“Exactly what did the White House know and when did they know it?”
It’s a pretty simple question and one that you would think is on the lips of every reporter that has the opportunity to ask a question of the Press Secretary or President Obama would be asking about the failed Solar company Solydnra which received over $500 million in loans from the U.S. Government.
I’ve tried to find a moment where this direct question was asked but so far have come up empty. Luckily the print media and the blogosphere are on top of it. As such, we’re finding out the answer without even having to hear Jay Carney’s voice.
Apparently, President Obama knew in late October that there might be problems, as his own advisors raised serious doubts about the process which had approved Solyndra for the over $500 billion in loans.
At a White House meeting in late October, Lawrence H. Summers, then director of the National Economic Council, and Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, expressed concerns that the selection process for federal loan guarantees wasn’t rigorous enough and raised the risk that funds could be going to the wrong companies, including ones that didn’t need the help.
And:
In late October 2010, administration officials took their opposing views directly to Obama. In preparation, a memo was drafted by Summers, who remained wary of the program, and two others who were more supportive: then-energy advisor Carol Browner and Ron Klain, then chief of staff to Vice President Joseph Biden. The memo laid out their different concerns and options to fix a ‘broken process’ for getting loans approved.
After these concerns were raised, there was meeting to “streamline the process,” but little was done. President Obama had ample opportunity to try and deal with this failing program’s poor approval process and protect the American taxpayer from further exposure. He instead chose to continue charging down the path that has led us to our $500+ million loss.
In fact, they received more money after defaulting on the loans.
The U.S. Department of Energy learned in December that Solyndra was violating its federal loan deal, but the agency changed the loan terms to allow the solar company to continue receiving taxpayer funds, federal officials confirmed Wednesday.
It must’ve been great while it lasted for the executives at Solyndra. Of 18 companies that the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Federal Financing Bank gave out, Solyndra’s was the lowest. Even lower than Chris Dodd’s sweetheart mortgage, they received a 1.025% interest rate. On $500 million that is a staggeringly good deal. And as has already been mentioned, it couldn’t have been as a result of everyone feeling so secure in the financials. They were a mess and the process of approving them revealed that while still allowing the loan to move forward.
In order to make it more appealing to customers, the IRS jumped in on this deal of a lifetime and slashed the cost to consumers by offering a 30% tax deduction for Solyndra’s customers.
Solyndra, not only received a $500 million loan guarantee, it also got a favorable ruling from the IRS. According to “California Watch” — a unit of the Center For Investigative Reporting — the IRS decision gave Solyndra’s customers a 10-percent tax deduction and it was later increased to 30 percent.
And the timing of the ruling, just weeks before getting the stimulus loan, raises questions about whether the White House pulled strings for Solyndra, at other agencies.
How’s that for government intervention destroying competition? It’s unclear whether the IRS granted the deduction specifically to Solyndra’s customers or if it was related to their product, thus benefiting competitors, but what is clear is that the government was quite determined to cut every cost imaginable for Solyndra. One presumes they did this to create the appearance of success where none existed.
With all of the fancy footwork going on to make Solyndra look good, my original question stands: “Exactly what did the White House know, and when did they know it?”
Merely looking at the evidence would seem to indicate that they knew quite well how dangerous of a position Solyndra was in. By fall of last year, not only did they know that the vetting process was broken, not only did they know that George W. Bush’s administration had turned the loan down in ’08 citing concerns of financial stability, but their actions seemed to indicate that they were doing everything in their power to force that instability to change short of the one thing that a business person would’ve known instinctively to do: stop throwing good money after bad.
During the Dot Com boom, one of the pieces of evidence that the bubble was in danger of bursting had to do with extravagant spending, lavish offices, and blowing through money with reckless abandon that was symptomatic of many companies that had received investment. For Solyndra, the signs were there, but apparently no one in Barack Obama’s inner circle had dealt enough with the situation in the 90′s to read the writing on the wall. That, or they knew what was happening and just ignored it.
When it was completed at an estimated cost of $733 million, including proceeds from a $535 million U.S. loan guarantee, it covered 300,000 square feet, the equivalent of five football fields. It had robots that whistled Disney tunes, spa-like showers with liquid-crystal displays of the water temperature, and glass-walled conference rooms.
And
“The Plant Features 19 Loading Docks, Four Electric Car Charging Stations In The Parking Lot And Landscaping Of Wild Grass And A Rock Garden.
Even employees could see there were problems:
Former employees of Solyndra, the shuttered solar company that exhausted half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, said they saw questionable spending by management almost as soon as a federal agency approved a $535 million government-backed loan for the start-up.
And
After we got the loan guarantee, they were just spending money left and right,” said former Solyndra engineer Lindsey Eastburn. “Because we were doing well, nobody cared. Because of that infusion of money, it made people sloppy.
Even the mayor got in on the action:
There was available space that we talked about with them,’ Bob Wasserman, Fremont’s mayor, said in an interview. ‘It was their decision that they needed a new building. Was that a good decision? It didn’t turn out to be.
Real estate agents too:
Commercial real-estate agents in the region wondered why a new factory was being built in the Silicon Valley region, the epicenter of some of the priciest real estate in the country, where most new construction consists of office space.
“There hasn’t been a factory or warehouse building built in Silicon Valley in well over 10 years,” Jeff Fredericks, managing partner at Colliers International in San Jose, said in an e-mail.
All of these onlookers were able to determine what somehow evaded President Obama if it is to be believed that he was as taken aback as anyone else at the bankruptcy.
So maybe the administration didn’t realize a few things happening an entire country away? Who can blame them, right? You can’t expect them to pay for people to be out there enough to know what’s going on for a measly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money.
But the problems were right there on their doorstep as well.
As noted above, Solyndra defaulted on their loan in 2010, in violation of their agreement.
The failed solar-panel maker, which is under numerous criminal and congressional investigations, ran so short of cash in December 2010 that it was unable to satisfy certain terms of its U.S. loan agreement, these people said. The agreement required Solyndra to provide $5 million in equity to a subsidiary building its factory but cash-flow problems prevented those payments.
It would be pretty incredible if the White House claimed to not know of these problems in 2010. Would that information really have been withheld from President Obama even as he was allowing more money to be thrown in while tossing aside the first creditor rights of the taxpayer?
The company’s financial problems prompted the Energy Department early this year to allow it to reshuffle its debt. Under the arrangement, private investors agreed to provide a new $75 million loan and won the right to be paid ahead of the government if the company was liquidated.
It would be equally difficult to believe that the White House was unaware of the pitfalls inherent in restructuring the loan this way.
New records obtained by The Washington Post show that some federal reviewers warned internally earlier this year that it would be far cheaper for the government to allow Solyndra to shut down and sell off its assets, rather than to restructure the deal and bet on the company recovering.
And
A Preliminary Estimate By The Office Of Management And Budget In January Showed That Restructuring Solyndra Could Cost Taxpayers Up To $168 Million More Than Liquidation.
OMB staff members had warned that the Energy Department’s restructuring of Solyndra’s loan might be throwing good money after bad, other e-mails show, and could cost taxpayers $168 million more than if Solyndra had liquidated in January.
So here’s what we can say for sure about who knew what when:
- The employees knew something was up as far back as when the original money was given to the company.
- The mayor knew that they were making questionable spending choices in his town when they first picked their location.
- The local commercial real estate industry knew that they had made an expensive choice that hadn’t been made by private investor funded startups in over a decade.
- Obama’s advisors new there was trouble at least by October of last year when they raised their concerns, if not earlier.
- The Office of Management and Budget knew in January that restructuring was going to be a bad deal for taxpayers.
- Solyndra’s own executives knew as they warned the government that they were going to need more than $100 million more dollars just to stay afloat to 2012.
Daniel Horowitz
Steve Maley
How perfect are we looking for?
florajo Thursday, September 29th at 1:47PM EDT (link)I read somewhere that the loan portfolio that contains Solyndra is 97% performing. I wish my lousy bank had that kind of record.
I trust you're not looking at the Fannie & Freddie
johnt Thursday, September 29th at 1:59PM EDT (link)portfolio.
In any case the 97% you cite may be performing[ or it may not be] but Solyndra is and must be a seperate issue.
“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville
And how well would that money be performing if it had been left in private hands?
Next93 (Diary) Thursday, September 29th at 7:41PM EDT (link)I’m self-employed, and I’m currently making monthly payments to the IRS for several thousand dollars on last year’s taxes. I could be using that money to pay my kids college tuition, buy groceries, make charitable donations, or invest in a *real* company (one that makes a profit without a government subsidy). At the same time, the government is handing out HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars to people who are “juiced in” to the Chicago thugocracy occupying the white house. You really expect me to be happy that they’re *only* losing 3% on an investment portfolio that shouldn’t exist in the first place?
I don’t recall anything in the consitution that gives the federal government the right to play amateur venture capitalist with my money. I don’t think that was an unintentional omission by the Founders.
I can’t invest in REAL venture capitlists because I don’t have enough, after taxes, to invest in anything. Meantime, the feds take my money under threat of force, passes it though the hands of unelected bureacrats (who don’t know enough about business to function in the private sector), and hand it off to money-loosing propositions so that the Narciccist-in-cheif can have yet another photo op? I could be using that money to pay for my kids college tuition, buying groceries, making donations to foodshelves, or investing in companies that actually TURN A PROFIT.
By the way, there’s a local indian casino that boasts at 97% payout rate on the slot machines. I’d hope that if the government chooses to gamble with my money, they at least get better than house odds.
Come to think of it, I’d rather see the government putting my tax money into the slot machines. At least that way I know it’s going to an organization that knows how to run a profitable business (coincidentally, the same organization that runs Chicago and most of the unions).
Obama was The One in 2008.
He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.
Remember
edintexas Friday, September 30th at 10:57AM EDT (link)Remember what they say about statistics. If a hypothetical loan portfolio had 100 outstanding loans, and 3 were in default, it would be 97% performing. If those 3 defaulters accounted for 99% of the funds involved in the portfolio, it still COULD be called 97% “performing”. Depends on your perspective. From mine, the government should not be in the commercial loan business.
What's a half a bill' between friends?
Spartan4Life (Diary) Thursday, September 29th at 2:38PM EDT (link)That’s walking around money in Washington DC. A rounding error on the light bill. Probably more than that was spent on WH parties and state dinners.
They were doomed from the beginning
easyb (Diary) Thursday, September 29th at 3:20PM EDT (link)- One of the most expensive places in the country for real estate
- One of the most expensive places in the country for construction labor and materials
- One of the most expensive places in the country for engineers and other employees
I’ve mentioned this before, but if they had set up shop somewhere else in the US like Texas or Huntsville Alabama they would have been better off. Or, if they had executive and sales offices in the bay area (like many other solar companies), but had fabrication in China, Mexico, Poland, etc., they could have been more cost competitive. Hate to say that, but its true. There’s a reason why nobody has built a factory in Silicon Valley in 10 years…
Add to the above the fact that they responded to the loan guarantee with lavish spending. Too bad we have to pay for it.
The engineering idea behind their modules is a good one. It was very poorly executed, and questionable whether it could compete with silicon based technology on price. If they had been forced to compete on the same playing field with everyone else in the market, they might have made better decisions on where to build, who to hire, etc. Then the market would make its own decision on whether the idea had longevity.
As a side note, the 30% tax credit mentioned in the post isn’t specifically for Solyndra. All PV projects in the country get the 30%, whether it’s flat silicon based modules, or solyndra, or other. Here’s a link to the 2010 IRS form for the credit: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f5695.pdf
No juice
florajo Thursday, September 29th at 3:33PM EDT (link)Yes, Solyndra should be looked into and thoroughly investigated, but it’s not interesting as a media object. There’s no juice in this fruit despite the lamesteam media’s attempts to squeeze it for all it’s worth. It’s a dried up lime. Margaritas anyone?
Solargate = Obama's Waterloo
ombd Thursday, September 29th at 4:58PM EDT (link)If Solyndra isn’t a household name by the time the election rolls around, the GOP will be guilty of political malpractice. This one has it all and is quickly becoming the scandal that won’t stop giving. What did the President know and when did he know it … indeed. Evokes some fond memories …
http://www.ombudizen.com/2011/09/11/solargate/
Not sure if it has anything to do with Solyndra and solargate,
rickbull Thursday, September 29th at 10:10PM EDT (link)but
Tesla
has withdrawn their application for any further assistance in Energy Department loans.
WE ARE THE 53% (who actually pay taxes).
Deja vu All Over Again:
spinoneone Thursday, September 29th at 9:15PM EDT (link)Watergate, Iran-Contra, Valerie Plame, and Solyndra. Oh, and did I mention “Gunwalker?” Where is the special prosecutor? Out to lunch?
Dumb and Dumber are leading this country.
rattlerjake Friday, September 30th at 10:17AM EDT (link)When are the American taxpayers going to get their heads out of their azzes and require prosecution of this idiot and his administration for their continuous law-breaking? Obuthead is complicit in or has committed fraud (birth certificate), theft or embezzlement (depending on how you look at it with Solyndra) , tax evasion (geitner and others), murder (fast and furious), and immigration violations (including his uncle and aunt) to name a few. The writing on the wall shows that it will not matter if a conservative gains the White House in 2012, this country has lost it’s ability to govern itself and will soon disintegrate.
Now let's find out
jlsankot Friday, September 30th at 6:54AM EDT (link)How much he knew about Operation Fast and Furious and when did he know it?
All these cases are moot
ag8tor Friday, September 30th at 7:50AM EDT (link)since there wiil be nothing done to anyone about any of them. The “O” administration has gotten a pass ever since they have been in office. Whether it’s been the lame liberal press or the no-ball Republicans he will continue to get a pass. As was stated earlier you can bet the GOP will be found guilty of “political malpractice” because they don’t have the stones to call the emporer and his
so-called AG out. This administration has devalued the Constitution and the Law along with our money. The sheer arrogance of this group is sickening. What’s even more sickening is the weak almost non-existent attempts by the GOP to bring these latest criminal acts to light. This gangster mentality in DC has got to be stopped before the country is in total collapse. Problem is that the ones who could slow it down continue to whistle past the graveyard!
The mainstream media will not cover this scandal
gritsandall Friday, September 30th at 9:22AM EDT (link)because it indicts the liberal administration. Even if they did, the people who put Oboma in office would not care. He caters to the non-taxpayes who send in IRS tax returns so that they can get the free credits back from taxpayers. They care less whether if we have crooks in Washington as long as they get those checks back on taxes they did not pay. Unless we reform tax codes and voting requirements, it is a lost cause. As long as people are receiving money for doing nothing, they will continue to elect the people who will keep the money flowing. Problem is, when the business environment becomes so toxic that no one can produce, where will the liberal voters be. They will probably start trying to take their money from individuals whom they feel owes it to them.