EPA Calls Compliance with Own Law “Absurd or Impossible” and Requests 230k New Employees


You may have read my recent post reporting that the EPA will be responsible for over 1.4 million job losses over the next 7 years.  In that environment, I suppose bureaucratic hires is the closest one can get to good jobs news when it comes to that big government dream agency known as the Environmental Protection Agency.

DailyCaller: The EPA is asking taxpayers to fund up to 230,000 new government workers to process all the extra paperwork, at an estimated cost of $21 billion. That cost does not include the economic impact of the regulations themselves.

“Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year,” the EPA wrote in the court brief.

So while the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) as well as  Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) rules are going to wreak havoc on places like Texas, destroy the coal industry, and ultimately force power bills to increase almost as quickly as energy sector jobs are shed, the United States government will be embarking on its own jobs initiative: 230,000 freshly minted pencil-pushing bureaucrats!

As stated above, these new jobs would serve the purpose of enforcing all of the new regulations under the Clean Air Act  which was created by the EPA in 2009.  So why are courts involved?  Because the EPA is deliberately violating the very Clean Air Act they are intending to enforce.

The Institute for Energy Research documented excerpts found in the EPAs brief:

EPA studied and considered the breadth and depth of the projected administrative burdens in the Tailoring Rule. There, EPA explained that immediately applying the literal PSD statutory threshold of 100/250 tpy (tons per year) to greenhouse gas emissions, when coupled with the “any increase” trigger for modifications…would result in annual PSD permit applications submitted to State and local permitting agencies to increase nationwide from 280 to over 81,000 per year, a 300-fold increase…Following a comprehensive analysis, EPA estimated that these additional PSD permit applications would require State permitting authorities to add 10,000 full-time employees and incur additional costs of $1.5 billion per year just to process these applications, a 130-fold increase in the costs to States of administering the PSD program….Sources needing operating permits would jump from 14,700 to 6.1 million as a result of application of Title V to greenhouse gases, a 400-fold increase.…Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year. [Bold added.]

In summary, they can’t keep up with regulating something that they volunteered to regulate, so rather than reconsidering the law, they are just breaking it.  And while they’re breaking it, they are requesting that taxpayers (you know, the people who don’t have the option to simply break laws that are overly burdensome) have to fork over $21 billion so the EPA can hire enough bureaucrats to handle the absolutely ridiculous hours it would take to regulate all of the carbon dioxide in America.

Even the EPA acknowledges that it’s all pretty insane:

While EPA acknowledges that come 2016, the administrative burdens may still be so great that compliance at the 100/250 tpy level may still be absurd or impossible to administer at that time, that does not mean that the Agency is not moving toward the statutory thresholds. To the contrary, through this regulatory process “EPA intends to require full compliance with the CAA applicability provisions of the PSD and Title V programs….”…(explaining that EPA will implement the tailored approach “by applying PSD and Title V at threshold levels that are as close to the statutory levels as possible, and do so as quickly as possible….”).[Bold added]

And yet, they are pushing forward, requesting enough employees to process the 6,085,300 new permit applications from companies needing to stay in compliance by hiring enough people to fill 1.4 billion hours of work with every single hour financed by the very tax payer they themselves seem to admit they are overburdening.

Here’s hoping that the EPA’s inability to comply with its own standards will create some type of a wake up call within the Central Bureaucracy.  Somehow I doubt it.

Follow @Ben_Howe



RSS feed

18 Comments Leave a comment

The end is near for the greenies.

luvnthebigsites (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 4:52PM EDT (link)

The always brilliant J.R Dunn:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/09/green_twilight.html

(No offense Ben, Your brilliant too).

“Ask not what your candidate can do for you, but what you can do for your candidate”. —Andrew Breitbart
“These people invoking the Buckley Rule couldn’t carry his TYPEWRITER!” —Rush Limbaugh
“Our problems are not economic, they are political.”—John Ransom
“Ron Paul will not be the nominee”—Erick Erickson

A Liberal "Rule of Law"

radicalrabbi Tuesday, September 27th at 8:59AM EDT (link)

First and foremost, it must always be remembered that the left have code phrases that they all live by. One of the most important phrases is, “unintended consequences.” This is there side issue; it is like the liberal press calling an out right lie by Obama as an, “over suggestion.”
The left for some unknown reason, just doesn’t get it; we’re unto their games, and most importantly, we believe the truth will set us free. To paraphrase a Scripture, “Even so 2013, come…”

 
 

Heh

HawkImNot Monday, September 26th at 5:31PM EDT (link)

“The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.” – Wilde

 

Just DEFUND the Left wing radical extremist EPA

bobojake (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 5:45PM EDT (link)

Totally agree. No conservative should vote even one cent to fund the epa.

d_lamar Monday, September 26th at 5:49PM EDT (link)

The upcoming cr would be a good time to defund it and a dozen other liberal job killing departments and regulations.

The problem is that the Republican leadership clearly is not interested in defunding anything.

there are soooo many agencies to repeal

kyle8 (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 6:04PM EDT (link)

But this one should be the first, we should repeal it, black list everyone who ever worked for it, dynamite the building, and erect a monument to free markets in it’s place, Maybe a statue of Adam Smith and Milton Friedman.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 
 

Nuke em from orbit

kyle8 (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 6:07PM EDT (link)

it’s the only way to be sure.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

I'm not filling out the environmental impact report for that!

acat (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 6:22PM EDT (link)

Wait. Do we have to file one if we nuke the EPA?

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

You have to file one in order to do so

Raven (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 7:52PM EDT (link)

But not one for building the monument Afterward.

Because Before you nuke them, they’re still there.

“If you do not have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
Luke 22:36

 
 
 

Defund and Defend

johnboy64 Tuesday, September 27th at 6:58AM EDT (link)

Yup. My eyes glazed over while I tried to navigate this newest EPA expose. Then my immediate reaction to all this Carol Browner mini-government-power-play-continuing-outrage was to and continues to be to…

…simply and finally defund it. Now. In the House. Now. And endure the Reid/Durban/Leahy/Schumer House of Lords calumnies with a sense of humor. But laugh without budging. Defund. Then defend a government shutdown. Defund. Gain back some popular American citizen support. Get at least the House out of the single-digit approval record book. But defund and defend.

Not cut some EPA programs, trim some budgets, reduce some regulatory/permitting excesses. Defund EPA. Make it go away. Irradiate and chemo this cancer out of our government by legislation. Now. Then do the same with all the rest: DOE (both of them: educ and energy), FCC, Commerce, Labor, HUD, Mae, Mac, and more. Make them go away. Now THAT is a good start.

 
 

A law at cannot be fairly enforced cannot be allowed to stand

reddog53 (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 6:55PM EDT (link)

One of the States or perhaps an industry group must sue to haventhenwhole thing struck down

This should be a banner example for the Tea Party and the Republicans to show just how stupid this greenhouse stuff is.

Agree. UNequal protection under the law

carolina Monday, September 26th at 9:10PM EDT (link)

cannot stand. Now, if only we can find a trial lawyer who isn’t a lib – could be tough to do.

 
 

Great news everybody!

anotherindyfilmguy (Diary) Monday, September 26th at 10:28PM EDT (link)

The end is finally here, clean out your desks and go to the federal jobs center and re-education camps!

Razz Etc!
“Best Poker book written ever!!!” – Author’s unbiased opinion…

 

Only the EPA

ag8tor Tuesday, September 27th at 7:24AM EDT (link)

could be stupid enough to try to regulate and not be able to handle the load. What’s more they admit it. No wonder that these geniuses are costing everyone more than they supposedly are saving. Typical lib mindset. I am with you. DEFUND THEM NOW!!!!!! House of Reps, are you listening? Here’s a chance to make points with the American public plus actually doing something to help them! A novel concept for you I realize but try it you might like it!

Sadly, not only the EPA

YnotNOW (Diary) Tuesday, September 27th at 10:18AM EDT (link)

Almost all of the regulatory bureaucracies in Govt (Federal, State and Local) are totally overburdened by the requirements of the regulations they are supposed to support. I deal with local building departments regularly, who are having to cut staff for budget constraints, yet enforce more and more rules in review of buildings – which means they take longer and longer to approve, slowing down business and job growth. The IRS is the prime example of an agency charged with enforcing the regulations that they write to uphold the confusing law, and not even understanding themselves so they give out conflicting information to inquiring taxpayers.

EPA may be among the worst, but not the only ones!

YnotNOW
If not me, who? If not now, when?

 
 

230,000 people passing paper off to each other.

johnt Tuesday, September 27th at 8:39AM EDT (link)

On top of the current crew. I assume this is what “progressives” mean by progress. The NY Times will have to drop it’s wall to wall coverage of Operation Fast and Furious and the Presidents ongoing vicious sliming of Republicans to highlight this big story. {:

“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

 

EPA is the textbook definition of bloated bureaucracy ...

randy streu (Diary) Tuesday, September 27th at 9:42AM EDT (link)

yes, vote to defund, and if can’t defund entirely, start with CUTS. Eliminate job-killing mandates to render those jobs they’ve already filled unnecessary.

 

The EPA only needs one more regulation

hotnike Tuesday, September 27th at 1:05PM EDT (link)

and that is a regulation to De-regulate itself into oblivion. Whah a wonderful that would be.