« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

John MacGovern (R CAND, VT) to Challenge Sen. Sanders

It is official, Sen. Bernie Sanders, self avowed socialist, will be challenged by John MacGovern for the chance to represent the state of Vermont in the U.S. Senate.

A few weekends ago, after our state committee meeting, I had to opportunity to sit down with John. We discussed his record in government, his views on the issues, and his run to unseat Sen. Sanders and bring balance to Vermont’s federal representation.

John MacGovern is a pro-growth fiscal conservative who believes that our debt is creating a condition of economic slavery, and our policies are hindering economic mobility. John is in favor of flattening taxes and creating an environment where producers are not punished for their success.

In addition to being a fiscal conservative, John MacGovern conservative on National Defense. John is supportive of common sense cuts to defense spending that do not endanger our missions or the safety of our Armed Forces. MacGovern believes we must trust our commanders on the ground and stop making policy decisions based on political calculations.

John is also pro-life. He understands that Obamacare will lead to government being in more private family decisions, such as the hotly debated HHS mandate. John sees that the HHS mandate is a violation of conscience rights protected by our Constitution for some 200 years. John MacGovern supports the full repeal of Obamacare so we can work towards true reform of our healthcare system.

John MacGovern also comes into this with a history of government experience. As a 4 term member in the MA House, John represented a 2-1 Democrat district from 1983-1990. During this time he received a fiscal rating of 100% in first term, 84 in second, third and fourth from Citizens for Limited Taxation. Giving him an overall average of 88%. In 1990 John ran for the U.S. House in MA-5, Lowell – Lawrence – Framingham, against Chet Atkins. He ended up losing that race with 48% of the vote.

Since moving to Vermont John has run for the State Senate twice and served on various committees. As a member of Windsor’s Budget Committee last year they sent the Selectmen a budget that did not require new taxes, which is a rare achievement for Windsor. In short, on account of the committee’s efforts, Windsor, for one year at least, was living within its means.

John grew up in Harvard Mass on a dairy farm and was a graduate of Dartmouth. For more on John MacGovern, please check his campaign website.

It is time to restore balance in Vermont. It is time to bring a bit of common sense to the Senate.

It is time to send Sen. Sanders home and send John MacGovern to Washington.

Aaron B. Gardner

COMMENTS

  • citizenjerry

    A pro-growth fiscal conservative who’s pro-life to boot. I’d love to see him win, but I’m not confident about his chances. After all, Vermont, like Bernie Sanders, is also a self-avowed socialist.

  • drohan00

    Just wanted to know. These people used to send reliable fiscal conservatives to the congress all the time. Was there some type of generational misstep that has led to New England being a bastion for socialists like Sanders?

  • citizenjerry

    I think the shift happened when New York and Massachusetts liberals fled the city for a place with more open air and lower taxes. But their strident leftist ideology pushed out the traditional Republican New Englanders.

  • mdavt

    I live in Vermont and unfortunately, he has no shot. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll almost certainly vote for him, but the race will probably shake out with Sanders getting somewhere around 65% of the vote. The only hope would be for Sanders to make some breathtakingly awful gaffe, but that is very unlikely. Sanders is extremely consistent and on message, and no Republican has been successful convincing the voters that Sanders’ message is bad medicine.
    The only Republicans with sufficiently high name recognition to mount a real challenge to Sanders chose not to run. Mr. McGovern, with his long history in Massachusetts, will gain no traction here.

  • freemanja1991

    will sanders be able to win on just that point?

  • freemanja1991

    raise the $?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Do you have a candidate?

    Or are you just here to badmouth a man who’s stepping up?

  • lineholder

    If it is, then WE step up in what we can to make sure he has the funds he needs to succeed.

  • naraht

    Some states like New York are willing to elect those from out of state (RFK, Hillary), but Vermont is one of those states that views those *not from here* with suspicion.

    I hope that Mr. McGovern has read everything he possible can on Jack McMullen, Fred Tuttle and the 1998 Vermont Senate Race.

    In 1998, Jack McMullen ran for the Republican Nomination for US Senate in Vermont, having moved there from Massachusetts relatively recently. A Vermont Farmer with a 10th grade education, Fred Tuttle ran against him and Tuttle won due to both the fact that Vermont has open primaries and some truly ugly results in the debates (which included questions from one candidate to another and McMullen answered incorrectly on how many teats on a cow (guessing 6) and the local pronounciation of various Vermont towns).

    In the general, Leahy played things *very* soft including making joint appearances with him and won re-election.

  • naraht

    But Sanders probably doesn’t need it. I wouldn’t be all that surprised if Sanders decided to do “I’m Bernie and I’m running for re-election” ads.

    Also, I wouldn’t be all *that* surprised if the Democrats performed the same trick they did in 2006. Enough signatures are gotten to put Sanders n the Democratic Primary, which he *wins* and then *declines* the Democratic nomination, thus ensuring no Democratic line on the Senate ballot. I have no idea if there is any way to keep that from happening again, someone considerably more up on Vermont election law would have to chime in.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    It’s not always much, but I trust the recommendations/endorsements made at redstate, so I’ll give what I can. Lot of places to try and stretch my dollars this year.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Every donation helps. Even if John doesn’t win it is important because it will force Bernie to take resources that may have gone to others. Bernie has already said that he will break with his principles and take SuperPac money.

    Thanks for helping.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Especially when Sanders was born in Brooklyn, NY and didn’t move to Vermont until he was 23 years old himself.

    Also, growing up a dairy farmer in neighboring Mass, is much more representative of the average Vermonter that growing up in Brooklyn, attending the University of Chicago and then becoming a kibbutznik.

  • johnt

    Half of Brooklyn and a chunk of what is Manhattan moved up there
    You know how it is, destroy a local culture, help wreck the finances,and skip out of town, Like Brooklyn Bernie Sanders. Do though, pull your moral wreckage behind you, and oblivion as to your beliefs is a must The cycle repeats itself, introspection seems to be an illness with these “folks”.
    I picked that up form Obamsa, who picked it up from that giant rodent Axelrod.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    While citizenjerry cites cities, the reality is much more complex. The post-WWII invasion of Flatlanders* actually produced a wave of antipathy against their association with the coincident, blitz-paced transformation of the economy from agriculture to tourism. If anything, the increasing leftward tilt grew, not from an inability to stand against strident ideology, but as the first shock passed and it became evident that the Jews on the hill or the hippies in the hollow sometimes made sense at Town Meeting. The strident voices, by the late 60s, were the isolated radio hosts and weekly shoppers’ guide editors who had “told us so” that you wouldn’t be able to find a buck on Opening Day without having to stomp around a nudist colony or that the drug dealers would get the combination to your bomb shelter from your kids and it would be you, not they, who would face the concealed double 12-gauge moments after the preternatural glow flashed over the horizon like an Orodruin in the south.

    This all happened at the end of a multi-generational abandonment of orthodox Congregationalism. While the doctrines of grace had been of such momentous impact as to leave a scriptural imprint even on a society which, largely, no longer believed them after 1850, by 1950 the Scriptures had been abandoned as well and all that was left was an ethical skeleton. This may have been sturdy enough to carry most of the Greatest Generation through the Depression and into Europe and Africa and the Pacific, but it was so void of content by the 60s that nearly any doctrine could be substituted for the original–and many were. I cannot recall a single man of my father’s generation teaching me of sin, judgment and salvation–but many were quite eager to put away the now-exposed shames of racism (Mom remembered seeing burning crosses from the 20s KKK resurgence in an encampment in a river bottom across from her house in South Royalton) and militarism, and they would give a hearing to any who offered hope in a new direction. Phil Hoff? Bright young kid, let’s see what he can do in this new world! Goldwater? City slicker. Warmonger. Gonna blow the whole place up. McGovern? I’m sick of this stupid Republican war. Kids keep talking about peace–maybe it’s time to listen. Reagan? Smiles too much; gotta be a liar. Gonna set the Russkies off one of these days. Sanders? Socialist? What a hoot that would be! Can’t be worse than anything we’ve seen yet. It was a great year for zucchini, and we got the permits for the wood lot, what could go wrong?

    * for y’all Southenas like GC, that was anyone hailing from south of the VT-MA line, predominantly Bwaston, NYawk, LawnGuyLand and Joisy (Jersey being affectionately applied solely to relatives of the Misses Guernsey and Holstein)

  • Aaron Gardner

    Although, Vermont did vote for Reagan. ;)

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    The voices of those who didn’t are what stuck with me, however.

    Actually, I’m encouraged by little anecdotal indicators that the pendulum may be swinging back to the right. Probably too slow and too late for Mr. MacGovern’s sake, but I’m thrilled to hear he’s in the fight.

    And ever since seeing your title today I’ve been racking my brains for any dirt I could dig up from the week in 1980 that ol’ Bernie and I were nighttime housemates at my Aunt’s office in Burlington–I needed her IBM Selectric to type a research paper–but I only spoke to him once about who would park in the garage vs. the driveway; I don’t recall anything untoward, nary even a nefarious gleam in his eye, although he was probably planning for City Hall at that point.

  • renl57

    There has been an enormous increase in the number of young Americans going to college. And virtually all the universities in New England are liberal: Yale, Wellesley, Harvard, M.I.T., etc.

    And 18 year olds now have the right to vote. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of votes there.

    Take a look at the numbers from the 2010 special election in MA that got Scott Brown elected Senator. In the traditional exurbs and rural areas, Brown did very well, winning up to 70% of the vote.

    But in Cambridge MA, dominated by Harvard and M.I.T., the liberal Dem candidate, Martha Coakley, won a remarkable 84% of the vote.

    http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html

    At the same time, the near-collapse of New England’s manufacturing industry chased away the more socially conservative working-class folks from the cities, while older folks who had enough of New England snowstorms and freezing weather fled to the Sun Belt.

    New England used to have a vibrant textile industry and shoe industry, in which solid, stable Italian-American and Irish-American working-class people worked. Asian competition eliminated those industries. The factories are gone and the workers are gone.

    Look at the Census. New England has been losing population to the Sun Belt for years now. So this huge and growing cohort of students is ever more important in the elections.

    And VT became a playground for wealthy hippie types from all over the country, just like the San Francisco Bay area.

  • renl57

    In the 2004 presidential election–which Bush won–VT voted for Kerry over Bush by 20 points.

  • Kyle-MI

    And if memory serves me right, Tuttle ended up voting for Leahy showing that he was never a serious candidate. I suppose a lot of the people of Vermont thought they were being clever, but the whole joke has left me with a very low opinion of Vermonters. They literally turned the democratic process into a joke and seriously beclowned themselves.

  • freemanja1991

    In order to be competitive he will need to raise money, can he? It is a good question.

  • freemanja1991

    I just think the issue is he was an elected official in a different state, but Its good to know it will more than likely not be an issue.

  • freemanja1991

    to see about getting another candidate on the Dem on the primary ballot, and do what can be done to make it a 3 way race.

  • naraht

    As far as I can tell from the reports, Tuttle voted for himself, but his wife voted to Leahy. Tuttle also broke his only campaign promise which was to spend less than $1 per Vermont County on his campaign, but had to pay more than that for the Portapotties for the one campaign event that he had at his farm…

    Note, I’m not sure the final result would have been that different if Tuttle hadn’t run. McMullen actually got the Republican Nomination in 2004 and only did two percentages points better. Leahy beat Tuttle 72%-23% in 1998 and Leahy beat McMullen by 71%-25% in 2004. And Vermont probably had fewer political ads during the election in 1998.

    And the Film has actually set in 1996 and was a fictional about Fred running for Representative…

  • naraht

    Sanders won the 2006 Democratic Primary with 94% of the vote and was endorsed by the State Democratic Party. (http://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=7222). Everyone knows what’s going on with this…

  • naraht

    12+ years in state and having tried for lower political office, I think it won’t be a significant issue.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You have nothing constructive to add.

  • elizaliza

    how long they’ve lived there? irrespective of policy or issues?
    What?

  • freemanja1991

    asking if he can raise the money needed is constructive.

  • Juggernaut

    and make Christy Matthews and Dread Schultz proud. Past time he moves on. I may send a donation once I learn more about MacGovern.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    The “classic VT joke” frequently turns on shrewd self-deprecation being underestimated as idiocy by the outsider, to the ultimate harm of the latter. In a case where a beloved son candidate like Leahy could only have been beaten by a resurrected Ethan Allen, the venture at least got plenty of air time and discussion. In 2008 I could not hear a very different Fred’s name mentioned without a fond mind’s eye view of “SPREAD FRED” lettered on the back of a … Natural Crop Enhancement Distribution System.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Do you have anything constructive to add toward winning this seat?

    If not, zip it.

  • Pingback: » John MacGovern (R CAND, VT) to Challenge Sen. Sanders | RedState