Environmentalists Battle Lawn Mowing


Keystone Pipeline Attracts Frivolous Lawsuits Despite Overwhelming Support.

Environmentalists are up in arms and going to court to try to prevent the mowing of grass taking place around the future site of the Keystone XL Pipeline, an oil pipeline connecting Alberta, Canada with Gulf Coast refineries.

The Center for Biological Diversity, Western Nebraska Resources Council and Friends of the Earth have filed a lawsuit making the charge that the mowing of grass along the proposed route is really the beginning of construction.

“It’s outrageous that TransCanada is already clearing the way for the Keystone XL pipeline before the public has had a chance to have its say and, indeed, before federal agencies have even said it can be built,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “It looks like the fix is in on this dangerous project, and the sham public process is nothing more than an afterthought.”

In actuality, the mowing is an effort to find and relocate the American burying beetle from burrowing below where the pipeline is proposed to be built.  Something you’d think the environmentalist whackos would be happy was being done.

But it’s not really about the beetle or the grass.  This is simply a stalling technique, and one that the Center for Biological Diversity is well accustomed to.

You probably also won’t hear that the Center for Biological Diversity alone has been involved in 800 lawsuits since 1999. These organizations simply don’t have a legitimate pipeline safety case; that’s why we’re left wasting taxpayer dollars and clogging our already overburdened legal system over alleged mowing violations.

This lawsuit only underscores the very fact that activists cannot back up their very vocal allegations that the project is a threat to the region’s main source of irrigation and drinking water.

These campaigns funnel resources, in the form of both time and money, away from pursuits that actually improve environmental safety and public welfare. Unfortunately, we the consumers are ultimately the ones who end up paying. If activist groups did their homework, they would realize that Keystone XL has already proposed $500 million in enhancements beyond what the law even requires.

As usual, these environmental groups are on the wrong side of history.  The Keystone Pipeline will bring in over 20,000 jobs and $20 billion to our economy, and deliver 700,000 barels of oil to refineries in Texas in a safe and environmentally friendly way, every single day.

People are falling all over themselves to support it, from all walks of life and all political persuasions:

Today Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the American Trucking Associations (ATA) and the Ports-to-Plains Alliance announced that they have submitted more than 450,000 public comments calling on the U.S. Department of State to allow construction of the Keystone XL pipeline. The comments, which come from residents in states all across the country, demonstrate strong support for the project among Americans from numerous backgrounds.

CEA Executive Vice President Michael Whatley commented on the broad support that exists for the project: 

“The shear breadth of these comments shows that Americans are ready to get back to work while moving toward a more secure energy future. Keystone XL will deliver 700,000 barrels of U.S. and Canadian crude oil per day to refineries along the Gulf Coast in Texas and will be the safest pipeline ever constructed in the United States. Each barrel that flows through Keystone XL is another barrel we don’t have to buy from places like Venezuela and the Middle East. In addition to being the safest pipeline ever built, the project will create more than 120,000 American jobs, strengthen our economy and lower fuel prices for American families coast to coast.

“The American people have spoken loudly and clearly in favor of Keystone XL. We simply cannot afford to delay this critical project any longer, especially as millions of Americans across the country struggle to find work.”

NAM Vice President Chip Yost added:

“The Keystone XL pipeline project is estimated to create 20,000 high-paying manufacturing and construction jobs and will provide access to affordable sources of energy. Manufacturers use nearly one third of our nation’s energy supply, so reliable, affordable energy is critical to global competitiveness. We encourage action by the State Department and President Obama to avoid further delay or additional red tape. Our nation’s economy is stalled and Americans need jobs — we hope the Administration will act quickly and move this project forward.”

ATA Vice President and Regulatory Counsel Rich Moskowitz commented on the benefits of increasing supplies of North American crude to U.S. markets:

“Diesel fuel is the lifeblood of the American trucking industry. The State Department can help ensure that the 18-wheelers that deliver America’s essential goods like food, clothing and medicine have reliable access to that fuel by approving the Keystone XL project. The development of this important project will provide a stable, long-term supply of crude oil from Montana, North Dakota, and Canada – one of our strongest and most loyal allies – to refineries in the United States. The United States’ reliance on overseas oil places U.S. consumers at greater risk of supply disruptions and damaging price spikes.  This pipeline will enhance our energy security.”

Michael Reeves, President of the Ports to Plains Alliance added that the economic impact of the project will be welcome in the states where the pipeline will be built:

“As leaders from the region that the Keystone XL pipeline will traverse, our members applaud the State Department’s thoroughness during this approval process. The department has fully analyzed the project’s environmental impact and the Final EIS rightfully concludes that there are no substantial environmental concerns that should prevent the construction of this valuable infrastructure project. They also understand that Keystone XL will provide significant economic benefits for our region – including the contribution of more than $5.2 billion in tax revenues to the Keystone XL corridor states — and call on the State Department to grant the Presidential Permit and allow construction of this important project.”

(emphasis mine)

But hey, what do these guys know?  Let’s focus instead on whether or not the lawn mowing is happening to early.  Take a moment to realize that President Obama has to try and win the vote of people that are against construction of a safe, job producing, energy independence making, environmentally friendly political no-brainer.  It’s almost enough to make you feel sorry for him for having to pander to such environmentally whacky extremists.

 

Oh, that’s right.  He’s one of them.

Follow @Ben_Howe



RSS feed

17 Comments Leave a comment

Make it about the *jobs*.

acat (Diary) Thursday, October 13th at 10:31PM EDT (link)

What, you think they’re using robots to do the mowing?

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Nope, ATMs

DerKrieger (Diary) Thursday, October 13th at 10:38PM EDT (link)

Automatic Turfing Machines.

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690

 
 

Obama won't hesitate

DerKrieger (Diary) Thursday, October 13th at 10:37PM EDT (link)

… to take credit for any jobs the project creates even though if it were up to him it would never be built.

“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison

Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690

 

Every time I think

redpenny Friday, October 14th at 7:27AM EDT (link)

the Obumble administration has reached the height of stupidity;they stand up and prove me wrong.I agree that projects as important as this one must leave no stone unturned and be done very carefully.Think of the jobs this project will provide.Jobs,far more important than some insect;yadda,yadda,yadda.

Don’t bother: the moderators tossed me out on my racist posterior already.

 

The greens are deceptive again

kenchely Friday, October 14th at 6:08PM EDT (link)

Their business about a beetle is completely bogus. They aren’t doing this because they’re solicitous of a beetle. They’re doing it because they don’t like fossil fuels and would rather have our fossil fuel supply in the hands of hostile nations so that we become desperate and thereby fund the kinds of energy that they favor.

Just how altruistic the whole solar business is has become clear with Solyndra and several other solar companies.

The project is not “dangerous.” What’s dangerous is that greens, who were once decent but naive, have become out-and-out liars whose interest runs directly counter to that of the nation.

 

The greens are deceptive again

kenchely Friday, October 14th at 6:08PM EDT (link)

Their business about a beetle is completely bogus. They aren’t doing this because they’re solicitous of a beetle. They’re doing it because they don’t like fossil fuels and would rather have our fossil fuel supply in the hands of hostile nations so that we become desperate and thereby fund the kinds of energy that they favor.

Just how altruistic the whole solar business is has become clear with Solyndra and several other solar companies.

The project is not “dangerous.” What’s dangerous is that greens, who were once decent but naive, have become out-and-out liars whose interest runs directly counter to that of the nation.

 

And to think that green used to be my favorite color.

lastgopinillinois (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 1:33AM EDT (link)

But now my eyes are turning RED.

As I have said many times before, the truth needs to be spread across the mainstream media so the public will be aware of their deceit.

We just need to find a way to trick the MSM into an accidental act of real journalism.

In the beginning, God created earth to be an extension of his vast Kingdom and his LOVE was so great that he wanted to share it with man, whom he created in his own image and likeness and gave him free will.
To this very principal, the Founding Fathers of our nation decreed that freedom is a God-given in-alienable right of all the people.

You do know it's not easy being green. Let my friend explain it.

gekster (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 1:58AM EDT (link)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 

any excuses

mutantone Saturday, October 15th at 8:24AM EDT (link)

any way he can force the USA to buy oil from his friends Soros or the Arabs instead of drilling here and his blanket statement about bankrupting cola producers when we have abundant sources here in our nation and he bases it on the fake science of the faked global warming and co2 emissions when most coal fired plants have had mandatory scrubbers installed for years now, thanks to the EPA it is all to obvious that he rather support other countries and his campaign fund raisers than American Independence from foreign sources, to much of the money is being kicked back into his campaign pockets for him to be honest about it

 

Build Refineries, Not Pipelines

wumingren Saturday, October 15th at 8:24PM EDT (link)

Why build a pipeline to pump Canadian oil all the way to Texas to be refined? Instead, build a refinery or two in Montana or North Dakota. With all the oil in the Bakken, we could simply refine the oil there and ship the processed value-added products by rail or truck directly to consumers. Canada could send its oil to this refinery complex without having to build much more than about 500 miles of pipeline. Moreover, the Bakken field extends into Canada, where it will certainly be tapped, so a nearby refinery would serve them well. We need more refining capacity in the U.S. anyway. Note that every minor disruption to existing refineries, even simple outages due to periodic facilities maintenance, spikes gasoline prices, and every winter, the switch to heating oil production has an adverse effect on diesel and gasoline prices. A refinery in the middle of the country, not far from the geographic center of the continent, would be an ideal situation. Who says refining has to be done in Texas?

oil refineries are built by water for a reason

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 8:44PM EDT (link)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery

have an idea, let people in the business decide whether to build their refineries in Texas or Montana. We can vote for politicians, who tend to be lawyers, who will get out of the way.

Molon Labe!

Chicago's got a refinery or two...

acat (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 8:49PM EDT (link)

and there’s even a pretty decent rail line from Chicago to the Bakken field area.

Not sure why the oil “must” go to Texas to be refined, Chi-town’s closer.

(barely a quibble)

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

never said it had to go to Texas

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 9:07PM EDT (link)

but last I checked, Chi Town had more water than Montana.

btw, lots of companies are going to Texas, has to do with the business climate. Boeing chose Chicago over Seattle. But the devil is in the details. They could move it all to Texas one day.

Molon Labe!

True, Doc.

acat (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 9:13PM EDT (link)

And IIRC, Chitown threw a huge tax break Boeing’s way to get ‘em here.

Not sure how happy they are about it, now that they’ve arrived….

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 
 

I agree, although...

gsatt Thursday, December 15th at 5:30PM EDT (link)

I agree with more refineries, it can only prepare us for the capacity to refine the amount of crude we consume. Ever have a motor with too much horsepower to spare….. rarely.

My question is what are the intentions of the oil? Are we going to be buying this oil from Canada and using it ourselves? Or are they planning on shipping refined oil out of the port in Texas to the sand land, that cant refine their own oil. This is the only reason i can think of that would solidify connecting Canadian oil directly to Texas refineries. Otherwise yes, just build refineries on our northern border.

I should probably look more into this myself, but its nice to have more viewpoints going on a research mission…. personally

“The humanitarian wishes to be a prime mover in the lives of others. He cannot admit either the divine or the natural order, by which men have the power to help themselves. The humanitarian puts himself in the place of God.

But he is confronted by two awkward facts; first, that the competent do not need his assistance; and second, that the majority of people. . . positively do not want to be ‘done good’ by the humanitarian. . . . Of course, what the humanitarian actually proposes is that he shall do what he thinks is good for everybody. It is at this point that the humanitarian sets up the guillotine.”

– Isabel Paterson-

 
 

oil refineries are built by water for a reason

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 8:41PM EDT (link)

http://www.vcdl.org/elections/house_election_results_2007.html

I have an idea, let people in the business decide whether to build their refineries in Texas or Montana. We can vote for politicians, who tend to be lawyers, who will get out of the way.

Molon Labe!

disregard this post and link -nt

Doc Holliday (Diary) Saturday, October 15th at 8:45PM EDT (link)

.

Molon Labe!