« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Creating a Transparent Government

I know our current President has made a transparent government one of his campaign slogans. I am glad to hear it, but I am very skeptical that he actually means it in a non partisan way. He only means transparent on any dirt of Republicans they can find.

There have been many ways proposed to create a transparent government. An example is the earmark reform lip service in Congress that was anything but reform. However, I do think there is one way to get a truly transparent government. I propose a constitutional amendment. I know it won’t happen, but I would propose it just the same.

Now before I write it out here, I want everyone to know I am not a lawyer, nor do I have any legal training beyond doing my own taxes, and I call a CPA I grew up with for advice to make sure I get it right. So, please do not rip me apart for my lack of knowledge in this area. I am asking for advice to clean it up if you see any deficiencies.

Now with all that said, imagine conservatives across the country campaigning on promising to initiate this amendment and how the public will react to it.

All Legislation brought before Congress that contains provisions affecting taxation or spending, must be posted to the Congressional web site in searchable format in its entirety for no less than ten calendar days. The public posting of said legislation must occur before it is voted upon for final passage and sent to the president for signature.

Once said legislation is posted to the internet for public viewing, no changes to the legislation may occur with the exception of grammar and spelling changes that do not affect its meaning. If changes are made that affect the proposed legislation’s meaning in any manner, the legislation with its changes must be resubmitted for an additional 10 calendar days for public viewing on the internet before being voted upon by either chamber of Congress.

The ten day viewing period may be waived by The President of the United States and Congress in concert to legislation that pertains to a National Emergency or Natural Disaster. The first action is the President of the United States must declare a National Emergency or a Natural Disaster Area. The second action must be that the Congress in both chambers, by two thirds majority vote acknowledges the declared Disaster or Emergency to waive the viewing period. This must be done for each piece of legislation that is being considered for waving the viewing period.

This would do more to clean up government than a lot of other proposals would, but that is just my opinion.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Pingback: Nilda Zeman

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com LJ “Beaglescout” Miller

    If we’re talking about messing around with Amendments, I’d rather repeal the 16th and 17th. The 16th, which established the IRS, is what allowed the federal government to have a progressive tax system (just like Marx and Engels wanted). A flat tax would be legal under the plain constitution, though it would need to be collected by the states, a la the Fair Tax collected as a sales tax. The 17th Amendment, which changed the selection process for the Senate, unbalanced the American system. Formerly, the Senate was intended to represent the various states and act as a brake on the more populist House. After the 17th Amendment, the Senate became just like the House with longer terms. Since the 17th Amendment, the Federal government has exploded in size and intrusiveness, not only intruding in personal rights but taking over many of the states’ responsibilities and rights. In addition, since the 17th Amendment the Senate no longer effectively opposes the increasing hegemony of the judiciary, which is taking over the responsibility for legislating controversial issues from the actual legislature, which would rather not do anything controversial that might lose them votes. If the Senate were elected by the states, they would be able to take unpopular but virtuous stands that are now punished.

  • icbm

    although I like your other comments, too

    The 17th amendment was a big step toward ending our federalist system.

  • 1SGinTN

    Although I’m not so sure I like it as an amendment to the Constitution.

  • 1SGinTN

    nt

  • Wubbies World

    … even try to bring it up for a vote on the floor of either chamber. I say that in terms of this being a simple rule, legislation or amendment. I guess I am just being wishful in my thinking.

    Republican politicians are more interested in being loved by Obama and the media that they could care less about what the base voters want. A good reason for term limits, but that won’t happen either.