« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

2012 DNC Discriminates Against Charlotte Businesses, Demands Unionization

Look for the Union Label...if you'd like to be allowed to do business.

After working in construction for many years in Canada, John Monteith had had enough of unions calling all of the shots and forcing themselves onto employers.  So John did some research on the United States, and found that one of the best right-to-work states was North Carolina.

John got in touch with an immigration attorney, and worked with him to emigrate legally to the United States at a cost of $40 thousand of his personal money.  Well worth it as far as he was concerned, to have the freedom to run a business without being forced into negotiations and contracts with special interest groups.  So he packed up his bags and never looked back.

He eventually found himself working for a company called Heritage Printing & Graphics.  Originally located in the Northeast, Heritage had decided to open up a large format print shop in Charlotte, NC, and they hired John to help with business development to grow their sales.

The company has done very well in the large format printing business.  Large format are basically the types of signs you see everywhere.  Think of a concert or a sports game.  Now picture all the “enter here” and “ticket booth” signs that find their way into events of that type.  Heritage Printing & Graphics is one of the companies that competes for that business and they did well enough that, when the DNC announced they’d be holding their convention in Charlotte, John was tasked with making the pitch to land some of the work.

According to John, statistically speaking based on their size and clientele, it was a fair bet that Heritage could land at least 25% of the available work which he estimated to be about $1 million.

After continually receiving no return phone calls from the people that would review bids and determine vendors, John started working harder to land the business.  Donuts that he would send to their offices would be eaten, thank you’s would be said, but still no follow ups.  No call backs.  No  business.

Finally, confused and bewildered, John reached out to someone he knew that might be able to help.  He was so shocked and upset at what he was told by this person, that he felt he had to tell the story.  I spoke with him today.

The person that John spoke to is an executive on the Charlotte in 2012 Host Committee who are central to the planning of the convention and how things will operate in Charlotte.  There are only a handful of executive members of this committee, but John refrained from naming anyone specific.  Ultimately, which one it is may not matter.  What does matter is how the conversation went.  According to John, he approached this person to see why he couldn’t get any traction with the committee.

They responded by asking him, “John, are you a union shop?”  When John told him he was not, the Committee member told him, “We were just told that we cannot accept bids unless they are from companies that are unionized.”

“Cannot? Or will not?,” John asked.  ”Cannot,” was the response he got.

When he pressed to find out who to complain to, he was not given a straight answer.  After spending some time thinking about, accepting that the jobs would not go to his company, John decided he wanted his story to be told.  Not for political reasons so much.  He says he thinks that partisanship need not enter into this.

As far as he’s concerned, he was denied the opportunity to even compete for work because unions had already bought and paid for the people in charge.  Maybe he could’ve let it go at that point if not for the fact that the Mayor of Charlotte, Anthony Foxx, hadn’t gone to such great lengths to assure the citizens that this would be a boon for their local economy and an opportunity for the city’s business owners.  With the mayoral election in Charlotte coming next Tuesday, these broken promises of jobs has been something Foxx’s opponent, Republican Scott Stone, has been pointing out.

“I think one of two things is going to happen: either the workers are going to come from out-of-state, either Chicago or Philly, and they’re going to come and get the work,” Stone said. “Or, they’re going to force local people, local employees and local companies, to unionize if they want to get a piece of this project. So, one of those two things is going to happen and neither one is good.”

According to John Monteith, that’s exactly what happened.  The person on the committee that he spoke to specifically asked him if he could unionize his shop in order to make bidding possible.  After already fleeing union bastions like Canada, that was the last thing he was going to do.

Undoubtedly the response from the DNC Host Committee will be to provide a laundry list of companies that they allowed bids for and awarded work to that weren’t unionized.  Companies like Time Warner Cable (which one wonders what else they could’ve done about, but I digress).

The truth is, that is all irrelevant in the face of what John was told about his business.  North Carolina is a right to work state.  No employee can be compelled to join a union.  This is the law.  Apparently, the Democrats in charge of the 2012 convention in Charlotte have found a way to get around that.  In order to get the DNC’s business, companies are being asked to unionize their employees — regardless of if the employees want a union.  And if not, they don’t get the work.  Apparently, discrimination is still legal.

How long until John must find another way to escape the clutches of union control?

COMMENTS

  • Carol Tarasewicz

    Ben-Didn’t they use non-union employees for Obama’s bday party in Chicago but union for his DC bday party? Thank you. Carol

    • carolina

      BO was stroking the La Raza crowd for that bd event. Everything else goes to the unions.
      Unions in Charlotte will be offensive to the locals. This should make it easier to NC to vote for the GOP cainddate

  • Adjoran

    The unions pitched a fit when the convention was award to Charlotte in the first place, because of the RTW laws. At that time the DNC promised to ensure as many union contracts as possible.

    Obviously union shops aren’t going to win competitive bids, so the only way to follow through on the promise is to do what they are doing. It probably violates NC law, but that’s never seemed to affect Democrats’ practices in the past.

  • ag8tor

    set by their “Dear Leader” and his attorney general in finding ways to get around ANY law they don’t like. This is being called “Chicago” style politics. I don’t think they’re this sleazy in Chicago. In his quest to become the USA’s first King BHO has tarmpled on almost all parts of the Constitution. Therefore it should follow that his minions have no respect for the rule of law unless it is favorable to them. The Dems should really be proud of the group of scum they have infiltrated this government with. The sad part is that the antics for the 2012 election have just begun. We can expect more chicanery from these vermin on an even grander scale. The likes of BHO and holder in the administration and Reid , Pelosi, et al will try to move more inane bills through congress and if they don’t pass will blame the Reps or BHO will use more executive orders that he has become so fond of when he doesn’t get the reults he wants. Total SCUM. I pray we still have a free country and are still able to vote him out by November 2012.

  • cacharlie

    Thanks, Ben! Just the kind of information that helps rally votes for stopping obmania in 2012.
    Please,fellow conservatives, no more ripping to shreds every hope for a good President next time around. Common sense dictates that we view the resumes of both Cain and Perry as proof of capable leadership in our federal government’s Constitutional business practices.
    In addition, those who insist on candidates defending themselves endlessly against spurious assaults on their integrity appear forgetful that the value of our judicial system lies in innocence in the absence of proof to the contrary.

  • josephine

    If this were a movie , Jimmy Stewart would tell them to take a hike and have their convention elsewhere.
    We could plan a week long victory celebration in Charlotte instead.
    They must always try to rub our noses in their mess. They have had this planned all along.

    • msjallen

      not by name so here it is and everyone should watch it; including every politician. Rent or buy it…it is worth it.
      “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington”

  • spolson

    Unions are just gangsters. They have long outlived their usefulness. Now they are a drain on the economy and don’t benefit a their members. The Democrats are paid accomplices. The best way to get rid of these gangsters, who by the way are not above murder, extortion, graft, terror, or anything else illegal, Is to vote out the Democrats top to bottom. Our two party system should be Conservatives and Tea Party. Democrats shouldn’t even be there.

  • vandalii

    …and the libs own the sign-making company :-(

  • vandalii

    …and the libs own the sign-making company :-(

  • cptclaw

    I don’t really see this as the evil to which it is being portrayed.

    While I agree that the Mayor can and should pay a political price for his pre-award hype and sell job on promising jobs and economic windfalls, isn’t it well within the rights of the DNC to select to do business with whomever it wants. Just as I have made the decision to never see a Michael Moore movie because I do not agree with his views and those projected by his product; why can’t the DNC make a similar decision on how and where to spend its money?

    I have no issues with the non-union shops raising their hands and calling attention to the decision. In fact, they should as I believe it will show how hypocritical they are. However, just as I scoffed at the Dixie Chicks et al screaming censorship because people exercised their right to neither listen to nor purchase their CDs because the ladies political views were abhorrent to many of us, I hesitate to scream discrimination at the DNC for choosing to support companies which more fully support their values – however wrong minded they may be. Just trying to be consistent, I guess.

    • calhoun211

      What values? The dims have no values.

      • cptclaw

        Should have called it was it is… ‘Bat $#1t crazy views.’

  • cptclaw

    I don’t really see this as the evil to which it is being portrayed.

    While I agree that the Mayor can and should pay a political price for his pre-award hype and sell job on promising jobs and economic windfalls, isn’t it well within the rights of the DNC to select to do business with whomever it wants. Just as I have made the decision to never see a Michael Moore movie because I do not agree with his views and those projected by his product; why can’t the DNC make a similar decision on how and where to spend its money?

    I have no issues with the non-union shops raising their hands and calling attention to the decision. In fact, they should as I believe it will show how hypocritical they are. However, just as I scoffed at the Dixie Chicks et al screaming censorship because people exercised their right to neither listen to nor purchase their CDs because the ladies political views were abhorrent to many of us, I hesitate to scream discrimination at the DNC for choosing to support companies which more fully support their values – however wrong minded they may be. Just trying to be consistent, I guess.

    • dyarbrough

      …and the Democratic Socialist Mayor of Charlotte.

      North Carolina is a right to work state. The DNC promised that the majority of work generated by the convention would go to local (read: non-union) business. Once the City was contractually bound to host the Convention, the DNC showed their true stripes and reverted to giving their business to their union patrons.

      “Discrimination” is only indirectly the point. The Democratic Socialists and their union thug patrons prove just how discriminatory they are every day they sustain the NLRB action against the Charleston plant of Boeing for daring to decertify the IAM.

      Integrity is the point. The Democratic Socialists clearly show they have none.

  • shadowmane

    This guy, and all of the other business who can’t compete for these jobs should sue. If its state law, and the DNC isn’t following State law, then the suit would have solid legs to stand on.

  • Snertly

    Mr Monteith has a problem with the vagaries of the free market?

    He came to America so he could do business as he wished, but is now hurt and sad that a potential customer would rather shop else where?

    Does Mr Monteith feel somehow entitled to be the DNC’s printing provider? Will he file suit against the DNC to force them to do business with his printing shop?

    Does he believe attempting to publicly shame the DNC will cause them to change their mind? Does he think this tactic will encourage other customers to come to him for their printing needs?

    • bonnman

      As far as I know a customer can buy products and services from any seller they want. If they don’t like the way a company conducts its business, in this case the DNC doen’t like non-union labor (big surprise) then they can refuse to do business with them.

  • leehazel

    The outcome here is being watched!!
    South Carolina is a living “poster child” for the success of a “Right to Work” state. If the unions, using the DNC can break this law, and can force Union membership on workers and businesses as a requirement to even bid contracts for the convention then South Carolina and the nation has lost.
    The Tuesday mayoral election in Charlotte, like the votes in Ohio are vital to a reinvigorated US economy. Get out and vote. Vote your concience, but vote.
    In my opinion the time and place for unions is in the past.
    The time and place for public sector unions is long past. Quite frankly, they should have never been allowed in the firs place. It is the epitome of “conflict of interest”.

  • williamjameson

    Its not just unions but the deliberate motivation to discriminate and bully business owners centers around laws that AG Eric Holder was sworn to uphold. And if those biz owners are black then it gets more serious considering Holder expanded civil rights investigations.

    Its time for conservative media and bloggers to expand the attacks exposing media bias, coverups and the lack of desire to call out the DNC, unions and democrats who turn a blind eye to deliberate discrimination.

    I think we’re all tired of the excuses and double talking from the party of slavery, Jim row and segregation. The reality is that dems and liberals have shifted away from attacking blacks, today conservatives are enslaved to such abuses because too many conservatives ignore such stories and refuse to take a stand. Keep the fight alive because unions are driving jobs out of the USA.

  • quad4x4

    If any one thought the union bosses were going to stand still they need to think. Chicago Style things happen and when someone negotiates with a submachine gun on his desk, you pretty quick get the point. Rules? Law? /so what, Holder can fix or ignore anything he likes to suit himself or Friends of BO. Open warfare in Politics is not new, 2012 will be the bloodest year for this country in many years. RESTORE AMERICA, vote the bums out..

  • awkingsley

    The DNC unionization scam in Charlotte is why the Democrats need “Big” government. “Big” government and nationalization allows the Socialist Democrats to unionize every business and every employee, They want total control.

  • Pingback: Big labor favor: DNC may replace local workers with out-of-state union labor for convention | The Daily Caller