« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Government Motors Spends Your Money

Yes, General Motors.  A great example of Obama’s efforts to revitalize our economy.  He bravely handed a failing industry billions of dollars of other people’s money and then planted political friends in high positions while paying off the unions with shares of the company.

As recently as May of this year, people like Jen Psaki, White House Deputy Communications Director, and Vice President Joe Biden, can be found praising the auto bailouts as the crown jewel of this administrations efforts.

In fact, it’s becoming clearer and clearer that the Obama administration plans to use the auto bailouts as a way to win over voters in swing states.  This is helped of course by how so many GM jobs keep ending up in swing states.

Unfortunately, the reality of our “investment” isn’t as pretty as they’d have people believe.  Instead, it’s becoming clear that we will be lucky if we at least break even.

General Motors chief executive Dan Akerson, an Obama appointee who was handed the job around the same time the government handed GM billions of dollars, has steered the ship into an area that he himself warned we should watch for when he was first awarded the position of CEO.

Said Akerson:

The board told me they don’t want a transitional CEO. I know what I`m signing up for. As long as I make my numbers, I’ll probably keep the job. If I don’t, then I shouldn`t keep the job. That`s the way it works.

“As long as I make my numbers” is as vague as the stimulus claim of saving jobs, but I think it’s safe to assume that a 20% decline from their original IPO price was not what the company had in mind.

I’m sure things will work out great when the treasury finally sells the American tax payer’s holdings.  After all, the stock market is just doing peachy these days.  And as Akerson has been quick to point out, “We have about $35 billion to $40 billion of cash in our balance sheet.  That’s a lot.”  Yes Dan, that is a lot.  Especially considering you still owe the American people about $20 billion by your own admission.

Currently, GM owes about $26.4 billion to the taxpayers.  Their stock would need be trading at $53 per share just for the American people to break even (the stock closed a little below $24 today).  If they were sold today, we would lose $10 billion dollars.

So the government appointed CEO has taken the company’s stock to historic lows; pushed out money losing, government subsidized cars that the American people don’t want, all at the behest of his bosses in Washington; and is sitting on enough cash to pay back the loan but is instead choosing to wait for the treasury to lose money when it sells our shares.  So what’re they doing with all that money?

Well, they’re handing out bonuses that will be over $400 million and could exceed 50% of workers salaries.  In fact, nearly all 28,000 engineers and managers will get 4-16 percent of their base pay.

They’re paying homage to the green gods by investing in solar panels and wind farms.  Not exactly sure how that contributes to making cars, but what do I know?  In fact they’re spending just under $1 million for weatherization projects in Maine which they claim will be the first of similar investments in all 50 states.

GM is investing over $40 million dollars to “offest its carbon footprint,” and invested enough money into the World Golf Championship in Doral, Fl to get them to add the word “Cadillac” to it.

The average cost of a superbowl ad is $3 million for 30 seconds.  GM aired 5 of them.

They’re working on getting the green light for a reality tv show about their Chevy Volt.  I’m guessing it’ll include a cast of 20 people that will coincidentally be the only people in America that actually own one.

In fact, they are spending on entertainment at a faster rate than any other category.

And I know what you’re thinking, “Hey, companies have to advertise man! It’s getting them name recognition!”  To that I would ask you if you really believe that GM’s name is so unknown that they need to spend a minimum $15 million worth of advertising during one game, or if, perhaps, they might be well known enough to advertise somewhere other than the most expensive commercial spot on planet Earth.

Yes, I know companies have to spend money to make money.  But I’ll tell you what I see.  I see a company that is trying to keep their Washington masters happy by supplying jobs in key spots for Democrats, a stock that is being driven into the ground, a higher and higher likelihood that we won’t be getting our money back, and a reality TV show starring the Volt.

As an unwilling shareholder of the company, I think I’d feel a lot better if someone other than an Obama lackey was in the top spot.  How about you?

Follow @Ben_Howe

COMMENTS

  • DerKrieger

    Some facts on the ground:

    1. Most of GM’s sales are from trucks and SUVs.
    2. Liberals hate, so they claim, gas guzzlers that are destroying the planet.
    3. Liberals don’t really like American branded cars period.

    So are we conservatives the ones keeping this company alive an at the same time support the detestable UAW?

    I want a Ford but probably won’t buy one because of the UAW and I’ll never buy a GM or Chrysler product.

    • acat

      *without* union labor.

      Since Japan is a better ally than the UAW, I consider this a reasonable compromise.

      Mew

      • snowshooze

        The work is in making the parts.Assembly is for any idiot.
        And assembly is the easiest phase, if the parts are right.
        A small concession, really.

        • acat

          and assembly is no picnic, don’t kid yourself.

          Remember the Oldsmobile Alero? Built – parts and all – mostly in Mexico. Most GM product, by the way, contains something like 25% Canadian content.

          Also, see this Fox article that indicates for some Hondas the American content is over 70%. That’s not quite as good, but .. no UAW either!

          Mew

          • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

            the slowdowns over the past few weeks at all three of the “American” car companies because they couldn’t get the Chinese made parts from Japan because of the tsunami. Need I say more?

        • snowshooze

          Really. Any grease monkey can screw them together. Toyota USA is a farce, and if you think it is generous that we get the final assembly which may account for 15% or less of total cost… you do not realize the effort required in the process.
          It is a suckers deal if the premise is that we are building their product. The casting, forming, forging, machining, materials and sub-assembly is where the money is. The final assembly… a detail.
          Really, that is the truth.

          • rightwingmom52

            Because I worked at the local factory to help my parents put me through college – on the line, spraying air conditioning panels with insulation, and I assure you it’s no picnic. I worked a couple of other lines as well, and while some are easier than others, plenty of them require a steady hand and precision. Granted, it wasn’t an auto plant, but the point is there are a lot of hard-working, non-union Americans doing these jobs, and you just insulted all of them, including a good number of my family.

          • snowshooze

            You, get a screwdriver.
            I get a machine shop.
            You want to bet who gets done first starting with the same block of steel?
            You have no idea.

          • rightwingmom52

            to answer the question. But then, you didn’t master “Reply to This” upthread either unless you intended to reply to yourself instead of acat.

          • acat

            You can have a machine shop. I’ll take the assembly line.

            Yes, a machine shop does one-off stuff, but nothing – *nothing* – that goes into a car is a one-off. Even the machined pieces are all done either on an assembly line, or on your favorite – computer-driven push-button machines.

            Oh, and I may not get my first toaster, not even my first dozen done before you .. but I’ll get to ten thousand well before you.

            Mew

          • snowshooze

            Assembly is a cost factor.
            Not saying you do not work very hard, not the point at all.
            Toyota views assembly as a cost, the only saving graces in assembling in USA are the fact that it would appear that there in fact is production, and shipping works out a bit better because you can stack the stuff a bit better on the boat and save on space, usually space, or cubic feet on things like cars actually cost more than the weight.
            So you go to build a car…they are built from parts. Each part has a material cost, a tooling cost, a production cost,, you take all those factors into account and add your profit right there. That door panel, it may cost yo $50 to make it. You are going to pull $150 out of each panel. And keep it. You sell all the parts into a car, then you add the assembly cost. You don’t mark the labor up at that point, and you really do not make anything on it.
            So, there is where you have missed my point.
            I know, you gotta plug in 40 transaxles a day… all 16 bolts and only 12 minutes per to get them in.
            There are over 900 finely crafted machined and pre-assembled parts in it representing hundreds of hours of work and effort that this country never sees a second of.
            They started as raw materials, rolled, forged, cast, what have you.
            Then off to the machine & welding departments.. also in Japan. Or wherever.
            Built in USA… 15% is an extremely generous assembly percentage. Probably over double of reality.
            .

          • acat

            There are no “finely crafted” (although “machined to precise tolerances” I’ll buy) in cars. There is no “craftsmanship”, although maybe “pride in maintaining ISO900whatever” counts for something. You have a pride in what you do – don’t confuse it with the pushbutton operators feel at the end of their day.. assuming they haven’t been automated.

            The Fox article I linked to above makes this quite clear, your 15% number is pulled from wherever statisticians get their figures. Yes, for some vehicles where the primary market isn’t North America, a lot of the parts are made in Japan .. or China or Taiwan. For vehicles that are purely for North America – the Tundra for example – they’re not going to increase their cost by making every subassembly and widget in Japan. The radios are almost certainly not made here., but .. why pay to ship the engine block from Yokohama to Indiana when *nothing* else in Toyota’s lineup uses that block?

            Finally, it’s car manufacture, without unions. That’s kind of a big deal. All the laborers, skilled or not, are paid – and taxed – *here*. And the UAW gets nada.

            That, to me, is a big improvement over GM – where the UAW gets something like $3000 per car or truck sold.

            Mew

          • Menlo

            Right now, the simplest American-made model costs close to $1000.

      • a-b

        I drove Fords when I got my license in the late 60′s and a Chevy or 2 in the 70s. After a road trip with a close friend in his Toyota in the late 70′s I bought my first new Toyota in 1981 and haven’t looked back since. Toyota products make American car quality look like complete “crap”. Call me a happy Toyota/Lexus owner from now until the day I die. …….. and one more thing – the over paid un-American UAW, along with their politcal buddies in DC, can kiss my butt!

    • JoeG

      That’s where my truck was made.

      • acat

        No habla espanol, el patron Toyota.

        Mew

    • DerKrieger

      …who’s buying GM.

      • victrola

        we could break them overnight. Red State conservatives are the ones that actually buy Big 3 products that MAKE money (trucks and SUV’s).

        I gave up on the Big 3 a while ago because of quality issues. You can find Made in the USA cars and trucks (like Toyota, Nissan, Honda, etc) with MUCH better quality, and the best part is, you’re not funneling money to Leftists candidates and causes.

        Buying UAW products is anything BUT patriotic.

        Look for the Union label, and then buy elsewhere.

        • gunslingr45

          Sounds like good advice.

          I have not bought a US made because of union overpricing for a very long time now.

          Get your tax refund early?mug a GM or Chrysler worker tonight.

          • acat

            (nothing further)

    • ihateliberals

      an they are doing great. At least the Ford’s are making American Cars on American soil. I know that the Toyota is made here and isn’t union but the money is still going to Japan. Ford builds a nice car and I think it is comparable to the Toyota. For many years Japan has been pushing their cars and telling us that they are better than ours and that just isn’t true.

      • earlgrey

        a Fusion recently and it is very easy to drive. I myself own a Camry though

        • acat

          (this space for rent, inquire within)

      • rightwingmom52

        and would consider another because I like it and they didn’t take the deal. For the most part, I’m captive to whatever’s in Auto Trader or is on the used car lot as it’s not likely I’ll ever buy another new one.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    Janesville, WI, is gone forever circa Government Motors.

    The savior economy canard only works outside of the states who see through the little ruse, because their economies weren’t really saved.

  • MuskegonCritic

    almost continuously from March 2000 through 2009 with a brief hiatus in 2006. The rescue of the domestic auto industry put a stop to and reversed that decade long trend.

    http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LASST26000003?data_tool=XGtable

    Many people rightly point out that Toyota and Honda parts are made in the US.

    In fact, often times a single factory will make parts for many major auto manufacturers.

    So, for example, a disruption in the supply chain from reduced orders from ONE company would disrupt supply to all other car companies.

    That’s why Toyota was very vocal about endorsing a GM bailout.

    People don’t realize how interconnected the supply chain is.

    A company making parts for GM also does small order manufacturing for companies that make bread ovens, for example. There aren’t enough orders from the bread oven part manufacturing to stay afloat, so a disruption from GM orders could stall production of break oven equipment…stalling production of bread ovens, stalling production of bread.

    Saving GM and Chrysler was never about just saving GM and Chrylser or even the unions. It was about saving Domestic manufacturing capacity.

    • gekster

      Give the money to the unions, which in turn donate money to the Democrats.
      Rush has pointed that out quite eloquently, and often.

    • gekster

      Give the unions Government money, which in turn donates to the Dems.
      Rush has pointed this out more than once.
      And if the people wern’t making auto parts, they would still be making the bread machine parts.

      • MuskegonCritic

        rarely show up at the same time. Just In Time assembly line manufacturing is insanely efficient with the next delivery of parts rolling up to the assembly line the moment the assembly line worker pulls the final piece out of the box.

        With assembly line production, thousands, tens of thousands of units can be produced more rapidly than through any other method.

        But it’s not a particularly flexible process. It doesn’t adapt quickly. An interruption in any one part of the supply chain and that’s it…the whole production shuts down. Now imagine that with a machine that has tens of thousands of parts.

        That’s one reason Toyota got whacked by the earthquake in Japan. There’s no way it could retool its assembly line process in short order. It doesn’t work that way. And guess what? Many of the new suppliers are in the US, and will continue to be for a long time…they may never return to Japan. That’s what happens when a supply chain is disturbed. Once suppliers are established, they’re established long term.

        And that’s why Toyota and other manufacturers were freaked out about GM being out of commission for a while….the companies that make GM parts ALSO make Toyota parts and ALSO make, say, refrigerator parts.

        A disturbance in the supply chain shuts the whole chain down.

        If CWC Textron can’t stay profitable on making camshafts ONLY for Toyota because GM is down for a bit….that’s it. The company furloughs its workers and Toyota can’t make cars either until it finds a new supplier, probably not in the US.

        Again, we have a real life example of this playing out in Japan right now.

        • gekster

          for the work they did to get Obama elected.
          Reguardless of the supply chain, it was done to keep unions afloat, and thus to keep the donations to Dems coming in.

          • gekster

            Although part of that was a payoff too.

          • MuskegonCritic

            understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the domestic supply chain.

            You can believe what you want about Unions or Obama.

            Bush was right to bail out the domestic auto industry in late 2008 and Obama was right to bail out the domestic auto industry in 2009.

          • gekster

            And don’t you think that letting companies that are not profitable to keep going with taxpayer money is and always will be a bad thing.
            In this administraton, we would still have large buggy whip manufacturers if it was in power when the automobile industry started up in ernest.
            The country didn’t go to pot when thier industry went down to a minimum.

            And the Bush bailout was just as bad as Obamas, although it was much less, (17.4 B) it still was mainly for the unions to keep afloat.

            And to address your first point in your first comment, it was the policies of Granholm that was losing jobs, because she to was beholden to the unions.
            Her administration also was a payback to the unions that helped to elect her.
            The proposed auto plant in Grand Rapids is a prime example.
            She told them that to build a plant in Michigan, you HAVE to be union.
            They said no, and built the plant in Indiana.
            Couple of thousand jobs right there that went away.

          • acat

            Not a car rolls of *any* line that’s 100% made-in-U.S.A. anymore – except maybe the A.M. General HumVee – and you and I can’t buy those!

            We lost that battle in the 1970s, in large part due to the U.A.W.

            Mew

    • ihateliberals

      at least one thng he could boast about during the 2012 election cycle. If not for GM he has nothing. Hmmm very fitting, Nothing to boast about for a Nothing President,

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      It was 100% about the unions. That’s why the secured bond holders got stiffed and the unions got a third of the companies.

      In addition, what makes you think that a “real” bankruptcy would have done any damage to domestic manufacturing capacity? What it would have done was protect secured creditors and given the company the right to abrogate their union contracts.

    • acat

      That specifically did not happen in the GM or Chrysler cases.

      Do. The. Math.

      Mew

      • BA Cyclone

        I think the “method behind the madness” that MuskegonCritic is laying out is perfectly spot on…up until the point the federal government structured the bankruptcy deal to their political liking.

        That was the early sign that we had a caudillo on our hands and not just a hopey-changy pol in the White House.

        The “bailout” totally could have been done in a way that helped the domestic automakers and the vast web of supply chain businesses without trampling private property rights and established case law precendents in bankruptcy proceedings.

        How it really played out in court gave proof to the ruse, at least in 2009. Obama cannot let any crisis go to waste.

      • BA Cyclone

        I think the “method behind the madness” that MuskegonCritic is laying out is perfectly spot on…up until the point the federal government structured the bankruptcy deal to their political liking.

        That was the early sign that we had a caudillo on our hands and not just a hopey-changy pol in the White House.

        The “bailout” totally could have been done in a way that helped the domestic automakers and the vast web of supply chain businesses without trampling private property rights and established case law precendents in bankruptcy proceedings.

        How it really played out in court gave proof to the ruse, at least in 2009. Obama cannot let any crisis go to waste.

  • ag8tor

    bailout of the auto industry. Ford didn’t take any of the money. GM & Chrysler are the main offenders mostly at the behest of the unions. Another exmple of the ineptitude of this administration. Had they let GM fail they would have been reorganized under Chapter 11. They could have renegotiated union contracts that have esetially bankrupt them. The union goons would have been forced to take a smaller share. Without government intervention the market would have corrected itself like it always does. “O” and his band of theives should have kept out of it but had to repay the unions post election. It makes one wonder what devious spending plans the DNC and “O” have in store with our money. I want my portion of this bailout money back. I do not recall giving anyone permission to use my share for this. Not that it will matter to these a++holes!

    • skorrent1

      GM and Chrysler did, in fact, go through a “bankruptcy” process, but with Obama pulling the strings to make sure the unions stayed healthy. Chrysler wound up being bought and run by Fiat! That could have happened without Obama. At GM, the bondholders took a bath so the union wouldn’t. Both companies wound up with Obama having more power than a straight Chapter 11 would have given him. That’s what he wanted.

  • bonzo

    Isn’t that where the Media did their misdeeds and misconstructions. Stating that the government had to “save” the auto industry from failure. The delusion was that these entities would have disappeared, zillions of jobs lost, when in fact they would go through the normal “bankruptcy” process that all other companies have gone through for years for this purpose. The issue here was to get the Feds in charge so they could change the rules of the “bankruptcy” to benefit their Union buddies, which I would think the idea was to refund their pension plans which were going to go under anytime without that huge infusion of capital. This process raped the Chrysler and GM bond holders who should have been the top of the list of creditors. They were moved to the bottom receiving 7 or 8 cents on the dollar. You know, they were rich people so they really didn’t need their money. Why else would they not have it in their mattresses at home if you didn’t really need it?

    Is that the general gist of the event.

    Sorry, I haven’t been paying attention.

  • http://www.tinfoilhelicopter.com lunaticrex

    I remember once, long ago, being ignorant of the bias in media. When I went to work as an analyst in the military, we used a “Reuters machine” in my office. It was a 24-hour shop, and Reuters / CNN were essentially our only access to civilian news feeds. The intertubes came to the government/military significantly later than to my own quarters (for example). That is par for the course. It was 1993.

    Oh, those good old days, when I was young(er) and much less cynical.

    Now, this: In the Reuters report referenced in Ben’s piece, very near the end, the reporter refers to the Dolt as the “$41,000 Chevy Volt.” They seem to have conveniently forgotten that it is actually the ~$48,000 Chevy Dolt. Apparently, that $7,500 tax credit is part of the deal. Wait. What? It will expire? Hmm.

    Unless, of course, I am wrong, and Chevy has reduced the MSRP on the Dolt. I don’t recall seeing that happen. Ever, in fact. On any product involving fossil fuels.

  • hwgood

    Any day now, any day now the new GM vehicles will be introduced. The ones with the technology that the Evil Moneygrubbing rich people have been buying up and hiding. 100 MPG, maybe 200 MPG by now! Since HIs Holiness Obama is the Best&Brightest, His people are the Best&Brightest, and They will have found all that hidden technology. Just you wait!
    Sarc/off