« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ladies and Gentlemen, We Are The Cheetahs.

[This diary is my reporting on Tim Scott's Tuesday night victory party. I'm sorry that it's so late, but I had a medical board exam on Thursday and Friday that I had to travel to Atlanta, GA to take, and I just got back late Saturday night.]

From 2010-06-27
From 2010-06-27

As many of you are aware, I recently wrote a diary titled, “Tim Scott MUST Win–This Is Not Negotiable!”. In this diary, I explained that if Tim Scott lost to Paul Thurmond (in the SC District 1 Republican Primary), it would be disastrous for the state of South Carolina, and for the Republican Party. Why? Because the spectacle of a more qualified, more conservative, more charismatic African-American candidate losing to an unqualified guy named “Thurmond” (and I realize that this might not be entirely fair to Paul Thurmond, but who said that life was fair?) would be just too big of a spectacle for us to overcome. Furthermore, in this diary, I explained that, the MSM was closely watching this race. Also, I mentioned that the mocking and humiliation that SC received with regard to the Nikki Haley circus, via Jon Stewart and the rest of the MSM, would be cubed if Tim Scott lost to Paul Thurmond. (See embed below–go to 4:30 in to see SC bit. H/T Allahpundit of Hot Air.)

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Thank You, South Carolina – The Race to Replace Disgrace
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

To be specific, I wrote that the MSM would take us down like a hungry cheetah taking down a gazelle if we elected Paul Thurmond over Tim Scott.

Let’s face facts folks. To much of the MSM, we in SC were a big joke. I mean, does anyone remember when Joe Wilson shouted “You Lie!” at the State of the Union Address, and Maureen Dowd (and the rest of the MSM) tried to make everyone in SC look like Confederate flag waving racists? I certainly haven’t forgotten about it.

Well, Tuesday night, that all changed with Tim Scott’s and Nikki Haley’s victories.

How you ask? Because the elections of Tim Scott and Nikki Haley changed the entire narrative about southern conservatives and the issue of race. I mean, we all know that liberals love to support black politicians–that is if they represent primarily black districts, and/or race bait/play the race card by falsely accusing people of shouting racial slurs (see Jim Clyburn and John Lewis as prime examples of such behavior). Oh, and of course, liberals love to support extremely liberal African-Americans, like Barack Obama and Deval Patrick–that religiously tow the party line and are indentured servants to liberal special interest groups (like SEIU, ACORN, the teachers unions, etc.)–so that they can exorcise their white, liberal guilt.

For instance, the day after Obama’s presidential victory, Maureen Dowd wrote a column where she exclaimed that she was so excited to see black people and white people “talking to each other for the first time”–and, she admitted that she asked her “cute, black mailman” what he thought about Obama’s victory (someone needs to inform Ms. Dowd that, outside of Manhattan down in them red states, we’ve been talking to black people for years.) Then, Maureen Dowd wrapped up her ridiculous column by bragging that she was going to call her one black friend, Gwen Ifil (hey, she has a black friend, so it’s all good).

Anyway, my point is that it’s easy for Maureen Dowd, the MSM and the Democratic left (and Manhattanites) to support the most liberal guy in the US Senate who also happens to be black. However, I wonder what would happen if a black Democratic candidate actually started to think for himself, instead of simply towing the party line?

Well, if you’re curious, then just ask Alabama African-American US Representative, Artur Davis, what happened to him when he strayed from the Democratic party line and campaigned for governor of Alabama by running against Obamacare. You guessed it–the Democrats threw him under the bus. In fact, Jesse Jackson said the following with regard to Artur Davis

“We even have blacks voting against the healthcare bill from Alabama,” Jackson said at a reception Wednesday night. “You can’t vote against healthcare and call yourself a black man.”

Really????!!!! I did not know that. I guess you learn something new everyday.

[Oh, and just to put this in perspective for you--Artur Davis has an undergraduate degree and a law degree from Harvard, and he graduated with honors from both (not to mention, he was also a assistant US attorney before he was a US congressman). Now, Ron Sparks, the guy who beat Artur Davis in the AL Democratic primary, was an AL agricultural commissioner with a degree from a community college. Kind of shocking, huh?]

By the way, did anyone remember what happened to Harold Ford Jr. when he tried to run in the Democratic Primary for the New York US Senate seat? Again, you guessed it. Democrats railroaded him before he could even get in the race, simply because he was seen as too moderate because he voted against gay marriage in the past, supported a payroll tax cut, and and was against trying Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in New York. (In fact, the Democrat party bosses pushed Ford out in favor of Kirsten Gillibrand, who voted against cutting off funds for ACORN after that huge scandal last year, so that should explain a lot.)

Furthermore, if memory serves, it was mainly liberals that griped when blacks voted in high numbers in CA against gay marriage. I guess that Harold Ford Jr. (and the CA African-American voters) didn’t get the memo that “you can’t call yourself a black man and vote against gay marriage”. (The nerve of him!! Who does he think that he is thinking for himself?!). But, I digress.

And finally, speaking of straying from the liberal talking points, we know exactly how much respect liberal elites have for black conservatives–just ask Clarence Thomas and Charles “Minstrel Show” Blow. For some odd reason, liberals seem to be extremely threatened by black conservatives (probably because they have proven that it’s possible to get ahead in America without towing the liberal line or being beholden to liberal special interest groups). Don’t believe me? Well just look here, here, and here at the comments sections of these articles about Tim Scott–all of the racist comments were made by liberals. (The liberal commenters compared Mr. Scott to “Marion Barry”, said that “he had sheets hanging in his closet”, called him “a token”, etc.)

So, in conclusion, when I was at Tim Scott’s victory party on Tuesday night, I saw a bunch of good old southern guys and gals who were sunburned, exhausted and dehydrated from standing out in the sun all day long holding signs for Tim Scott. In fact, many had gotten caught in a heavy afternoon downpour, yet refused to leave their posts despite the heavy showers. They were tired, yet ecstatic. Moreover, Brandon Rowland, one of Tim Scott’s aides, told me that he had forgotten to eat that morning when he was standing out in the sun holding a sign for Mr. Scott, but he was determined not to leave his post–so he stood out in the sun all day, dehydrated on an empty stomach. (I asked Brandon if he was afraid of passing out. He said that he went to The Citadel, so he had passed out before, and that it was really no big deal.)

[If you want to get an idea of the energy and excitement pulsating throughout the room at Tim Scott's victory party, then watch the video below. At about 1:25 in, people start chanting "We want Tim!". Then, his mother goes to get him, and at around 2:15 in, Tim Scott makes his grand entrance and the crowd erupts with applause and jubilation.]

And at the end of the evening, when I asked Tim Scott about how he felt after his victory, he told me that he was “elated, yet focused” on the general election race to come, and that “it is still only half-time.” (Mr. Scott is a former football player.)

Yes, the left and their lackeys in the MSM were not at all prepared to handle both Tim Scott (likely the first African-American US Representative from SC since Reconstruction) and Nikki Haley (likely the first Indian-American female governor anywhere, and the second Indian-American governor in US history after Bobby Jindal–who is also a Republican) winning in SC on Tuesday night. The left woke up Wednesday morning flat on their back, feeling as if we had gone straight for their jugular. We in SC permanently maimed the race card with the election of Nikki Haley and Tim Scott. We slowly snuck up on them and they never saw it coming. Tuesday night, we were the cheetahs.

PS–If you want to know why Tim Scott was elected to Congress, then watch his interview with Sean Hannity below. When Hannity asks Mr. Scott what grade he would give President Obama (at around 2:40 in), Mr. Scott doesn’t mince words–without even flinching, he flat out answers “F”. Just like Chris Christie, Tim Scott has a set of brass ones (which is probably why The Club for Growth endorsed him). We need a lot more like him in Congress.

PPS–The first photograph in this diary is of Tim Scott, me, and Brandon Rowland on the right (one of Tim Scott’s aides). The second photograph is of Andrew Boucher on the left (another one of Mr. Scott’s aides), me, and Brandon Rowland on the right.

This diary was originally published on The Minority Report and Hillbillypolitics.

COMMENTS

  • JadedByPolitics

    to be SMACKED around on ALL of their treasured HATE! In the end Conservatism is about WE The People and liberalism is about slavery to the State.

  • http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/ BigGator5

  • snowshooze

    Holy Cow!
    Geeze!!!
    Wow!
    If that red dress don’t just kill you..you aren’t even a man.
    Now what is this post about? ummm….I kinda lost it…

    • Susannah

      ….I appreciate it (blushing). I’m glad that you think that I have good fashion sense. ;-)

      Take care.

      X0X0, Suzi

  • snowshooze

    What were we talking about again?
    xox back at ya..
    A beautiful Lady you are,
    LOL, I NEVER expected to get busted.

    :” right at the edge now…hey, I can see the river…
    there”s fish!! I have fly pole…think I could make it… going… going…”

    • snowshooze

      pushing the limit..
      You’d look just fine in a flour sack.

      • Susannah

        ….Anyway, that’s good to know. The next time that all of my good dresses are at the cleaners, and I need something to wear to a party at the last minute, I’ll just throw on a four sack and tell every one that I’m starting a new trend–I’ll call it “flour sack chic”. ;-)

        • eastbaylarry

          …then flour sacks will be on the fasion runways of Paris within a week.

  • loupgarou1317

    Ladies like you make me PROUD to be a conservative…..a SOUTHERN one at that! We will be the cheetahs, wolves, and bears breaking down the walls in November!

    • Susannah

      ….You’re very kind. :-)

      Now, let’s kick some butt in November and be cheetahs, mama grizzlies, the wolf at the door, and every other sneaky predator known to man. Let me hear a “Hell yeah!”. ;-)

  • avgjo

    don’t like that we seem to be succumbing to this PC stuff too much; we are FAR too concerned with what the MSM thinks. And as long as we are, they will continue to control what we do.

    Think I’m crazy? The idea that we HAVE to nominate a black man so the media doesn’t smear us as racist means we have let them determine what we do. This action is racist towards Mr. Thurmond (it excludes Thurmond because of the color of his skin) and it is insulting to Mr. Scott; there will be those, esp. on the racist left, who will assert that the man only got the nomination because the GOP wanted a token. (NOTE WELL, this is not my position; I think Mr. Scott will be a fine statesman and is eminently qualified, from what I have seen of him.) I have no qualms with the person selected; it is the whys and wherefores of the selection process that bother me.

    Just something to consider: the MSM is well on its way out. They don’t have the influence they had even 4 years ago. One should never compromise principle; it is even less understandable when one is doing it to placate a discredted, dying institution.

    Pragmatics over principle is always, in the end, a losing proposition.

    • snowshooze

      Until Obama gets his hands on the internet kill switch..
      About three weeks from now I think…
      At that point, I won’t even be able to fight with my friends.

      • avgjo

        cause serious social unrest if he actually is crazy/stupid enough to use it, assuming he even gets it.

        Actually, Obama doing that would put the MSM in an interesting position. Either they criticize Obie for doing it, which would put pressure on him to undo it, or they don’t, further eroding, perhaps finishing off, their credibility.

        • snowshooze

          The MSM won’t have to worry about their credibility…when they are the only game in town.

          • avgjo

            A government clearly in cahoots with a completely compliant media would light conservatives on fire and creep moderates out. That would be for the democrat party what the Missouri Compromise was to the Whig party. Now, it might be argued that if they did such a bald power grab, there won’t be an election. That would be a point well taken, and if, God forbid, it happened, we’d be out of the normal range of affairs. Agai, God forbid.

    • Susannah

      ….And it is totally against my principles to vote for or support someone with three years of experience on the Charleston County Council, who is mainly running on his daddy’s name (like Paul Thurmond), over a guy with 13 years of experience on the Charleston County Council, as well as two years in the State Legislature (like Tim Scott)–and, Mr. Scott wrote the state’s anti-Obamacare legislation in the State House to boot. Tim Scott, literally, has 5 times more experience than Paul Thurmond. It is against my principles to elect an unqualified guy running on progeny over a more qualified guy running on experience and qualifications.

      Oh, and one more thing. This is the real world–not La La Land. And in the real world, who you elect to represent you, REFLECTS upon you and REPRESENTS your values. You have to accept the world how it is–not how you want it to be. That’s just the way things are. I’m not going to sugar coat it. It would have reflected quite poorly on us in SC if we had selected the unqualified guy named “Thurmond” (who mentioned every chance that he got in his ads that his name was “Thurmond”) over the immensely more qualified, more charismatic African-American candidate. Period. The end.

      PS–As I previously stated in my last diary, if and when Mr. Thurmond comes back in a few years with some REAL experience and accomplishments of his own, then I will be more than happy to give him a fair hearing (and even possibly vote for him).

      • avgjo

        Why can’t the discussion be restricted to purely qualifications? Why the mention of anyone’s race? That’s all I’m saying.

        And no, I’m not in la-la-land. As a half-hispanic who looks all hispanic (and is accordingly treated), I see this stuff on both sides all the time.

        • Susannah

          Were you sleeping during the whole Nikki Haley “raghead” circus? If you think that was bad, then picture a more qualified, more charismatic, more conservative African-American candidate (who was endorsed by the Club for Growth no less) losing to a totally unqualified, uncharismatic guy named “Thurmond”–coupled with the whole Nikki Haley buhaha going on simultaneously. Thankfully, the good people of SC decided this past week that they didn’t want any part of that foolishness, and instead decided to vote on qualifications and experience–and taught the rest of the country a valuable lesson.

          • throwback59

            cares what the left thinks. While I support Nikki Haley, and Scott may be the best candidate, the idea that we have to pick someone to satisfy the media
            irritates the heck out of me. Isn’t that what we’re fighting against?

            One more thing regarding those photos… Oh, Susannah!!

          • Susannah

            Susannah’s diary was not really about the reaction of the the MSM, it was a call to action to support a more qualified and more charismatic candidate that was running against a legacy candidate. This excerpt from a Politco article discusses legacy candidates,

            “Since high name recognition tends to give legacy candidates an unmistakable advantage in elections ?they also inherit their family?s political connections and a built-in fundraising network ? the fact that five budding dynasties were snuffed out qualifies as an eyebrow-raising political happenstance.”

            Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39054.html#ixzz0s71TkmUT

            In Tim Scott we had a candidate that was a no-brainer to support, and he happens to be African-American–nowhere does Susannah say we should support Tim Scott solely because he is African-American. However, if we want to recruit more African-Americans to join the Republican party we must be vigilant when a highly qualified African-American runs for office, especially when said candidate faces a less qualified legacy candidate that benefits from voter apathy.

            I believe that getting more African-Americans to vote Republican and recruiting more African-American Republican candidates will benefit not just African-Americans, but all of America. Tim Scott is a successful small business owner that has been active in Republican politics for many years and held several elected offices–he is a great example of how African-Americans get a fair shake and excel in the Republican party.

          • Blueblood

            That was me not Susannah. I am Susannah’s husband, and I was responding to you and we had computer troubles earlier on the way back from Atlanta. She had used my computer, and I forgot to log her out. She is studying right now and I did not want people to think she was talking about herself in the 3rd person.

          • Flagstaff

            We don’t hear from you often enough.

          • Blueblood

            …voting patterns, and polls. I have commented on a few front page diaries and I am trying to comment more…and the results from the South Carolina primaries indicate that I will be commenting MUCH more here and less often on the college football blogs that I post on. These next several months are going to very interesting, and the Republican party is running a number of outstanding candidates.

            Susannah is more of a writer and I am more of a commenter.

          • avgjo

            I am sorry if I came across as supporting Thurmond over Scott. When I saw Mr. Scott on television the other night, I was very impressed, and I will be donating to his campaign. The only thing that bothered me about the post was that many good and smart people on our side seem implicitly to accept that MSM criticism is legitimate; or if not that it is legitimate, that it must be heeded. That they are good means that they are repulsed by trash the likes of which was hurled at Nikki Haley and that they are smart means that they take a very practical, ‘nuanced’ approach to these things. And I hate it when it seems that we get co-opted into the thought processes that the other side tries to impose on us. And I understand the whole ‘real world’ argument. But I remember that the Founders didn’t accept the world as it was, and the world is the better for it. They stood on principle, and it must have struck quite a few pragmatic types that they were in ‘la-la-land’.

            It strikes me, from my studies of history, politics and my experience in the world of work and business, that the ‘pragmatic’ approach is, in the end, not always so. And that the seemingly idealistic approach is often practical. What do I mean? Think of the implications of each, and I think it will be plain. Please forgive me, I’m back off to work at this dark hour.

            Regards,

            avgjo

          • Blueblood

            The MSM is thankfully becoming less relevant; and Redstate, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party movement, and other outlets are becoming more influential–the 2009 general elections and the 2010 primary results have been nothing short of amazing and are evidence of the influence individuals can have over the political process.

            However, the evening broadcast news still have relatively large viewership and do influence some swing voters, so I think it is reasonable to consider their reaction to some degree…like how they would react with regard to the SC-01 primary–which was a no-brainer because of Tim Scott. I saw several MSM pieces highlight Nikki Haley and Tim Scott because of their ethnicity, but imagine if the Republican voters had been apathetic and not realized the power they have in a primary–see the SC Democratic primaries for what happens when people do not get involved, and Artur Davis in Alabama.

            Tim Scott and Paul Thurmond did not want to make the campaign about race, and I think they succeeded. However, Sean Hannity asked multiple questions about race after Scott won because it is great news story, and I think the Republican voters of South Carolina should be very proud of the fact that we nominated many great candidates such as Tim Scott and Nikki Haley and even threw out some incumbents (which was a big story in its own right).

            Btw, thank you for your contribution to Tim Scott, I took those photos in this diary and I can attest that Tim Scott is the real deal.

          • Susannah

            …You have every right to express your opinions, and your concerns are legitimate. (I probably come down too hard on dissenters, because I get defensive when people assume that I have some bigotry towards Thurmond, because of his race or name.) In my previous diary, I went into great detail about Tim Scott’s credentials vs. Paul Thurmond’s. However, in this diary, there was so much more to discuss (like Scott’s victory party), that I felt like this diary would have been entirely too long if I had gone into that kind of detail about their respective backgrounds again (which is why I just linked to that diary, where I discussed their qualifications, in the first paragraph). In hindsight, I probably should have explained their credentials again, so people wouldn’t assume that I was just supporting Mr. Scott because of race/PC issues.

            Thanks in advance for your donation. I have met Tim Scott twice, and I can attest to the fact that he is a real class act.

            Take care.

            X0X0, Suzi

    • Adjoran

      Tim Scott EARNED the promotion through years of public service as a conservative fighter. He talked the talk and walked the walk and paid the dues.

      No disrespect to Paul Thurmond – or any of the other five candidates in the Republican primary, either, all were qualified and would have made fine Representatives.

      Tim Scott was the MOST qualified of an excellent field. Any of the others could have a distinguished future as a conservative public servant; Scott also can point to his past.

      • avgjo

        Read my post again carefully. I said the problem with us discussing race in this matter is that it can (a) open us up to charges of tokenism, (b) by being so concerned we fall right into line with what the leftists want and (c) it can cause Mr. Scott to UNFAIRLY be treated by the left as someone who was selected merely for the color of his skin, which is crap, because AS I POSTED above, he is eminently qualified.

        I am legally white, but half hispanic. I look hispanic. When I was in high school, a well-meaning counselour offered me a scholarship because of the color of my skin; indeed, when I pointed out to her that I probably didn’t qualify, being legally white, she offered to work around it. I thanked her and refused the scholarship. I did not want people thinking that the only reason I got into school was because of the way I was made. BTW, I was offered a foreign language scholarship that year to an excellent private school because I had learned 6 languages in high school. I wish I could have taken that one (family circumstances prevented it) – that one I earned on my merit.

        Mr. Scott earned this nomination on his merit. From where I can see, he seems to be an excellent human being and quite capable. It appears he will make an excellent statesman. ON HIS MERITS, he absolutely deserves the nomination. But if we discuss publicly the sort of concerns earlier mentioned, it can be taken by a perverse MSM and twisted to look like mere tokenism. THAT’S ALL I am concerned about. It would be a tragedy to give any space to these people to level a charge like that against a seemingly fine man like Tim Scott.

  • Flagstaff

    (maybe I did?) but no longer necessary, I see. Good job, and congratulations to future Congressman Tim Scott.

    • Susannah

      …I appreciate your intentions. :-)

      Take care and have a good night.

      X0X0, Suzi

      • Flagstaff

        from Dana Milbank. And also some burgeoning awareness on his part of the falseness of some stereotyes. His OpEd column is called S.C. turns racial history on its head.

        It starts out strong.

        WASHINGTON – Strom Thurmond died in 2003. This month, South Carolina finally buried him.

        The hubbub over Nikki Haley’s victory in the state’s Republican gubernatorial primary eclipsed what for the rest of the nation could be more significant: Thurmond’s son was defeated in a run for Congress – by a Black man, Tim Scott. This is a beautiful thing because along with the late segregationist’s son fell some stereotypes of the South and of the “tea party” movement.

        This poetic storyline comes not from a Black-majority district nor even a swing district but from South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District, a coastal stretch from Charleston to Myrtle Beach where a mere 20 percent of residents are African-American. It’s solidly Republican territory (John McCain beat Barack Obama by 14 points here in 2008) and also happens to be the area where the first shots of the Civil War were fired.

        Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2010/06/28/20100628milbank29.html#ixzz0sGk1Rwqh

        Get the picture? A solidly White Republican district chose a Black man over Strom Thurmond’s son. More good news. Somehow, this election told Milbank something good about the tea party movement, although Milbank doesn’t confirm that the tea partiers had anything official to do with Scott’s victory.

        Just maybe this also tells us something hopeful about the tea-party movement. I’ve seen with my own eyes the racism at tea-party tax protests and rallies against health-care reform: the racist signs about President Obama, the “Joker” image of Obama in whiteface and the “birther” slander.

        But the vote in South Carolina’s 1st District suggests that the clowns who hijack the tea-party demonstrations do not speak for the conservative movement.

        If you can ignore the nonsense about racism Milbank imagined he had seen (TV pictures probably, hardly representative, and his own mental prejudice which transformed the Joker image and birther skepticism into something racial), you see that Milbank has experienced an epiphany: the folks he’d previously thought were typical tea partiers were actually hijackers and “do not speak for the conservative movement” at all. If he can remember that, it could be significant in the future.

        Of course, Milbank has trouble with Scott’s conservatism, which he doesn’t understand.

        There are caveats to this happy theme. Scott, 44, is if anything more conservative than the 34-year-old Thurmond…. Scott, who had been embraced by White voters for years at the county and state level (he even co-chaired Strom Thurmond’s Senate re-election campaign in 1996) is a racial outlier.

        Sounds like even more happy to me. A Black man is chosen on his merits by White voters. He’s conservative. They’re conservative. What’s not to like?

        The take-away from the column is Milbanks’ quote of Al Sharpton.

        “You’d have to say there has been some kind of shift in racial attitudes in that area,” the civil-rights leader said. “When a relative of a segregationist can be defeated by an African-American, it’s some kind of statement.”

        I think this is exactly the good that could happen and the bad that Susannah imagined could be avoided when she wrote Tim Scott MUST Win – This Is Not Negotiable!

        The media will humiliate us in SC?and the Republican Party in general?with this because it will be fun for them. And worst of all, we will have no defense, because Tim Scott is such an obviously superior candidate. We will have to assume the position and take it?and, it will also kill our chances of appealing to future minority recruits and voters.

        Instead, we got at least one article which noticed the obvious–conservative voters are concerned with issues, not skin color. Had Thurmond won, the story would have been reversed, and probably more widespread. Whether that was her intention or not, she was right.

        • Susannah

          ….I’m serious. This would make a great diary!

          By the way, Pat Caddell wrote good things about SC on Real Clear Politics as well. Here is the link–

          http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/06/28/south_carolina_outlier_or_national_precursor.html

          He called Scott beating Thurmond “a when hell freezes over moment”.

          Furthermore, I previously stated in this diary that “the left never saw us coming” and that “we were the cheetahs”. I think the reason that they never saw us coming, is because they were too blinded by their own prejudices and stereotypes of southerners, conservatives, and “teabaggers” to be able to see straight.

          Oh, and thanks so much for the kinds words, and for taking the trouble to write this excellent comment. :-)

          Take care.

          X0X0, Suzi

          • Flagstaff

            After I wrote it here (but didn’t post it), I tried to copy it to a new diary. When I then tried to clean up the differences caused by the different word processing editor, I couldn’t get it to do the blockquotes right. The first one was OK, but after that, every attempt to blockquote or even indent made the entirety of the remaining entry indent, and I couldn’t un-indent individual paragraphs to make it right.

            After about 15 minutes of trying different fixes, I gave up and went ahead and posted it here, which was after all my original intention.

            Milbanks is a squish (like Scott Brown, apparently) but his column is widely read, and he stated the obvious here. He may have missed the point himself, but readers could get it. And you predicted it, in a double-reverse.

  • Joliphant

    And while one of the most despicable man in media hasn’t changed at all it brought a nice sense of schadenfreude to see the lefts attack dog bite them.

    • Susannah

      …..Maybe the Obama kool-aid is starting to wear off, because he’s had some really funny sketches recently.

      • Susannah

        I haven’t seen you in quite a while. It’s good to see you back around Joliphant. :-)

        • Joliphant

          And even better to see you

          • Susannah

            ….I appreciate it.

            Don’t be a stranger. ;-)

            X0X0, Suzi