« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Sen. Tom Harkin to Release GAO Report on For-Profit College Amidst Looming Questions From His Last One.

Sen. Tom Harkin will be releasing a report today on For-Profit Education but here’s a spoiler: He’s not a fan.

His previous investigation into For-Profit schools resulted in error-ridden reports & accusations of witness tampering. Much of the controversy surrounding that investigation still leaves ample doubt that Harkin is capable of providing an objective assessment of for-profit education.

To start with, Harkin had commissioned a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) which was ultimately determined to be riddled with errors and was an embarrassment to the department. An internal email was acquired which accused Harkin of pressuring the GAO with “extreme short time frames” which ultimately led to numerous errors in the report.

A smoking gun document about an error-ridden GAO report puts the murder weapon in a top Democratic senator’s hands. GAO issued a slew of corrections in November to an undercover investigation into for-profit colleges requested by Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa Democrat, who had unveiled the report at a hearing highly critical of the schools Aug. 4. The email says GAO was put under “extreme short time frames” by Harkin to issue the report and “congressional staffers” demanded the inclusion of numerous details as it was being finalized.

The GAO report (released in the summer of 2010) was highly critical of for-profit education accusing universities of engaging in “fraudulent recruiting practices.” Once it came to light that Harkin’s office may have put pressure on the GAO to guide them into reporting what Harkin wanted them to, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrel Issa (R-Calif) started an investigation into what had happened. This investigation resulted in 16 changes to the 28 key investigative “scenarios” which had led to the reports conclusions. To put it in perspective as to how big of a deal this was at the time, the issuance of a revised GAO report, the Coalition for Educational Success reports that “out of over 1,000 reports issued in the past year only 16 were later revised.” Of course, none of the other reports seem to have had the accusation of Senatorial influence over the report’s conclusions.

But the controversy doesn’t end there. Harkin was also accusing of meeting with special interests what had a financial stake in the outcome of the investigation and that they colluded in witness tampering:

Top aides to Iowa Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin collaborated with a special interest group and a law firm with a financial stake in the matter to edit the written and oral testimony of a witness at a key investigative hearing last year, documents obtained by The Daily Caller show.

Officials from The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS) and the James, Hoyer, Newcomer & Smiljanich law firm edited Josh Pruyn’s testimony for a pivotal Aug. 4, 2010 hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP), as did Harkin aides. (emphasis mine)

One hedge fund short seller, Steve Eisman, had meetings with Senior Department of Education (DOE) officials two months prior to the first batch of regulations targeting for-profit colleges.

On April 26, 2010, Steven Eisman, famed short-seller, met secretly with two senior DOE officials, Deputy Undersecretary of DOE Robert Shireman and Acting Deputy Assistant for Policy and Budget, David Bergeron. Less than two months later, the Department issued its first batch of regulations targeting only for-profit colleges…

Why is that important? Well after giving numerous speeches comparing for-profit colleges to the subprime mortgage industry as well as meeting with Sen. Harkin’s staff and officials at the DOE, Eisman casually revealed that he was short selling private education stocks.

This is a lot of information so let me summarize. Sen. Tom Harkin commissioned a GAO report to use in an investigation of for-profit education. He subsequently used his staff to apply pressure to the GAO which ultimately resulted in a report that was highly critical of for-profit education (going so far as to accuse them of fraudulent practices) and the report was eventually determined to be covered with errors.

After the investigation, Darrell Issa of California did his own bit of investigating and discovered that Harkin’s top aides along with a special interest group that had a financial stake in the outcome of the education investigation, had tampered with witness testimony and edited it for their benefit.

Additionally, it was discovered that hedge fund manager Steve Eisman, who acknowledged that he was short selling education stock and thus had a financial interest in the outcome of the investigation, had consulted with the DOE and Harkin’s offices on the issue of for-profit education and in short order the DOE had issued new regulations on for-profit education.

And after all of this mess and scandal, the same man, Senator Tom Harkin, is set to release his new report on for-profit educational institutions.

His timing on this is not an accident. We are amidst what many have referred to as a “student loan bubble.” Graduates are having trouble finding jobs, debt is weighing on the mind of students, and overall it is not a great time for college education.

In short, the entire college education sector is facing a mountain of problems. No doubt Harkin’s report will glaze over this fact and again attempt to point the finger only at the for-profit portion of that sector.

COMMENTS

  • edintexas

    Reputation for being absolutely outside politics. Of course few people will learn of this.

  • freemanja1991

    Like Dick Lugar he lives in DC, and then spends all but one other day a year in the Bahamas. To Hide is mental condition from his constituents.

  • dodgeone

    in IA when its time for reelection.

  • golfbum7

    I am on the other side of the aisle, so I do not comment here (I read it every day, absolute must read on my desk), nor will I engage in discussions relating to political topics (again, your forum, and quite honestly a bit out of my league) but as a professional on a trading desk, please do not buy stocks Steve Eisman shorts. It really is not a good idea.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    But all of that will be lost in this whole mess.

    I worked at a for-profit school in the late 80′s and the wild-eyed greed and waste of taxpayer money was stunning. They eagerly enrolled welfare moms, some who could barely read, got the maximum federal and state grants and then loaded them up with student loans they knew would end up in default. Many already had substantial student loans that could be deferred if they enrolled in school.

    And of course, for-profit schools aren’t alone…many public universities do the exact same thing. Once a school gets on the government dole, there is every incentive to enroll any and every person that walks through the door at taxpayer expense. The “free” money inherently corrupts and dumbs down the system.

  • Melody Warbington

    Posted a long comment that is either waiting on approval (?) or has disappeared.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      We’ll have to track that down for you. We are having some issues w/ comments that need to be fixed. Thank you as always for reading what I write.

    • Ausonius

      You are not the only one! I am still waiting for a Return command for starting a new paragraph, without immediately editing the post!

  • spandrel

    The picture changes somewhat if you account for differences in purchasing power parity (i.e., pretty much everything costs more in the US than in Mexico), but the point is well taken: we do a crappy job on education.

    Competition would clearly be part of the solution, but only if their are strict educational standards. My experience – sending 3 kids to 24 years total of private schooling – is that private schools have perverse incentives that create moral hazard. Private schools want to keep paying customers, and thus bend the standards this way and that to keep parents happy. In the extreme case, one of my kids was in a class of 12 students that counted a billionaire and two half billionaires among the parents, and when those parents showed up at the front office they were able to make things happen for their kids that the rest of us working class folks could not. But even more generally, private school administrations are necessarily conflicted between expecting more of students and keeping parents happy. The results are often ugly. (Hence, this week my fourth child started KG in the local public school!)

    I’m not sure school lunches count as extras – hungry kids don’t learn anything – but spending on sports is absolutely ridiculous, and I still have no idea why the high school sent my three kids home with personal tablet computers. Still, if there are high, transparent standards, I don’t see why schools couldn’t compete with “extras”.

    But in the end, probably the biggest needed change is also the most difficult – a cultural shift towards valuing math and science.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I’d agree private education is a Caveat Emptor affair. My only advice (for what it is worth) is do your homework. A good private school will actively seek out the same credentialling as it’s local public system and can then more accurately bill itself as public school +.

      • spandrel

        Of course, one shouldn’t just pick a school based on the brochure. But private school competition will only produce results that parents demand, and not a smidgen more.

        I recall reading a study some years ago that looked at how parent assessment of their kids’ schools correlated with how their kids did on 8th grade math and science tests. An international study. In the countries with the highest test scores (Japan or Korea, I think) the parents were most dissatisfied with their schools, whereas at the other end – America – parents were most satisfied with their schools. And all the other countries fell on a nice straight line in between. It’s a simple, obvious, truth – where parents demand better results, they get better results.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          Public Schools which are unaccountable to the parents, have less pressure to perform than that.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          And to Kowalski this. Parents in Korea and Japan are also far more respectful of teachers who do well than parents in the US. There has to be both a carrot and a stick to make teachers *want* to take teaching our offspring seriously.

  • Viet71

    The highest unadjusted SAT scores were for the class of 1963 — kids born in 1945. After Hiroshima, U.S. parents knew the future lay with their children getting a good education through high school, at the very least.

    LBJ’s culture of welfare began the erosion process. What’s the need for a good education if Uncle Sugar provides a comfy fallback?

    As a society, we’ve come a long way since 1963. Mostly downhill, IMO.

    Born 11/9/45.

  • runner12

    Excellent points. The public school system is overrun by bureaucracy and ineffiency. The administrators are paid way too much and teachers too little. Teachers are exhausted trying to be parent, social worker, nanny, and teacher to masses of kids. Now they are providing daycare at tax-payers expense. Instead of focusing on education, they have largely become a social experiment.

    You are correct, the public school system is going to have to make a choice to either continue on its path to extinction or renew its focus on actually educating children.

  • ss396

    All good points, and I don’t dispute the underlying concept that we could do a lot better in delivering an education, as opposed to regurgitating bullet points on a standardized exam.

    But there is disparity among the various nations as to what constitutes educational spending. We carry a lot of student services charges in our education budgets, whereas Europe counts those in their social welfare spending. (On the other hand, the U.S. carries medical internships and training hospitals in our health care budgets, while Switzerland carries these in their education budgets.) How different are the definitions of ‘educational spending’ among the nations, and how far from apples-to-apples is the comparison?

    Additionally, the U.S. educational system is a populist based system, whereas Europe is more elitist. We spend a lot to educate, or at least “school”, the widest possible base of students. Europe focuses more on identifying the better performers and developing them. This contributes to the widening gap between performance in either system at the higher grades. How would U.S. test scores compare if only the top half of the students were used in the comparison?

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Populism. It gives a cross between “It Can’t Hppen Here” and “Harrison Bergeron” everywhere its tried.
      As for the comparison. I actually did try to adjust things from the USC link. They mad no adjustment in per-pupil expenditures for length of time they expected someone to be in school. E.g. Australia has an expected educational lifespan of 21 years vs 16 for the US of A. I divided US spending per pupil by 16 and AU spending by 21 to try and normalize the data set. To make a long reply shorter…It may be that apples to pomegranites is about as close as you’ll ever get unless you get to do the D of E a priori. Thanks for an interesting critique!

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Part of the problem in AL is volume of revenue. Fairfax County, VA took in more annual tax receipts in 2005 than the entire state of AL. And then there is the poverty AL started from during the 1st 1/2 of the 20th Century.
    AL could undoubtably do a better job for far less than 85% of the state’s revenues, but that would require a total war against the AEA. (Which isn’t the worst idea I’ve thought this fair morn.)

  • Pingback: free ipad apps

  • Pingback: Nick Carnes

  • Pingback: Newton Taulman

  • Pingback: Car Forum

  • Pingback: Reverse Number Lookup

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: distill alcohol

  • Pingback: milosc w tarnowie

  • Pingback: τοποθετηση πλακιδιων

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: steel strapping

  • Pingback: rubinetterie

  • Pingback: liquor moonshine

  • Pingback: Setup

  • Pingback: I was reading this

  • Pingback: Browse Around These Guys

  • Pingback: web design barrow

  • Pingback: skachat igru karos

  • Pingback: madamelux

  • Pingback: working from home uk

  • Pingback: desain interior rumah

  • Pingback: biaya bangun rumah

  • Pingback: Morton Faries

  • Pingback: Justa Andrews

  • Pingback: Justa Andrews

  • Pingback: Store Fixture Installers

  • Pingback: aloe vera juice for hair

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: Angla Dallam

  • Pingback: Zella Asher

  • Pingback: raspberry ketones supplement

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: the green coffee bean extract

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: Inverter Servo Motion Control

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: Scooters

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: spray tanning kit