« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Post-election memo to the bedwetters

We lost an election, but don't let it make us lose our ideals

Dear Conservatives Bedwetters:

You know who you are, talking about how Republicans need to get hip with tax increases, amnesty, gay marriage and abortion-on-demand. You are shell-shocked and babbling about Obamacare as the law of the land. If only we could be more like the Democrats, you lament. You want to throw in the towel: Give them everything they want, let them stew in it.  I never recalled the Democrats or liberals ever throwing in the towel on their precious ideology, or deciding to become Republican lite, when THEY were thumped in any election.

We thought that 4 years would be enough Obama economic failures to prove to voters that big government tax, borrow and spend doesnt work. We were out-sold by charlatans that preached that Obama needed more time.

Well, he’s got more time now. And now the stock market sold off, realizing that Obama’s win only means more tough economic sledding. I am also reading of how growth estimates for next quarter are a miniscule 1.5%. The Obama economic malaise and depression continues and his political victory now will only make his policy failures more evident.

The pain of loss you feel now, and the economic pain we all will feel in the next few years will be a hard lesson, but the lesson will deepen the learning. We dont yet know if America is ‘too far gone’ or what we can salvage, but I suggest you urge your 30 Republican Governors, your Republican Speaker and his House majority, and all the other Republicans in office to Hold The Line, and to continue to stand for smaller government, fiscal responsibility, economic freedom, and the Constitution … BECAUSE THEIR SERVICES WILL BE NEEDED IN THE NEAR-TERM FUTURE AND WE WILL NEED AMERICA TO STILL BE ONE PIECE WHEN THEY ARE AGAIN CALLED TO LEAD.

The useless and counterproductive  post-election “shut up you stupid conservatives” calls from some quarters, are calling us to respond to false perceptions and not to true realities. I would urge the bedwetters to take a deep, deep breath, and let the ugly reality of the Pyrrhic Obama victory sink in.

The reality is that Obama’s next 4 years will be about paying the piper for his failed Keynesian schemes that have added $6 trillion in debt and will add $8 trillion more by the end of the decade. We added debt to fix the economy – it didnt work and now we have a bigger mess, a weak economy AND a huge and growing debt. The ratings agencies are already itching for further downgrades, and the negative impact on the economy from the Obamacare tax hikes and other tax increases is about to hit home.

People voted for 4 more years of the economic mis-management and malaise that Obama has presided over so far. They voted for a status quo government that in August 2011 couldnt even craft a budget deal without kicking the can further – to now, where we face a so-called ‘fiscal cliff’. They voted to re-elect a guy with the worst jobs record in a generation, who pulled  his 2nd term agenda out 2 weeks before the election – it was 20 pages of pictures and bromides.There is no leadership and there is no way out of our $1 trillion deficits without the kind of hard choices obama refuses to make. Funny, but we just had an election and 3 debates and hardly AND of the debate, discussion was about the simple question: “What would you do to balance the budget?”  As if all those hard choices are dis-connected from the voter’s choice of a few days ago.

The stock market has fallen 5% since Obama won re-election precisely because he  offers no real solutions to the budget problems, his tax increases in Obamacare hit Jan 1 and now wont be repealed and he insists on raising taxes on investors and small business owners next year. So will the EPA regs he held back for political reasons.  These will hurt our economy to the point where a 2013 recession is now possible.  Good luck with that. The Obama voters have made their bed and unfortunately we all have to sleep in it.

What this all means is economic malaise akin to the 1970s or even worse. It means the Obama Depression continues. We may see average growth in 2013 and 2014 be no better than 2%, putting Obama’s 6 years in office down in the basement of economic performance.

Yet we hear a different story from the bedwetters – they forget that this election we wanted to be about the economy. They focus on the bright shiny object of “social issues”, forgetting the simple blunt fact that – if indeed we lost this year on social issues, it was because we ran away from it rather than making a coherent stand. In 2004, abortion was about “partial birth abortion”, which 2/3rds of Americans think is horrific and should be outlawed. In 2012, Obama kept up the drumbeat on birth control, creating a strawman that Republicans failed to rebut; and they used the ‘rape’ comments to make an anchor of the also unpopular position of outlawing abortion in cases of rape.

Another Redstate Diary put it this way: “debt and deficit are critical issues, but do not resonate for most Americans they way social issues do.”

That’s like saying a month before Pearl Harbor “The wars in Europe and the Pacific dont resonate the way the latest Frank Sinatra song does.”  If they dont resonate, its because nobody has connected the dots between our economic misery and our fiscal mismanagement. A decade of lost growth under Obama might be enough to do that, but it would certainly behoove Republicans to point out Obama’s economic failures and propose a better way to avoid the coming pain.

That diary and other post-election analysis keys off of trying to chase perceptions derived from reading exit poll tea leaves.  “Many Americans perceive …” … a lot of things. Some of those perceptions are wrong. Obama’s campaign in particular took advantage to cultivate incorrect perceptions about Romney, Republicans and the state of our nation. He won a narrow victory in an ugly negative campaign on that basis. It will behoove us to correct those incorrect perceptions, both by arguing against the currently dominant paradigm and fighting to win hearts and minds to it. it will behoove us also not to throw away the principles we stand for just because we only won 48% of the vote this time instead of 51%.

So even though abortion kills a human being,  we are told to put that crazy pro-life Aunt back in the attic, that barbaric practice is now something the left has ‘won’.  Team Obama ‘won’ nothing but a perception war by ignoring what abortion is and because some of our guys said some stupid things that were taken out of context.

Here’s lousy advice:  Give up on all the Republican agenda items, embrace the Democrat ploy of pandering, graft and “how to get credit for what government gives them” and the Obama voters will like us more. Reality check: Given the choice between two Democrats, voters pick the real ones every time.

If there are some voters out there more concerns about free birth control than about our $16 trillion debt, then its their failure to understand and our failure to educate and communicate. If the Republicans do continue to fail to communicate, reality has a way of biting people in the butt sooner or later.

The danger with Obama’s big government ways has always been that under Obama we would go the way of the economically-weak Euro-socialist states, with permanently large Welfare spending, statism, high taxes and economic weakness, but unable to fix the economic weakness because the statism is locked in by the political patronage system. Mark Steyn has opined as much, and many of us fear that Obamacare is the tipping point.  Claims that Obama won from only the ‘moocher’ vote are false; that’s a part of his coalition but the greater part was ordinary folks who do work but got sold a bill of goods about who cares for them more; or bought some lie about ‘war on women’ or other slander. Slander and Pander Show.

We don’t know if we are past that point of no return. So don’t act like this is the end.  We do know this: There’s  NOTHING to lose when you stand for what you believe in, fight the good fight, and remember why you are doing what you are doing. We believe in universal principles that worked yesterday, work now, and will be ready to work in the future when the people are ready to turn to them. That’s why I repeat this advice for you to tell your Republican office-holders:

  … tell all the other Republicans in office to Hold The Line, and to continue to stand for smaller government, fiscal responsibility, economic freedom, and the Constitution … BECAUSE THEIR SERVICES WILL BE NEEDED IN THE NEAR-TERM FUTURE AND WE WILL NEED AMERICA TO STILL BE ONE PIECE WHEN THEY ARE AGAIN CALLED TO LEAD.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • SirGladiator

    You’re exactly right. America is now a majority Pro-Life nation, and yet we allowed the left to use the abortion issue to its own advantage, turning out droves of pro-abortion voters (the exit polls showed a +23 pro-abortion advantage, and while that is due in part to the fact that certain pro-life states werent polled, the fact is Obama turned out WAAAY more pro-abortion votes than Romney turned out Pro-Life votes, because he didnt even try). We ran solely on the economy, which was absurd. Of course the economy was the primary issue, and we were right to pay it a lot of attention. But when innocent lives, and the institution of marriage, are under attack, you ignore that at your own peril as a Party, and we paid the price. Of course theres plenty of blame to go around, the failed GOTV effort gets lots of attention, the dismal failure among hispanic voters, but ultimately its the fact that Pro-Life voters stayed home that made more of a difference than anything. America is, according to Gallup, a +8 Pro-Life Country. Even if that poll had been wrong, and it was only +5, then by having a turnout that was just split even, pro-life vs pro-abortion voters, we’d have won the election in a LANDSLIDE. Its absurd to run away from the social issues, ESPECIALLY when they’re winning issues.
    Instead, we let the left go nuts, the whole ‘war on women’ thing, the ‘contraception’ thing, and of course the insanity of the Akin and Murdock rape comments, all resulted in the pro-abortion forces turning out in unexpectedly large numbers, while nobody bothered to even try to turn out the Pro-Life voters. Turns out we needed ‘em, we needed ‘em REAL bad. State after state we needed the Pro-Life voters, and didn’t get them. We didn’t just lose the Presidency because of it, we lost countless House and Senate races because of it. We as a party cannot be afraid of any issue, economic or social. We should be proud to be the party of Life, quite frankly we should’ve been proud back when it was a minority viewpoint because it was the right thing to do, and now that its a majority among Americans its not just the right thing to do to stand for Life, its the right thing politicially as well. Of course we need to stop the insane comments by people like Akin and Murdock, we need people who actually sound sane when they express their Pro-Life views, but so long as they do that (and obviously 99.9 percent of all our candidates do), then we’re going to win and win big.

  • dajeeps

    I agree with most of this, but I am left with one nagging question: What the heck are we to do about the out of touch inner circle – the ones who did all the arm twisting to get their boy nominated and now are blaming their own failures on not being enough like Democrats? People couldn’t vote for a modern version of Reaganism because they heard very little of it during the campaign. They heard very little of it because the big government types calling the shots of course don’t believe in it and wouldn’t implement it again.

    I can’t keep going on like this. The strategy of holding my nose in the voting booth to keep from getting “transformed” is now about as sustainable as Obama’s spending habits.

    • SirGladiator

      There’s only one thing we can do with them, defeat them in primaries. They’re as pro-abortion and anti-marriage as the liberals, they just don’t always come right out and say it. They’ve been getting the better of us lately, there’s no way around that, and as long as they keep nominating folks like McCain and Romney we’re going to keep losing. Eventually we’ve got to stop splitting our Conservative vote so many ways that the moderate/liberal candidate wins, but thats far easier said than done. Once somebody figures that part out, we’ll be most of the way there to reclaiming the White House in 2016. Until then, we’ve got State and Local primaries to win in 2014, because we’re in for some massive gains, and we want to be the ones in position to take advantage of that, just like in 2010.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      “What the heck are we to do about the out of touch inner circle – the
      ones who did all the arm twisting to get their boy nominated and now are
      blaming their own failures on not being enough like Democrats?”

      Funny thing is – they are the bedwetters!

      Two elections in a row we have nominated and ran moderate Republicans. And twice now they have failed badly. They fail to energize the base, lose, and then blame the very base for their own failure. We have serious issues with Republican unity and a fraying coaliation, and the last thing we need is the long knives out for one part or another in the party, including the ‘inner circle’ types.

      Go figure.

      In the meantime, clip-n-save for your favorite bedwetter.

      • dajeeps

        I guess you missed my point, but it is my fault that it isn’t more clear. I am with conservatives. I will support them no matter where they are – and I sharpen that point to the last period. We are the last line of defense. It doesn’t matter about these other guys in saving whatever we can out of the rubble of their failure. You know what the loss means, or you wouldn’t have written this. And so inquiring minds really want to know – what about them.

        • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

          I dont have a good answer but I am with Sir Gladiator: defeat them in the primaries.

      • commonsenseobserver

        I can imagine why we wouldn’t be too happy with people who voted for John McCain then couldn’t be bothered to vote in 2012 in the name of some new found love for “purity”.

  • commonsenseobserver

    I can tell why the Democrats didn’t want to throw in the towel after 2004- they knew that personal accounts and immigration reform, if enacted, would work and become popular, even if they didn’t actually “work” in the Democrats’ view.

  • rustyoldgarand

    ” I never recalled the Democrats or liberals ever throwing in the towel on their precious ideology, or deciding to become Republican lite, when THEY were thumped in any election.”

    I’m sorry, but this is false. What you describe is exactly what the democratic party did during the 80′s and early 90′s after comprehensive defeat by the Reagan coalition, and it brought them Bill Clinton, who was moderate by the standards of the left. “Know thine enemy”…not empty words. One of our biggest problems as a group is that we spend too much time fighting shadows, and not enough time fighting actual democrats.

    I don’t mean to suggest that we should abandon our values, but we must make an honest effort to understand exactly what we’re up against. It’s not a question of compromise, but of manuever. I’m a military man; assessing the capabilities of the enemy is part of my d.n.a., as is the understanding that many battles can be lost, and the war won. If you face defeat, you don’t lay down your gun, but do work on your aim.

    The first steps here are to refine our understanding of the enemy. We need to stop calling them marxists or islamophiles or whatever other nonsense labels get thrown around by histrionic idiots like D’Souza. I know what a marxist is, and obama is not that. He is something more subtle and insidious, and thus more difficult to defeat.

    • rickredfrog

      Quite correct. In 1984 Walter Mondale 1) advocated a general tax increase; 2) opposed the death penalty; and 3) favored banning sales of certain types of handguns. He lost 49 states.

      Since 1992 no Democratic presidential candidate has advocated tax increases on the middle class or any significant gun control, and none has opposed the death penalty. I have no doubt that in their hearts Clinton and Obama share Mondale’s views, but the Democrats have pretty much given up on these issues in order to make their candidates more palatable to the public at large.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      The Democrats also lost in 2000, 2002, and 2004, and kept moving left, not right. The Democrat party today has moved pretty far from the Clintonesque triangulations.

      Also, rickredfrog, on the #1, #2, #3 items, in 1993-1994, Clinton passed the assault weapons ban and the largest tax increase in modern times. So, his shift was more rhetorical than actual. He said what he needed to say to get elected. He said one thing, did another. A good liar.

      I recall a curious event on C-Span, where liberal Democrat Texas Gov Ann Richards was talking to a group in Harvard. This must have been the 1990s, and the death penalty came up, and she just replied, in a way that indicated some annoyance with those backwards Texas hicks, that there was nothing you could do about that issue in Texas. It was perfectly clear that they’d move on those issues if they could.

      Now, I would ask you, what 3 things did Romney say in this campaign that were akin to Mondale’s 3 items?

      “I don’t mean to suggest that we should abandon our values, but we must
      make an honest effort to understand exactly what we’re up against. It’s
      not a question of compromise, but of manuever.”

      I am all for that. What I am against is the hapless herd behavior of panicking or giving up principles where no such behavior is warranted. The worst people in our party at selling our values are the very RINOs who want to abandon our principles so readily. A case in point is the ‘drop the social issues’ crowd. We get it. They dont care about those issues. But in not caring, Romney failed to respond, to energize prolifers and to win back voters on it. It could have been his margin of victory but became his margin of defeat.

      That said, the conservatives often fall for the bright-shiny-object routine, and support impossible goals – like the Fair Tax, or Human Life Amendment or other ideas that will require a huge consensus that doesnt exist. Frankly, most of the ‘extremism’ in the Republican party is simply rhetorical excess by leaders responding to a distrustful base that wants to know “Are you really serious about this issue?” because we get lip service too often. So instead of solid pro-lifers we get the extreme prolifers talking about rape – MORE lip service.

      As a result we get the worst of both worlds, punished for being ‘extreme’ at the polls, but actually moving the ball not at all when in office. The patron Saint of this folly is the do-nothing libertarian perennial pres candidate Ron Paul. Do you know of a single thing the man actually did to enlarge freedom and cut government power in 20 years as a congresscritter? Ne neither.

      It would behoove conservatives to replace demanding adherence to strict positions of our leaders with more attention to support those pushing real, practical and actual policy changes that can win and will work to create positive change. More workhorses and fewer showhorses. It would help in building trust on this for our leaders to not sell out and be honest about what they are doing. Having show votes to repeal Obamacare while failing to actually get into the guts of the bill and rip it apart bit by bit is a case in point.

      • rustyoldgarand

        Agree 100%, on basically everything. We, as a party, have been taken over by a lot of big-talking charlatans. Real, honest, practical conservatives who are willing to get their hands dirty for the cause are few and far between. We get pumped up with exaggerated goals by a lot of talking heads who are mostly interested in our money, and then fail to achieve ANY goals because we have overshot the mark.
        Case in point: America hates late-term abortions. Even many democratic voters are disgusted by the very idea of it (proving, perhaps, that they’re not all bad), and yet…where are the federal laws against it? Why haven’t we succeeded in dramatically cutting back on the most barbaric forms of abortion? Because we’re still trying to overturn Roe v. Wade! Lack of realistic engagement with the other side, and with the american electorate, as a whole, has cost us much of the progress that might have been made.

      • rickredfrog

        FT, you asked for three Romney positions that were akin to Mondale’s:

        1. “The answer is self-deportation.” Retire this two-word phrase. It’s poison.

        2. Opposition to homosexual marriages and civil unions. This will no longer be an issue in 10-20 years. Romney’s position with regard to homosexuals was a big step forward on this (when he wasn’t busy being on both sides of the issue), but still leaves him (and the GOP) behind the curve.

        3. Signing the Grover Norquist pledge. The single most important thing that the next Republican presidential candidate could do to improve his prospects of getting elected is to tell Grover Norquist to go pound salt with that asinine pledge of his. I’m not saying that the candidate should run on a promise to raise taxes, but the idea that taxes should never, ever be raised on anyone, not even one cent, no matter what the reason, is not a winning position.

  • oldtownyankee

    I’m for standing the conservative ground and fighting.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Your second to last paragraph says it all. Now is precisely the time to stand tall and hold our ground and watch our enemies weaken and crumble to the ground. The truth never fails. Our principles are superior and — as long as we don’t betray them — we will come out the ultimate winners.

    Good job, Freedoms Truth.

    • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

      Thanks for positive feedback.

  • WmCraig

    No offense, but democrats will keep setting up conservative kill zones and fools will keep running into them with their mouth wide open until the entire party is destroyed in detail. Think about it. That is basically what happen this year. And in 2008

    Look at the map. We lost all the big states, you can’t win unless you win at least some of the big states and the open primary and caucus system will never yield a conservative candidate for national office. They can’t get through that system. Yes I know it was all about voter suppression by the Democrars. But it was the stupid conservative budget tricks that fueled all the negative ads that worked so well.

    For the record, I do not advocate surrender. Simply turning the tables on the Democrats. I am tired of seeing them lay traps for conservatives, knowing that conservatives are like a moth to light, they can’t resist. I don’t have much hope that we will suddenly start thinking strategically, but there is no hope if we don’t. It is time we simply drop our false defenses, positions that do nothing but reinforce democrat scare stories about or intransigence, and let the democrats run head long into the quicksand of their own policies. They will wear out their welcome far faster than we can educate the public.

    For the record, had the 2011 congress shut down the government I would have been happy, I don’t expect to reverse 100 years of growing progressive oppression without any suffering and that seems to be the excuse most people give for not standing our ground when we did have a mandate. There is a new political landscape, and new battles to be won. Refusing to leave the field where we were defeated will not lead to our victory, worse, squandering effort to build a Maginot line of impregnable conservative fortresses is a waste valuable energy. Let them move in a make a mess, like I said, they will wear out their welcome fastest if we give them the run of the place.

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Errol Christensen

  • Pingback: Salvatore Capek