« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

EPA Calls Compliance with Own Law “Absurd or Impossible” and Requests 230k New Employees

You may have read my recent post reporting that the EPA will be responsible for over 1.4 million job losses over the next 7 years.  In that environment, I suppose bureaucratic hires is the closest one can get to good jobs news when it comes to that big government dream agency known as the Environmental Protection Agency.

DailyCaller: The EPA is asking taxpayers to fund up to 230,000 new government workers to process all the extra paperwork, at an estimated cost of $21 billion. That cost does not include the economic impact of the regulations themselves.

“Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year,” the EPA wrote in the court brief.

So while the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) as well as  Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) rules are going to wreak havoc on places like Texas, destroy the coal industry, and ultimately force power bills to increase almost as quickly as energy sector jobs are shed, the United States government will be embarking on its own jobs initiative: 230,000 freshly minted pencil-pushing bureaucrats!

As stated above, these new jobs would serve the purpose of enforcing all of the new regulations under the Clean Air Act  which was created by the EPA in 2009.  So why are courts involved?  Because the EPA is deliberately violating the very Clean Air Act they are intending to enforce.

The Institute for Energy Research documented excerpts found in the EPAs brief:

EPA studied and considered the breadth and depth of the projected administrative burdens in the Tailoring Rule. There, EPA explained that immediately applying the literal PSD statutory threshold of 100/250 tpy (tons per year) to greenhouse gas emissions, when coupled with the “any increase” trigger for modifications…would result in annual PSD permit applications submitted to State and local permitting agencies to increase nationwide from 280 to over 81,000 per year, a 300-fold increase…Following a comprehensive analysis, EPA estimated that these additional PSD permit applications would require State permitting authorities to add 10,000 full-time employees and incur additional costs of $1.5 billion per year just to process these applications, a 130-fold increase in the costs to States of administering the PSD program….Sources needing operating permits would jump from 14,700 to 6.1 million as a result of application of Title V to greenhouse gases, a 400-fold increase.…Hiring the 230,000 full-time employees necessary to produce the 1.4 billion work hours required to address the actual increase in permitting functions would result in an increase in Title V administration costs of $21 billion per year. [Bold added.]

In summary, they can’t keep up with regulating something that they volunteered to regulate, so rather than reconsidering the law, they are just breaking it.  And while they’re breaking it, they are requesting that taxpayers (you know, the people who don’t have the option to simply break laws that are overly burdensome) have to fork over $21 billion so the EPA can hire enough bureaucrats to handle the absolutely ridiculous hours it would take to regulate all of the carbon dioxide in America.

Even the EPA acknowledges that it’s all pretty insane:

While EPA acknowledges that come 2016, the administrative burdens may still be so great that compliance at the 100/250 tpy level may still be absurd or impossible to administer at that time, that does not mean that the Agency is not moving toward the statutory thresholds. To the contrary, through this regulatory process “EPA intends to require full compliance with the CAA applicability provisions of the PSD and Title V programs….”…(explaining that EPA will implement the tailored approach “by applying PSD and Title V at threshold levels that are as close to the statutory levels as possible, and do so as quickly as possible….”).[Bold added]

And yet, they are pushing forward, requesting enough employees to process the 6,085,300 new permit applications from companies needing to stay in compliance by hiring enough people to fill 1.4 billion hours of work with every single hour financed by the very tax payer they themselves seem to admit they are overburdening.

Here’s hoping that the EPA’s inability to comply with its own standards will create some type of a wake up call within the Central Bureaucracy.  Somehow I doubt it.

Follow @Ben_Howe

COMMENTS

  • luvnthebigsites

    The always brilliant J.R Dunn:

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/09/green_twilight.html

    (No offense Ben, Your brilliant too).

    • radicalrabbi

      First and foremost, it must always be remembered that the left have code phrases that they all live by. One of the most important phrases is, “unintended consequences.” This is there side issue; it is like the liberal press calling an out right lie by Obama as an, “over suggestion.”
      The left for some unknown reason, just doesn’t get it; we’re unto their games, and most importantly, we believe the truth will set us free. To paraphrase a Scripture, “Even so 2013, come…”

  • HawkImNot

    “The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.” – Wilde

  • bobojake

    NT

    • d_lamar

      The upcoming cr would be a good time to defund it and a dozen other liberal job killing departments and regulations.

      The problem is that the Republican leadership clearly is not interested in defunding anything.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        But this one should be the first, we should repeal it, black list everyone who ever worked for it, dynamite the building, and erect a monument to free markets in it’s place, Maybe a statue of Adam Smith and Milton Friedman.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      it’s the only way to be sure.

      • acat

        Wait. Do we have to file one if we nuke the EPA?

        Mew

        • Raven

          But not one for building the monument Afterward.

          Because Before you nuke them, they’re still there.

    • johnboy64

      Yup. My eyes glazed over while I tried to navigate this newest EPA expose. Then my immediate reaction to all this Carol Browner mini-government-power-play-continuing-outrage was to and continues to be to…

      …simply and finally defund it. Now. In the House. Now. And endure the Reid/Durban/Leahy/Schumer House of Lords calumnies with a sense of humor. But laugh without budging. Defund. Then defend a government shutdown. Defund. Gain back some popular American citizen support. Get at least the House out of the single-digit approval record book. But defund and defend.

      Not cut some EPA programs, trim some budgets, reduce some regulatory/permitting excesses. Defund EPA. Make it go away. Irradiate and chemo this cancer out of our government by legislation. Now. Then do the same with all the rest: DOE (both of them: educ and energy), FCC, Commerce, Labor, HUD, Mae, Mac, and more. Make them go away. Now THAT is a good start.

  • reddog53

    One of the States or perhaps an industry group must sue to haventhenwhole thing struck down

    This should be a banner example for the Tea Party and the Republicans to show just how stupid this greenhouse stuff is.

    • carolina

      cannot stand. Now, if only we can find a trial lawyer who isn’t a lib – could be tough to do.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    The end is finally here, clean out your desks and go to the federal jobs center and re-education camps!

  • ag8tor

    could be stupid enough to try to regulate and not be able to handle the load. What’s more they admit it. No wonder that these geniuses are costing everyone more than they supposedly are saving. Typical lib mindset. I am with you. DEFUND THEM NOW!!!!!! House of Reps, are you listening? Here’s a chance to make points with the American public plus actually doing something to help them! A novel concept for you I realize but try it you might like it!

    • YnotNOW

      Almost all of the regulatory bureaucracies in Govt (Federal, State and Local) are totally overburdened by the requirements of the regulations they are supposed to support. I deal with local building departments regularly, who are having to cut staff for budget constraints, yet enforce more and more rules in review of buildings – which means they take longer and longer to approve, slowing down business and job growth. The IRS is the prime example of an agency charged with enforcing the regulations that they write to uphold the confusing law, and not even understanding themselves so they give out conflicting information to inquiring taxpayers.

      EPA may be among the worst, but not the only ones!

  • johnt

    On top of the current crew. I assume this is what “progressives” mean by progress. The NY Times will have to drop it’s wall to wall coverage of Operation Fast and Furious and the Presidents ongoing vicious sliming of Republicans to highlight this big story. {:

  • http://slcliberty.blogivists.com randy streu

    yes, vote to defund, and if can’t defund entirely, start with CUTS. Eliminate job-killing mandates to render those jobs they’ve already filled unnecessary.

  • hotnike

    and that is a regulation to De-regulate itself into oblivion. Whah a wonderful that would be.

  • gekster

    why do they think that crap works.

  • lineholder

    They regulate everything to the hilt…layer upon layer of it…hiring more and more government employees to keep up with demand for meeting regulatory measures…

    Cutting back on regulations…can’t do that now….too many people dependent on the jobs…devastating impact on their economy if they do.

    • gekster

      is the fact that we are standing here watching what’s happening in the fish bowl, and we keep swimming in the same direction.
      And what is truely sad is that some are trying to yell lets not swim like those fish, they are ridiculed and ignored.

      • lineholder

        Oh, and you have to throw “valuing diversity” in there for good measure.

        Redistribution of the wealth, baby! It’s a good thing /sarc

        • gekster

          It used to be that ones quality of life was up to themselves,
          not the government.

          • lineholder

            I wonder if anyone has ever made a comprehensive list of these code words they use?

          • gekster

            I’m to busy, but it would be nice if somebody picked up on that. ;)

          • checkmate2012

            see “The Alinsky Code” in the May 2012 Whistleblower Issue from WND.com. All 46 pages of it decodes the left speak and how we got here. Great read.

            Hope I don’t get banned as WND doesn’t conform to all rules but does have other great articles :)

      • The Anti-Gekst

        The end of your post reminded me of something Gandhi said best – ?First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.?

  • Pingback: Links 144-Are you ready for the end of the internet? | Cindy's Zone 2