« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Paul Ryan: Radical American

If there’s anything we’ve come to expect from the Obama administration and his media lackeys, it’s demonizing those opposed to his agenda.  So it was no surprise when his campaign’s immediate response to Mitt Romney’s Vice Presidential pick of Paul Ryan was to label him “radical”.  In the same predictable fashion, Democrats cheered at another chance to play the radical card:

“I haven’t been this happy waking up since I was 12 and got a BMX for Christmas,” said one top Democrat working for an outside group that is helping to reelect Obama.”

A former senior administration official agreed. ”I think we’re all licking our chops this morning,” the former official said. “The president has spent the last several months attacking the Republican budget and who better to be the VP pick than Ryan? Fits into our narrative in the best possible way.”

It wasn’t that long ago that the Tea Party was painted as radical, right wing, extremists.  Democrats and the media associated thousands of Americans with the Oklahoma City bombing, claiming their fight for gun rights was actually to incite a revolution.  Even after Tea Party candidates swept the polls in the November 2010 elections, the rhetoric continued.  As recently as last week, Real Clear Politics boasted the old familiar Radical Tea Partiers headline.  With the selection of Ryan, the Democrats believe they can achieve rhetorical perfection: weaving the old radical Tea Party with the new radical Paul Ryan.  It would be tired if it wasn’t so laughable.  As is usually the case with the Democrats, they fail to learn the lessons history has taught.

Our Founding Fathers, the original Tea Partiers, were also known as radicals.  They fought against an overgrown government that seemed to know no limits.  Their story is remarkably similiar to ours today, except without the vast ocean to separate the people from the tyrannical government.  Great Britain created a monopoly on a popular product, overtaxed it and then lost money when the people found ways around the heavy tax burden.  Seeking to make up for the loss of income, the British did what every fiscally irresponsible government does, they increased taxes.  This time they targeted the colonies who, by today’s standards, probably assumed could handle more taxes given their new prosperity.  Ultimately, as we know, the colonies decided they had had enough and the rest is our history.

The current administration has offered no solution to the unsustainable path we are on.  Our national debt is coming quickly upon 16 trillion dollars.  Paul Ryan brings to the fight that which the Democrats fear most: a budget.  His priorities harken back to those of our founders…

“I, however, place the economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared.” – Thomas Jefferson

“We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.  We must make our selection between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude.  If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and drink, in our necessities and comforts, in our labors and our amusements… If we can prevent the Government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy.” – Thomas Jefferson

“To say that the United States should be answerable for twenty-five millions of dollars without knowing whether the ways and means can be provided, and without knowing whether those who are to succeed us will think with us on the subject, would be rash and unjustifiable. Sir, in my opinion, it would be hazarding the public faith in a manner contrary to every idea of prudence.” – James Madison

“No pecuniary consideration is more urgent than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt. On none can delay be more injurious or an economy of time more valuable.” – George Washington

“There are two ways to conquer and enslave a country.  One is by the sword.  The other is by debt.” – John Adams

We’ve been enslaved from within.  President Obama, blinded by statist ideals, doesn’t see the present situation in the same light.  He, and the those around him, believe Ryan is radical because they don’t aspire to the same principles.  While Ryan’s influences can easily be traced back to our founders, Obama’s can be found only linked to those that don’t exactly espouse the same sentiments -

“As an organizer I start where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be. That we accept the world as it is does not in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what we believe it should be — it is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be.” – Saul Alinksy

“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America…” – Jeremiah Wright

“I don’t regret setting bombs…I feel we didn’t do enough.” – Bill Ayers

“I get up every morning and think…today I’m going to end capitalism.” – Bill Ayers

Perhaps the Democrats’ assessment has been correct after all.  Paul Ryan (and the Tea Party) are radically American, and it’s about time we got back to that.

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    This is because they are fundamentally wrong about everything. This is also why they are dumbfounded when they are repeatedly proven wrong. They just can’t realize that they are wrong. It confuses and frightens them.

    I like that.

    • evilbloggerlady
      • daniel22

        moved the center. Since the american people have generally governed to a center left position politically no matter who wins elections the left wins. At least that is the strategy that has been employed in recent history. It is like the old saying that once an entitlement is born you just can’t kill it. It is the same here. Be radical and introduce radical “rights” and anything that attacks these “rights” is seen as radical and that includes returning to the former position. Hence we have thes accusations of being too radical handed to Ryan.
        With an even more radical platform being adopted by the MoveOn controlled DNC it is the perfect time for the Tea Party and allies to reach out to the Blue Dog democrats in a meaningful way. There are a lot of things that are held in common between both parties involved that an alliance can be formed without the gutting of core beliefs. Since I believe no one person or party has all the answers this could be particularly advantageous.
        It is no secret that the established GOP has no use for and even contempt for the Tea Party and the Tea Party has roughly the same respect for them. Speaker Boehners recent comments concerning the Tea Party and knuckle draggers should be evidence enough let alone his actions.
        Both major parties know that the Tea Party is too weak to mount an effective block to any agenda proposed, however an alliance between Tea Party and Blue Dogs could prove to be fruitful and effective. It would also effectively move the center of governance from center left to center right.

  • renny

    they “aspire” to different values. I credit the left with no moral values save control and power.

  • tominkorea

    They believed that holding liberal positions while espousing moderate sounding rhetoric was the reason they won, so now they think they have to espouse liberal positions yet claim to be mainstream.

    If they want to run a race on which ticket is more extreme, they’re going to lose. I guess they’re more comfortable running on liberalism than on their economy though.

  • fredflintlock

    When you put it that way, it makes him sound like a Maoist who participated in bombing the pentagon and who lived off money stolen in an armored car robbery in which two policemen were killed. I can almost picture him being acquitted in a mistrial after being on the lam for several years and then going “mainstream” with a professorship that allowed him to keep beavering away at the cause while warping a new crop of young minds each year.

    Yeah, I can just hear Ryan saying, “People don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.”. Heck, I could even see him being a mentor to the most radical president the U.S. has ever had. Fits him to a T.

    Makes me pine for the good old days.Things just aren’t what they used to be.

  • babykaboomer

    will be sawed off November 6th. It will be delicious to watch liberals try to balance on their failed philosophy after that. Like clowns on a unicycle.

  • Rick_Caird

    The Democrats have defined down the word “radical”. They trot it out so frequently that all it now means is “we don’t agree”. I suspect that few people actually pay attention to the word any more.

  • celador2

    When has any Democrat ever been labeled radical or even liberal by MSM?

    The ‘radical’ tag used against Paul Ryan has replaced the ‘conservative’ tag that was added to every conservative name in every MSM news story.

    The tag is to marginalize and position us apart from them in the mainstream. The writer of a news story is center and positions Ryan outside that stream as ‘radical’ to cue or signal readers there is something off center about him. It does not take much to slant a news story.

    Ryan comes back with his plans for open reform around taxes and entitlements to deal with debt. Voters will decide if they like what they see and hear, baggy radical pants or not, in November.

    ROMNEY RYAN 2012

  • adair

    William F. Buckley tried (in vain) to find a headline or even just a description in an article referring to an “extremist liberal” or a “left wing radical” or “left wing extremist” while conservatives and right wingers were referred to thus daily in the New York Times, Washington Post, etc.

    They call themselves progressive, but they cling to the pejoratives of the past.

  • gwbramhall

    How does the AgH2O quote go?
    Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.
    I think we’re there!

  • reclaimit

    The more it grates on the Tea Party faithful, the more “radical” becomes “liberal,” which Democrats ran from for the last quarter century. When someone calls me radical for supporting the abolition of abortion, even in cases of rape, or a flat tax, (I used to say 15% but I think we can do even better), I just laugh, and tell them, if that makes me radical, so be it. I never let anyone think that radical is a negative.

  • poillini

    nt

  • doctorbob

    So…. associating with Frank Marshall Davis, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Reverend Wright, and a host of other Communists / Socialists / Anti-American nut jobs is NOT radical? What a bizarre world the Democrats must live in. We need a LOT more “radicals” like Paul Ryan if we are to save this country from the Marxists!

  • proudmarinemom

    but my kids just call me “Mom.”

  • hart65

    and you have just made writing some of the GOP convention speeches a snap. Your analogy to our founding, when half of the population was willing to sacrifice freedom for a false security, warrants the cliche “We’ve seen this movie before.” I hope there are enough of us willing to spend a little time at Valley Forge to see us through to victory.