« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Racism Race

Let’s write a script for a Lifetime movie. Set it in the 80s. The main character is older. He’s white. Heavy-set, glasses.. balding. Sweaty. You know the sort. What Winston Churchill would look like if he were raised in a shack on a farm out west during the Dust Bowl era. You know .. a redneck. Lets call him Bob.

Bob works for an insurance company. It’s his job to process claims. By his word, people receive care, or do not. Bob is efficient. He’s skeptical. Oh, and he’s a racist. Bob comes up against a claim from a poor black family in, oh I don’t know, let’s say Georgia. He drags his feet. He does the least he can do. He tries to pawn the family off on a black co-worker. But over the course of the film, he gets to know them. He starts fighting for them. In the climax, he throws a tantrum and makes a huge speech about how he was wrong, and this family is worth fighting for. Everybody cries. Eventually he’s playing baseball with the formerly death-bed-ridden now healthy again thanks to Bob 12 year old kid at the family’s Fourth of July picnic. Uplifting, right? Touching even. Good old Bob.

Now imagine the only part of Bob’s story that Lifetime airs is up to where he tries to pawn the family off on a black coworker. That’s it. End of movie. Well no more good old Bob eh? He’d be bad Bob. Bob the racist.

Race is a touchy subject, even in President Obama’s post-racial workers paradise. Today, the Daily Caller posted email from the infamous Journolist, in which the idea of randomly accusing conservative figures of being racists was floated as a reasonable way to shift the focus from Reverend Wright story, so as not to damage then-candidate Obama. To those of us on the right, that was one of those “well … duh” moments. We know the left does it. They obviously do it with malice and forethought. The racist smear is both the most common and the most potent rapid fire tool in the liberal democrat toolbox. Slap the label on someone and then they don’t matter anymore. They are marginalized. Perhaps they lose their credibility or even their job. But no matter. A political advantage was won.

Shirley Sherrod, as you certainly already realize, is the inspiration for Bob the racist. A video of Sherrod, first posted at Big Government, shows her at an NAACP meeting in March discussing something that happened in the 80s. She is telling the tale of a white farmer she was unenthusiastic about helping. She wanted to pawn him off on “his own kind.” Just before the YouTube video cuts off, you get the preview of where her story is headed. She’s about to tell the receptive audience that sometimes it’s not about race, it’s about how white people hate poor people, even when those poor people are white. Right?

Only there is much more to it than that. As subsequent reporting has revealed, Sherrod ended up working tirelessly for that white family. They became “friends for life” according to the family. The point of Sherrod’s story was that you have to move beyond race. That was her point.

Now, let us be clear, class warfare is also an ugly thing. But Sherrod wasn’t forced to step down from her position at the USDA because she spoke on helping poor people regardless of race. No, she was forced out because it was perceived that she was racist. Because she was being spun as being a racist.

When charges of racism are so casually set upon the world so routinely, this is what happens. Sherrod was arguably speaking out against racism, and yet was forced out of her job overnight by an administration with no moral courage, and was condemned by the NAACP, apparently absent even the barest investigation of the facts on their part. The same NAACP that casually slandered the entire Tea Party movement as racist.

Racism and race in general are big topics these last few weeks. The New Black Panther party wants to kill white babies, but you know, only in the right context. The reporting on that story has been abysmal. In fact, for the left the story isn’t voter intimidation, or DOJ corruption, or even, you know, baby murder. No, for them the story is that Fox News reported on the story, and must therefore be trying to exploit racial antagonism to hurt President Obama or something. Whatever. Glenn Beck!!

And then there was the NAACP resolution accusing white people who protest government spending of basically being giant lynch mobs. When that didn’t sell they morphed into a “call” for the “tea party” to condemn its “racist” elements. This charge was “brilliantly” answered by Mark Williams of the Tea Party Express, who posted a “satirical” letter to Lincoln from the NAACP. I’ve run out of scare quotes, but suffice it to say the letter went from satire to blatantly racist in about 20 seconds flat. He was roundly, and rightly, thereafter condemned.

Williams was kicked out of the Tea Party Federation. Today the Tea Party Express PAC is disavowing him. Despite that, rest assured his idiocy will be used by the left as definitive proof that the tea parties are full of racists. As we saw on Glenn Beck last night, those who would use race as a political weapon don’t require that their accusations contain truth. Political advantage is the game. Regardless of casualties.

There is no race war in this country, but the racism war rages apace. There are deserving casualties like Williams, and undeserving like Shirley Sherrod. And in both cases, the reactionary race-baiting of the NAACP were integral.

America used to dream of a day when people would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Today, instead, we judge them by the content of their sound bytes, YouTube clips, and social media footprint. We have a political atmosphere where even those who accuse people of racism don’t do it because they care about racism, but merely because it gives a temporary political advantage, or conveniently changes the subject. It is a charge used to take out political opponents, not to single out or object to evil.

As a society we are surely drifting morally. Slouching toward Gomorrah, as they say. And amid our moral ambiguity, we have lost fundamental outrage at actual racism, as well as the discernment to detect frivolous or baseless charges against the innocent. Racism ambiguity, in other words.

In America, politics often becomes a race to the bottom. The racism race is a perfect example. If there is a cure for this, I don’t know it. What can any of us do but object? And so that’s what I’m doing. I object.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • renny

    They can’t ever run on the taxes they want to impose, so they have to use race.

    Don’t let them. Counter them. Oppose them. Deny them.

    • gemimail

      The liberal elite is already using the Mark Williams incident as proof positive that the tea party really is racist. See “Purge this Poison” on RCP by Eugene Robinson. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/07/20/purge_this_poison_106376.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+realclearpolitics-articles2+%28RealClearPolitics+-+Articles%29

  • E Pluribus Unum

    She certainly was a racist when that story started.

    But I will say that the BG airing of that clip was most unseemly. I like them, they’ve done great work. But they should have done better than this. They owed their audience better than this.

    Next time, not so much trust will be given to BG without context. They’ve damaged some of their credibility with me.

    And in the meantime, there’s a sneaky part of me that says the Obamanistas fired her *because* of the unaired part. They have no trouble protecting the NBP, and Eric Holder, NAACP, that stupid Harvard professor, and other racists. why would they under-bus her? I don’t htink they felt any pressure at all from FoxNews.

    • MrMosis

      Does anyone have any idea what the story is there? I am very disappointed. Why must so many shoot their feet? Was the entirely of the video kept from AB/BG until after the fact?

    • ZootSuit
      • E Pluribus Unum
        • ZootSuit

          I’m sorry but thinking that the Obama Administration fired Shirley Sherrod because of the unaired parts ranks right down there with “black helicopters” and such.

          And this even aside from the fact that, yes, I think that Shirley Sherrod should have been fired and the NAACP should be commended for their support of her firing.

          • Richard Mullins

            as a Public official(working for us, although they don’t believe it), she should be videotaped at anytime. If she doesn’t want to be video taped, don’t be a public official. Her mouth is her worst enemy.

          • ZootSuit

            And please note, I am not defending Shirley Sherrod. Quite the contrary.

          • Richard Mullins

            NAACP did the right thing but it was after the fact. I never seen you defend Shirley Sherrod(hence forevermore known as Shirley Mugabe).

          • E Pluribus Unum

            Tongue in cheek, in terms of ‘because of what she said after the video cuts off’. I was just kidding.

            But how can they SERIOUSLY claim that they fired her because they felt pressure from Fox News? If they felt pressure from FNC, they would have fired Eric Holder, they would not have recess appointed Becker or this newest-latest one (name escapes me). They would have thrown those NBP guys in jail, they would have actually worked on the BP cleanup instead of having life-jacket inspections.

            I think they scapegoated her for some purpose other than what they say. That is the point I am getting to.

          • ZootSuit

            Although I am also wondering if others on this page also did not catch your comment as tongue-in-cheek. Especially those here who are agreeing with you.

            As for the reason Sherrod was fired so quickly, I have not heard anyone say or intimate it was because of Fox News. I think she was fired because what she said in a closed door meeting became public knowledge and, as I quote below, she became an albatross.

            Bluntly, I think Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was absolutely correct in his quote below.

          • E Pluribus Unum

            Tell you what, I am loathe to say anything nice, ever, about NAACP or Obama, and that is well-earned. And I have enough skepticism to just hold on and wait for more evidence before coming out with positives.

            The FNC thing, I don’t recall where I heard that, so I can’t attest to the truth of that.

            This whole race thing is running about 6000 degrees right now. Trust or even moderation, from the standpoint of conservative whites or tea partiers (including the black ones), is going to be slow coming, considering what the other guys are doing right now. We’re just tired of being called racists for breathing air and wanting freedom from big government.

            But I hear what you are saying. It’s worth contemplating.

          • ZootSuit

            and to me, that’s a problem.

            First, let me say that I am profoundly disappointed at the latest statements by the NAACP. As I write elsewhere on this page, even in full context I think Shirley Sherrod’s comments are racist and she should be fired.

            But the funny thing here is that, rhetoric aside, the NAACP is still following the lead of many conservatives. Even here on RedState, Erick and Caleb are saying that Shirley Sherrod should not be fired and even chastising elements within the “right-of-center” media for not getting the full story out sooner (and they are well able to correct me if I am misstating their position). Well, now the NAACP is (mistakenly, in my opinion) saying the same thing. Yet “somehow,” even in agreeing with one another, both sides manage to get zingers out to one another.

            And that to me is sad. Probably expected but still sad.

          • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

            No freaking way.

            Who made them the arbitrator of racist morality?

            This isn’t grade school where we offer positive reinforcement!!

            Until they come out and CONDEMN Shabazz for inciting hate and instructing black men to kill the “white cracka baby” of their white women – categorically NO.

            Sounds like the Newty/Iran ploy. Legitimize by bringing them to the table to “negotiate.”

            No teapartier should sit with an NAACP member until they denounce the racism of their own “kind.”

          • Richard Mullins

            when it was cool to do so. Otherwise, they wouldn’t say anything at all.

    • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

      (how ironic — get it? segregation? bussing?)

      to throw conservatives off the DOJ/kill white cracka baby trail.

      DOJ did an insidious thing letting Shabazzy go. This was huge and obvious.

      We were on top with “this is DOJ policy!” then NAACP condemns, and Sherrod is worthy of tire tracks.

      I’m thinking news cycles.

      • qixlqatl

        convenient, shall we say. Shabbazz gets a pass, but it wasn’t about racial politics because, oh, look, we fired Shirley Sherrod. Nothing to see here, move along.

        So Sherrod gets ‘hypo-vehiculated’ (heard that on the radio yesterday), and the Shabazz story gets swept under the rug…

        Must be wearing my tin-foil hat too tight….

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      She is everything that Breitbart’s initial footage implied. Her major life accomplishment is a victory in a class-action lawsuit Pigford vs Glickman and then later Pigford vs. Vilsack. The end result of this activity was that 96,000 different plaintiffs were paid off on a suit where somewhere in the ball park of 30,000 African-American farmers may or may not have had valid grounds to sue.

      Her life’s accomplishment reminds me of how the “Reverend” Jesse Jackson got his sons their Anheiser-Busch beer distributorships. She plays the acial entitlement game as a professional.

  • thelibrul

    The problem is this: One side claims the race card far too often, while the other claims that there are no race issues far too often. Two sides that cry wolf too often creates the problem that when there is ACTUAL racism (whether it is the NBPP or people like Mark Williams) the issue gets side swiped by the “process” story of who cries wolf more often. Every group of every color and poltical orientation contains someone who is racist. No group is perfect, but pointing that out instead of calling out the actual racists is the problem with racism today. It’s all process, no substance, and the media buys into the childish finger pointing every single time.

    • ZootSuit

      the real problem is that both sides would rather call the other side “racist’ and blame them for all their problems than confront the real racism on their side (whichever and whatever “their” side may be) and work to address the real issues this nation is facing.

      Sadly, even on those unfortunately too rare occasions when one side does addresses its own shortcomings (e.g. the Tea Party with Mark Williams and the NAACP with Shirley Sherrod), there seem too many still too eager to find fault.

  • erp617

    I heard the audience was clapping and cheering her. They won’t be able to sweep that under the bus.

    • ZootSuit

      http://www.redstate.com/zootsuit/2010/07/20/did-the-naacp-actually-do-or-at-least-say-something-good/

  • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

    excellent post. I’m sorry we can’t recommend. Creative element should land it in RedState U. What a way to get the job done.

    second, so what was the Sharron vid? a plant?

    I knew something was up b/c this vid came from a closed meeting. Who turned on “their kind” and for what purpose? Guess this is it.

    third, what about the rest of her speech? did she try to “turn” her crowd? or maybe give some little uplifting reversal there at the end, like a dangling modifier?

    or do we assume she did this for her “kind”?

    a very sad story, all of this.

    I can’t speak enough of the greatest of this post, especially when it leads to this:

    “America used to dream of a day when people would be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Today, instead, we judge them by the content of their sound bytes, YouTube clips, and social media footprint. We have a political atmosphere were even those who accuse people of racism don?t do it because they care about racism, but merely because it gives a temporary political advantage, or conveniently changes the subject.”

    Especially this:

    “It is a charge used to take out political opponents, not to single out or object to evil.”

    This is why I have a problem with hearing about Newt trying to legitimize the NAACP when he said on Hannity teapartiers need a sit-down with them.

    Politicization. Legitimization. No finger pointing at the obvious evil.

  • ZootSuit

    (Perhaps in a strange and perverted way, this may have to pass for racial progress in America. Sad)

    I think Sherrod should have been fired because, in her own words:

    I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough. (emphasis added)

    Bluntly, if a race of the parties had been reversed, I would demand the firing of the White Federal worker who had denied Black farmers “the full force of what [he or she] could so” even if they later “did enough.”

    Moreover, I also agree with Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack when he says in justification for her firing:

    Second, state rural development directors make many decisions and are often called to use their discretion. The controversy surrounding her comments would create situations where her decisions, rightly or wrongly, would be called into question making it difficult for her to bring jobs to Georgia.

    Shirley Sherrod had become an albatross who — fairly (in my opinion) or unfairly — had to be separated from government employ.

    Indeed, bluntly, if she had not been separated from government employ I very seriously doubt there would be this misplaced sympathy for her on the Right now. Have we become so jaded, partisan, unprincipled and hypocritical that we now condemn the Obama Administration even (on the rare occasions) when it does the right thing?

    I fear we may have.

    Moreover, for those who do think Shirley Sherrod has now been falsely accused, please acknowledge that her primary accusers have been on the Right. If anyone has lied about her, her comments and her record, it has been conservatives. Yet now, somehow, at least some of her new-found champions on the Right want to blame the Left for this?

    Get real!

    To think, I started the morning hopeful because the NAACP had the courage to condemn the racist comment and actions of a Black person. See here: http://www.redstate.com/zootsuit/2010/07/20/did-the-naacp-actually-do-or-at-least-say-something-good/

    Now I end the afternoon discouraged because it seems that a few conservatives are too cowardly to admit that the Obama Administration and the NAACP did the right thing.

    • Caleb Howe

      Nice. Good to see you have plenty of benefit of the doubt for the motives of the NAACP. Too bad you can’t spare any for your supposed allies. Go enjoy your hissy fit.

      • ZootSuit

        And the hissy fits all yours.

        • Caleb Howe

          You stop divining my motives, and I’ll not ban you. How’s that deal sound?

          • ZootSuit

            You stop trying to divine my motives and then I’ll stop divining yours. The old saying, “If it’s good enough for the goose …”

            (Although I also find it amusing because, basically, much of your diary is itself an attempt to divine the motives of others.)

            Sayonara.

          • Caleb Howe

            Exactly where I got into your motives. Like, right now.

          • ZootSuit

            I was about to use your quote “They obviously do it with malice and forethought” but I myself ascribe such motives to them so it would not be fair to use that against you.

            However, I do think there is a general tone in your diary and in many if not most of the comments here. It does seem to me that we want to ascribe the most nefarious of motives to the actions of the Obama Administration and the NAACP when in actuality their actions and statements should be applauded here. For once, they did the right thing.

          • Beasley Beesmeal

            but they were Forced to do so

            they shouldn’t be applauded, they should be Embarrassed

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

      You’re kinda all over the map, Zoot.

      As Caleb establishes, the story is developing. More is coming out.

      She said the words, she should get fired, even though she obviously wasn’t racist because she helped the white farmer — but the real tragedy is that she probably felt pressure to “perform” for “her kind.”

      But there is no misplaced sympathy.

      There is evil. And the NAACP is racist.

      Then there are lies and half-truths and the Obama Administration is heartily guilty of offering Sherrod as a sacrificial lamb. There was no “right thing.”

      What are you trying to instigate here? An RS Race War against the NAACP?

      • ZootSuit

        You?re kinda all over the map, Zoot.

        How?

        As Caleb establishes, the story is developing. More is coming out.

        Mostly agreed. But if the story is developing, then if you (and Caleb?) think the story is still developing, then why are you (and Caleb?) still jumping to conclusions?

        Moreover, I agree (with you?) that Sherrod should have been fired (you say so below) and disagree with Caleb on many of the conclusions he is jumping to. Among the conclusions that I disagree with Caleb about is, quoting him, “There are deserving casualties like Williams, and undeserving like Shirley Sherrod.” Well, truthfully, I do agree that Mark Williams is a “deserving casualties” but in this pantheon of guilt and racemongering I think he is less guilty and thus more deserving of my sympathy than her.

        She said the words, she should get fired, even though she obviously wasn?t racist because she helped the white farmer ? but the real tragedy is that she probably felt pressure to ?perform? for ?her kind.?

        While I agree that she should have been fired (and again, we both evidently disagree with Caleb here), I would say that she was racist. By her own account, she did not give the White farmer her best effort; she only did “enough.” Bluntly, that was wrong and, because it was racially motivated, racist.

        But there is no misplaced sympathy.

        For the reasons I state above, I would argue yes there is, for Sherrod.

        There is evil. And the NAACP is racist.

        There is also hypocrisy. And quite frankly, conservatives are the ones more guilty here. A Black woman made comments and actions which, even when taken in context, show a racial bias. The Obama Administration fires here and the NAACP commends the firing and, even more, they say they will investigate their members who applauded when the Black woman spoke of her racists behavior. And in response, many conservatives condemn the Obama Administration and the NAACP. Wow!

        Look, I like neither the Obama Administration nor the NAACP but in this case, they did the right thing.

        Then there are lies and half-truths and the Obama Administration is heartily guilty of offering Sherrod as a sacrificial lamb. There was no ?right thing.?

        Wrong! In this case the Obama Administration did the right thing in firing here. Again, I think her actions were indeed racist. But even if you don’t, as Secretary Tom Vilsack says, “The controversy surrounding her comments would create situations where her decisions, rightly or wrongly, would be called into question making it difficult for her to bring jobs to Georgia.”

        For that alone, she should have bee fired.

        What are you trying to instigate here? An RS Race War against the NAACP?

        Quite the contrary! I am the one who is saying that in this one particular instance, RedState and the NAACP should be in agreement.

        • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

          First of all,

          Redstate and the NAACP will never be in agreement as long as the NAACP continues to say things like this — as they did in their retraction of their Sherrod condemnation:

          “Next time we are confronted by a racial controversy broken by Fox News or their allies in the Tea Party like Mr. Breitbart, we will consider the source and be more deliberate in responding. The tape of Ms. Sherrod?s speech at an NAACP banquet was deliberately edited to create a false impression of racial bias, and to create a controversy where none existed. This just shows the lengths to which ***extremist elements*** will go to discredit legitimate opposition.”

          ***my empahsis

          So .. I guess this covers the “kill white cracker baby” thing because this has been covered by both FOX and Breitbart. Ignoring DOJ’s policy to disregard voter intimidation by thugs with clubs is legitimate because, gee, obviously, these are just the lengths to which “extremist elements” will go to try to prove racism in the ranks.

          Second, Secretary Vilsack is dismissing her because it’s an inconvenient “controversy,” not because they are condemning her words as racist. Getting rid of her erases this whole problem — evaluating her then-racist comments/evaluation of racism/whatever and “her decisions, rightly or wrongly.”

          They’re effectually saying: It’s a problem, so we’re going to get rid of it. Oh, and by the way, of course we condemn racist behavior. We’re just not offering a specific comment on her .. but what the hell will the American public know? It sounds like we’re condemning her, right? .. because, let’s not forget!! the economy’s in trouble and this is really all about JOBS! In Georgia! (Get that, Mr. Erickson? We care..give us kudos, friend.)

          Now, about that parsing.

          Look, Caleb said we live in a world of soundbytes. We need to get back to “singling out” and “objecting to evil” and not make it so political — which is what Obama and the NAACP are doing by sacrificing Sherrod.

          They not only LOOK like they’re doing the right thing, they’re trashing Brietbart and FOX, and really, the whole conservative blogosphere. They’re just not *saying it*, but they mean it.

          You bet we’re going to disagree.

          Again, Caleb closes out with “As a society we are surely drifting morally. Slouching toward Gomorrah, as they say. And amid our moral ambiguity, we have lost fundamental outrage at actual racism, as well as the discernment to detect frivolous or baseless charges against the innocent. Racism ambiguity, in other words.

          In America, politics often becomes a race to the bottom. The racism race is a perfect example. If there is a cure for this, I don?t know it. What can any of us do but object? And so that?s what I?m doing.”

          And at the end: ” I object.”

          Please.. tell me where the NAACP or the Obama Administration spoke as directly and eloquently about the evil and divisiveness of racism.

          Instead, the NAACP harps, “..we have yet to hear from other leaders in the Tea Party movement like Dick Armey and Sarah Palin, who have been virtually silent on the ?internal bigotry? issue.”

          Huh? Did they even SAY anything about Sherrod? Did they speak publicly? Why are they being singled out?

          Because this is all political. They don’t give a damn about evil or racism. This is Caleb’s point.

          If you still want kudos for the Obama Administration or for the NAACP, they I say you forfeit all your arguments by having fallen for the charade.

          This is political expediency. And they’ve struck their arrows at the heart of the conservative movement with our primary sources.

          They made mistakes. So what. All they did was report what came out of people’s mouths.

          That’s better than the msm (NYT, WaPo, MSNBC) who will purposefully omit reporting information to the public on the left’s behalf.

          What she said was still disgusting and truthful (the applause and whoops prove it) – because it shows the depths of racism that is a group that likes to cry wolf.

          It can’t be rooted out.

          They want to solve racism? They need to disband and stop segmenting the country.

          There are laws that protect minorities.

          Tell me who’s protecting “white cracker babies” and white people who turned away because they were afraid to vote?

          Where is the NAACP soundbyte condemning Shabazz’s remarks?

          Where is the NAACP advocating community service for Shabazz in the white part of town?

          Where is the NAACP telling the DOJ to FIRE the careerists at the Civil Rights Division?

          Where is the NAACP telling the DOJ to pursue Shabazz with the full extent of the law.

          Agreement? What agreement?

          • ZootSuit

            As I have said before, I think Shirley Sherrod’s full comments when taken in context still show a racial bias for which she should have been fired.

            Moreover, I will not even argue with the motives of Secretary Vilsack in firing her (although getting in the motives of others is a risking prospect) but I will and do agree with his stated purpose for the action. Do you disagree that Shirley Sherrod was an embarrassment and distraction and if for that reason alone should have been separated from government employment?

            But Veronica, you’re ranting and are not addressing the issues I am talking about.

            I am not nor have I ever excused the NAACP for its excesses and errors, including the ones you mention. You’re just raising a straw man with that.

            But I am saying is that they should have been commended when they did come out against Shirley Sherrod. Indeed, rhetoric aside, now that they have come out in support of her, as much as they would be loath to acknowledge it, they are still just following the example of people like Glenn Beck, Erick and Caleb.

            The “funny” thing to me about this entire episode is that if you look past some of the rhetorical flourishes on both sides, you will see that many of them are saying the same thing. Funny, but sad, too.

          • http://www.facebook.com/vidaestrada Veronica

            If I had a backstabbing “friend” who was a complete jerk with me, because they lied about me and my friends and refused to acknowledge some very serious infractions on their part .. I would ignore them and think whatever they said illegitimate.

            Whatever came out of their mouths would be discredited based on my experiences with them.

            I move on, but still warn other people of said jerk.

            I am not obligated to speak well of them. I am obligated to warn people because of my experiences with them.

            That’s my point.

            They aren’t worth “honoring” with a compliment, because they do more harm than good.

            Our screw ups? We own them. But they are not racist, nor do they hurt the country the way the NAACP does.

            IF you have issues with the NAACP, go in yourself and fix them.

            Don’t depend on stimulating enough controversy to get core conservatives to say “gee, they’re really nice folks.”

            And if you think NAACP and Glenn and Erick and Caleb are playing on the same level field with the same rulebook, you’re unreachable.

            Why am I even telling you this?!

            I said “If you still want kudos for the Obama Administration or for the NAACP, they I say you forfeit all your arguments by having fallen for the charade. ”

            Now I say you forfeit because you’re essentially calling us all racist.

            I’m done with this one-sided debate. I don’t dig tricksters.

            .

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • Richard Mullins

      The question that comes to my mind, is would they do the same thing if a video tape wasn’t released? In other words, they jump on the correct train when it seemed that they couldn’t do any thing else. They want to relevant even though, they should have ceased to exist years ago. People can do the right thing and still be condemned for not being quick enough to the correct thing.

    • streetwise

      the race card, which is why it must always be scrutinized very carefully.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      Because I don’t think anybody on the right owes Obama or the NAACP anything, when just the other day the NAACP, with Michelle’s blessing, made it their official policy that the entire anti-big government movement is guilty of blatant racism (their words) with trumped up evidence.

      • ZootSuit

        in this particular instance it seems that many conservatives fear to give the Obama Administration and the NAACP credit for doing the right thing.

        Be honest, what would you have done if the Obama Administration did not fire Sherrod or, if they did, the NAACP came out against her firing?

        Seriously, if either of the above had happened, how many diaries do you think would have been written condemning the Obama Administration and the NAACP?

        • janis

          “Yep, business as usual. ” And if the NAACP came out against her firing, again, I would have said, “Yep, business as usual.”

          Fact is, at this point, that this has gotten to be such a hideous “Gotcha” type of exercise that everyone in the middle of it looks bad every single time.

          And, Zoot, I think that you show up every single time that there is a racial episode that you can pontificate on and then you do all you can to try and prove that the entire lot of us are ignorant racists.

          No thanks.

          • ZootSuit

            And you’ve proved my point. What the Obama Administration and the NAACP did was not “business as usual.”

            I just say let’s give them credit for that.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            credit for either and shouldn’t. We have read his books and statements before he was President and seen his actions and heard his statements on all such race matters as President and can reach an informed conclusion about his motives. They are bad. But I wouldn’t and don;t care what his motives are in the final analysis. I care about what he does, and what he always does is bad too.

            And Zoot, despite your admirable denunciation of racist acts, etc by blacks, it does not help to rehabilitate your seeming ongoing and unjustified suspicion of whites in general and esp conservative white Republicans in particular, hence the characterization up thread by another that ZS is “all over the map.”

            Maybe you could use some of the Christian virtue of patience, passivity under the circumstances and humility?

          • ZootSuit

            My problem is not with Whites in general nor with conservative White Republicans in particular, My problem is with hypocrites of all races and political stripes. And that is the issue with me: I see the very same pathologies within the conservative movement that forced me to leave the Left. Both sides would rather argue about how bad the other side is than address the real issues this country is facing.

            Heck, about the most honest person I’ve been around for the last couple of years is a (yes, admittedly Black) liberal friend of mine who can’t stand Obama because he thinks Obama is continuing many of the policies of Bush. Sorry but with rare exceptions (including a few regulars here on RedState), I don’t see that much honesty among either liberals, Black or White, or conservatives, Black or White.

            You can fantasize about conservatives, White or Black, being different from liberals, White or Black, all you want gamecock but I’m sorry, I no longer can. We (conservatives) may have more of the correct answers but we still play games, use whistle-words, and waste our time on ad hominem attacks just like liberals.

            And it’s precisely because conservatives have the correct answers that are behavior is to be the more condemned.

            I hope you still read Dred …

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            focus on what Democrats DO and what Republicans DO in terms of the laws they pass and save all the psychobabble for people in your personal life that you have to hang out with? that is rhetorical…but more practical it seems to me. But that’s just me.

            My library doesn’t have Dred. I have ordered UTC again and will get back to you.

    • streetwise

      No one who has the slightest acquaintance with Caleb Howe would EVER put his name, or imply it, and that word in the same sentence.

  • Beasley Beesmeal

    racing at racists

    itchy trigger fingers best

    not point at the rest

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • JadedByPolitics

    because well they have to keep that racist meme moving against the TEA Parties and Shirley was ruining that …..LOL!

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      really much further back than that. They are the race hustlers and poverty pimps and false chargers of racism. They need to seek out Tea partiers for help in getting their minds and hearts right. Not vice versa. Screw the racists named Obama and Holder and Kagan et al

  • teresakoch

    I sincerely hope that we have not ruined Ms Sherrod’s life with this. It will be interesting to find out who gave this sound byte to Mr. Breitbart – Lord knows that ACORN is hopping mad that they got punked by his crew. I wouldn’t put it past them to be behind all of this…..

    Of course, there could be much more to this story than meets the eye. We’ll just have to see how things play out. Usually Breitbart has more stuff that he lets out as the other side wades deeper and deeper into his web.

    The fact that this got “resolved” so quickly certainly speaks to an administration that is running scared.

  • streetwise

    The race card, i.e. so-and-so is a racist, depends on its uncontested effectiveness once it plausibly is made to stick, regardless of facts. In the lefty playbook, so-and-so is dragged off to the firing squad, much like the Communist party cadres in Stalinist Russia. The left has no compunction about throwing one of its own under the bus if the cause demands. Just ask the Clintons about their experience in 2008.

    There are very few racists in America. However, we probably all have prejudices that can be played by an astute, media-savvy defamer.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      that white guilt and intimidation by the race hustlers of the NAACP or the MSM or the White House and dems and libs is

      over. America has purged the unjustified-in-the-21st C-white guilt by giving a black man the nukes. Now the equality that IS, will be applied.

      The greatest moment wasn’t when Frank Robinson was hired. It was equality when he was fired like any other losing white guy!

      Obama’s real equality moment is coming in 2012 with all kinds of smaller equality moments in between…

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    Sarah Spitz, NPR producer on the idea of Rush dying, says he deserves it. A Bloomberg reporter Ryan Donmoyer compares Tea Party people to Brownshirts. He also references their violence. A UCLA law professor suggests Fox News could be closed by the FCC. John Fund overview.