<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/slee/2017/12/15/agency-obama-wasnt-politically-weaponized/feed</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:39:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Was There an Agency Under Obama That WASN'T Politically Weaponized?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Friday morning on Twitter, notable free-market champion Phil Kerpen shared a chart from a November 2017 Forbes article showing just how much the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) flubbed the numbers related to how many people they projected would sign up for Obamacare. We&amp;#8217;ve known for a while the assumption that Obamacare, with it&amp;#8217;s ridiculous premiums, would actually draw record enrollments was, at best, optimistic (at worst, an outright fabrication). But the graphic is startling:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:36:37 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Sarah Lee]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/rs/images/2017/02/obamacare-e1487277295939.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/slee/2017/12/15/agency-obama-wasnt-politically-weaponized-n81385</link></item></channel></rss>