« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

This Week in Washington – September 19, 2011

The President will be making a speech today from the Rose Garden (echoes of Carter?) mapping out proposed savings of $3 trillion over the next 10 years.  According to the AP, the President’s new plan contains an old idea — massive tax increases:

$1.5 trillion in new revenue, which would include about $800 billion realized over 10 years from repealing the Bush-era tax rates for couples making more than $250,000. It also would place limits on deductions for wealthy filers and end certain corporate loopholes and subsidies for oil and gas companies. 

The President is going to propose his deficit reduction plan for the Super Committee heavy on tax increases and light on actual cuts.  According to Politico, “$1 trillion in savings would be achieved by winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”  Another accounting gimmick used to is to count $430 billion in savings from lower interest payments as a debt savings.  The Senate is going to attempt to reauthorize another welfare program for those supposedly displaced by free trade agreements called TAA.  The House is going to commence the process of getting a continuing resolution passed to keep the federal government running after September 30.  The Super Committee will meet again.   

On Tuesday, the House will consider 5 suspension bills:  H.R. 2005 (Legislation dealing with Autism), H.R. 1852 (Legislation dealing with “Children’s Hospital GME Support), H.R. 2646 (a veterans health care measure);  H.R. 2944 - (U.S. Parole Commission Reauthorization); and, H.R. 2189 (Death in Custody Reporting).

On Wednesday and the balance of the week, the House is expected to consider three suspension bills and two bills under a rule.  The three suspension bills include: S.Con.Res. 28 (A concurrent resolution authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal);  H.R. 2943 (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Extension – TANF); and, H.R. 2883 (Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act).  The bills to be considered under the regular order are a continuing resolution, H.J.Res. 79 and a regulatory transparency and scoring bill H.R. 2401 .

Conservatives are researching whether the TANF bill reauthorizes a provision in the President’s Stimulus bill that partial repealed the 1996 welfare reform bill.  The ’96 welfare reform measure removed an incentive for states to add people to the enrollment list for the purposes of securing more money from the federal government.  The potential reauthorization a welfare reform gutting provision should be considered in any debate to reauthorize TANF.

Markups are scheduled to be held in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Foreign Affairs, and Judiciary CommitteeThe Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, the Super Committee, is scheduled to have a hearing on “Revenue Options and Reforming the Tax Code.”  Expect the President’s ideas on tax increases to get an airing at the Thursday hearing. 

The Senate is scheduled debate a motion to proceed to H.R. 2832, a trade preference bill, that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid intends on using as a vehicle to carry Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) over to the House.  As Daniel Horowitz of Red State explains, “the TAA is a subsidy program created in 1962, which arbitrarily rewards job training, relocation allowances, loans, grants, and unemployment pay to workers who supposedly lost jobs from FTAs.” 

The Senate Finance Committee has a hearing on tax reform options.  Senate Appropriations subcommittees will markup the Transportation-HUD and Labor-HHS-Education approps measures.  Markups are scheduled in the Senate EPW Committee, Homeland Security, Commerce and Judiciary

Conservatives need to watch the Super Committee to see if they are predisposed to adopt the tax increasing ideas of President Obama.  Also, it will be interesting to see if House Republicans have the fight in the belly to use the continuing resolution for more spending cuts.  In the Senate, conservatives need to watch the TAA debate to see if Congress will terminate a program that duplicates other job assistance programs for the unemployed.

COMMENTS

  • rightsideray

    BO starts speaking and I thought Fox was replaying last week’s speech prior to BO’s delivery of the “new” proposal. Nothing has changed, he’s ‘going to release some details tomorrow’ but looks like his reduction proposals include a $T that isn’t acceptable, a couple of $T that has already been removed from other proposals, so pretty small real change. We have now hit the tipping point and if we don’t fix this now, the contributors will never regain control from the takers. He’s talking about the Buffet proposal, but didn’t I see that Warren Buffet was in a court action with the IRS regarding unpaid back taxes? Sounds like BO is talking about a Flat Tax, Fair Tax, 9-9-9 or something similar, but I bet his written proposals will never look like what we (the contributors) think these should do for the economy. I think his idea of “fairness” isn’t Webster’s.

  • boria

    Obama is counted $1T from the Iraq and Afghanistan war as savings.
    He wants to raise taxes now and PROMISED cuts in the next ten years.
    Like that’s going to happen…

  • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com punditpawn

    Republicans need to call him out on this. He recently extended them… what has changed other than his poll numbers tanking that suddenly makes this a good idea? He could have stopped them at any time with his Congressional super-majorities before he screwed that up, too. Now he’s out of power, repealing them is a good idea?

    • steve010

      would base his whole re-election campaign on tax increases. I’ve been watching these things since Nixon/Humphrey and I don’t think any candidate has ever done this.

      • qsclues

        …worked really well for him, too. :-)

        • uselogic

          MaObama finds similar success.

          • steve010

            nt

  • Marcus_Traianus

    That is why this economy is in such dire straits.

    “Tax the Rich”? Since when has dividing our populace been a means of bringing people together and healing a nation? When have such proposals actually produced the promised results? Never. This is nothing but another scheme akin to the “Stimulus”, “Cash for Clunkers” and “Obamacare”.

    Washington has become nothing but a carnival, where the barkers try to sell us on the latest illusion. Shameful.

    For two years neither unemployment, nor debt, nor new job growth was a priority for the President and Democrats. The latest actions are simply sloganeering for a reelection campaign and fully disingenuous by any measure.

    • renl57

      Heilemann and Dionne and the other usual suspects admit that Obama’s 9% unemployment and 18% underemployment has alienated much of the Independent vote.

      Hence Obama’s last hope for re-election is to \win on the strength of turnout of his loyal base, via his big GOTV operation.

      To get that motivation, they want Obama to propose bills that the GOP won’t accept, so that Obama can pick lots of fights with the GOP to motivate the Dem base to turn out and campaign for him.

      With Hispanic approval of Obama down to 48% according to Gallup, I don’t think this strategy will work.

  • scatterometry

    Rush just made what I thought was an excellent point;

    this “Buffett” tax is essentially just another version of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The AMT was cooked up in the 1960′s for the then “rich” that were avoiding paying taxes. Today that same AMT effects far more families than was EVER intended 40 years ago.

    So, say O gets this done (which he can’t…); then, in another 20/30/40 years, lower income earners will still be beholden to this new tax, just as is happening today with the AMT. (and they’ll still be stuck with the AMT if we can’t get some kind of flat-tax/fair-tax implemneted one R’s once again hold the majority in Congress and the Presidency)

    Today’s middle-class are tomorrow’s highly taxed rich…

    • YnotNOW

      Liberals always promise to tax “the other guy”, and then find out that the “other guy” does not pay enough for their grand schemes, and the taxes trickle down to the rest of us.

      And of course the “other guy” is also the guy who signs your paycheck. So you actually start paying right now – via slower economic growth.

      Envy is such an ugly human trait.