« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Today in Washington – June 24, 2010

The DISCLOSE Act is on House floor today.  This bill chills the rights of Americans to band together in an organization and participate in the political process.  Sean Parnell of the Center for Competitive Politics said of this legislation, ”as the Rules Committee prepares to advance this speech-chilling bill to the House floor, its supporters are cynically misrepresenting the bill as simply providing transparency and avoiding all mentions of the many outright prohibitions on political speech it would impose on Americans.”  Legislation that restricts political speech in any manner is a restriction on the First Amendment rights of all Americans.

The House will be voting on the DISCLOSE Act today and a conference report dealing with sanctions against Iran.  The Senate continues to dither on the Tax Extenders bill containing an extension of unemployment benefits.  A conference continues on Financial Services Deform.  More Gulf hearings scheduled for today.

Issues for Conservatives to watch today:

  • DISCLOSE Act – The Center for Competitive Politics has a 19 page policy briefing for Americans to review on the DISCLOSE Act that will ”silence unfriendly voices as midterm elections approach.”  CCP describes the bill as follows: “The ‘DISCLOSE Act’ would (1) single out business groups for outright bans on political speech: government contractors would be prohibited from engaging in political speech as well as companies in the United States (even those with 80 percent of American shareholders) that attract  minimal foreign investment—no similar restrictions were included for labor unions with foreign connections, unions receiving government money or public employee unions negotiating for salaries and benefits; (2) create a far more onerous and vague disclosure regime than the Supreme Court cited in Citizens United, deterring grassroots groups from speaking out in midterm campaigns; and (3) explicitly sow chaos and confusion among those attempting to comply with campaign finance law by mandating that the law go into effect without clarification by the FEC of numerous vague and undefined provisions as well as slowing down the judicial review process.”  The House is expected to vote on this legislation today.
  • Tax Extenders - One of the hold ups for the Tax Extenders bill on the Senate floor this week is the issue of “Doc Fix.”  The Hill reports that “Senate Democratic leaders have returned the doc fix provision to the tax extenders bill they’re trying to push through the upper chamber this week.”  “Doc Fix” is legislation that changes the reimbursement rate for doctors treating Medicare patients and many doctors argue that the rates are set too low.  The Senate approach allows for a higher rate of reimbursement through election day.  The Hill reports that “House Democratic leaders have been sitting on (a Senate passed “Doc Fix” bill) in order to pressure Senate centrists to pass the tax package.”  This is a $6 billion dollar game of chicken being played between the House and Senate. Conservatives need to keep a close eye to see if Congress will pay for all of these new spending programs.  It looks as if the tax exenders bill will not pass the Seante this week.

COMMENTS

  • http://leehurdcpa.com LeeH

    I received your email regarding the NRA`s position on H.R. 5175, the “DISCLOSE Act”. Regrettably, our position has been misstated by some and intentionally misrepresented by others. I hope you`ll allow me to provide the proper context.

    The U.S. Supreme Court`s Citizens United decision was a significant victory for free speech and the Constitution. The NRA filed a strong brief in that case, which the Court specifically cited several times in its opinion. The DISCLOSE Act is an attempt to reverse that victory and that`s why we told Congress we oppose it.

    The NRA has never supported–nor would we ever support — any version of this bill. Those who suggest otherwise are wrong.

    The restrictions in this bill should not apply to anyone or to any organization. My job is to ensure they don`t apply to the NRA and our members. Without the NRA, the Second Amendment will be lost and I will do everything in my power to prevent that.

    We believe that any restriction on political speech is repugnant. But some of our critics believe we should put the Second Amendment at risk over a First Amendment principle to protect other organizations. That`s easy to say–unless you have a sworn duty to protect the Second Amendment above all else, as I do.

    The NRA is a single-issue organization made up of millions of individual members dedicated to protecting the Second Amendment. We do not represent the interests of other organizations. Nor do all groups fight all issues together. For example, we didn`t support the U.S. Chamber of Commerce when it backed amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens and we did not join the Chamber in its support of President Obama`s stimulus bill. And we`ve been in direct opposition when the Chamber has tried to restrict Second Amendment rights in publicly accessible parking lots.

    Rather than focusing on opposing this bill, some have encouraged people to blame the NRA for this Congress`s unconstitutional attack on free speech. That`s a shame. If you oppose this bill, I hope you will contact your Member of Congress and Senators so they can hear from you.

  • ritaok

    with our own enslavemen is being tested. The contortions in play by democrats on DISCLOSE is simply one more attempt at attaining an evil disguised as good. It’s method acting by tyrants, a predictable design to advance infringements on liberty, free speech and freedom in genrkeral. If freedom isn’t free, then the cost of freedom at least calls for some misniscule effort to resist threats. There aren’t enough freedom snatchers, YET, to shut up American free speech in its various forms, including the human groupings of small busines and big business and organizations. “They” can’t round us all up, YET, so timing is everything. Now will do. We have a Constitution, and a Bill of Rights. Neither document is dead. We do not have to comply with these people. We don’t have to cooperate. So, don’t.

  • http://www.wolvesofliberty.com GJ Merits

    It’s that simple. Medical Marijuana, Real ID – both were held back by sheer numbers of people ignoring the law or states unwilling to enforce it. Then the federal government lacks the manpower to enforce it.

    We have become such sheep that we are no longer aware of simple practices such as jury nullification. Google the term, its been used a great deal and is completely legal. The simple fact is this: if we don’t like the law and are willing to ignore it in vast numbers, it can’t be enforced. If the FEC wants to make an example of someone, then a very simple campaign of educating the public about jury nullification is all you need to pretty much ensure nobody is found guilty of breaking the law. It is on its face a very unconstitutional law to even the most dense among us.

    This is actually quite simple and a really good test case to show the tyrants in DC we mean business.