statements will be so much chaff in the furnace.

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            … to have a shot at changing the economy. How many non-Newtonians will watch the vid on energy and jobs? No news outlet is covering the meat of it.

            I have appreciated our exchanges and your thoughtful and humorous replies. The point you might be driving by is that the majority of Americans don’t make any decision logically. The sales training I’ve done only 7% of the population make a decision in the same pointed head way I do. The rest run on emotion and gut feelings.The path you are describing has a leap over all the emotional issues that many, women especially, are not willing to make.

            We will see as things progress. I would love to see a combo ticket of Rick and Newt, if both of them could acknowledge the others strengths. That would be amazing but is not how our political system works.

          • demsaresatanic

            the gender gap runs around 7% no matter the candidates. In my view, Newt is more adept at turning on the charm when he wants to than the others and might even beat that figure in the general by a little.

          • honoraryintern

            Site your numbers. Sounds like you are grabbing a cheek…

            Just some of the links available are posted above. Mitt 10% below o’ with women. Newt 18% below o’. Real exit polls of real FL voters. If there were no other candidates in the primary you may have a point.

            Looks like this has been asked and answered in all the Newt strings running. Suggest each man must ask a women and then post their response!

          • demsaresatanic

            and google “site” sometime.

          • honoraryintern

            English classes were a painfully long time ago. Still void of substance no matter which cite I ask you to produce of a site on the internet that sights the issue. Newt has a women problem. How does he fix it?

            MI numbers:

            http://race42012.com/2012/02/23/poll-watch-epic-mra-michigan-2012-republican-primary-survey-3/

          • trickamsterdam

            (I paraphrased your words)

            I grew up in PA and am familiar w/ the State too. To understand why Santorum fell from grace, and why I think he’s back as far as PA (although I still put he chances of taking it from Obama at no better than 50/50, it’s measurably better than the others, IMO), you sort of have to understand the eccentricities of the PA electorate.

            You know how Bob Casey jr and Toomey have almost polar opposite voting records, but a very similar demeanor (e.g., soft spoken, almost bland)? That’s what people in PA like.

            Yeah, there’s an Ed Rendell who never met a camera he didn’t like on his “a working class hero is something to be” tour, but he’s the exception that proves the rule.

            This new R governor, he’s instituted reforms similar in some ways to Walker of WI et al, but I can’t recall him giving one interview (literally) since he was elected (more on why the reforms could help the R candidate later).

            Anyway, when Santorum made a laughing stock out of himself w/ the “man on dog” thing, he went out of the “quiet, I’m just doing my job” image he’d had before and that Casey and Toomey have now.

            But by starting from nowhere as a Presidential candidate, and rising to become a front-runner by sheer hard work, and believing in himself more than the T-Paw types who gave up at the first sign of resistance, I suspect he’s eared the respect of the PA voter again.

            I’d be shocked if he didn’t win PA in the primary, and give him a significantly better chance than the other three in the General.

            PS – About the reforms by the new governor, I mentioned…I’m not sure they’ve gone through yet, but basically they stop PA from being a winner take all state w/ its electoral votes. What that would mean (I believe, I’m writing this from memory) is that Obama would have gotten less electoral votes than McCain, even though he won it by ten points. Why? McCain squeezed out many victories in individual counties, but Obama completely hosed McCain in Philadelphia….but in the new reforms, Obama would only get those electoral votes from Philly, while McCain would get them for all the counties he won. This might even enable Romney to be successful in the State, but I’m less sure about Newt (although, yeah, I could see maybe see Newt taking pretty much every county but Philly, so there’s a chance, I guess, maybe even he could do OK).

          • acat

            Santorum will have to just about run the table in the rust belt .. because I don’t see him doing well in Florida outside the panhandle…

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            Bob, Will, Joe? a pdf would be great

          • acat

            Put in “Guzzardi Pennsylvania Santorum” and click the “Search” button.

            Mew

          • honoraryintern

            I hope to be, an honorary intern, and not a tree. Regular Google pulled the names above.

            Thanks

            The retired Catholics in FL make the whole place, Rick friendly.100,000s of thousands of .NE Catholic snow-birds living in Mobile Homes. Not in Miami and West Palm; but St Lucie cnty north to Jacksonville. Rebuilt 8 MHs after the hurricanes. they are dual residents, wonder where they are registered?

            Know what an ’55+ age controlled Mobile Home park’ is? It cost me $50k to find out…

            Still wondering about the female feline in you house…

          • acat

            are balanced by a similar spread of 55+ midwest-retirees on the gulf side. I don’t know why the two groups don’t mix but ..

            The major motivators for seniors will be whether their income is threatened .. and that means medicare and social security, not “penguin stories”. This is where Gingrich can shine, and Santorum has a hard row to hoe… although a lot of those retirees are union or ex-union so not an impossible one.

            Mew

            p.s. yes, there is a Mrs. cat, but she won’t start paying attention to politics until early October.

  • Viet71

    Watched him with some interest at a distance in the 1990s. Liked how he took charge, played Clinton. Intelligent man. Don’t care about his personal life.

    Why does he want to be Prez?

  • rightland1111

    this worries me more than anything else. This electorate is not interested in accomplishments…otherwise Perry would be on top. They are interested in superficial appearance…that is it.

    If you go outside of this blog…you will find the most ignorant people in the world. How do I close the case…look who they elected, Obama with two words and no outline about hope and change. We got a glimpse of it with Joe the Plumber. Had some of the electorate read his book, their warning lights should have come on. I am rambling about something we can do nothing about, but it proves the point.

    Many Americans are all about appearance…not about substance. Go on any of the mainstream blogs…not the left wing ones…mainstream and you will see people post the most ridiculous garbage you have ever seen.

    Gingrich is a visionary…he is. I don’t have an argument about that. I don’t believe that Romney is all that smart…no matter what his grades say and Santorum is another GOP Spender. I will say this about Santorum, he will beat Obama, if he is the nominee, in the debates.

    Want a glimpse at what they are saying. Check this out: Fat, bloated drunk; mean and nasty; a typical cheating GOPer; I wonder who will impeach him; his wife is a plastic doll; his wife is a gold digger; he doesn’t have the experience; who’s going to appear..the nasty or nice Newt, etc. etc.

    They read an article and then they bloviate further. Each one that blogs gets meaner and meaner and the stories change. This does not even take into account…HuffPo garbage which is the food for the Progressives not to mention Media Matters.

    We’ve all decided that the MSM, including Fox News has chosen their candidate and it is not Newt. They influence voters…and guess what…the electorate are not politically saavy people. Add to that, the NYT, Washington Post, The Hill, Politico, CNBC.com, Bloomberg, CBS.com, ABC.com, Yahoo.com, Rueters. That does not even take into account The Blaze or Fox Nation and they do not endorse Gingrich either. This is what we are fighting here. It appears that Levin and Rush are still not there with endorsing people, however, Levin does not want Romney but will vote for him and the same is true of Rush.

    Will Perry’s attempt to form a PAC help Gingrich…maybe. However, the news is on Politico. Just sign in and see how they have linked “stupid” with Gingrich.

    I’m not trying to be negative here, I am trying to tell you that Ameritopia is alive and well and we already went over the cliff…we’re just in free fall right now…not living in reality. When we crash…we’re going to see things the likes of which we, as a Nation, have never experienced.

  • WillWong

    The country is on the wrong path and must be turned around with some bold moves. The others can only manage the decay. He intends to change the trajectory of the government with jobs creation, spending cuts, and be known as the paycheck president rather than the foodstamp president.

  • WillWong

    I can only speak for myself and the people I hang around. Most of us were not Newt supporters to begin with at the start of the primaries. Newt was able to inspire us with his debate performances and upon further research many of us were convinced that he is the right person. I am from Southern California, not exactly conservative country but almost every one I talked to agreed with me that Newt is the only one who has a fighting chance to turn this around.

    I think we are on the right track. We should work to get grass root conservatives to fight for Newt. We should also get the RNC to realize that the base matters. I for one had been been telling the RNC that all my money is going to Newt. If God willing, Newt becomes our nominee, the RNC will either have to get behind him or risk losing down the ticket. At that point, we shall see if it is more important to the GOP establishment that we get the WH or they maintain control on the Party.

  • jamesm

    many uninformed people. Eventually the truth comes out. Some people even when faced with the truth refuse to accept it. Forget about them. They have made their choice. In reality it seems there is a percentage of americans that do not seek truth. They only care about their physical needs.

  • naharu89x7

    Made was the statement made by an unknown person:

    “I reject any form of government in which the opinion of the village idiot is given the same weight as Aristotle”

    We see that unformed, and frankly willingly ignorant people have a great influence on who wins the Presidency. Look at Obama, most people who knew what his past would know immediately not to vote for him.

    But most didn’t care or did not pay attention. I think this is why a Republican, rather than a democratic form of government was what the founding fathers choose. But over the years this country has become more democratic…which is one of afew reasons we are in the mess we are in today/

  • brand

    “If you go outside of this blog?you will find the most ignorant people in the world. How do I close the case?look who they elected, Obama with two words and no outline about hope and change.”

    I know what you mean – but we have to continue to give the American people a choice. Obama was elected not just b/c of hope and change, but also because of the color of his skin and a generation or 5 of group guilt-think, because of a Republican Congress who could no better reign in spending than Democrats, and because of a protracted war that people started to believe (and continue to believe) was pointless.

    I don’t think the American people will choose Obama over a candidate of substance – we aren’t the most powerful country in the world because we’re completely stupid. But, fool me once, random politician, shame on you, but fool me twice, shame on me.

    I don’t see America being fooled twice.

  • demsaresatanic

    I don’t know the figures but I’ll bet the average American does not blog.

  • westcoastpatriette

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49598

  • WillWong

    and to work and hope for the best. Campaign, plant yard signs, donate money, talk to friends, go on FB, Twitter to sell our candidate (Newt) as though Obama is a shoo-in and we shall be pleasantly surprised with the results!

  • WillWong

    About 33 minutes long but worth every minute of your time. The comments said it all…Anyone who takes the time and listen to it will come away knowing exactly how Newt Gingrich will go about rolling back the Federal Government, Judicial Activism, Create jobs, and help bring about energy independence and a lot more. Thanks WCP for sharing!

  • westcoastpatriette

    interviews like this with each of the candidates. The debates are a joke and, with 60-90 second responses, amount to nothing more than superficial gotcha contests that really demean the seriousness of the entire election process. We need to demand better. We should not have to do all of our own research to find out what the candidates plan on doing once elected.

  • duramater

    Maybe someone has posted this elsewhere. But I’ve not seen it so here goes….It’s a bit long but grab a glass of sweet tea and enjoy the history. WW is correct in pointing out Newt keeping his word in past.

    http://newtgingrich360.com/video/newt-gingrich-the-republican-revolution-full

  • Viet71

    Yes, the country is on the wrong path. And has been for 40-some years.

    Who is the best leader who can be elected?

  • WillWong

    I believe that Newt has spent the last 30 years in framing up solutions to roll back the federal government, reform welfare, create jobs, reform health care, energy independence, and a host of other issues confronting this country. As such, he is uniquely qualified to be the 45th President of the United States.

  • acat

    The best leader who can be elected isn’t running.

    We have to choose between the gilded weather-vane, the horndog, the nanny-statist, and the quack.

    I choose the horndog. First, he’s the “least bad” – horndog presidents in the past have done relatively well for us. In JFK’s case, he was the last of the ficon-Dems. In Clinton’s case, he was forced to do well by .. Gingrich. Second, he’s got the best actual-conservative record of the four remaining, paws down. Nobody else even comes close.

    Yes, the country has been on the wrong path, and it’s more like 100 years than 40, but for his entire career Gingrich has been working to change that path.

    Romney was the go-along-get-along guy in Massachusetts, Santorum the pro-union pro-big-government cheerleader for the Bush administration, and the spiders from mars ate poor Ron Paul’s brain. There’s just no comparison.

    Mew

  • LDahl752

    which apparently is easy for people to absorb. So many do not want to read anything and can’t pay attention to a video that is longer that three minutes. So, they live in a world of 60-second sound bytes. They may be inspired for a few hours by any of the candidates until another sound byte catches their attention.

    I didn’t know about those hours and hours of speeches on the House floor, late into the night, until a couple of weeks ago. That was an amazing achievement; yet, many people remain unaware of the story and don’t even comprehend the significance. It was done to combat all the MSM negativity toward Reagan’s administration. The only way to get airtime was to utilize CSpan’s commitment to keep the camera running whenever someone was speaking.

    Too many millions of voters don’t yet realize the seriousness of this election due to the dire financial condition of this country. And, with 47% of the people having “no skin in the game,” it will be hard, but not impossible, to get them to pay attention.

    Whoever the nominee is, and I hope it’s Newt for my country’s sake, the message will have to be bold, clear and repeated consistently. Obama has caused so much misery and destruction and absolutely must not win a second term. The nominee will have to appeal to the conscience of the people, pleading with them to not leave these massive burdens to coming generations. Younger people and their future children deserve the American dream, too, not a welfare state where everyone works only to pay the nation’s bills.

  • WillWong

    Thanks Linda for your great input. The speeches on the House floor to empty audience was indeed a great idea. It is sad that so many in this country do not realized how much we owe the history professor and how much more he can still do to salvage our country.

    At 69, Newt is at a comfortable stage of his life and really had no need to subject himself and his family to the ridicule and scrutiny that comes with a Presidential run but his love for the country and his firm belief of what needs to be done and an inner core that will get the job done no matter what.

    It is truly an indictment of the average American that so many of us are not able to sieve through the misinformation and propaganda to see Newt for all his qualities, heart, and achievements.

  • WillWong

    Gives you a comprehensive overall view of what was behind the Contract with America. I have only read and heard bits and pieces of it over the years but after spending 2 hours on this, I came away with a profound understanding of the enormous task faced by Newt and the 104th Congress. Contrary to what some had suggested, Newt play the overwhelmingly key role in the CWA. In the video, you will see clips of Henry Hide, A young Boehner, Dick Armey, John Kasich, and a few others, but sorry Santorumites, there were no glimpses of Santorum at all!

    You get an overwhelming sense that History was being made and you get to see the massive amount of resistance and smears by the Left and how despite all these, Newt kept marching on!

    The 65-35 defeat of the Balanced Budget Amendment due to the Konrad holdout seemed like a massive missed opportunity for America that contributed to the fiscal hole we find ourselves in today! Bryd is now dead but he was so happy that it failed that he kept thanking God on the senate floor. I wonder if he can look down from where he is today (giving him the benefit of doubt), he would still be happy! Someone should ask Konrad if he is happy he voted no!

    This is the best 2-hours I had invested and recommend all of you to watch it. If you are pro Newt, you will come away invigorated. If you are undecided, you will become pro Newt. If you are for Santorum of Romney, there is a good chance you will be swayed! Happy watching!

  • Common_Cents

  • Lesstressrx

    Couldn’t agree with you more.

  • johninflorida

    You got that right … Newt, warts and all, is the man for the job.

  • Viet71

    I feel safe in saying that Newt would play better than Santorum here and maybe as well as Romney. He’s got the education and intelligence; his personal life would be made an issue but wouldn’t matter to most voters.

    Not saying Newt would carry Connecticut, for example, but he’d have pretty good coattails, IMO.

    Not anti-Santorum, but I know a fair number of women he scares.

  • rightland1111

    “but I know a fair number of women he scares”. If these women are so smart…and I am a woman…do I really believe that, if Obamacare were not enforced and Santorum were to become president, that he would take away my right to birth control. It would never pass Congress!!!! This is such a stupid, senseless concept…it blows my mind. Nothing against you Viet71…I am talking about women getting into their heads that they can’t have birth control.

    Have we become a nation of stupid people? Oh…we might have to pay for it, or get ourselves fixed permanently…but we will ALWAYS have birth control…even if the Catholic Faith disagrees…and I am also Catholic.

    I will vote for whomever is the Republican canidate…but I swear…both Romney and Santorum have shot themselves in the foot. Gingrich has been the victim of Romney’s smear campaign…which would have come out during the GE.

  • WillWong

    Romney’s smear against Newt were largely unanswered because of the lack of money, unfortunately.

  • APA Guy

    It’s as though some conservatives are on Mars when it comes to these candidates and their conservative records. For God’s sake, he was House Speaker (2nd in line after the veep) and BALANCED THE BUDGET! Those balanced budgets ensured dollar a gallon gas during a time of great economic uptick.

    And oh by the way, he also led welfare reform. Don’t we have some entitlements that are in need of reform?

    Newt is the right man for the job among the candidates that are left…no question about it.

  • Wayne

    That’s a bit silly coming from you Cat! As unfortunate as his past daliences are, painting him as a serial falnderer deminishes his character unfairly. People are emotional creatures and all any of us really want in life is to be happy. Something the pursuit of our Constitution guarantees. Marriage is a pressure cooker of emotions that either build the flame of love or deminishes it. I’m not rationalizing his actions, merely pointing out that we all have more likely entered into personal relationships thinking that the person we are committed to has represented themselves to be someone we find out is very far from the one we thought we knew after we have married them. Unfortunately, men are hard wired differently than women and our tactile nature works against our better judgement. Standing behind all great men is a woman shacking her head!! Not to take away from your post, I am a committed Newt 2012 supporter. I wish he had better judgement in his selection of women as life companions, but I have far too much respect for the pragmatic nature of woman’s fundamental nature to think any one of us poor sucker stands a chance against your kind! Men do not choose women, women choose men!