« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

TX Senate Dem recruit once object of scorn for military interrogations

Did national Democrats’ recruitment of former Iraq commander Ricardo Sanchez transform the Texas Senate race from a blow-out into a marquee 2012 contest? Not a chance, say Republicans eyeing the race.

For deep red Texas GOP’ers, the most significant task is clearing the primary field, which includes former solicitor general Ted Cruz, ex-railroad commish Michael Williams, former Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert and car dealer-turned-secretary of state Roger Williams. Sanchez, whose military career took an unceremonious dive after those below his command were charged with prisoner abuse at the Abu Ghraib detention center, registers a distant second for these Senate hopefuls.

Despite news that Democrats have finally fielded a challenger for the open seat, Cruz and Leppert are riding high. Aides to both campaigns circulated earlier this week fundraising figures indicating both had posted north of $1 million a piece in the first quarter. Williams reported a slimmer half-million haul for the same period.

Even beyond fundraising, a Sanchez candidacy isn’t without its serious hurdles.

The legacy of Abu Ghraib — the enduring images of naked prisoners bound and tortured — and the outrage it sparked on Capitol Hill wasn’t lost on one Republican operative with ties to the race.

A 2004 panel that investigated prisoner abuse found Sanchez, once the nation’s highest-ranking Hispanic officer, was derelict in overseeing Iraqi detention. According to a classified report by three Army generals, Sanchez approved the use of harsh military interrogation techniques that were once limited to prisoners held at facilities in Cuba and Afghanistan.

The irony that Democrats who once raked the lieutenant general over the coals now view Sanchez as their savior will no doubt be a hallmark of the campaign.

Senator Patty Murray, who steers the Democrats’ Senate campaign arm and vaguely teased reporters earlier this week of a top Texas recruit, said in 2004 that all those responsible for Abu Ghraib — no matter where they fell in the chain of command — must be held to account for their actions.

“These actions are a disservice to the thousands of American soldiers in the region who serve us honorably each and every day, and, sadly, are likely to make their efforts to calm a troubled region even harder,” Murray said of the controversy.

When former President George Bush tapped then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to fill the nation’s top law enforcement post, Murray joined Senator Maria Cantwell in opposing the nomination over his green-lighting of Sanchez’s interrogation techniques.

In a 2004 statement, Senator Patrick Leahy accused Sanchez of authorizing “the use of techniques that were contrary to both U.S. military manuals but also international law.” “Given this incredible overstepping of bounds, I find it incredible that the reports generated thus far have not recommended punishment of any kind for high-level officials,” he added.

The onslaught of Congressional criticism came as military brass looked to give Sanchez his fourth star. The promotion never materialized and months later he retired.

And in January 2009, President Barack Obama ordered the Central Intelligence Agency immediately cease using many of the interrogation techniques earlier approved by Sanchez in Iraq.

“Senate Democrats forced Ricardo Sanchez into retirement over his performance in Iraq and now they’re recruiting him to run for the Senate?,” one top GOP strategist mused to Beltway Whispers. “Republicans will look forward to hearing what Patrick Leahy, Carl Levin and Patty Murray have to say about his candidacy because it speaks volumes about how desperate the Democrats are to hold onto a Senate majority.”

COMMENTS

  • Locke

    About detainee abuse or anything beyond winning elections (and enslaving all)?

    • Locke

      to Leahy and his ilk is the way to smash him electorily.

      • Locke
  • banzaibob

    He will be forgiven for his sins

    • banzaibob

      just to make things clear

      • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

        Andrew Bacevich, in his review of American Soldier by Tommy Franks for the New Left Review, offered a devastating critique of Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez.

        “Consider: when Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez assumed command of coalition forces in Iraq in 2003, the first stirrings of an insurgency had begun to appear; his job was to snuff out that insurgency and establish a secure environment. When Sanchez gave up command a year later, Iraq was all but coming apart at the seams. Security had deteriorated appreciably. The general failed to accomplish his mission, egregiously so. Yet amidst all the endless commentary and chatter about Iraq, that failure of command has gone all but unnoted, as if for outsiders to evaluate senior officer performance qualifies as bad form. Had Sanchez been a head coach or a ceo, he would likely have been cashiered. But he is a general, so the Pentagon pins a medal on his chest and gives him a pat on the back.”

        Bacevich is Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University. He graduated from West Point, served in Vietnam, and has a Ph.D. in history from Princeton. He has been a harsh critic of American foreign policy and especially the use of the U.S. military abroad. He is a solid military historian who offers some hard-hitting analysis. The left loved to use his stuff to bash Bush. I wonder if his critique of Sanchez will be allowed to stand.

        You can find the entire review at http://newleftreview.org/A2529 . It was first published in the New Left Review 29, September-October 2004.

        • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

          Thomas Ricks, author of Fiasco and a favorite of the left, expressed similar sentiments. “The biggest shift in the U.S. effort in mid-2004 wasn’t in policy but in people.” Ricks applauded the removal of Sanchez, concurred with the assessment by Bacevich, and wondered why Sanchez had remained top commander for so long.

          • radicalrighty

            and get depressed, when hearing or reading of GOP confidence in a contest based on: a) the wrong doing of the Dem opponent or; b) the idea that if we (conservatives) will just contrast our beliefs with those of the left, we will win every time.

            It is true, if our our message or the honest truth actually reached the public. But the public is shielded from and actually lied to about the truth, by the dishonest MSM.

            The MSM is “all in” for this corrupt President, and any, no matter how corrupt, member of his party.

            Period.

        • Ed54

          He was a poor commander, totally out of his depth, and should have been relieved. Read “Fiasco” … Tom Ricks gets it right.

          Funny thing is, he got a bum rap over the Abu G business. His subordinate GO’s failed him. They should have properly supervised the prison (among many other things), so he could focus on doing HIS job, which was finding a way to beat the insurgency.

          • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

            I had wondered if Ricks had gotten it right. Thanks for the confirmation.

  • Aaron Gardner

    When you wait long enough it becomes crystal clear that the Dems were projecting all along.

  • briefsynopsis

    With the large contingent of hispanics he has a base, and the media will insist on rehabilitation for him through charges of racism.
    And the good General was well known in Iraq for taking routes that increased the risk to the lives of those in his Motorcade,.. How many times were they hit?
    He will do thier bidding with glee!

    • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

      We should not underestimate the general or the ability of the eventual Republican nominee to shoot himself in the foot.

      At this point the serious Republican candidate should already be engaged in opposition research on Sanchez. We need to read his book on Iraq and read what his fellow commanders had to say about him. We should also be collecting and compiling the left’s own words on Sanchez to feature in Republican ads and counter-attacks.

  • lawrenceperson

    Actually, political neophyte Sean Hubbard had already declared for the race. Which is more than you can say for John Sharp, Chris Bell, and the other rumored Democratic contenders.

  • Michael Dugas

    One of the reasons we catch them flip flopping and lying and seeming to contradict themselves daily is that they really don’t believe in anything but Obtaining, Maintaining and Gaining Power through intrusive government… of which they are members. They will say and do pretty much anything to that end and can’t be bothered to remember everything they have claimed to believe or have done…along the way.
    If Sanchez ends up as the nominee a smart Republican candidate should pretty much leave it alone except maybe to voice the candidates amazement that the Dems would choose a candidate that they themselves crucified for his involvement with Abu Ghraib…and then drop it.
    Any Republican Nominee should have no problem beating Sanchez in the Media and debates given their experience in politics, speaking to the regular public….. and that we OWN the facts can’t hurt either.

    I find it even more curious that Sanchez would want to run for office AND as a Democrat given his experiences over Abu Ghraib.