« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Rolling Blue State Bailout Ended in Tax Agreement

One of the best things to come out of the White House and Capitol Hill tax deal is that the liberals are apoplectic that there is no extension of the so called ”Build America Bonds.”  These bonds are a rolling-state-government bailout mechanism that subsidizes the interest rate of state issued bonds.  Essentially, these bonds put off the day of reckoning for the blue states that are in a terminal budget flat-spin.

This is a rolling bailout and you, the taxpayer, are on the hook and pay part of the interest to keep afloat states that have made terrible budgeting decisions.  This decision by the federal government would force irresponsible states to resort to conventional bonding, without the federal government giving them preferential treatment.  This only seems fair and conservatives need to make sure that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) don’t sneak a provision reinstatement these bonds when the House and Senate consider the White House-Capitol Hill tax compromise.

The Los Angeles Times reports today that these tax-free municipal bonds are taking a hit on the market, because it looks like the federal government is going to end this program.

Market prices of tax-free municipal bonds took a hit on Tuesday, hurt by uncertainty over the fate of a federal subsidy program for muni issuers and by another general rise in interest rates.  The Build America Bond program, which for the last two years has allowed state and local governments to issue taxable muni bonds with interest partly paid by Uncle Sam, may not be extended beyond Dec. 31. The program wasn’t included in the compromise tax-cut agreement reached between President Obama and Republican leaders.  If the BAB program is terminated, it could mean that muni issuers that would otherwise have borrowed via the bonds in 2011 would be forced to issue conventional tax-free bonds instead — boosting the supply of those securities.  Reacting to that possibility, some investors dumped longer-term tax-free muni issues on Tuesday, driving prices down and yields up. That showed in prices of popular muni bond mutual funds.

CNBC reports that these bonds have exploded since being included in the President’s Stimulus plan and account for over one quarter of the whole municipal bond market.

Since its introduction last year, the Build America program has come to account for about 26 percent of the muni-bond market, and October was its biggest month yet.  One reason: Issuers were scrambling to take advantage of the program’s benefits—which include the federal government footing the bill for 35 percent of the bonds’ interest costs. Of course, demand for the bonds, now a significant cornerstone of the $2.8 trillion muni market, has also been strong.

These states are facing a crisis, so why should taxpayers subsidize these bonds?  Why should somebody in a fiscally responsible state be paying for the big government policies in Illinois and California?  The New York Times has a Sunday headline that reads: “Mounting Debts by States Stoke Fears of Crisis.”

Some of the same people who warned of the looming subprime crisis two years ago are ringing alarm bells again. Their message: Not just small towns or dying Rust Belt cities, but also large states like Illinois and California are increasingly at risk.  Municipal bankruptcies or defaults have been extremely rare — no state has defaulted since the Great Depression, and only a handful of cities have declared bankruptcy or are considering doing so.   But the finances of some state and local governments are so distressed that some analysts say they are reminded of the run-up to the subprime mortgage meltdown or of the debt crisis hitting nations in Europe.

Build America Bonds were not extended in the tax deal, despite pleas by the liberals to extend them.  With the end of the Build America bond program, which the GOP has held firm to date, means that blue states that are spending beyond their means must face the music that much sooner.

The unions really want this and are expected to come to Capitol Hill begging to get this put back into the deal.  They want to make sure that irresponsible states with huge liabilities to public union members, including over funded pension programs and higher than average salaries, don’t get renegotiated by financially distressed states.

Conservatives need to make sure that this bailout program is not extended.  Red state taxpayers are paying the tab for irresponsible blue states.  The BuildBailout America Bonds experiment was a failure and it is time to end this fiscally irresponsible program.

COMMENTS

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    I don’t want to LOL because I’m sure I’ll be impacted by this when some blue state collapses but I will enjoy watching union and Liberal dominated states implode. It will serve as an example to the rest of us as to what happens when socialists are in charge.

    • seattlebruce
      • 6eorge Jetson

        It’s 18 months old, but you don’t get into or out of this situation in that time frame

  • rdelbov

    that there is also a $40 billion slush fund of loans to the states to pay their portion of unemployment benefits.

    I believe there was 8 billion out in loans to CA alone.

    I read today that NV is increasing its state unemployment tax rate to 2%. The state paid out twice of much in benefits as it received in taxes.

    These blue loans are like co signing notes-they are an off the books liability.

  • Dan Perrin

    The time for subsidizing irresponsible state and city governments who have been using bonds to pay current expenses — subsidized by the taxpayer, must end.

  • donp

    Need I remind you that granny Pelosi represents California. There is less than a 0% chance that she won’t be trying to throw CA a bone of some kind while she still has the power.

  • GreyCloak

    I own the former and wouldn’t buy the latter.

    The Federal Government has long “subsidized” municipal bonds by not imposing Federal Tax on the interest local governments have to pay for loans from the public. This may be the last bastion of Federalism versus States’ Rights.

    Eligible are any bonds (local government borrowing) that are for Public purposes: roads, county hospitals, airports, schools, water and sewage plants, or even front-end borrowing against anticipated [local] tax revenues. Subject to at least the AMT are bonds issued to fund Commercial development: factories and stadiums, for instance.

    If you like new highways or bridges, municipal borrowing against future tolls is not a bad thing. THIS year, it costs a whole bunch to build ‘em, but they will be used for decades … so the borrowing from a municipal bond issue is like taking out a mortgage … taxpayers may need 30 years to pay off big costs .

    “Build America” is a whole different thing: LOCAL taxpayers get to vote on bond issues, but Build America is a FEDERAL subsidy of local government interest payments. ALL US taxpayers pay, and none had much to say about it.

    I will not miss the demise of “Build America.”

    As a side note, Munis are not entirely safe:

    The most infamous default cases involving general obligation bonds include New York City’s default in 1975 and Cleveland in 1978. The largest default in the history of the municipal bond market was the Washington Public Power Supply System’s (WPPSS) default on $2.25 billion in bonds.

    If California (or other States or Cities) goes bankrupt, perhaps the politicians should be held liable (and pay) for the damages.

    As another aside, Muni bonds used to be insured by outfits like MBNA and other financial institutions that made money off of premiums and created derivatives to offset their risk. “Build America” bails out those commercial institutions.

  • nativeconservative

    http://www.law360.com/topnews/articles/213865

    BofA to Pay $137M in Muni Bond Bid-Rigging Probe it’s rather an interesting read after reading your article.

  • nativeconservative

    http://www.law360.com/topnews/articles/213865

    BofA to Pay $137M in Muni Bond Bid-Rigging Probe it’s rather an interesting read after reading your article.

  • robobbob

    In a conservative world, having no money would means cutting back spending. But do any of you think that in liberal land, that is going to happen?
    The defaults are just going to happen sooner, and you know who is going to pick up the tab.

    • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

      Uncle Sam is not gonna do it with a new congress. The lame duck was the blue states’ last chance to get anything. There have been multiple leaders unambiguously on the record as stating that the USA will not bail out any states, including California. For them to go back on these statements would be . . . well, if not unhead-of definitely Unwise.

      • calgacus

        Who votes for any more bailouts of any kind, must go forever. This includes any and all Representatives and Senators.

        The U.S. will have a balanced budget, the only question is who will do it, the bond market or the congress

        • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

          when you have Ben Bernanke at the Fed willing to trash the dollar and buy up all the T bills that the markets won’t!

      • robobbob

        There is a huge gulf between wishful thinking and the reality.
        The States are going to start flailing around. Heaven knows meaningful spending cuts won’t happen. One of the things they’ll do is to raise their bond rates. This puts them into competition with the UST. You know, the ones that the FED and the Bernank are desparately buying up with QE2 to pump up the economy. In the Sunday interview he is already thinking about QE3. What will happen when state bond rates shoot up? What happens to the UST yields? The deficit will skyrocket.
        Do you really think mid and upper managers will get cut? Funding for the liberal community organizers? The wasteful environmental programs? Arts programs? Business regulations? Heck no. Whenever there’s cuts, who always goes first? teachers, firemen, police.
        We will have the news clips of grandma being put out of her house. Children lined up at soup kitchens. Houses on fire because there are no fireman. Tuition increases. Riots. The whole time the MSM cheerleaders will be talking about the horror of it all, but hardly able to contain their giddyness as they tell everyone its those GOP hostage takers are to blame.
        And just who in Congress is going to hold the line in this? Gramm, Snowe?
        The GOP has shown their colors. Do you really think they’ve got what it takes?
        And even if they do, then what? If a state FAILS, the feds will have no choice but to step in. goodbye 10th amendment.
        Really, I wish it was as simple as cutting off their money cold turkey. But leftists have no shame, and are full of crocodile tears. They will herd their poor sheeple straight off a cliff to protect their own and get what they want. You know its true.

        • Dan Perrin

          But what if the police won’t go along, quietly, I mean