« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Do Nothing Good Congress

I have written an Op Ed for Human Events titled the “Do-Nothing-Good-Congress.”  A Human Events commenter made an excellent point.  square root writes:

Truman’s “do-nothing” Congress was the sole Republican Congress from 1928 to 1953. All Republicans could do in that ONE term, was stand against Truman’s liberal agenda and hold firm for the people they were sent to serve. Republicans had the numbers to legislate conservative law; but Truman would sign NO conservative legislation. Even though Republicans were (just barely) the majority party, Truman had them over a barrel.  Alas! In 1948, voters unwittingly returned control of Congress to the Democrats. Even then, and it’s even worse now, too many Americans lacked/lack sufficient understanding of how Congress actually operates. Too many believed Truman’s liberal lie of a “do nothing Republican Congress”. Truman won his election by sleight of hand; which Christians regard as dishonest.

I worry that my Op Ed may have offended those fans of the “Do Nothing Congress” of the Truman era.  I love the idea of stopping bad ideas, because it is unlikely we will get any good legislation during the last two years of “Hope” and “Change.”  It is interesting to note that in this session of Congress, liberals did not complete action on the budget, any appropriations bills nor did they even bother to schedule a vote on extending the ’01 and ’03 tax cuts.  They did much bad, but did nothing good in this Congress.

I missed something in my Op Ed and that is why I am compelled now to post on Red State to supplement my screed from Human Events.  In my Op Ed I stressed that Congress has done nothing good.  I wrote that “members spent time crippling healthcare and Wall Street with ‘reform’ bills, yet they never spent time reforming the federal government.  No wonder incumbents are expected to pay a high price on Election Day.”  Because they passed unpopular legislation and didn’t spend time finishing the budget and appropriations process on time, the American people look at Congress as a collection of elitists with misplaced priorities.  The American people absolutely hate Washington, D.C.  The most compelling evidence of that hatred is Real Clear Politicshas Congress’ job approval rating at 20.5% favorable and 71.3% negative (for a -50.8% confidence gap).  The voters are going to send some sitting Members of Congress into the unemployment lines in about one month.

It is important to note that liberals will campaign against a Republican controlled Congress in the next two years, if Rs win as expected, as the “Do Nothing Congress.” The “Do Nothing Congress” mantra worked to demonize the 80th Congress from 1947-49 for President Truman.  Politicians love reading the tea leaves of history and many liberals will roll out the Harry Truman playbook in an effort to repeat the events of 1949 for President Harry Truman and Congressional Democrats.  This will only become true if conservatives ignore history and don’t get prepared now to fight back against that theme.

The Obama Administration is more likely to drop the gloves and fight against Congress than triangulate like Bill Clinton.  This Administration seems incapable of pivoting to an agenda of tax reform and entitlement reform that may have elements of bipartisan agreement.  Expect highly partisan ideas to be proposed by the President, then for the President to use the bully pulpit to accuse the next Congress of being a “Do Nothing Congress.”  In other words, expect not much to get done the next two years with Republicans in control, because President Obama will veto any conservative legislation that makes it to his desk.

 I know I am getting way ahead of the curve, but indulge me.  From U-S-history.com:

The campaign of 1948 was a study in contrasts. Dewey, as befitted a clear frontrunner, staged a very subdued campaign, hoping to assure victory by avoiding discussion of troublesome issues. Truman did the opposite, figuring that he had little to lose. He embarked on a 31,000-mile train trip across the nation and delivered hundreds of off-the-cuff speeches to crowds that often greeted the president with cries of “Give ‘em Hell, Harry!” And Truman did. He lambasted the “do-nothing, good-for-nothing” Eightieth Congress for its inaction and hoped that his opponent would be tarnished in the process.  Truman raised the stakes by summoning a special session of Congress in July, proclaiming that he was offering the legislators an opportunity to enact some of the liberal planks they had proposed in the Republican platform. The results were meager, reinforcing the allegation that Congress did nothing.

When one looks at history, the “Do Nothing Congress” stood against Truman’s Fair Deal.  For that matter, a Democrat controlled Congress did not pass many elements of FDR’s New Deal.  The 80th Congress passed bills that were sent to the President, but those bills were inconsistent with the Truman vision of America.  Truman vetoed bills then campaigned against Congress.  When President Harry Truman left office, he was one of the most unpopular Presidents in our nation’s history.  President Obama is in danger of going down the same road if he decides to dig in and fight Congress.

This Congress has done much bad adn nothing good.  The next Congress will be demonized if Rs win and take over Congress as the “Do Nothing Congress” — mark my words.  Conservatives need to read up on the 80th Congress to make sure that the leaders of today don’t make the same messaging mistakes of the past.

COMMENTS

  • natlanthem

    You know, watching Halloween come a little early over the weekend in Washington, I hope with everything I have the Republicans nail this election cycle, then hold the line for the next two years. Saying no is a proud thing, and I hope the messaging out of the GOP can make that clear.

    The election of 2008 made conservatives doubt, but seeing a) the comparative photos and b) the commie-crazies out in force, I KNOW who is really the majority and the adults in this country.

    I am also hoping those who vote D based on family and history will be ASHAMED of who they are complicit with now, and see cause to break with tradition. THAT way leads to millions dead from progroms and tyranny.

  • wethepeoplevstheprogressives

    If there is one thing Glenn Beck has proved to me its the critical importance of knowing our real history! Thx so much for the refresher!

  • A_Texan

    First, the Republican Congress, with the aid of southern Democrats, passed the Taft-Hartley Act over Truman’s veto. The GOP also passed other, conservative foreign-policy legislation that Truman favored (even though the hard left of the Dems (and some isolationist Republicans did not), such as approval of the Marshall Plan and the National Security Act.
    http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/busch/06/1946.html

    Second, Truman’s attack was well-deserved as well as effective. In summer 1948, he called Congress into special session to pass some of the more liberal components of its own platform–elements with which Truman agreed but which divided the GOP–including civil rights legislation, as well as more spending on housing, education, and healthcare. Of course, the GOP did nothing on these very measures of its platform. And Truman thus shifted the focus to those areas that divided his opponents.

    If the GOP wins control in 2011-2012, the situation will be quite different from 1947-48 in the following respects:

    1. There are no conservativish Dems left with which the GOP can form an alliance to override Obama’s vetos, except, perhaps, a repeal of SOME aspects of Obamacare.

    2. Obama, unlike Truman, is not a foreign-policy hawk, so there will be no Obama-GOP alliance against liberals in foreign policy.

    3. The GOP, thankfully, is no longer such a pathetic party dominated by me-too squishing Republicans who put things in their platform that are offensive to the conservative wing of the party. It is HIGHLY unlikely that Obama would call a special session of Congress just to pass some aspects of the GOP platform.

    I note parenthetically that it is a great shame that the GOP did not have the wherewithal of pass civil-rights legislation when they had the control of Congress and the support of the politically-courageous Truman–and especially dismal given that the GOP had once been THE party of civil rights.

    • A_Texan

      Housing can best be supplied and financed by private enterprise; but government can and should encourage the building of better homes at less cost. We recommend Federal aid to the States for local slum clearance and low-rental housing programs only where there is a need that cannot be met either by private enterprise or by the States and localities.

      Consistent with the vigorous existence of our competitive economy, we urge: extension of the Federal Old Age and Survivors’ Insurance program and increase of the benefits to a more realistic level; strengthening of Federal-State programs designed to provide more adequate hospital facilities, too improve methods of treatment for the mentally ill, to advance maternal and child health and generally to foster a healthy America.
      ….
      We favor a revision of the procedure for the election of the President and Vice President which will more exactly reflect the popular vote.

      We recommend to Congress the submission of a constitutional amendment providing equal rights for women.

      We favor equal pay for equal work regardless of sex.

      We propose a well-paid and efficient Federal career service.
      http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25836

  • merryj1

    My mind’s eye is now watching :30 spot commercials of obvious villains whispering (a) plea to our hero or heroine who reacts, aghast with shock, distress and/or outrage, a look of disgust and a resounding “No!” and the soothing Voice-Over intoning, “The ONLY (possible) (Constitutional) (American) (decent) (appropriate) response to Obama’s (radical) (progressive) (alien) (name your evil) plan… is NO!”

    My favorite so far is the sweet young thing being whispered to by an oily lothario, and her shudder of revulsion as she shakes her head and yells, “NO!”