« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Megyn Kelly Spanks Kirsten Powers

Powers screams: Shabazzbut!!

By: Aaron Gardner (Diary)  |  July 13th, 2010 at 06:00 PM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

Earlier today, Megyn Kelly of Fox News had Kirsten Powers on to talk about the Justice Department’s handling of the Voter Intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party(NBPP). Specifically, Brad Sherman’s [Democrat representing CA-27], reaction to a constituent question on the subject.

For a bit a background, members of the NBPP committed voter intimidation, one of which is Samir Shabazz. This is not in doubt as injunctions had been put in place. Unfortunately, in a land where Law is no longer king, injunctions can be reversed at the whim of a bureaucrat working to affect his leaders style of change.

The injunctions were reduced or reversed by the direction of AG Holder and the case was put out to pasture. The people, seeking justice, come to their duly elected representative to ask questions and they are met with arrogance clothed in ignorance.

The scene is now set, prepare yourselves for 10 minutes of pure awesome …

I believe they call that a smack down. Yes, I am sure of it.

Now, I wonder where anyone would have gotten the idea to do this sort of stuff.

It boggles the mind.

I do hope that Mark Reed can raise enough money to make this issue stick to Brad Sherman

Aaron B. Gardner

Tags: , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • izoneguy

    Powers is a very dim bulb. She sticks to the left’s talking points and never has an original thought. She never listens to the question.

  • http://www.redstate.com/etcartman Kenny Solomon

    …………sounds like a Cinemax PPV special.

    But I saw the video and all they did was talk, with only one of them making any ind of sense at all.

    Oh well.

    ————————–

    Did I just say that ?

    ;)

  • rick554

    Megyn destroys Democrats, liberals and fools……..the woman is one my heroes!!

  • Flagstaff

    Kirsten Powers is an intelligent advocate. She had no case, at least none that stood up against our own lyin’ eyes, so she did what she had to do–she filibustered and dodged and diverted. Kelly was under magnificent self-control to not cut Powers’ mike.

    Andrea Tantaros, the “balancing” guest, didn’t get to say much–Kelly chose to smack down Powers herself, which she could do with less acrimony because she was the host.

    I observed it live, and was as impressed as everybody else was. The whole thing was proof that you can’t argue with insanity. Kelly’s closing was perfect.

  • averagevoterdotcom

    Many Dems think only short-term, like children. Few are chess players, as most are capable of only checkers. Obama’s political move of dismissing the Black Panther charges likely altered the chessboard greatly to Dem disadvantage. An yes, no doubt Obama ultimately made the decision.

  • Composer_Man

    n/t

  • donnylatenight

    There is no other forum in which liberals lame and predictable talking points are actually challenged by objective voices. Constant liberal smackdowns are inevitable……

  • teapartypatriot

    This video shows that when a lunatic-left drone is pitted against the facts, they fold like a cheap suit. BTW, the same thing occurs repeated on Hannity whenever the dolt bob beckel on on. The more beckel spouts the inane, shallow, mindless ideology of the d-crat socialists, the easier it is for all to see that these people, like their Messiah, offer nothing of value or substance to America. The lunatic-left d-crat socialists are their own worst enemy.

  • Flagstaff

    Then counter them with facts and logic. It’s the best way to convince the undecided.

    I just wish they’d cut out the crosstalk–nothing is understandable then. I hate those remote discussion spots; the delay makes them very awkward, especially for the polite conservatives who stop talking when the lib spouts off, which is frequent and long.

  • melissatx

    she is right on.

    Kirsten Powers is a black apologist and oddly enough wanted to discuss Bush, not Shabazz.

  • BigGator5

    …

  • njrob

    was that she knew she had no case in regards to the illegal behavior of the NBPP. They’re a bunch of thugs and if she talked about them she would get run ruff shod over by Ms. Kelly. So she tried to filibuster constantly like a politician and only speak about her fixed talking points. She’s a joke of a commentator and really has gone off the deep end in her love for the Obama Administration.

    Instead, Ms. Kelly kept bringing up the issue for why they were on the show, the criminal behavior of these thugs, and Kelly won by a TKO.

  • throwback59

    She would know how to handle Iran & N. Korea.

  • earlgrey

    My kids can come up with bette rmore interesting lies than these twits.

  • Flagstaff

    the “Best Title of the Year.”

  • Cheryl

    Score!

  • gazill

    what examples have ever been provided of her claims, regardless of relevance to Megyn’s point, of voter intimidation cases thrown out during the Bush administration. In the recesses of my mind, I recall (time after time) accusations of voter fraud, voter intimidation/suppression and disenfranchisement during the Bush era whenever a Democrat lost, yet did not see any true evidence. However, I did see a video of the panther standing in paramilitary gear with a baton. I wish Megyn would have asked the drone to cite a specific example, and then provide the evidence. As I get older (and crankier, and boy is this administration elevating that trait), I lose complete patience with these people.

  • Michael Dugas

    I don’t remember the MSM screaming, and they would have, about white/republican intimidation of Americans of African descent at the polls. I see racism daily on the Left which I know they like to tag us with, maybe it makes them feel less dirty if they feel we are on par with their own racist behaviors.
    We all saw the New Black Panther leader calling for killing whites and their babies….is that not the definition of the Hate Speech the left is always talking about? If I, as a Caucasian Conservative and a Republican, were to call for the killing of Americans of African descent and their children I’d be crucified in the media and probably brought up on federal hate crime charges of some sort. Incitement of violence for starters and there wouldn’t be any DOJ dropping the charges on me.
    I do know this, if it happens again the Administration and the DOJ have just increased the likelihood of violence because the intimidated may just decide that there isn’t any justice for them
    through legal channels and they may decide to handle it themselves.

    Just sayin’ ya know…..

  • DavidS1787

    I watched this story live and believe Megyn Kelly who was a well seasoned trial attorney shredded Kirsten Powers !

  • Right_Again

    Kirsten Powers is usually one of the brighter liberal guests on Fox news shows. She doesn’t always toe the line for the left. However, on this particular show she was channeling Alan Colmes. She had no legitimate argument against what Megyn was saying so she resorted to Alan’s standard bag-o-tricks and played the moral equivalance card. Ineffectively.

    What a closing line. A classic.

  • mom25

    Liberals cannot mount a sensible, logical argument on any issue. They have all these ideals and positions, but nothing factual to base them on. The sole weapon they have in their arsenal is calling names and blaming other people. Thank God for people like Megyn who can keep control, make sense, and try to bring people back to the original argument. That Shabir Shamaz person should be on trial for hate speech…..if a white person stood on a corner with a bullhorn, shouting that black men should kill “white crackers” and babies, they’d be slapped in jail, plastered across the television screens and possibly dragged out for a hanging. This administration is a disgrace………

    ————————-
    Hope and change….yep, hoping things change in November.

  • Jack_Savage

    The voter intimidation of African Americans that we are clearly guilty of is our racist idea that voters should actually be eligible and registered to vote and not be felons. At times we have even proposed the radical, teabagger racist idea that voters should actually carry identification that would prove that they are who they say they are when they voted. We also want to intimidate blacks by occasionally purging voter rolls for people who might have moved, be dead or be convicted of a felony.

    Come on, man – systemic racism, so pervasive that we don’t even notice it? Don’t you read The Nation or hang out in the Village?

    (snark off)

  • http://rwno.pcriot.com warrenbeatty

    Just what did you expect from the NYPost and a member of Congress?

  • Stan

    Agree completely. I’ve seen some well-reasoned arguments from Kirsten in the past, but this was awful. Megyn whacked her around pretty good. Kirsten deserved it.

  • haumea

    They’re all tactics, no strategy — Obama is the quintessential example of this. While racking up short term wins, he’s losing the long game.

  • deano64
  • raoul_duke

    No one is denying that the NBPP is a hate group. Both the Anti-Defamation League & the Southern Poverty Law Center define them as such. Beyond that, most of the story as reported here and in most conservative media outlets begins to fall apart.

    Here’s a few facts for you… a smack-down of another sort. Sorry to trouble the good readers with a brief dose of reality:

    1) The civil complaint alleging “voter” intimidation was filed by the Bush Justice Dept. on January 7, 2009.

    2) The prosecutor assigned to the case was a one J. Christian Adams, a former Bush Campaign poll watcher, a prosecutor with no previous experience in voting rights or civil rights law but an extensive background in Republican politics & conservative activism. Adams was hired by the DOJ in 2005 by the disgraced & ethically challenged former political appointee Bradley Schlozman

    3) The Bush DOJ dropped the case against all defendants except one later that year. At that time, Prosecutor Adams sat on his hands, remaining silent.

    4) Last May, Prosecutor Adams resigned in protest, citing primarily that the DOJ had refused to allow him to testify and expressed an unwarranted fear of being held in contempt of court if he did not testify.

    5) The Civil Rights Commission held hearings last April on the case(s) of “voter” intimidation.

    6) To this date, no, zero, zilch, nada zoters have come forward to formally allege any sort of intimidation.

    7) Complaints of voter intimidation at that Philadelphia precinct have come solely from Rebublican poll watchers. Your beloved Megan Kelly described video of the incident occurring that day as having been made by a voter. This is patently false. The video of that incident was made by Stephen Robert Morse, a blogger hired by the local Philly Republican Party on behalf of the McCain Campaign.

    8) Adams has openly admitted that he has NO first hand knowledge of the events, conversations & decisions he is citing in relation to his accusations.

    9) It was the Bush DOJ that dropped charges against all members of the NBPP, save one.

    10) The Obama DOJ successfully obtained a default judgment against Samir Shabazz, a NBPP member, for carrying a nightstick outside the Philly polling place in 2008.

    11)The only white “voters” in evidence at this particular polling place throughout that day were local Republican Party poll watchers according to eyewitnesses on the ground that day.

    12) Abigail Thernstrom, the Republican vice-chairwoman of the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights, which is currently investigating the DOJ’s decision, has called the investigation “very small potatoes full of “overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges” and went on the say that it “has not served the interests of the commission”. She has further stated that the DOJ has given “plausible argument” for not pursuing additional charges in the case.

    12) Video made by Mr. Morse failed to capture any racial slurs made by anyone. An earlier documentary by National Geographic did capture two NBPP members using derogatory terms against whites.

    Tempest in a teapot? Manufactured outrage?

    Have a nice day…

  • Jack_Savage

    So much time to post, so factually incorrect.

    The only thing one really needs to do is watch the video, then understand that the Obama Department of Social Justice dropped the case and downgraded the injunction, as Megan said. The NBPP is a well recognized and documented hate group, and I wish I could say it surprised me to see a lefty defend them. But it doesn’t.

  • RedBeard
  • Read Chesterton

    as long as they didn’t use the N word?

    Got it.

  • Jack_Savage

    They don’t have the sack to engage in a debate.

  • izoneguy

    and if Powers is on the great American panel I turn it off….
    I also turn it off for Bob Beckel and few other leftys that I cannot stand to watch. They are wasting air that the rest of us could breathe.

  • lending

    mine too

  • raoul_duke

    And, if you had bothered to read the info I posted, that point was stated in the first sentence. NBPP IS a hate group.

    That’s not what’s being debated here and elsewhere. I believe the entire focus of the current storm is revolving around the issue of “voter” intimidation at the one Philly polling place in 2008.

    So far, the facts just don’t support those allegations, under this admin’s DOJ or the previous.

    Hey, but why let a few messy facts get in the way of a good head of steam, right?

  • raoul_duke

    WTF?

  • Aaron Gardner

    I understand you read Cynthia Tucker, and that’s great, problem is … I read Hans A. von Spakovsky.

    This

  • raoul_duke

    am I “cool” with any of it. Nor am I “cool” with manufactured charges brought by political operatives for political purposes.

    Are you?

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    The Liberal talking points come out to play

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    This is the same that all Liberal blogs are spouting. It is nice to see that they get around to here..

  • raoul_duke

    … I infer that you read more than The National Review and Red State. That’s good!

    Never heard of Ms. Tucker until now… thanks, I’ll be looking her up, as I read everything I can get my hands on… even the abysmally silly drivel that sometimes appears on these pages.

    The appearance of anyone at a polling place dressed in paramilitary get up and behaving in any way to be construed as menacing is wrong… very wrong. Same for showing up at a town hall meeting strapped, locked & loaded. I’m not defending the NBPP in any way, got it?

    It’s the lack of evidence of actual intimidation, as no voters from that day have yet to come forward during any hearing, and the theatrical resignation of Adams, he, too, without any concrete evidence to support his claims that has downgraded this case.

  • cactusjack

    he was interviewing James Carville and wife Mary Matalin from new Orleans. I could not believe what I heard…Carville absolutley dumped on the Moratorium. Talked about job loss in the Gulf, the economic impact, how bad it was. You got to hand it to him, Carville is a loyal Cajun. His wife backed him up. They were both dead serious, no axe to grind, but I bet the WH was turning back flips. Sen Landrieux knows she had better go to bat for her threatened state or she is toast next election whenever it is. Cajuns have long memories I guarantee.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Or are you just shifting the goal posts because you didn’t understand my last reply?

  • RedBeard
  • cactusjack

    subliminally, anytime anyone hears the name Bush now in political context it just makes them compare then to now, and realize they either miss him, or -shazam- GWB actually did better than “my man 0.” Either way a good association.

  • raoul_duke

    at least until concrete evidence & testimony of those intimidated “voters” supporting the charges is brought forth. So far, it hasn’t.

    That is how it works in the USofA, like it or not.

    Charges made by local Republican poll watchers and a Schlozman DOJ appointee and known political activist don’t quite make an air-tight case, now matter how much mis-attributed video is aired or who Ms. Kelly shouts over.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    No evidence. did you see the video of Megyn with the long time Democrat that said that this was the worst case of intimidation he has ever seen and he was actually at the polling place. Or the Black Republican poll watcher that was intimidated into not coming to the polling station.

    They had a conviction and downgraded it for political reasons not legal

  • raoul_duke

    … shout over Ms. Kelly did to Ms. Powers being hailed as a “smak down” by synchophantic lemmings.

    Waiting ‘fer that debate….

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    this is just a roundabout

    Heinz Rule

  • Bill

    democrats start speaking out about this INSANE, SOCIALISTS, MARXISTS ADMINISTRATION THAT WE HAVE IN POWER NOW

  • gekster

    Wouldn’t those intimidated white voters be afraid of being labled “racist” if they said anything.

    I can see it now.
    Intimidated voter:
    “That black man kept me from voting.”

    Eric Holder:
    “He did no such thing. Your just a racist teabag….,
    And I’m filing charges of hate speach.”

  • Bill

    while she was squirming in her seat, rolling her eyes and fighting back the look of being run over by an eighteen wheel truc? Go get ‘em Ms Megyn Kelly! You are the woman!

  • gekster

    Can be used in the next campaighn?
    He is a Clintonite.

  • paulnashtn

    I could not believe Kirsten Powers, she normally has intelligent, if not correct, comments on whatever the subject, but this was painful to watch

  • Michael Dugas

    Of course it’s so subtle as to be almost non existent. Systemic Racism and the Left seems to think the only cure for it is….more racism!!! More Hate!

    Your SNARKisms aside, the overwhelming hypocrisy of it all is almost laughable if its intent wasn’t so malicious.

    If The New Black Panthers were to actually start killin’ dem crackers and their babies would the DOJ prosecute or just issue a summons on a misdemeanor?

  • cactusjack

    this “get by” the producers of CNN interview shows. They had to know Carville was probably going to open fire on Bamster again. No, CNN has not suddenly gone Red State or anything like that. I have to believe, the producers must have called all their anchors in recently and said “look, Obama is consistently under 50% approval rating and still dropping, the only thing being hurt by not taking the gloves off with him now, is CNN’s ratings…so you can take the gloves off…a little.” These dump on Obama shots out of the woods at CNN are not an accident anymore. The Clinton connection may indeed be the answer gekster. And as I recall Clinton carried LA in 1996.

  • Bill S

    I suggest you answer this.

  • cactusjack
  • kchand

    if you turn it off whenever Powers and Beckel are on; you cannot watch that often. Beckel is just a goof that hasn’t had a good idea since the 1970′s, if then.

  • kchand

    Obama’s moves are all for HIM. The Dems are just ‘useful idiots’ to his aspirations. I believe he would be fine with losing the Congress for the next 2 years; it’s his best chance for re-election.

  • Read Chesterton

    Charges made by local Republican poll watchers…

    That they were republicans, or that they actually did their job and *watched* the polls?

    You do realize this is a website where Conservative Republicans gather, to have Conservative Republican discussions and support Conservative Republican candidates, right? And you seem to be trying to make a Liberal Democrat case that Liberal Democrats shouting and showing weapons outside of a Liberal Democrat polling place isn’t a chargeable offense as long as Liberal Democrats don’t see fit to complain?

    And you expect anybody to believe you wouldn’t be equally as dismissing of any complaint if the business end of one of those nightsticks had found a Conservative Republican head to open up?

  • barleycorn

    Check out the video at about 2:45 and then at 6:55.

    She first says it wasn’t voter intimidation and then claims Megyn Kelly is putting words in her mouth and denies having said it wasn’t voter intimidation.

    The inability to keep track of what she had said in a short interview is pretty solid evidence she was making it up as she went along.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …where I abruptly lost my suspension of disbelief that this guy wanted to have a discussion.

    Good job defending the honor of a guy who wants my kids dead because of their skin color, Sparky. And the Presidential administration who are fine with letting him and his group get near polling stations.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    But there’s something funny about passive-aggressive mockery of somebody’s spelling when it incorporates a pretty egregious spelling error itself.

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf
  • JSobieski

    Time to return to individual therapy?

    Those on the left are the Sith lords of manufactured outrage! In contrast, real non-astroturf folks are actually quite alarmed at the dropping of this case. Morover, people are legitimately concerned at the lack of press coverage by the MSM.

    Heck, the Congressman at the beginning of the segment even denies knowing anything about it, which means that the coverage of the topic has not been well covered.

  • JSobieski

    Its one thing not to bring a case in the first place, but to dismiss your own case after the defendant defaults by not answering is an entirely different matter.

    If the case wasn’t air tight, why didn’t the BP even bother to deny the charges? They had their day in court and didn’t even bother to show up.

  • merryj1

    Liberal/radical, regardless of what the facts are, yes. But Powers will vent as much against Black conservatives as against anyone else. It isn’t race, it’s ideology.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx
  • merryj1

    …and the Bush DOJ sent lawyers down to investigate: There were allegations of minutemen intimidating voters, but it turned out they were gathering English Only petition signatures, they were not within an improper distance to the voting polls, and there was no approaching of or interaction with voters until/unless the voters went to the petitioners to read and sign (or not) their name(s).

    On the other hand, I was chewing nails about all of the Democratic voting fraud instances that the Bush DOJ did not investigate: Washington state where more votes were cast than registered voters; Wisconsin, where Michigan students bragged of casting several votes each at various Wisc locations (and a NY activist sent busloads of vagrants from poll-to-poll to cast multiple votes for $2 plus a pack of cigarettes each); numerous ACORN-related cases nationwide (some enforcement efforts on some cases), etc.

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim

    to listen to Megyn’s show for a few minutes each day during the Kelly’s Court segment. Thanks for this, Aaron. This is why she’s one of my favorites on Fox. And I agree with Fladstaff waaaay up in the first comments thread. Kirsten usually is better than this. Right_Again I think pointed to her downfall quite accurately. She channeled Colmes, and fell on her face. I still think Megyn woulda had her for breakfast, but not as bad.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica
  • merryj1

    … was primarily between 1866 and 1964, when the Democratic Party head in Tn, Nathan Bedford Forrest, created the Ku Klux Klan as a Dem Party national enforcement arm, with the declared purpose of breaking down the Republican Party so the Democrats could obtain control of elections.

    That was actually pretty much common knowledge up into the FDR Administration; how on earth the Dems ever managed to twist history that 180 degrees to garner the Black vote and loyalty is mind-boggling to me, but you have to admit those old boys were very good at deception and deceit!

    Dispicable and violent, absolutely, but very good at bald-faced lying. Ironic, though, no? The NBPP is now part of their 21st century KKK, as is the SEIU and who-knows-what-else.

  • clintonformccain

    Carville was banned from his CNN gig during the primaries in 2007-08 because he was a Clinton supporter, while all the Obama supporters (Donna Brazille, etc.) continued on CNN everyday.

  • Bill

    Liberal opportunitist and political animal that looks like a “saint” next to Obama, the Socialist Marxist Progressive Idealogue. We could expect certain things from B Clinton based on the polls (and I guess Dick Morris whispering in his ear)! Obama is working the Alinsky method and taking orders from George Soros and whoever else who has bought him off. Obama doesn’t care about the majority of people in the USA, just the ones who need social justice and fit his Marxist Ideology! To my best gut feeling, Hillary Clinton is in the same mold of B Obama, not her husband B Clinton. However, Hillary may not be a complete hard a-ss idealogue, although I could be wrong!

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

    She’s smart, she’s sexy, she’s conservative ..

    Powers needs a dye job.

    From her face, you could tell she was birthing everyone one of those lies.

    She was a cheap date, er, debate.

    Loved this.

    Flagstaff, I’m jealous.

  • JSobieski

    if the people giving testimony are black democrats and some black democrats still vote?

    Got it. The ability of left-nuts to drink so deeply of hypocrisy is both impressive and alarming.

    If the racial situation was reversed, this story would have been front page on the NYT every day since 2008.

    Didn’t your parents ever teach you not to beclown yourself in public? Or are all 9 of the witness statements disqualified in your view because all 9 people were white?

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

    as “corrupt,” as it were (whatever, Kristen, you dimwit) — she “proves” the DOJ is just as corrupt.

    What does the existence of the first injunction prove? More than “just a big scary.”

    Anyone who brings up Bush is toast.

    Conservatives have already won that narrative!

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

    so much so, I’m passing it around because it gives a clear explanation of how the partisan politics, lies and deceit of the progressives who blackmail us with cries of “No civil rights!!.. Reparations!” undermine our democracy.

    It clearly contradicts you.

    You said:

    “So far, the facts just don

  • izoneguy

    And Beckel & Powers are on a least once a week each.

  • merryj1

    …if I’m not mistaken, it seems as though Hillary did a grade paper on Saul Alinsky and considered him her “mentor.” That, of course, would have been what, 40 or so years ago, so there might have been some mellowing, but she’s always seemed a whole lot more “hard core” than her husband.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

    because you saw Megyn in action, not the girl-on0-girl or anything else than may have been alluded to in the comment section!

    :P

    (Go, Megyn! Kirsten, you’re so ratted out … Tool, tool, tool…)

  • spepper

    when I saw that Beckel was coming up on a “great American panel” segment of Hannity the other night (I flipped the channel also), when they threw up the image of him in between the 2 other panelists on the screen, my immediate thought was “turd sandwich”………

  • betsyred

    RINO in Chief, Joe Scarborough ran the clip on his show this morning. As is typical for Joe, he can’t help but stand with the WH on any issue that hints at conservatives demanding the truth and complete transparency. After running the clip, he and his cohorts giggled and jabbed at the entire issue with Joe, himself, saying that he ran it because Americans care about voter intimidation. Of course, he was being his usual sarcastic self. Yesterday they lauded Mrs. Obama’s remarks at the NAACP event. She whipped up the crowd by saying blacks need to intensify efforts. Does Joe think that should include voter intimidation? Joey says after watching the Kelley and Powers video, he’s so glad he’s nestled in the warm embrace of MSNBC with Mika’s WH files on every issue to help guide his thought and show prep. Joe can’t even stand up for Americans when it comes to ensuring our right and privilege of voting is kept pure. Thanks, Joe.

  • romeg

    to watch Joe Scarborough. After watching 1 installment I switched to CNBC’s Squawk Box which features The Real Mornin’ Joe: Joe Kernan.

    Moreover, I don’t have to watch the insipid idiocy in which Joe Scarborough has ensconced himself. Mika is fun to look at but she should keep her yap shut or read commercials.

  • c1212c

    That just truly made my day, thank you Megyn! Powers had the same stupid talking points on last Saturday’s Fox News Watch. This reminded me of the good ‘ol days when she tried to debate Michelle Malkin on O’Reilly’s show, she had even less of a chance with Malkin. Looks like she hasn’t learned anything.

  • Pingback: Megyn Kelly Smacks Kirsten Powers with Facts: Rep. Brad Sherman Shames HimselfVideo | Maggie's Notebook