« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Bizarre “Caper” Targets CNN Reporter

The above video report is just the tip of the iceberg in this story about a bizarre attempt at what is generously being referred to in the media as a “prank” or a “punk”. For my part, I’m not so sure those words will do.

Look, I’m not a journalist. I’m a blogger. But the term “citizen journalism” is a popular one these days, most often used when referring to people who produce video. Most of these folks could more properly be referred to as activists. James O’Keefe has been referred to as both.

O’Keefe made his major debut on the activist scene back in 2008, when he produced the “ACORN” videos which were then posted at Andrew Breitbart’s “Big” sites. The corruption exposed in the videos brought enormous attention to a very serious story that has had long-lasting implications nationwide. It was just some dudes with cameras, but the subsequent investigations revealed wide-spread corruption and fraud. If indeed “citizen journalism” is a thing, this was it.

Not so for O’Keefe’s latest alleged, and thankfully foiled, video ambush plan, described in the above video. And the video ain’t the half of it, as we say in the south.

The real creepiness of the proposed “stunt” is excerpted by CNN here. The document, titled “CNN Caper”, outlines a grotesque plan to isolate reporter Abbie Boudreau on a boat in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by pornography, condoms, and sex toys, and then engage in an attempted “seduction”. Seriously. There was a tripod and camera over the bed meant to appear, and this is a quote from the document, as “an obvious sex tape machine.” And those are just the parts that CNN has released so far.

The twisted logic outlined to justify this plot is that CNN “seduces” conservative activists by having attractive reporters, and this would somehow be turning the tables on CNN. Or whatever.

At one point in the strange outline, there is actually a script, complete with fantasized responses from Boudreau. Again, yes … seriously.

As Boudreau reported to CNN’s Rick Sanchez in an interview, “part of the script was I would break down and start crying and … ask to just please let me off the boat.”

That’s considered “punking”? A deliberate plan to make her feel isolated, alone, unsafe and afraid? The stated goal of which is to have her pleading to be let go?? That’s not called punking around here.

O’Keefe, in a statement to CNN, said that the document was not his “work product” and claimed that when it was sent to him, he “immediately found certain elements highly objectionable and inappropriate, and did not consider them for one minute following it.”

Boudreau, however, counters that “that does not appear to be true, according to a series of emails we obtained from Izzy Santa, who says the e-mails reveal James’ true intentions.” Izzy Santa, as you saw in the video above, was the activist who pulled the plug on the plan by informing Boudreau.

If an enterprising citizen can expose media bias with a video camera and good idea, that’s a good thing. But I fail to see how luring a lone female reporter to a remote location and isolating her on a boat, surrounding her with sex toys and pornography, and trying to convince her that the virtual stranger sitting next to her is coming on to her, possibly in front of a “sex tape machine,” does that. That’s not a recipe for a gotcha video, it’s more like a step-by-step instruction on how to cause discomfort and fear. What an ugly and potentially traumatic situation to create on purpose. It’s not clever or funny, it’s sick.

There will no doubt be more details and, one assumes from the reporting, emails, that will fully establish who wrote what and whether O’Keefe was going to go through with the plan or not. Those details will probably be reported by Boudreau, an actual journalist.

So no, I don’t think “stunt” or “prank” are the right words. I think the one I would use is “despicable.”

Oh and Izzy Santa? Good for you.

In the interest of full disclosure, I’ll just note that RedState Editor Erick Erickson also works for CNN.

COMMENTS

  • Kudzu

    None of this makes any sense whatsoever. A group of people who make a living off of recording people for exposing the truth I would think would do the same to themselves. Basically, where’s the video of this? Granted, Boudreau says Santa asked if they were recording her and said she was not but why not? Then again… why not just cut this off at the head since this whole scheme sounds stupid to begin with. I’m sure Mr. Big would have stepped in and done something, especially if it had backfired.

    But since it never happened and the document itself seems to elude to that it never would, with canned responses, whats to say that this itself was not the prank? Sometimes all you need is to get the enemy to do exactly what you want without ever going through the plan.

    • theduck6

      certainly wouldn’t be the first time someone thought they were bigger than the story or they tried to become the story. (See MSLSD CNN et al every night and the big 3 at dinner time)Maybe O’Keefe is a nutbag but the left has such a history of dirty tricks just before an election, especially one where it looks like they are going to get their hindquarters spanked .sure is awfully convienient.

      kinda like the years old story of an illegal alien working for Whitman in CA reappearing just before the vote. Gov Moonbeam must surely have a veritable boneyard in his closet but virtually no scrutiny from the sycophantic MSM.

      • Jewels

        Is that what this is about?

        Did he agree to it? I am hearing conflicting reports about what he agreed to and didn’t.

        And if he didn’t, did plans for the ambush move ahead anyway?

        And if plans were made anyway, who made them?

        Could it, perhaps, be the same person who came up with the scheme?

        And is the person who came up with the scheme the same person who alerted CNN to the scheme?

  • wannabeanncoulter

    Not so for O?Keefe?s latest alleged, and thankfully foiled, video ambush plan….

    You forgot O’Keefe et al’s caper involving Sen Mary Landrieu’s non-DC office. Those guys were lucky to get misdemeanor plea deals since the “caper” involved frauduently gaining access to a federal office and fiddling around in a closet/access panel. Homeland Security is not known for its sense of humor.

    O’Keefe is desperately in need of good legal advice (at the very least) before he launches these projects.

    • RedBeard

      Most people would have. Instead, he seems to be doubling down on stupid.

    • streiff

      I see.

      Or are you just incapable of telling the truth while playing moby here?

      • RedBeard

        But it’s clear to me that O’Keefe’s plan during the Landrieu affair was poorly designed, poorly executed, and it backfired. Even if it had worked, the end result would have been uncertain due to the methods and location involved.

        Skepticism is always the best bet, particularly when dealing with outlets of the MSM that have demonstrated a bias against conservatives. But if what we see here is all true, then O’Keefe has definitely run off the rails, and needs to rethink his entire raison d’etre, journalistically speaking.

        The rest of the story should prove interesting.

        • streiff

          but that doesn’t justify a material misrepresentation of what happened in her office.

          • Raven

            I somehow managed to miss that when it was going on.

          • RedBeard

            …between actually fiddling around inside the phone cabinet and trying to get access in order to fiddle around inside the phone cabinet. But the intent is identical; it was only the execution of the plan that failed. And because of this amateurish nonsense, the dishonest media had another opportunity to run wild, accusing O’Keefe and Company of things they didn’t do, such as attempted wiretapping and bugging.

            Silly idea. I mean, even if O’Keefe had been able to prove that Landrieu purposely avoided taking calls, how does that make her any different than any other disingenuous leftie who avoids constituents’ questions? We see hard video evidence of that every day. Proving she was ducking questions would have been about as spectacular a story as proving that water is wet.

            O’Keefe has created real problems twice now, no matter what his specific intentions were, and has given the leftie media yet another hammer to use against us. Thanks a bunch, James.

  • Zaber

    Whle he did one good thing with helping to expose the ACORN corruption that everyone already knew was there, at this point, he’s turning into the right’s very own Michael Moore.

    Anyone in the GOP or TEA Party leadership needs to distance, distance, distance. O’Keefe could probably do a lot of good with his energy and creativity, but until he gets himself reined in, he’s only a problem and a talking point for the other side.

  • Uma Richie

    Perhaps James O’Keefe should restrict himself to collaborating with her.

    Source:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/16/the-sensational-giles-and-okeefe/

  • http://stixblog.com Black River Wolf

    He should be shunned from all those on the conservartive side for an idiotic stunt like this

    Good for Izzy to stop this

  • http://itsaboutfreedom.proboards.com IronDioPriest

    …was excusable on the merits. It looked bad, but there was no evidence of criminal intentions. He was able to move past it because he had a reservoir of conservative goodwill held over from his awesome exposure of corruption at ACORN, which still stands on its own. He blew his 2nd chance at “citizen journalism”, but conservatives were willing to look past that single episode, and towards his next “takedown”.

    Something tells me the reservoir has done run dry. It’s time for James O’Keefe to do something productive with his young life.

  • pilgrim

    NOTHING HAPPENED

    Of course a lot more words can be written about e-mails about the plot yada yada yada. The bottom line here is nothing happened.

    • Bill S

      To someone who gets shot at but the gunman is a lousy shot?

      The attempt itself is “something”.

      • pilgrim

        I will agree with you that the emails going back and forth between folks about plotting something like this are “something”, but no actual action took place.

  • tomato

    … what he would have gained had he succeeded? Rather, what did he gain by failing?

    He is either a) a nut job or b) It was all scripted including his associate for an ulterior motive.

  • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

    One might have thought O’K learned his ‘lesson’ with his fail at the Senator’s office…

    ‘Forwarded’ emails are so easy to phony up that one other scenario that seems to fit the facts might be considered. That Santa and O’K had a serious enough falling out that Santa dummied up the emails to do the final take-down on O’Ks reputation.

    The primary reporting entities are CNN and Medaite, two organs I don’t really trust all that much.

    Santa could have engineered this whole thing from the middle, no problem.. Anybody considering that possibility?

    Any pictures or video of the champaign and strawberries on the boat? No?

    I am hesitating clicking ‘Post’ because I don’t really have that much motivation to defend O’K based on what I know about him,, but we should look at all scenarios that fit the ‘facts’ that can be established…

    I can understand why Mediaite is making such a big deal out of this, but CNN? Every CNN reporter must have dozens of stories that didn’t pan out because the source had a separate agenda… some even with unsavory details… I think a real news organization would just shrug and get on down the road and save the ‘juicy’ story for a booby award at the annual xmas party….

    And if it had succeeded beyond his wildest dreams, he would have benefited just how?

    • Caleb Howe

      … that the document is genuine. For what his word is worth.

      • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

        ‘Genuine’ as he wrote it? ‘Genuine’ as he admits he read it (authored by someone else?) and objected to it?

        he said he read it and objected to it…

        I am going to try to indict you based on an unsavory email that I sent to you and you read and objected to?

        Who wrote the document? His ‘mentor’? He got an emailed copy of a really bad, unsavory idea?

        Sorry, I’m probably just going to reserve judgement on this until I see something a little more forensic-looking… like certified logs from an audited mail server…

        There’s just too many people in the middle of this with agendas we don’t understand yet…

        And so I’ll ask the question again: If this had succeeded perfectly, O’K benefits just how?

      • jccbin

        Emails are incredibly easy to fake, even forwards. Forwards might even be easier, since the headers and all could be faked more easily.

        O’Keefe saying the doc is real is NOT the same thing as saying the emails were real.

        Never heard of this blonde talking head, but I’s say she’s a liar before O’Keefe.

        • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

          But her story is legit and James, who I defended in the Landrieu matter, has discredited a whole field of conservative activists in his behavior.

          • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

            I volunteer at a police agency so I understand and demand a certain amount of ‘proof’ and tend to think in terms of forensics and since I do lots of security on the internet, I understand just how easy emails are to forge – and yes jccbin, forwards are much easier to forge than, say a straight ‘send’ from me to you.

            But what Erick says is true: the damage to other right-thinking activists is already done regardless of what some of us more prickly, demanding forensic types may think.

            Curiously enough, my own candidate started a firm that made it’s name producing software that could determine the validity of the emails – Guidance Software’s EnCase analysis would be the absolute determination if the email(s) in question would be admissible as evidence.

            Too bad…

          • SoFiMil

            .

          • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

            I just did a search of Redstate for my company name. I have never mentioned the name of my company on Redstate. nor is there a link to it in my signature. Qualifications, if they are relevant to the discussion, I think, are OK to mention.

          • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

            BTW, I mentioned Guidance not because I work for them (I don’t and never have, nor are they a client of mine) but because if these emails are ever evidence in criminal or civil court, such software (there are now competitors, too, I imagine) will be used in discovery and it’s very unlikely that evidence so vetted and admitted could be impeached.

            But folks who do cyber-forensics would be reaching too far to base authenticity on the email(s) themselves they would need to see logs from compliant email servers — somehow, my guess is that O’K's small ‘organization’ probably does not fall under Sarbanes-Oxley or the other laws and is not required to be compliant with full email server records.

            And if they were smart, they would have sent it from gmail anyhow. Maybe this will be one of the first times Google would gladly furnish evidence? Ahenh.

            But is it ever going to go to trial? I doubt it – my guess is that the real perp’s goals are already fully obtained right now. And I’m not sure that a crime (conspiracy?) was ever committed. Tort is something I don’t know about, but I’d want to learn a lot more before saying someone should be indicted.

          • SoFiMil

            While you may not work for a cyber-forensics company, the fact that you are a Committeeman, in addition to the fact that a candidate you support started the company you identified make it in my opinion inappropriate and at the least an appearance of a conflict of interest for you to name the company. Everything else you provided was excellent regarding cyber-forensics was value-added.

            When companies are mentioned in RedState, there’s an explicit disclaimer stating the nexus between the poster and the company in question.

          • SoFiMil

            …you’re giving away a free knickknack t-shirt ala EPU.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    …assuming the facts are as stated (with the disclaimer that IANAL)

    kidnapping, or false imprisonment
    sexual harassment, or attempted sexual assault/rape
    invasion of privacy

    come to mind for starters…and that’s just at the criminal level

    And then there’s the civil actions that Boudreau could have filed.

    James had better be thankful this didn’t happen, or he’d be looking at personal bankruptcy and possibly years in prison.

    Though he still faces a loss of credibility and reputation.

  • http://lheal.amplify.com Socrates

    This plan, if it had gone down as presented, would have been criminal.

    But all we have are secondhand reports from a reporter who, while obviously a pro, should without other evidence also be considered a part of the “professional left”.

    We don’t know, for instance, whether the boat was prepared as planned, or if that was part of some brainstorming session that took a turn down a wrong path. Suppose Izzy Santa, part of that hypothetical session, mistook a bad joke for an actual part of the plan.

    This episode fits one possible pattern for James O’Keefe’s career path. A guy gets rewarded for taking risks, and is not really punished for doing bad things in search of a story, feels insulated from consequences enough to do something really wicked.

    But another possible pattern is that card-carrying member of the professional left is out to make her mark by taking down an icon.

  • natlanthem

    James O’Keefe is a smart operator, and while the FBI jumped in on his last “caper”, he DID prove that Landrieu was ignoring calls from constituents.

    I will be VERY surprised if there is not something huge inside this story we are not seeing. And I would be delighted if it blew up in CNN’s face, but not Redstate’s.

    Personally, I think it is stone dumb to run with an opinion on a story like this NOW. Getting media to bite on a crap sandwich is exactly the modus operandi of both James and Breitbart.

    Bon Appetite

    • emaberk

      Stop everything and hand this kid a Pulitzer! Please thats not journalism or investigative or anything.

  • conservvoter

    . . . anyone? Anyone?

    I’ll wait for the whole story before passing judgment.

  • pamela1631

    If he wanted to ask her out on a date, why didn’t he just do that instead of pulling a whack job stunt….

    Unless there is something lurking in the background behind the curtain.

    James..get thee to the Secret Service Polygraph givers if you had nothing to do with this stunt. If you did, MEDS, lotsa MEDS.

    ..idiot kids..total lack of impulse control…no common sense any more.

  • Darin_H

    that she wasn’t comfortable talking with O’K while the conversation was going to be recorded? I wasn’t really paying attention because the ‘report’ was so sloppy, and filmed in her car while driving, but she said something that she wanted to talk to him about a story, get some info from him and yet, it couldn’t be recorded….

    Something’s hinky about that in addition to the “I was sent an email and objected to it.” Something stinks here, and CNN has always been smelly, so until they produce actual evidence, I’m not going to take their word for it. They should have gone to the Kinkos in Abilene.

    • http://www.benhoweblog.wordpress.com Ben Howe

      It was a meeting to discuss an upcoming shoot. How many normal conversations with people that you just found out were trying to publicly humiliate you (via recording), are you willing to have recorded conversations with?

      • Darin_H

        This whole thing seems weird, but this reporter isn’t helping me out here.

  • Bill S

    Boudreau had a concealed carry permit and pulled a .38 out of her purse and shot him in the nether region… That would have given “punked” a whole new meaning.

  • wolfster38

    He’s just looking for another five minutes of fame. And not to smart.

    The Lib spin had it been a Dem Senators son: He’s just a kid having a little fun. They are friends now.

  • Duke

    “Ooooh that smell
    Can’t you smell that smell
    Ooooh that smell
    The smell of death surrounds you”

    Something stinks. I’ve gotta think that, with ratings wallowing in whale poop, CNN needs a little help. Sex sells.

    I wonder if they didn’t take a page right out of O’Keefe’s playbook.

  • jackhammer

    but obviously some fools still are on our side.

    Shun him…he is a childish prankster…the pimp suit was already over the top, the phone tap idea is nuts….he looks like shaggy from Scooby doo and comes up with similarly lame hi-jinks.

    I wouldn’t get near him, with a messed up mind like that, there will be further embarassments coming down the line.

    Character tells me a lot more about a person than espoused idealogy.