« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Who are you calling extreme, Dems?

Incumbent Democrats are desperate — increasingly aware the public’s taste for their brand of change has waned. Some, in generally conservative districts and states, are reaching for the mantle of the moderate; others, like those in reliably Democratic areas, have not yet begun backsliding on the president on the issues of health care reform and spending.

But all — no matter how comfortable their lead in polls and campaign funds — have gone to great lengths to portray their GOP challengers as wildly out of the mainstream: We’re bad, but they’re downright crazy.

In an editorial for the Washington Times, I examine Tuesday’s Democratic primaries in New York and Washington, D.C., which saw the ouster of Mayor Adrian Fenty and the renomination of Rep. Charlie Rangel, and offer some thoughts as to who is the real party of extremists:

The Republican Party has been so captured by its more conservative, if at times unreasonably radical, elements that it ousted Tuesday a mayor whose pragmatism earned him national praise and renominated a 20-term legislator for Congress whose ethics probes had become a symbol of corruption and a clarion call for term limits.

With all the speculation that the GOP had been torn asunder by the Tea Party movement in its bid to refashion the party in its own image, one might be inclined to believe, wrongly, that anecdote. One splashy headline after the next has fomented the expectation that the lunatics had stormed the hospital, with loony policies abounding: Social Security to be phased out; the Department of Education to dissolve; and the 14th Amendment to be repealed.

But it was not the Republican Party that caved Tuesday night to deep-pocketed labor unions or willfully overlooked a career of stunning ethics violations in its intraparty contests in Washington and New York City. That’s the kind of change in which President Obama’s Democratic Party believes – though if generic ballot polls are an accurate indicator of the national mood, it’s not the change for which Americans signed up in 2008.

But the most appropriate rejoinder to Democratic criticism that the GOP has gone off the rails is not to observe that polling indicates supposedly extreme Republican candidates are leading or in contention with incumbent Democrats. Rather, it is to offer this simple reminder: You renominated Charlie Rangel.

No reasonable party would endorse the candidacy of a man whose previous misdeeds include the leasing of several rent-stabilized Harlem apartments while using one as a base of operations for a previous re-election effort, failing to disclose upward of $75,000 in income from beachfront Dominican Republic property, securing tax benefits for a company whose chief executive he was courting as a potential donor to his private foundation, and the undertaking of two corporate-financed tropical junkets in 2007 and 2008.

No reasonable party would oust a mayor whose aggressive school-reform campaign had won national accolades in a school district where, at the outset of his reforms, only 9 percent of ninth-graders were expected to earn a college degree in nine years.

And yet the Democratic Party did both to appease its radical elements. So much for the unelectable, extremist argument.

You might say that Democratic operatives living in glass, rent-controlled Harlem apartments would do well not to throw stones. Read the article in its entirety at the Washington Times.

COMMENTS

  • Douglas Erley

    I’ll tell you this, the Tea Party Candidates better win, or there will be Hell to pay. These entrenched Republicans and Democrats will be so pissed they have been put through this wringer that they will unleash a fury on us unseen before. If you think they hate us now, just see what happens if they survive the hunt. I sent Christine a donation today. This is the hill we must win, or die on.

    • avgjo

      They need to learn, ‘Better pissed off than pissed on’. First off, many, if not all of our candidates look slated to win. Second, if we don’t get what we want out of this bunch, we’ll just increase the heat. The only fury they’ll be concerned with is ours. the people in this country have realized that the ‘ruling class’ needs to learn its place. And if they throw a puerile temper tantrum, (they the ruling class), it won’t be good for them. And I think they know that. Fortunately, it looks like it won’t come to that.

      I’ll be donating to Christine as well.

    • edwlstr

      Dr. Lyle Rossiter explains it very well, Liberalism is a mental illness that has it’s genesis in childhood. Liberals, as you have no doubt noticed, are pathological as hell. You underestimate their wrath and capacity for revenge at your own peril. Kep your powder dry.

  • http://itsaboutfreedom.proboards.com IronDioPriest

    …but I do take a just a wee smidgen of an issue with the opening sentence…

    “Incumbent Democrats are desperate ? increasingly aware the public?s taste for their brand of change has waned.”

    I do not believe that the public ever had a “taste for their brand of change.” The far Left did. But the general public at large – the voters who were convinced to put these ideologues into power – were fed a lie of moderation via a message so strong, monolithic, and persistent, the lie could not be overcome no matter what truths were there to digest.

    If Barack Hussein Obama, the Leftist congressional caucus, and their sycophantic media tentacles would have told the truth about “their brand of change”, they never would have been swept into power.

    No, the public’s taste for Leftist change has not waned. The public’s awareness of the lies perpetrated upon them is increasing.

    Small issue with an otherwise excellent piece. But I believe those little nuggets of awareness make a difference. Any time we cede any facet of the true narrative to a false assumption of the Leftist narrative, we are missing out on an opportunity for truth to proliferate.

    The public NEVER wanted any part of this “change”.

  • avgjo

    Let’s see…

    The Democrats protected sex offenders with their ‘hate crimes bill’.

    They put Obamacare over principle during reconciliation for that piece of trash by not amending it to prevent sex offenders from getting viagra.

    Patrick Deval wishes that we didn’t have freedom of speech.

    Liebermann (lib, i don’t care what affiliation he gives himself) says that if Red China’s leadership can shut down the internet, ours should too.

    Obama wants to give your 401k to unions.

    The democrats (and some statist republicans, all part of the ruling class) want to reward millions for breaking the law with citizenship. Sorta like a court giving a bank’s money to a guy that tried to rob them.

    But THAT’S not extreme.

    No, things like

    cutting taxes

    shrinking intrusive, oppressive government

    cutting back ‘entitlements’ that have failed, that are sucking the life blood out of this country and that no one believes in anymore

    restoring fully people’s God-given rights to property, bearing of arms and speech (McCain-Feingold)

    that’s all extreme.

    And these idiots wonder why they’re about to get creamed in november.

  • fisk2521

    I’ve been thinking the same thing since the primaries were over…. the nerve of democrats and especially the White House referring to anyone else as extremist.

    The extremist in the White House have taken this country down a road of deception and economic disaster. Obama is the most extreme most incompetent man that has ever been elected as President. His extreme, radical ideas and association with radicals who are ‘left of Lenin’.

  • cjbjulie

    Best move? Throw them all out.

    Get a new crop in there. If you have a god incumbent, be willing to sacrifice him (her) for the good of the country.

    We won’t have to do this more than once for our “leaders” to get the idea who is in charge.

    It is we, the people!

    • davesinsanantonio

      to do this more than once” for your face to “get the idea who is in charge”! You are letting your ego get way ahead of your brain.

  • Wine Country Dog

    when I hear some Dem claim 0bama is a ‘centrist’ president. They can think the far left is their center all they want – they are delusional anyway. With their love of adjustable reality they make whatever they want to be their truth. Their problem is that this extreme leftist 0bama regime can’t sell their ideas to anyone with more than a few working brain cells so they end up having to lie, cheat and steal and complain about those mean conservatives always telling the truth about them.

    BTW the Dems’ new campaign strategy is to tell the voters that although the voters hate the Dems, the Republicans are worse. Now there’s a strategy with “Epic Fail” written all over it.

  • ac7880

    Extreme Liberal mantra:

    Bush?s fault. Bigots. Racists. Teabaggers. Astroturf. Nazis

    Bush?s fault. Teabagger. Racist. Biggot. Nazi.

    Bush?s fault. Bush?s fault. Bush?s fault.

    Repeat until meaningless – as meaningless as the dem party after November.

    I am the party of NO. NOvember 2010. NOvember 2012.

    No Extreme Socialism! No Extreme Congress! Vote them out! NOvember! Vote in NOvember!