« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Where We’ve Been Is Where I Want To Be

Burke 2012

Everything administered as remedy to the public complaint, if it did not produce, was at least followed by, an heightening of the distemper; until, by a variety of experiments, that important country has been brought into her present situation–a situation which I will not miscall, which I dare not name, which I scarcely know how to comprehend in the terms of any description.

In light of recent events and long standing policies, I could forgive someone for thinking the above comment came from the lips of some perspective 2012 Tea Party Candidate.  Of course this isn’t one of the many 2012 hopefuls, this is Sir Edmund Burke in his Speech on Conciliation with America.  This speech was given in 1775 in the House of Commons, prior to our Declaration of Independence.

Having witnessed the many changes in sentiment and conduct of Parliament, the ever changing ground put beneath America’s feet, and the continued failure to produce results, it is no wonder that Burke concluded that ‘under them the state of America has been kept in continual agitation.’

Although I don’t believe we are on the verge of a revolution, I do believe the agitation of our freedoms in commerce has grown to an unstable level, which is effecting our ability to be prosperous as a people and live within our means as a nation. The rise of the Tea Parties, the resurgence in conservative and libertarian material available online and in bookstores, this very blog; all of these are themselves evidence of this state of affairs.

The source of this agitation is found in the fundamental misunderstanding of where and how a nation achieves prosperity for its people and generates revenues for its government, as well as the effects government action has on these objects.

Freedom begets prosperity begets revenue.  Even though this is a simple concept,  it is nonetheless often difficult for the career politician, or Monarch, to grasp.   As we continue with Burke’s words as our guide we see him challenging the idea that government can create prosperity by some act of force that would provide returns in revenue greater than that which would spring forth from freedom.

And what is the soil or climate where experience has not uniformly proved that the voluntary flow of heaped-up plenty, bursting from the weight of its own rich luxuriance, has ever run with a more copious stream of revenue than could be squeezed from the dry husks of oppressed indigence by the straining of all the politic machinery in the world?

Do not entertain so weak an imagination as that your registers and your bonds, your affidavits and your sufferances, your cockets and your clearances, are what form the great securities of your commerce. Do not dream that your letters of office, and your instructions, and your suspending clauses, are the things that hold together the great contexture of the mysterious whole.

These things do not make your government. Dead instruments, passive tools as they are, it is the spirit of the English communion that gives all their life and efficacy to them. It is the spirit of the English Constitution which, infused through the mighty mass, pervades, feeds, unites, invigorates, vivifies every part of the Empire, even down to the minutest member.

We also see what little has changed for leaders who value a consolidated power rather than a broad prosperity as a desirable end.

Our President, the Democrats, and even some within our own party, are still slaves to the idea that they can bring forth equality if only they could wield these dead instruments or be allowed to wield them with just a little more force, all the while ignoring what effects their remedies have on the ability of the individual to become prosperous, which is itself a greater force for equality.

Despite the insistence of far away elites to maintain or increase the regulatory burdens in our system, 55% of voters, as Erick highlighted back in May, are now more concerned with over regulation than with having too few regulations.  The people are wising up and realizing that those who intend to continue our agitation have no business being near the purse strings of Congress.

As we move forward in our search for the candidates who will represent us in the 2012 elections at both the Congressional and Presidential levels, we must remember this spirit.  Unprincipled men who do not understand the relationship between freedom and prosperity need not apply.

All this, I know well enough, will sound wild and chimerical to the profane herd of those vulgar and mechanical politicians who have no place among us; a sort of people who think that nothing exists but what is gross and material, and who, therefore, far from being qualified to be directors of the great movement of empire, are not fit to turn a wheel in the machine.

But to men truly initiated and rightly taught, these ruling and master principles which, in the opinion of such men as I have mentioned, have no substantial existence, are in truth everything, and all in all.

Now is the time that we look for those who exemplify the spirit of our founders, that, as Burke notes, “turned a savage wilderness into a glorious empire, and have made the most extensive and the only honorable conquests–not by destroying, but by promoting the wealth, the number, the happiness, of the human race.”

Aaron B. Gardner

P.S. Regarding the subtitle, I am leaning greatly towards Gov. Perry as my candidate. I believe he fits the mold. This isn’t to say he alone fits the mold, just that he is the one with the longest track record of fitting the mold. If you feel as I do, make sure you let him know by donating. If you don’t, wait until Sept. 3rd and see if another option appears that is more appealing to you.

COMMENTS

  • reddog53

    Your point about the ‘dead instruments’ was underscored by the President during his bus tour last week. He touted the administrative change of auto mileage standards to 50+MPG as having done more to solve the energy crisis than anything in the last 30 years. Policy wonks always believe that the work is done when the policy is set….but nothing comes from these dead instruments. What change that does result comes from the inventive minds of those who actually build the better way, which they would do without the prodding of those who “are not fit to turn a wheel in the machine.” (What a great line!)

  • gekster

    .

  • azaeroprof

    ‘T’is a pity that 95% (or more) of Americans have never even heard of Burke, let alone read him.

    Every election in my lifetime has been littered with the “most important election of our lives” rhetoric. This time, it’s not just rhetoric. 80+ years of creeping socialism has reached the tipping point, in fact brought us over it. A solid conservative governance of the type you (and Burke) describe can possibly still take us back, but 4 more years of Obama will leave us certainly well past the point of no return.

    I, too, like Rick Perry. You are right, though, about the Sept. 3 date. Should things not go as I expect on that date, I am ready to get behind Perry. But I thoroughly expect the whole ball game will change in 2 weeks, and Labor Day will start a campaign that looks radically different from the one to date.

  • runner12

    This is an excellent piece. I love the references to Edmund Burke. He was a fascinating and brilliant English statesman and philosopher.

  • DerKrieger

    …revolution isn’t in the air I suspect that if we’re unable to stop the Leviathan and it continues to devour our liberty and our treasure then men’s minds will indeed turn towards that last resort. Americans are not Europeans and will not willingly submit to becoming subjects rather than citizens. We will not live our lives in service of government and it’s dependent classes.

  • briefsynopsis

    It is my belief that America was founded with the premise that the individual is best suited to make decisions for his own family. How that family survived and thrived were both a testament and lesson.
    1. Whether the head of a family was loving and supportive or domineering and curt, the lessons of success or failure were learned from parent to child and expanded upon or corrected with each new generation.
    2. The interaction of families and their community was the next rung of the ladder. How the individual and family influenced that relationship with their community through contribution and esprit de corps would determine their worth or level in that community.
    3. The Community itself, although influenced by geographical considerations, was dependent upon the individuals and families from which it derived its makeup.
    4. Accordingly the States were dependent on their communities for its ability to Govern.
    Under this model our Founding Fathers understood that the fail-safes were present and balanced with maximum freedoms so that:
    1. If an individual should fail, then the family would be there for rescue and support.
    2. If a family should fail, then it would be the community that would determine what assistance would be forthcoming.
    3. In the same way the State would determine what actions would be acceptable for a failed community.
    Fail-safes would be ensured through a bottom up structure in which the highest value was placed on individual responsibility.

    The two things that the Founding Fathers understood from the historical record were;
    Any government that is capable of giving anything, is also capable of taking anything.
    And that Government mandated equality in possessions or results, could only ever be accomplished to the lowest common denominator, with all having little or nothing above that needed for subsistence.
    The current structure of our Government no longer resembles the Representative Republic as designed. What we appear to have now is a heavily federalized form of government intent to ensure its own survival at the peril of those that it once served.

    Thanks Aaron, well written!!!!

  • aesthete

    It’s about control and prestige. There are reams upon stacks upon pages of empirical and logical data supporting the idea that there is a causative relationship between freedom and increasing prosperity in all areas of life, whether it be education, health outcomes, or fiscal affairs. Democrats and Republicans on the hill are not unaware of this knowledge — and really, anyone who had a position of power or influence during the Cold War has more than sufficient evidence based on the many natural experiments that could be seen when broadly free markets were compared to anything else. Anyone who lived through that era saw the rise of Hong Kong from a poor city-state to one of the most advanced cities and economies in the world, through the power of positive non-intervention. Likewise, the rise of S Korea and the other Asian tigers mirrored the lack of progress in nations which adopted socialism, or which stayed mired in feudalism or other medieval forms of governance. Most people on the hill are smart and informed enough to know these facts — but most people in DC could really care less.

    In reality, the chief concerns of most people in DC is not how to accrue more revenue to government; if that were the case, they would be discussing a VAT, looking for regulations to remove, and generally looking for a more efficient tax and regulatory framework. Instead, what you see it firm opposition to even marginal changes to either: the reason being that the tax code is not just a malleable code for how government gets revenue for these people; it’s a monument to the many politicians who formed it. Likewise, the regulatory state is not a rational attempt to direct market outcomes towards efficiency; it’s proof that Sen X is an important man! Why, he can make Intel and Walmart do his bidding! The common references to Europe’s entitlements are then little more than the modern-day version of a European dynast observing with resentment that his palace is not nearly as opulent as the Versailles. The progressive movement may have started with an eye towards efficiency, but today that is a minority strain within progressive politics. The dominant strain seeks to preserve and and expand these programs for the same reason that the Pharaohs were motivated to sacrifice so many slaves on the Pyramids: importance and self-worth is tied up in how much control one wields over people, not whether one makes the world a better place or not.

  • tritonspolartiger

    “Although I don

  • lineholder

    desire for power that often bothers me the most about the nature of politics in our country. It’s become an obstacle that gets in the way of finding long-term solutions to the problems that our nation is facing.

    I don’t blame the general public one bit for cynical and distrustful of politicians in general. Why should they be otherwise when most politicians repeatedly put their political interests first and foremost rather than acting with the integrity, determination and perseverance that is genuinely needed to find the kind of solutions that would allow us to turn things around?

  • dajeeps

    I don’t know how you define revolution, but I firmly believe that is what the Tea Party and associated coalition movements are all about. It is Reagan Revolution Part II.

    I don’t know if Perry is the guy, although I have already made up my mind that I will be supporting him in the primary. One of the reasons for doubt is that the Reagan Revolution did not get us far enough or provide lasting reform, and we find ourselves nearly back where we started only two decades after his farewell address. Because of this, I am quite cynical that Washington, after achieving virtually unlimited power, will not willingly restore it to where it belongs and the proposals for remedy of the disastrous side effects, like the Balanced Budget Amendment, do not abridge the regulatory power in any way, much less place Federal power within the original meaning of the commerce clause.

    We cannot prosper as a nation as long as property rights, free markets, and competition are continually trounced upon by the regulatory apparatus, and we are molded into constantly failing central planning schemes, with every aspect of life politicized beyond recognition. The old order must pass away, tossed in the dungeon of time with the key nowhere to be found if we are to survive more than a half century hence. Will Rick Perry and a new congress do this? I don’t have the answer, but if history is any guide, I would say there is likely little chance unless the states force the issue of overturning commerce clause jurisprudence with an amendment seen as proper to affect the needed limitation on Federal power.

    It might just be that we have our efforts focused in the wrong place, because like everything else, the answers the these issues likely do not reside in Washington. We need the states to stand up and assert their rightful 10th amendment powers. Until they do, we will just keep going around on the squirrel cage until eventual calamity rips us asunder.

  • littlehouse18

    I hope it never comes to that, and that if it does, it can somehow be achieved peacefully with civil protests.

  • littlehouse18

    has been painfully in operation in our public schools for many decades. Hence our current difficulty.

  • arthurmanger17

    It said it.

  • gunslingr45

    what kind of mileage the buses from Canada got?

    It sucks to be a liberal when you run out of OPM (other people’s money.)