« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

No More (Norm) Colemans.

Message to Republican Candidates, the NRSC, NRCC, RNC, etc.

Senator Al Franken.

Senator. Al. Franken.

If that doesn’t grate or demonstrate just how badly the GOP screwed up during the Bush Administration then I don’t know what else in politics does. But, thankfully, after just four years, voters have apparently seen just how bad a miscalculation it was to put all the levers of power in Democratic hands, and the GOP looks set to be given another chance to live up to its principles.

Here is where I digress to remind us all;

We’ve won nothing yet. Harry Reid is still the Senate Majority Leader, Nancy Pelosi is still the Speaker of the House. Whether or not they would remain in those offices after January is entirely still dependent on you.

Vote. Vote and get all your family, friends, neighbors, work colleagues to vote, and make sure they all vote GOP from the US Senate to local school board.

Digression over.

Looking over to the sidebar, one notices that the NRSC has chosen to remind Republicans how important it is to turn out by reminding us that Al Franken is sitting in the Senate, i.e. No More Frankens – it’s not enough to just win, we have to win BIG – or, as Hugh Hewitt would put it; If It’s Not Close, They Can’t Cheat.

I have no problem with the sentiment – if enough of us turn out to vote, then the entire point of this diary is moot.

But let’s be clear here … Al Franken being a Senator today is not the fault of MN Republicans who didn’t turn out to vote for Norm Coleman, because Norm Coleman was actually the winner on Election Night and the subsequent recounts even as Obama made mincemeat of McCain in the state. No, Al Franken sits in the Senate today wholly due to one of the most blatant and shameless acts of election theft, done in the open and in broad daylight with the active leadership and participation of a corrupt bought and paid for Secretary of State.

Of course, if more of them had come out to vote, Coleman would still be a Senator, but at the end of the day, MN Republicans held up their end of the deal. It was Coleman, followed by the MNGOP, the NRSC and the RNC who failed to hold up their end by allowing the Democrats to steal it.

I have no beef with Al Franken or Mark Ritchie for this – might as well be mad with a toad for being ugly. It can’t help its own nature. Al Franken is not a man known for his sense of fair play or decency and Mark Ritchie was a product of George Soros’ Secretary of State Project. What else were they going to do?

Norm Coleman, on the other hand, I’ve got major beef with. He played the “moderate” “bipartisan” even as he was being cheated in broad daylight. He stood by spewing useless “reach across the aisle” pabulum, watching impotently as Mark Ritchie and the rest of his Soros-sponsored crew stole his victory away from him.

Even after FoxNews noted the amazing contortions and twists of logic that guided decisions by Mark Ritchie like this …

A vote for Franken Not a vote for Coleman

… the Coleman campaign decided to remain silent. This is not to mention the ballots found in Democrat operatives’ car trunks and closets after Election Day that somehow made it into the final tally. Please read John Lott’s FoxNews article – written as it was happening; it’s enough to make you want to walk up to Norm Coleman and sock him in the face.

Up until Franken vaulted into the lead and the MN press cheerleading for Franken started calling on him to concede, Norm Coleman was preoccupied with thinking of all the “bipartisanship” he’ll get to do in the Senate instead of calling down a rain of fire and brimstone and running a scorched earth campaign against Ritchie.

In other words, Coleman failed to protect and defend his own victory, perhaps failed to even notice it was under attack until it was too late, and ended up losing it to Al Franken. Al. Franken. Worse, even though Coleman (at the time) would have made the difference between having 41 Senators, where Arlen Specter would be the most powerful Republican in the Senate and 42, the NRSC did nothing.

Neither did the RNC or the Party’s leaders in MN.

That’s why I’m not mad at Franken, Ritchie or anyone involved in stealing the election in MN. It was obvious they were going to do it from the first. They didn’t hide that they were doing it. They stole it fair and square, and the GOP let them

So, in response to the NRSC, we accept your “No More Frankens” challenge to make sure it is not close – where some corrupted product of Secretary of State Project can steal it for the other side. We will endeavor to ensure that the results on election are outside the margin of Soros.

But here’s our challenge, and its not just with regard to Senate races; if, despite our efforts, it is close but we’re on top, then you’d better be there to ensure that it does not get stolen. Run ads in broadcast and print, call press conferences, call for rallies and marches. Unleash hell.

In other words, No More Colemans.

COMMENTS

  • wolfgang

    Requiring a Herculean effort greater than what it took to rescue the Chilean Miners.

  • wethepeoplevstheprogressives

    Effort than when would we expect to see one/deliver one?

  • qsclues

    …so “Acting Senator” Al Fraudken will no longer be able to claim to represent me.

  • AceInTX

    What Frankin was able to do was directly attributable to the impotence of the Republican Party and it’s tendency to bend over and let the Dems have their way with them.

    I’m sick of seeing them not fight…..we put them there to stop the foolishness…and they lay down…

    They’d better develop spines and fast because the Dems are desperate and we haven’t seen anything to compare to the fraud and deceit we are about to witness in full view of a compliant and collaborative media

    • AceInTX

      This is a year of redistricting….the nex two years will determine control of state houses and the US House and Senate for the next decade.

      Any Texan can tell you what’s about to take place across this country…they are going to cheat on the ballot counts…what they can’t win there they’ll take to the courts so Obama’s appointees can decide things in their favor…this is when the gang of 14 deal will pay dividends for them…(Thank you John McCain since we allowed them to block so many of Bush’s judge seats which the Dems have now filled).

      They will play games like they did here in Texas by walking out and going to Oklahoma to block a fight on redistricting and then go to the courts to have the new map thrown out like they did here.

      • jeremyz

        It would be helpful if you actually were informed before you began your rant. FYI, the democrats have been very foolish in the past two years and only a small number of Obama’s appointments have actually been confirmed: 2 Supreme Court, 11 Appeals Court, and 30 District Court for a total of 42. Granted they will move some through during the lame duck session, but Bush’s 261 total judges over 8 years far outpaces Obama even with his 60 vote senate these past 18 months. The gang of 14 did not greatly diminish the overall number of judges approved as many like to say. Some good judges were sacrificed because of the Gang, but the total numbers (facts) do not really bear this out.

        Ace, your heart and intentions are good, this redistricting year is very important. But sadly, your lack of “ability” or “desire” (just recently reading your posts I can’t yet determine which it is) to inform your positions diminishes the credibility of your posts.

        Please, for the sake of our conservative movement: read, study, research, double-check your facts, and contribute something more than what any monkey can sit down and type out on the keyboard. If you need resources, credible and accurate journals, articles, books, etc. please let me know and I will gladly direct you accordingly.

        • AceInTX

          condescending attitude and become a childish AXX.

          at least you made a decent point…we’re making progress

          • jeremyz

            it would have shocked me if you had not. Sadly, you are not making progress…yet. I do have hope for you though and am committed to helping you.

        • blooch

          than packng the Judiciary from day one. The way I see it, he’s already gotten 2 Supremes with very little effort, and the Dems already enjoy a Federal judiciary which leans decidedly in their direction, so they’ll get plenty of legacy favoritism regardless of Obama’s picks. I know Ace specifically said “Obama’s appointees”, and this is what you seized on, but I think we all know the lay of the land where the Fed judiciary is concerned.

          Sure, the quantity of judges Bush got looks awesome, but I would be willing to bet that the ideological quality of many of those appointees is underwhelming to conservatives, and many “good judges were sacrificed” by the GOP Congress and Bush, and later the Dem Congress, with or without the Gang.

          Like you said, the Dems are going to make up some lost ground during the lame duck session. After that, I hope the new Congress makes a better effort to weed out Obama’s loonier Left nominees.

          • jeremyz

            I really believe that the key to the judiciary will be 2012 where the Rs can get the white house again and possibly a 60 vote senate. In 12 and 14 the Dems are defending a ton of seats. This was supposed to be their cycle based on “home turf”.

            That being said, a 57+ seat and possibly 60 seat majority in the Senate with a solid conservative in the white house and we could get back to Reagan style appointees. He holds the record all-time for judicial appointees. Preventing the Dems from filibustering good judges will be key.

            I do not necessarily buy your comment that the judiciary is “liberal”. Some regions and courts are liberal yes, but there are other solid conservative courts as well. Moreover, there are still a ton of unfilled vacancies which could tip the balance and allow another conservative generational wave like we had under Reagan.

            I still believe that the judiciary is key and thus the Senate is primary in importance. Taking 50+ seats tomorrow and setting up a possible 60 in 2012 would be HUGE in the long term battle. I do hope the wave can overcome some of the hard knocks Rs have taken in CA, DE and CT.

    • David123
  • Kyle-MI

    Our country and the integrity of our electoral system would be better off with no more Democrat Secretaries of State. (Not that GOP SOS’s are perfect.)

  • Next93

    I’ve gotten in trouble for saying this here before, but Coleman’s elevation to the candidacy by the GOP elite was the real source of the problem. He’s exactly the kind of candidate that the TEA party’s been trying to eliminate in this election. Basically, the GOP’s professional strategists chose his name recognition over his principals, and gave the voters a choice between a foul-mouthed, rabid democrat and a rabid democrat (albeit one who was pro-life) masquerading as a republican.

    I’m not saying that lightly – Coleman WAS a Democrat, and one of the rising stars of the Minnesota Democrat Farmer Labor Party (the alliance of Twin Cities Democrats and outstate rural socialists forged by Hubert Humphrey in the 30′s), He served a term (or two?) as Mayor of St. Paul, and only changed party affiliation in order to step around Hubert’s son, Skip (really – that’s his name) in his bid to run for governor.

    The local and national GOP was stupid enough to take him in and make him thier candidate solely on the bais of his name recognition (Norm’s crowning acheivement was “bringing professional hockey back to Minnesota”, which he did as mayor of St. Paul in true dem fashion – by saddling the city with a crippling debt for a new stadium).

    After losing the governor’s race to the Independence Party candidate (a political nonentity best known for having been a professional wrestler), Norm went on to serve a term as a senator, but only because the national GOP asked his opponent in the primary to step aside, which he did. He then went on to spend most of the following six years voting with the Democrats.

    I don’t deny that the last two years would have been better if we’d had someone with an “R” after his name in that seat, but I really can’t see Norm voting aginast the stimulus, health care (which he campiagned for as a Democrat), the financial sector takeover, TARP, or any of the rest.

    So, while it DOES infuriate me to hear the phrase “Senator Al Franken”, I don’t know that it would have bothered me much less to have to hear “Senator Norm Coleman” for another six years, particularly if that name was used in the same breath with Collins, Snow, Graham, and McCain.

    • Libertarian Republican

      …even more than your comment!

      One of my favorite sayings a s a libertarian is:

      “If you walk around and you never see anything that offends you, you’re not living in a free society.”

  • ctpsb

    I agree with most of the comments on here. Look we’ll do all we can to legally and ethically bring about as large a margin of victory as possible (to coin another funny phrase in the spirit of outside the margin of Soros–outside the margin of lawyer [Mark Steyn]). But look you can’t just help it sometimes. Let’s say the volunteers work very hard and pull out a 1% win in a D+8 district the GOP candidate should NEVER let it happen! The Demorats must be exposed at every turn! Chris Christie knew as a former prosecutor to have lawyers and watches stationed at every polling place because he knew what the Dems would try to do. Every Republican should be as close to prepared as Christie was.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Not enough of us are involved in Party politics. It’s that simple. Our local precincts don’t have enough conservatives serving as precinct committeemen. Here in my legislative district, in Tempe, AZ, one-third of the 69 precincts have ZERO precinct committeeman. Statutorily, there’s one PC allotted for every 125 registered Republicans in a precinct.

    If we don’t have a majority of conservatives (or near majority — many moderate Republicans are persuaded by conservative arguments and logic), then the elected leadership at the legislative district ends up not being conservative.

    And ends up not being conservative at the county level.

    And the state level.

    And the RNC level.

    Exhibit A: Michael Steele.

    Because ONLY precinct committeemen elect the leadership of the Party. In 2008, it was the MEMBERS of the Republican Party who elected Michael Steele RNC chairman. If you were ONLY a registered Republican, you had no say in his election. NONE. Again, ONLY precinct committeemen have the right to cast votes in the internal Party leadership elections. Don’t you want to be able to do that?

    It’s not hard to obtain that right. The requirements vary from state to state. None are onerous. Oh, and, in some states, the “powers that be” aren’t exactly advertising this. Why? Because they like being in charge just fine and home you remain in the dark, like a mushroom.

    If we conservative Republicans want the kind of response we’d expect at the RNC, NRCC and NRSC levels, then we must take over the Party leadership. And we do that by becoming precinct committeemen locally.

    Think national committees, act in the local committees.

    Want conservative street fighters in the Republican Party leadership? ELECT THEM. You only get to do that if you become a precinct committeeman.

    Want to make sure the House and Senate members overseeing the NRCC and NRSC are conservatives? Then become a precinct committeeman and drag every conservative you know where you live along with you? Then go to wherever conservatives hang out where you live and recruit some more conservatives to join you and your conservative buddies. Take over your local committee leadership. Come the 2012 primary season, be in a position to determine the winner of the Republican primary. If you don’t do this, no one else will.

    It’s up to YOU.

    John Cornyn could care less what is written here on Redstate about him. The only thing he cares about is whether his reelection chances are in any way threatened. The BEST way conservatives in Texas can threaten his reelection chances is by becoming precinct committeemen in every locale across Texas and then mounting a GOTV effort for a real conservative challenger. And, if the local Texas Repub. Party rules allow for it, by getting every Republican local and county committee across Texas to vote to ENDORSE CORNYN’S CHALLENGER in the primary.

    We have the numbers to do this. As of right now, we don’t have enough conservatives participating inside the Party itself.

    Get out of the bleachers. Get onto the playing field. The real ball game of politics is played at your local Republican Party committee meetings. May not sound like a lot of fun. May sound like it’s outside your comfort zone. Get over it. This is where the rubber meets the road.

    There are now enough conservatives here on Redstate who can back me up on this.

    And, I think they’ll also confirm, it really is fun.

    Thank you.

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW! (1 day until Nov. 2 — what are YOU DOING to help get out the vote in your precinct?)

    • deano64

      Republican party prior to 2008 I have no doubt they would have gotten Coleman over the top against Franken and it wouldn’t have been that close.

  • fifa3601

    You know things are going to be epic when even Politico is writing things like this.

  • liandro

    Rich Miller at Capitol Fax is reporting the Alex G. is sending FOIA requests to all county clerks in IL about a ton of voter information that is, by statue, confidential. Wonder why? Rich links to the actual FOIA request. Somebody smarter then me needs to look at this.

    http://thecapitolfaxblog.com/2010/11/01/wls-accuses-quinn-of-playing-terrorist-card-hynes-does-quinn-robocall-peraica-tobolksi-tangle-giannoulias-files-foias/