« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Rick Perry, our next President

It wasn’t that long ago that what I now predict as inevitable would have been unthinkable. A few months back, Gov Perry was wrestling with a Texas-sized budget shortfall, Trump was at the top of the primary polls, and when asked, Perry responded that he lacked an interest in running for President.

At this time, what America desperately needs is an economic policy that works for America, that restores American jobs, American manufacturing, American economic strength and growth. With 9% unemployment and an economy that is flatlining – it’s the jobs, stupid. Perry’s slogan “Get America WORKING again” is the correct counterpart to the failures of Obama. The Obama experiment has failed. The candidate we need is one who will challenge fundamentally the whole failed edifice of massive deficits, Obamacare mandates and Government control, the over-spending and over-regulating, and the failed Keynesian ‘stimulus’ claims.

In just one week, Perry has done more than any candidate since Trump to get under the Obama team’s skin, and he has done it on the right issues and right grounds: It’s jobs, it’s spending, it’s the debt, it’s the deficit.

Why Perry and not Bachmann, Romney, Cain, or even Palin? There are points to recommend other candidates, but only one candidate can tout such successful, conservative, long-standing executive branch governance:

  • 10 years of experience as Governor of one of the largest and most job-creating states in the nation.
  • A consistent pro-life, pro-gun and pro-traditional marriage record.
  • Presided over 10 years of balanced budgets, including two times where Texas was faced with serious shorfalls, and despite the usual liberal handwringing and demands to deplete the Texas rainy day fund and raise taxes, Perry and the Republicans in the Texas lege did neither, keeping the spending in check.
  • Passed tort reform and presided over other policies that have been business-friendly and helped Texas lead in job creation.

Perry hits the right spots in both being Tea Party fiscal-conservative  (a la Bachmann, Cain) while also having the executive Governing experience to tout a record (a la Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels, etc). Voter don’t need to choose between a moderate ex-Governor versus a conservative with thin governing experience. Perry is more ready to be President than Obama. Sarah Palin, if she does not run, will likely endorse him as she endorsed him in 2009.

There will be much more that Perry will bring to the table. Sure, there is  plenty for his detractors to bring. You don’t be Governor of a big state for 10 years without some questionable decisions or controversy, and already the liberal media knives are out for Perry, pouncing on every statement. But there is something else Perry can bring besides a record of conservative governance that should satisfy the braod swath of conservative Republican voters. Perry can fight, and he can win.

As the survivor of multiple campaigns, Perry has learned what worked and what didn’t work. Back in 2009,  Perry was facing a challenge from Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison.  To many, and early polls suggested, he was a goner. But in July 2009,  I predicted a Perry victory and that KBH would stay in the Senate.  I was right. On April 15th, 2009, I joined fellow citizens in Austin at a Tea Party. Two statewide officials were there – Michael Williams (Railroad Commissioner, who is now running for Congress in Texas CD-25), and Governor Rick Perry. Gov Perry got heat for ‘secession’ comments, but his support of that “Tea Party” rally and others helped solidify his position with the voters longing for leaders to stand up to DC; he ran and won the GOP primary by running against Washington DC (and Kay “bailout” Hutchison). When EPA tried taking over Texas regulators and overriding their rules, Texas fought back and sued; Perry took Obama to task over the Federal failures to secure the border;  Perry said no to the ‘race to the top’ funding with strings; and Perry refused to go along with the Federal govt to change unemployment compensation to chase stimulus dollars.  Perry has shown the stark policy differences we face and in the process got a lot of political mileage by standing up to the Washington leviathan.  Perry stood with Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott as he joined with other state AGs in the lawsuit against Obamacare.

When I predicted a Perry victory in July 2009, I did it in response to an interesting statistic – Perry’s twitter followers far outnumbered Kay Bailey Hutchison’s; Perry tapped the social networks, online media, and developed  an innovative and efficient 2010 campaign, built around a compelling message. A new breed of campaigns on the Republican side in 2010  took lessons from Obama’s 2008 campaign and leverage social media and related technologies. It’s both telling and instructive that Rick Perry used the Redstate gathering to announce for President. It’s a recognition of Redstate and online activism as a nerve center for conservative thought and action.

Perry has the record, he has the conservative credentials and record, he has a good record on jobs to tout a better way, and he has the campaign skills and organizational savvy to go the distance and win both the primary and the general election. That is why in one short week, he has bested every other candidate, included supposed front-runner Romney, in polls; that is why the media and Obama campaign have already started attacking him. Some are noticing that the Obama and media attacks don’t hurt him, and for an interesting reason. These attacks are ignoring the electorate. George Will, when asked if Perry was smart to go to the Houston prayer rally, replied “Very smart.”  Jon Huntsman is dismayed that Perry doubts global warming? Wow, is Huntsman also on the Perry payroll? that’s like giving Perry free advertising.

In 1920, Warren Harding won one of the biggest blowout elections in the 20th century, running at a time to economic despair on a campaign of a “return to normalcy”. What Harding and his voters saw in the Wilson-era enlarged Federal government was an abberation from the American way. Not only did President Harding restore the balance – ‘normalcy’ -  reducing taxes, spending and Federal Government interference left over from a regulated WWI economy – he restored the economy and set off, with his successor Calvin Coolidge, the Roaring Twenties. In the 1980s, President Reagan presided over a similar restoration after the malaise and stagflation of the Carter era.

As 2012 approaches, the American cycle of experimenting with liberalism, experiencing its failures, then rejecting it, will have to happen again. There has been a lot of talk in recent years of the “new normal”, but there is nothing normal about massive deficits, 9% unemployment, and the downgrading of our credit. America as we knew it seems to be slipping away. We have one last opportunity to make it right in 2012, to restore America’s greatness and to “get America Working again.” Rick Perry will win the Republican nomination on his combined strength as a solid conservative and an experience and successful governor. He will run against the failed Obama economy by touting Texas success and pointing the way to a more successful model – creating jobs, opportunity and private sector growth, instead of deficits, dependency and government control. Obama will try to make Perry the next GWBush III, but he will fail to sway voters with it. Rick Perry will pull one from the Reagan playbook and ask: “So how’s that last 4 years of change worked out for you?”

For all these reasons, Texas Governor Rick Perry will be our next President.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Scope

    I wish I could reco this diary 10 times. It is a must read for those that support Perry, and, also for those still sitting on the sidelines still undecided. Excellent job.

  • Flagstaff

    He’s Competent, Credible, and Conservative to a greater degree than any other candidate in the race so far, and also more than those whose supporters are making some noises about their guys getting in soon. His Character appears above reproach.

    His competency will be on display for the rest of the campaign, and he has already made a couple of mis-steps. They won’t hurt him if he doesn’t repeat them. He has ten years of history as governor of Texas–again, if there were any BIG problems they will come out in the coming months, because both Obama and the other Republicans will be looking for them. Obama will be reduced to pointing out that he has no foreign policy experience, as if both BHO and the other Republicans were born with it. (Huntsman is the only one who has some, and he is an incredible political loser and completely irrelevant.)

    Ten years as governor and several tough but winning election campaigns give him plenty of credibility. He can’t be accused of being only a “half-term governor” or of “never being elected to any office” or of “never having run a major enterprise” or of “being a quitter.” The question will only be, “Did he handle his challenges the right way?” and it will be asked by both left and right.

    His conservatism is yet to be proven. Although some folks are ready to jump on the bandwagon and take it for granted, EXAMPLES of his conservative behavior will have to become more overtly public. We all know there are Texans who say he isn’t conservative enough for them–they just say it with different words. Whenever they get the chance, the Obamanoids will be trying to paint him as too conservative, while his Republican opponents will paint him any way that fits their purposes. The public record SHOULD eventually tell us the truth. Right now, there are still some question marks that need to be erased, and Mitt Romney can tell him that it’s hard to erase them–especially in the eyes of someone who doesn’t want to see them erased.

    I don’t know of any attempts to smear his character. If he’s made any mistakes, I hope they come out before the real campaigning gets under way, giving him time to gracefully withdraw. What I really hope is that he has no such issues.

    My observation is that he’s the real deal, combining the conservatism of someone just a bit to the left of Bachmann/Palin, with political executive experience giving him credibility that exceeds every other candidate (including Romney). He doesn’t match Romney or Cain in business experience, a shortcoming that can be explained away and made up for by putting both of them in his eventual cabinet. Although he is an up-front Christian, he doesn’t have anti-gay or pro-choice or non-vanilla sectarian Christian positions in his past to explain, AFAIK. He WAS a Democrat, but “so was Reagan,” and his Texas went the other way from RomneyCare with tort reform. He is NOT a compassionate conservative. In all, I think he bridges the gap between Bachmann/Palin and Romney, doing almost everything they do better than they do it.

    I expect him to win the nomination: the only person who really comes close to him on all fronts is Sarah Palin, and although I predicted two months ago that she was going to get in, I hope that instead she simply stays out and gives advice and counsel to all the candidates. She is one tough cookie and would make a heck of an Energy Secretary.

  • acat

    I’m thinking along similar lines.

    To borrow from Silky Pony Edwards, there are two Americas – there’s the America for whom the last liberal president is a life lesson, and the America who think the next liberal president sounds great… but who don’t see why “we’re rich enough to afford this”…

    One other point. Regardless of who the Dems put up in 2012 – and you know the Dems in the Senate are seeing “DOOM!” in their polling, they may try to push Obama under his own bus – Perry wins.

    Mew

  • jaykali

    It was the arab spring or Bushes tax cuts from 10 years ago or the boogeyman.

    And how is it that now 3 years away from the housing crisis Republicans still get 100% of the 2008 meltdown blame? At best it was a split, since both parties let money get too easy. But somehow the media narrative that 2008 was all Republicans fault has stuck. Unfortunate bc that ‘ditch’ we were in in 2008 is now a canyon.

  • RealQuiet

    Lots of good stuff here. Also, check out the negative vetting that Think Progress has done via HotAir. Their stuff is so week. Trying to say that most of the jobs formed in Texas are government jobs blah blah blah. They are so desperate to throw mud on Perry’s jobs success in Texas and the other personal stuff they are trying to conjure up is so off the wall.

    http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/21/quotes-of-the-day-778/

  • trutexan

    between him and the other candidates. Before Perry, it was kind of hard to tell the others apart. Pawlenty could go after Bachman on the fact he believes she hasn’t done anything, but they are both good conservative legislators with basically the same platform. The “global warming is not man-made” separates him from those who want to give such a notion a nod, and “appleal Obamacare” puts him miles away from Romney. It just doesn’t get much better than that. Bachman isn’t getting much air time anymore as Perry has effectively “sucked all the air out of the room” and I’m sure she’s pretty steamed about that. But I’m with you and believe this guy IS going to be our next president – pure and simple. And thank God. I just keep remembering him shoving that letter about border security in Obama’s hand at the Austin airport and get a chill down my leg!

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    Especially now that the leftist-media complex has gone into full apoplexy-mode since the man announced a week ago;– I fully expect to wake up in a week or two to find out the Rick Perry was John Wayne Gacy’s helper and gay lover, splashed all over Page One of the NYT. ANYONE who is this despised so early by so many of our Leftists Deep Thinkers is A-OKAY in my book.

    But, I will chest my cards for the nonce. I need to see how things morph on the Rick Perry front in the next month or two. But, so far, so good.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    First, I like the way you think about judging candidates, the 4 C’s. The way I put it, it’s character, competence and vision.

    Perry has strength and weakness in being a long-time politician. A former Air Force vet, he’s been in public office continuously since the 1980s, serving in state-wide office since 1990 and serving as Texas Governor for 10 years, longer than anyone in Texas’ history to my knowledge. If you want a real political neophyte and outsider, go with Cain. But it’s Perry’s strength for sure to have years of experience navigating a hostile press and Democrat opponents and campaigning (Yes, the big-city press in Texas is liberal too.) It’s also a strength to have a solid record to tout, extensive enough that he cant be dismissed as a lightweight. (They will try, but it wont succeed.)

    Perry is MORE conservative than Palin, for sure. He is more out front against globaloney warming nonsense, his record as Governor shows he was willing to really cut spending in ways not shown in Palin’s shorter record. You may not know Perry’s record, but those in Texas do – he has signed prolife bills, he has passed ‘castle doctrine’ bills, he has vetoed spending, he has passed tort reform etc. You are correct that Perry is not a Bush-ite ‘compassionate conservative’, but a Texas conservative. He IS the right-wing cowboy the left said GWB was (but really wasnt).

    Perry’s one area of weakness in terms of conservative policy is immigration. The Texas business (cheap labor) lobby has stopped tough immigration laws in Texas, and Perry has used ‘secure the border’ as a cover for this weakness. He talks tough but that is all. On most other issues, he is solid.

    “We all know there are Texans who say he isn?t conservative enough for them?”
    There are Texans who will declare ANY candidate isn?t conservative enough for them, except maybe the one candidate they support. Look at his whole record and you will find nitpicks and potholes in a record that is mostly solid conservative. Whatever.

    It’s fallacious to think of Sarah Palin as more conservative than Perry. It’s better to think of Perry as the Texas cowboy version of Palin – conservative, a bit populist, good politician, likely to get a ‘dummy’ label undeservedly applied. (How is it we know Perry’s grades but not Obama’s?). And with the country/Christian/red-meat style that drives liberal latte drinkers nuts. Perry WILL get the Palin/Quayle/whatever-hits-the-wall treatment from the left.

    But Perry does have a clear advantage over every other potential candidate and that is his long-standing Texas governing experience.

    “I don?t know of any attempts to smear his character.” They are out there. This guy has won 6 or 7 statewide races and have been vetted more than anyone running. Character is important, but don’t let smears sway you.

  • Michael Moody

    This is meant as a genuine question, not an attack masked as a question. One of the attack points that’s come out against Perry is that the Texas debt has grown faster than the U.S. debt. That seems to stand in stark contrast to claims that he balanced a budget 10 straight years. So what’s the lie in the attack?

  • Scope

    that the budget must be balanced. This year there were large cuts in order to avoid a deficit, and, the $9 billion dollars remained in the rainy day fund untouched. They are the facts which I’m sure others here will expand on.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    when they say “Texas debt” they are including state AND LOCAL debt. the lie in the attack is to hold a Governor responsible for local and school board debt.

    State debt is actually doing fine. They got their credit rating UP-graded thanks to fiscal conservative policies. And the rainy day fund is still there.

    Texas population has boomed. It’s grown more than other states. When that happens you have to build schools and those school boards issue bonds to build those schools. a per capita basis would show the real trend. But in any case, it’s odd to hold a governor responsible for added school bond debt due to his growing state.

  • pttx333

    re Arne Duncan/dems never-ending hit pieces – this one about Texas schools and how harshly the students are treated. Huh?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/in-texas-schools-a-criminal-response-to-misbehavior/2011/08/04/gIQA5EG9UJ_print.html

  • Flagstaff

    “…he exudes calm confidence, strength, security, manliness…and I bet he doesn’t cross his legs like a girl when he sits.”

  • perry4prez

    @Freedoms Truth, I agree with you that Perry is a tad weak on immigration, but..it’s Texas. There are a lot of legal immigrants there, and small businesses probably depend on illegal aliens for menial labor. This needs to change over the long run, but I can see how Perry might make it a lower priority than responding to the needs of businesses, which is our most important challenge now. It’s easy to be rock-solid on immigration when you’re in the frigid climes of Alaska or Minnesota!

  • Flagstaff

    in the public arena already would have forced any character issues to the surface. Obviously there haven’t been any smears that were effective.

  • h4ckrn00b

    all in all, so this might be 11 and 12. Yes, I steal from Douhat.

    but:
    -A consistent pro-life, pro-gun and pro-traditional marriage record.
    -anti-global warming and other anti-science stuff (their words)
    -his Dominionism is gonna come out more.
    These won’t sit well with the Independents.

    Dems are praying HARD for Perry, much harder for Bachman and hardest of all for Palin. A Dem coworker confessed that he’s gonna sent Bachman money.

    Perry’s biggest problem though, is that he’s trailing Obama by double digits in swing states like Ohio.
    ORamneyCare (w/e) is only 3 percent down.

    What is REALLY interesting is that Perry is as unlikely as Obama WAS in 2008
    Difference is that Perry got a 10 year record. Perhaps it’s easier being a blank slate?

    I think Huntsman or Christie called him “soft”, because the usual Texas stuff went his way, (“Texas is an easy state for Repubs, lotsa oil and weak Dems”), and he never did have to battle like they did. Christie would have been much better, but I guess he and Rubio are waiting on 2016…

  • Flagstaff

    because of a “low” rate of high school graduation in Texas, compared to just what I don’t know.

    Texas has the same problem we face in Arizona–a large contingent of schoolkids whose first language is not English and who don’t speak it well or at all. Arizona has addressed the problem at the state level, only to find resistance from local districts like Tucson. In any event that means comparing Texas to many other states is comparing kumquats to pomegranates.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    on his education statements. I can’t find the link I’m looking for and I’ve got run out, but bottom line, performance in Texas is far better than in Illinois and light years ahead of the city of Chicago where Duncan had direct responsibility for education. There were two specifics that really showed Duncan had no clue what he was talking about, the first was class size and it’s smaller in Texas, and the second was $ per pupil, and that was within a few dollars of each other.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    it was from Hotair and it’s worth reading the Hotair article and the link to the Dallas newspaper.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    the target of lots of smears. The difference with him is that he shoots back. See the flap over his Bernake comment and the beaten bloody Arne Duncan over the attack on education in TX. Oh, and there’s the flap about job growth in TX being all public sector not private, they buried that shot too.

  • izoneguy

    to flat out lie when it comes to Perry…..

    The trial lawyers are coming after Perry as well.

  • aesthete

    Whites and Asians in Texas perform at about the same level as their counterparts in other states (IL, WI, etc), but Texas’ minority groups (at least, Native Americans, Hispanics, and blacks) perform at least one standard deviation higher than the national average.

  • Flagstaff

    debunking Duncan.

  • aesthete

    this education record has very little to do with Perry. Get ready to see a lot of attacks on Texas in general, as opposed to Perry’s actual record of governance.

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    on this, the author made a special note that the Governor of Texas has very little direct impact on education in Texas. Arne Duncan on the other hand, was in charge of education in Chicago.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    … by Obama flunkies is about as dumb as Obama challenging Perry on who can shoot coyotes better.

    The liberal progressives are in a fine lather over the Perry. He’s the crazed, right-wing, tea-party, dumb-hick, corporate-suck-up, anti-reality, terrorist/treasonous/ anti-government secessionist, insert-stereotype here candidate.

    Which is what they would say about whoever is running anyway.

  • Flagstaff

    I said “smears that were effective.” So we agree.

    We both know that the kind of smear that has the most effect involves sex of some kind, any kind. Then, far behind, come malfeasance and misfeasance in office, cheating on some things out of office (e.g., military service commitments), and exhibiting racism, gay-bashing, ageism, or sexism, or making unwise statements about the above on tape.

    Almost anything else is ignored as just political differences.

  • aesthete

    Nt

  • gregorysstewart

    I run a group of small companies. The most successful ones demand the least of my attention.

  • Flagstaff

    School administration is out of control, worse than the students, and it’s not just Texas.

    When the ability to lay hands on a misbehaving student is taken away from school personnel, what are they supposed to do? They may have to call the police. But they have made their own beds with zero-tolerance rules, too. All zero-tolerance means is zero responsibility–for the school. Take it one step further, and you find a fear of lawsuits in a litigious society.

    Our lives are being screwed by a few a–holes who can’t wait to file a suit. Since you can’t tell who they are in advance, you have to treat everybody as if he is one of those people.

    That’s also part of the reason liberals can’t believe we citizens can carry a gun responsibly. They can’t imagine anybody being that responsible. And it is a great responsibility.

  • pttx333

    is unbelievable. I also blame parents for hog tying the police, the schools, neighbors, etc. – all too many of them always say “but he/she is such a good boy/girl and you are lying about what he/she did.” Back when I went to school, society was different in that if you got in trouble at school, you also were in trouble at home. And there were very few students who didn’t study, make good grades and go on to have very productive lives.

    We must bring down these unions. In my view, they are akin to the gestapo. For the life of me, I will never understand the libs’ lack of ability to reason or have a logical concept of situations.

    I used to shoot muzzleloaders in competition – what a lot of fun that was – and believe that all of us should be armed. Thank God I was brought up in and still live in Texas where we really haven’t had too many problems with gun control. Ye gods, we have more than enough gun laws on record.

    Blame all of these things on the nanny state – you know, we are all too stupid to even boil water so they are going to come up with yet a new law. BTW, can we kick Nanny Bloomie out of the repub party? (I’m only half joking.) He has ruined NYC. I’ll bet the voters wish they still had Rudy!

  • devereaux

    http://tinyurl.com/3wuxnkn

    Interesting article from Doug Bandow.

    Bandow worked as a special assistant to President Reagan. He’s now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Just wondering how valid your appeal to authority really is.

  • Scope

    is actually, from what I’ve read, is to call that person a an evil Jooooo. That’s where the term began, with the anti-semites.

    On the other hand, it probably isn’t as bad as what Ron Paul is considered, a neoliberal. See Jeffrey Lord’s excellent article at AmSpec. today that is some excellent history.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    It’s one of those fascinating terms that I’ve never commonly heard except as a depracatory epithet. I’d like to hear a definition.

  • perry4prez

    This is exactly the kind of Romney supporter who attacks Governor Perry and doesn’t understand that the attacks REFLECT WELL on him. We WANT a candidate who believes in American Exceptionalism not someone who will go around bowing to Saudi Princes and apologizing for America (well, maybe it is OK to apologize for O’Bumbling (LOL). And Rick Perry is a cowboy – GOOD! The cowboy is a symbol of America and our love of Liberty and our disdain for big government.

  • devereaux

    Not as valid as Bandow’s

    http://tinyurl.com/3mkhee9

  • williamjameson

    The Obamabots fear Perry more than they fear Romney. A recent poll suggested that 64% of conservatives were satisfied with the current crop of GOP candidates.

    Though simple polls are a glimpse in the window of time, that window is fogged over by angry liberals who want voters to think Obama and the Obamabots are the normal people whom everyone wants to be like. Yea right.

  • devereaux

    Better ask the Editor of the Weekly Standard Bill Kirstol because it was his father Irving that coined the phrase.

    http://tinyurl.com/k773

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    neoliberal is completely inappropriate as a description of libertarians no matter what you think of their foreign policy.

    Let’s just do away with both terms they are very questionable.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    also worked for Reagan. So did Paul Craig Roberts (who called for GWB’s impeachment over the Iraq War at one point). Let’s hear a reason to care about Bandow other than the fact that he had a government job when Reagan was President.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Just came with another appeal to authority argument.

    Oh well.

  • Scope

    This article, written by a http://spectator.org/archives/2011/08/23/ron-paul-and-the-neoliberal-re”>well respected conservative who also worked in the Reagan administration, lays it all out for you. Of course when Ron Paul’s name is mentioned, in any negative light, the neoliberals come running out of the cracks. Sunlight does that to cockroaches.

  • Scope

    Ron Paul is a neoliberal, he is not a conservative at all.

  • devereaux

    Because Doug Bandow has been at the American Spectator lots longer than Jeff Lord and says pretty much the exact opposite.

  • Scope

    devereaux has been here for quite some time arguing for, and defending Ron Paul. We need to make the distinction between the Obama liberals, and the Ron Paul neoliberals.

  • mikeymike143

    both groups have the same ”blame america” attitude

  • acat

    Pournelle had this to say (http://www.baen.com/chapters/axes.htm) on the subject.

    Just go read the whole thing.

    Mew

  • devereaux

    Was a liberal?? Because his views on foreign policy are the same as the Congressman from Texas

    I seem to remember a very young William F Buckley calling Russell Kirk the father of modern conservatism.

  • devereaux

    Jack Hunter over at The American Conservative magazine has a pretty good explanation

    http://tinyurl.com/3z5jhar

  • Aaron Gardner

    Seriously.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Putting aside the dubious attempts for appeals to authority and even more durious “views are the same”, Russell Kirk is irrelevent to the issues of today’s foreign policy, since he is long gone and is unable to tell us what he would think TODAY.

    The fact remains that the Ron Paulite foreign policy is definitely OUTSIDE the *modern* conservative American Reaganite consensus of “peace through strength” and use of intervention when it is in the US national interest. You are free to not like that consensus, but not free to change facts and pretend that’s not been a part of Reaganite conservatism.

    The Reagan 3-legged stool brought social cons, fiscal cons, and national security cons together: free markets/limitd govt, strong national defense, family values.

    Some paleo-con/Paulastinians/neo-isolationists attack any robust foreign policy as “neo-con” and in the process distort reality of foreign policy and abuse the term. The one person qualified to define neo-conservatism is the one who invented the term, Irving Kristol. It’s distressing and disturbing the hate some self-proclaimed conservatives have for ‘neo-con’, like its a code word or swear word or something. Thats not how rational and reasonable people think.

    If we want to debate the 2012 candidates on foreign policy we need to check the baggage of over-used terminology and old disgruntlements and old fault lines at the door, and just discuss what America needs to do NOW and who will have the right leadership to be the leader of the free world.

  • Scope

    I don’t know if you read the linked article or not, but, the author referred to Ron Paul as a neoliberal, not all libertarians. He aggues that Paul is not a conservatie nor is he a libertarian. As I like to say, Paul has cherry picked from different ideologies, and has been rejected by all, as not being one of them. I did not take it that the author called libertarians neoliberals. He refers to Paul’s positions on foreign policy, and his stances on the social issues, and likens his positions to be closer to the liberal positions.

  • Scope

    If I am not mistaken he worked for the Paul campaign directly at one time, but, is now his blogger in chief so to speak. His articles are often on the Daily Brawler, arguing in favor of Paul. Jack Hunter is biased.

  • Scope

    posted at the American Spectator. Many times one author posting an article arguing against another author’s article. And the subjects they argue about aren’t always about Ron Paul.

    Heck Pam Geller’s hit piece on Perry was posted at the American Thinker, which is a site I read every morning, and consider conservative.

  • devereaux

    At the end of his life William F Buckley suggested Bush might be iimpeached for the Iraq war. Or if we had a parliamentary system he would have been forced to resign.

    Not sure why all the attacks on Bandow. He’s been a good conservative for over 30 years writing especially about religion and Christianity. Widely published in National Review, American Spectator and the Wall Street Journal. Also at the Acton Institute one of the best Christian websites out there.

    www.acton.org

    I knew this article would start a good discussion and it should. Defeating Obama in 2012 is too important and that’s why Perry’s views on issues should be fair game. The American people don’t want anymore wars. They are worried sick about their jobs and what the future holds for their children.

  • devereaux

    He got is start as a local talk show host in Charleston South Carolina and as a columnist for the Charleston City Paper.

    He moved on to the American Conservative magazine.

    If you don’t like Jack Hunter’s explanation of NeoConservatism then how about Timothy Carney Senior Political Columnist at the Washington Examiner and regular on the McLaughlin group the oldest political talk show on TV since 1982

    Exit NeoCons Stage Left

    http://tinyurl.com/3uqgpzd

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    If you have to appeal to somebody else’s authorite’; both your arguement and your ability to articulate said argument utterly suck! Farewell.

  • Flagstaff

    Mr. Ed Shultz and Arne Duncan may have been vying to be first.

  • radicalrighty

    .

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    That is a double endorsement to me.

  • izoneguy
  • pttx333

    by Rosslynn Smith at American Thinker – a funny and enlightening story quoting Kinky’s support of Rick Perry. For one thing, I didn’t know Perry plays the drums or that he and Kinky are friends. Kinky is quite a character – funny as well as a good guy, just don’t particularly care for his politics. Good read and some comments are good also.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/08/rick_perry_a_mensch.html

  • keysconservative

    “Which is what they would say about whoever is running anyway.”

    Which is exactly why we should ignore the Lib Media and nominate the most conservative candidate with executive experience we can find. The Libs are so transparent. We already know who they want us to nominate-Huntsman. As Krauthammer said, “Huntsman is the liberals idea of what a Republican should be.” We fell for their ruse in ’08 with McCain and look at what happened. They tore him up. Even if we nominated Huntsman the MSM would make him look like a right wing radical. It’s time to stand our ground and tell the MSM to go pound sand.
    Perry/Rubio 2012

  • h4ckrn00b

    McCain failed cos he went Palin nuts.
    Palin did sink him.
    If she had been what she seemed like, a young Republican lady leader, with a ‘spotless’ record, then mccain would have had a good chance.
    As it was, even now he came close.
    But Palin she wasn’t that at all
    I don’t think it was the thing about the bridge to nowhere, and certainly not her kids, (even though many people still don’t believe that kid is hers)
    It was …. wow, the stuff she SAID and did NOT say!
    It was the Couric interview and that other interview where she couldn’t name the Bush doctrine.
    I guess the soccer moms left in droves
    I am not attracted to ignorance covered by fake-regularness or whats the word.

    Bigger picture: I think its gonna be Romney because most rightwingers are not that emotional, they’re coldly calculating that he’s more electable than Perry.
    They picked McCain because his image was that he was moderate. Kind of anti-bush too.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Especially the line about taking CharlieSheen over Obama. Winning!

    When you get an endorsement from a guy who ran against you once, and might well have been a Democrat nominee for whatever-post-the-Texas-Dems-were-desperate-about, it tells you Perry’s ok on the personal relations side. Perry wouldn’t have gotten this if he was a jerk, and it’s telling that he mentions Perry reaching out to him after the 2006 election.

  • aesthete

    vis a vis foreign policy is that their idiocy prevents a broader discussion within the conservative movement of what, exactly, a conservative foreign policy should constitute. People like Kristol are advocating for wars in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and other countries *simultaneously* as part of a quixotic bid to democratize the third world by hook or crook — that’s insane, especially at a time when we should be reducing expenditures. Considering that Kristol et al have Presidential candidates like Pawlenty listening to them, that’s highly problematic, and the Paulites are just getting in the way of a rational discussion on foreign policy.

  • h4ckrn00b

    Whats that texas stuff about lending and mortgages?

    They say that Texas actually has tougher laws on lending and stuff, so the housing bubble crisis wasn’t as severe as it was elsewhere.
    Is that something government did right?

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Conservatives shouldnt be for empire-building or global policing, OTOH, we need a robust stance to defend our security and freedom. There’s a balance, and there’s a need for a conservative discussion, outside the circle of friends of Bill Kristol or those who dig US power.

    But we cant have a real discussion with kooky Bilderberg conspiracy theories or using neo-con as a swear word.

    bottom line … “the Paulites are just getting in the way of a rational discussion on foreign policy.” … I agree.