AP featured image
This Wednesday, April 26, 2017, photo shows the Twitter app on a mobile phone in Philadelphia. Twitter says it is rolling out a 280-character limit to nearly everyone, ending the iconic 140-character restriction. Users tweeting in Chinese, Japanese and Korean will still have the original limit. That’s because writing in those languages uses fewer characters. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Growing up, we were taught, or eventually learned the hard way, that words matter. Good words, bad words, in-between words. All words matter (pun intended). But in the “inclusive” world of Black Lives Matter, some words matter more than others — and not in a good way.

Hence, for a black programmer at Twitter and eventually other members of the Twitter engineering team, a discussion began about the team’s use of words with “racist connections.”

Via CNET:

For Regynald Augustin, a black programmer at Twitter, the impetus for change arrived in an email last year with the phrase “automatic slave rekick.”

The words were just part of an engineering discussion about restarting a secondary process, but they prompted Augustin to start trying to change Twitter’s use of words with racist connections. Augustin was used to seeing the term “slave” in technical contexts. “But with ‘rekick’ — I was madder than I ever thought I’d be in the workplace,” he said.

First on his own and then joining forces with another engineer, Kevin Oliver, he helped spearhead an effort to replace terms like “master,” “slave,” “whitelist” and “blacklist” with words that didn’t hearken back to oppressive parts of United States history and culture. He recounted his thoughts at the time: “This has to stop. This isn’t cool. We have to change this now.”

And go about “changing this now” they did.

Here’s the team’s “what we’ve done so far” list:

  • Whitelist becomes allowlist
  • Blacklist becomes denylist
  • Master/slave becomes leader/follower, primary/replica or primary/standby
  • Grandfathered becomes legacy status
  • Gendered pronouns (for example “guys”) become folks, people, you all, y’all
  • Gendered pronouns (for example “he” or “his”) become they or their
  • Man hours becomes person hours or engineer hours
  • Sanity check becomes quick check, confidence check or coherence check
  • Dummy value becomes placeholder value or sample value

Wait — “y’all”? Why not “all y’all”?

The team suggested that more changes are coming at Twitter.

Twitter senior management supports the team’s effort. Via CNET:

“Inclusive language seeks to treat all people with respect, dignity, and impartiality,” said Twitter engineering chief Michael Montano in a June 25 email to all Twitter employees. “It is constructed to bring everyone into the group and exclude no one, and it is essential for creating an environment where everyone feels welcome.”

San Francisco-based CNET reporter Stephen Shankland couldn’t be happier about Twitter’s jettison of “racially fraught” terms in favor of far more “inclusive” alternatives. Just “listen” to the guy:

No one expects that changing technical terms will end centuries of racial injustice. But some people at technology companies, including Oliver and Augustin at Twitter, are pressing for the changes that are within their reach.

That includes the effort to replace racially fraught technology terms like “master” and “slave” that describe things like databases, software projects, camera flashes and hard drives.

“Racially fraught”? I still can’t get over that. And please explain to me how changing “sanity check” to “coherence check” changes anything?

Shankland says changing words doesn’t necessarily change underlying concepts, but that picking words carefully can make a difference.

Changing words doesn’t necessarily change the underlying concepts — for example, in photography, what some companies still call a “master” flash still controls a “slave” flash.

And sometimes people pick new words in an attempt to start fresh with neutral vocabulary, only to find the new term picks up the baggage of the old. “Water closet” becomes “toilet,” which becomes “bathroom,” which becomes “restroom.”

But picking words carefully can make a difference when avoiding subtle or unconscious acts of discrimination called microaggressions […]

Got it.

So since “changing words doesn’t necessarily change the underlying concepts,” does changing “whitelist” to “allowlist” and “blacklist” to “denylist” mean “allow” means “white” and “deny” means “black”?

Confused? Me too. So dumb.

Mike Miller
Political junkie. Former senior writer and editor at Independent Journal Review. Realist. Slayer of hypocrisy. Sports lover (except for soccer, of course). Insufferable pizza snob.
Read more by Mike Miller