<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/diary/ryantanderson/2013/07/02/what-three-dissents-signal-for-marriages-future/feed</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:56:23 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>What Three Dissents Signal for Marriage’s Future</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Not only was the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act baseless and just plain wrong, you won’t learn much from reading Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion. Except that he thinks only bigotry can explain support for marriage as it was until the year 2000—a male-female union.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:00:48 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ryan T. Anderson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/ryantanderson/2013/07/02/what-three-dissents-signal-for-marriages-future-n48332</link></item></channel></rss>