« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Senate Majority Leader Reid Playing Politics With Nominations

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has tossed some red meat to his left wing base who have called for an end to the filibuster.  On Monday, Reid filed cloture on 17 district court nominations as a means to argue that Republicans are obstructing President Obama’s judicial nominations.  According to one Senate study, President Obama and President George W. Bush’s nominations are on the same pace. Reid’s allegations of Republican obstructionism are pure politics. 

Republicans are not obstructing Obama judges nor are they even filibustering any of these 17 judges today.  If you turn on CSPAN to view this Senate filibuster of 17 judges, you will be disappointed.  You will not see an extended debate of these 17 Obama nominations, yet will instead see a debate of the Senate highway bill or an extended quorum call. 

Reid is trying to trick the American people into thinking that Republicans are a bunch of obstructionists who are on the Senate floor filibustering judges and legislation.  I bet if you cornered all 100 Senators, including Reid, and asked them to recite the names of these 17 judges who are being “debated” this week, not one could get through even five of the names.  American politics is entering silly season and this fake filibuster is yet another example of the lengths some politicians will go to make a political point.

The Senate Republican Policy Committee (Senate RPC) put out a blog post today comparing the pace of Obama confirmations to President George W. Bush’s nominations.  Obama’s nominees are being confirmed at a similar pace to Bush’s.

President Obama already has more lower court confirmations (129) in three years of his presidency than President Bush had in his final four years (120). Supreme Court nominations require far more time and effort both by the Judiciary Committee and the rest of the Senate, and leave less time for consideration of other judges. That is why the fairest comparison is how each President fared during the presidential term in which he had Supreme Court nominations.

The Senate RPC  argues that even if you compare Bush’s first term to Obama’s current term in office, they both had about the same ratio of lower court confirmations — the same lower courts that Reid is trying to install 17 new justices.

In other words, although President Obama has fewer lower court confirmations than President Bush did in his first term, President Obama made far fewer judicial nominations in the first three years of his presidency than President Bush did in his first three years (173 versus 215). Considering the smaller number of nominations made by President Obama, as well as the considerable time spent processing his two Supreme Court nominees, it’s hard to see where President Obama is being treated unfairly. President Obama has had about the same number of lower court confirmations relative to the number of nominations he has made.

Here are the nominations by the numbers using the Senate RPC data.  

  • Average number of days from nomination to confirmation Bush 211 days — Obama 218 days;
  • For 83 judicial vacancies, the Obama Administration has made only 39 nominations;
  • There are 44 judicial vacancies without any nomination from the President;
  • 17 of 39 nominations are stuck in the Democrat controlled Senate Judiciary Committee; and,
  • 61 out of 83 current vacancies are either in the Obama White House (44) or Democrat controlled Senate Judiciary Committee (17).

As I wrote yesterday in my post Fake Filibuster Outrage From Left, there is no filibuster going on right now. 

These nominees were never blocked by any obstructionism.  They were never debated.  There has not been one word of debate on the Senate floor.  Furthermore, if many Republicans voted for the bulk of these nominees in the Senate Judiciary Committee, it is likely that they will pass pretty easily.  Reid is trying to break the back of Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) for objecting to President Obama’s unconstitutional recess appointment.

This fake battle over the filibuster this week will test the strength of Republicans in the face of a Senate Majority Leader Reid’s bullying tactics.  Conservatives will be looking to see if Republicans join Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) who has already stood up to the bully or back down.

COMMENTS

  • lcdrscottcoleman

    that can take this guy to the woodshed

  • melbedewy

    while there was NO recess, there should now be “zero” judges approved the balance of this Congress.

  • RDCook

    Our Republic was designed for an honest, moral and ethical people. If we abandon those concepts we will fail as a society and as a nation. A person who is deficient in any of these areas has no place in public service. If a politician will lie to get elected, they will lie after being elected and they will lie to stay in control.
    A lie is a lie, is a lie! Calling it anything else is political correctness at its worst. It is my absolute belief that every word a politician speaks should be held to the same standard required of witnesses in court. Every politician should be required to take, not only the present oath of office but also take the oath similar to that administered to witnesses in a court of law. If the person refuses to take the oath, that person should never be elected.
    I call the following the ?Honesty Pledge?. Try contacting everyone who represents you in politics and see if they will take the ?Honesty Pledge? and publish it in writing. If they will not you might reconsider any support you have given them in the past. Have internet contacts? Have them do the same. Make it go viral.
    Honesty Pledge:
    ?I do solemnly swear or affirm I will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in regards to every aspect of my elected or appointed office and duties including my speeches and written statements. I will demand the same pledge for all those who answer to my elected or appointed office. If I violate this oath I will resign immediately, so help me God.?
    There are members of both the general public and in politics that will claim I am na?ve for even suggesting such a requirement of public officials. I will take this idea to an even higher level. Any person who would support a politician that refused to take this oath is part of the problem themselves.

  • Pingback: Ezra Sliman

  • Pingback: Waldo Gibney