« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Newt Gingrich for RNC Chair

I am thrilled to see the ideas that Patrick Ruffini has been putting forward on fixing the party and the “Rebuild the Party” effort:

http://www.rebuildtheparty.com/

My own thoughts on getting back to victory as a party are here:
http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2008/11/no-place-to-go-but-up-strategy-for.html

My point #1 is “Servant-leadership”

It starts with leadership. We need local leadership and elected officials that
re-engage and re-energize the grassroots. These need to be servant-leaders that show the
way by encouraging broad participation. The model is a ‘big tent’, but it is based on core
principles as the tent poles that brings activists in and energizes them. We need to
re-connect our own leaders with our own base, and need to develop new leaders out of
grassroots by getting broader activist participation.

Without a leader who ‘gets it’ our efforts to rebuilt the party will be valiant but futile.
To that end, I think we need to draft Newt Gingrich to be RNC Chair:


1. He embraces the use of new technology
2. He shows he ‘gets it’ when it comes to leveraging grassroots networked movements, as shown by his American Solutions effort.
3. He is the most articulate spokesman we have and is high-profile enough to be able to represent the face of the Republican Party and carry some weight. He is a recognizable figure to unify the GOP that has no natural leader at this time. He can go toe-to-toe on Sunday talk shows, can and is already a draw for audiences.
4. Being an outsider of the past 8 years and a critic of Bush administration, he is not tainted by administration’s failures and subsequent unpopularity. He has critiqued the execution of the Iraq war, opposed the bailout, and been critical of administration on spending and immigration. In short, he stands with the people on issues that the Bush WH lost popular support over.
5. He has never wavered from solid conservative principles, taking popular and correct stands, on drilling, on the bailout, on spending, on fixing Iraq, on immigration. He has credibility with the Republican base.

  1. He engineered the 1994 victory, and 2010, in our best-case scenario, could and should be a similar repeat. Who better to win in this situation than to bring out the man who won this type of battle before.

Most critics of Gingrich will say “oh, we need a new face” but in fact, Gingrich, like Churchill, has had his ‘wilderness’ years. Most conservatives WANT the tried-and-true Reagan formula, and they want a leader they can trust not to waver from those principles. They want us to return to the principles that won Reagan the white house and the GOP the Congress. I cannot disagree. When I think of the GOP core principles, I come back to the Reagan formula as the principles to stand on.

Gingrich knows that, and he won’t wobble as others have from articulating a consistent conservative message. BUT ALSO HAS SPENT HIS LIFETIME TALKING ABOUT THE FUTURE. It is a rare and valuable combination that we need at this time. If the GOP stays as stuck-in-the-muds, we lose; if we shed our principles to chase futuristic butterflies, we lose too. Gingrich is unafraid to embrace the future while adhering to core conservative political principles.

We need new conservative leadership in the GOP and we need it NOW – in the RNC! Newt Gingrich is our man.

Draft Newt Gingrich to lead the RNC.

(Crossposted from http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2008/11/newt-gingrich-for-rnc-chair.html

COMMENTS

  • BigGator5

    (n/t)

  • PoliticalGhost

    Is there anything a peon like me can do to help make this happen?

  • reldim

    Okay, so we here at RedState think Gingrich has served his time in the wilderness – but do we have any indication that the general public feels the same way? We haven’t forgotten Bill Clinton’s baggage, and we were adamant that he not be returned to the White House through his wife – nobody was saying “oh Bill’s had his time in the wilderness and it’s okay for him to come back.”

    We DO need a new(ish) face. While those of us connected enough to read RedState and monitor the blogosphere know it’s bunk, the media is pushing the meme that last Tuesday was all about CHANGE! and the average person will probably believe them. The instant story on a Gingrich promotion would be that the GOP answered the public’s desire for change with a retread from the ’90s who wasn’t even all that popular back then. We will be portrayed as out-of-touch and backward looking. We’d have to spend valuable time rehabilitating Gingrich and doing a PR campaign to make people aware that he isn’t being elevated because he’s going to restore the Contract with America.

    I still maintain that Michael Steele is a better choice as Chair (that is not to say Gingrich has no place – but the RNC Chair is not “Idea-Guy-in-Chief” which is what Gingrich should be). Steele has party leadership experience, elected office experience, is a new face to most of the populace and has a somewhat “cynical political” benefit. That benefit is that the GOP will have a black man as its chief spokesman for differences with a black president – this will make claims that opposition to Obama’s policies is a manifestation of racism look absurd to all but the folks on the New York Times Editorial board and in the newsroom at MSNBC.

    I think we need to figure out what exactly we expect the party chair to be before we decide that Gingrich is the right guy. I don’t see Gingrich as a “nuts-and-bolts” party builder guy. He’s an idea man, and that’s not what I personally see as the function of the national chairman (even when we’re in the minority – was Howard Dean the “big idea” guy for Democrats after 2004? Not really). But hey, if the GOP thinks that we need a Chair who’s going to generate the ideas that the party is going to run with – fine.

  • RioGrandeRightWing

    NEWT GINGRICH.

    Its absolute truth. The Republican Party needs a true and tested conservative to run the RNC.

    Let’s get him in NOW.

    • WOSG
      1. While you dont see Newt as a party-builder, that is exactly what he was for many years.
        Newt did the GOP more good than any leader THIS YEAR with his drill now activity.
      2. The point is not merely that newt is an ‘ideas guy’ but that he gets some of the key ideas we need to get the grassroots reactivated
      3. Steele is a great guy, but maybe that means we have Newt & Steele both play a role, ie make Steele vice-chair. I’m not impressed with the tokenism argument, we cant scrounge around for minority faces just because we think the Dems will pull the race card every time a white Republican is our spokesman
      4. baggage is not a factor for RNC chair, and imho is overrated (the baggage of ayers/wright/rezko didnt slow Obama down much). The key is the ability to articulate and bring energy and ideas back to the party. Newt can do.
      5. There is a lot more here than just finding a new front man. We have to rebuild from the ground up, and I beleive that Newt is one who ‘gets it’. I cant vouch for Steele on that score.
      • WOSG

        step 1: Get everyone to recommend this diary so we get it some more visibility here on RS.

        step 2: get it out on your email tree of local/state activists, and get THEM to send a message to your states committeeman and committeewoman (see the link shared in another reply, to the RNC website, so you can find out who they are if you dont know them).
        step 3: Work the GOP hierarchy and talk radio etc. to get it out there.

  • PhxG

    but hell NO.

    • LloydC

      Something as simple as a grasroots effort and the contract with America can bring back true conservatism in the party. Bush didn’t like mean things said about him so he tried to be more liberal and let spending run wild. When will someone who understands that take the reins again? Newt is proven and an unabashed conservative- also willing to give up his seat when the fake controversy took power away from the movement. Let’s do it and do it now and let the liberal repubs go away- look at the stats on why the repubs lost- “lost their way”, “not conservative enough” and “economic incomepetence”- Newt would certainly know how to resolve those!