« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

President Barack Obama: “The Dependency President”

Government dependency is on the rise according to a new Heritage Foundation study.  Americans can thank President Barack Obama for a huge spike in the numbers of Americans dependent on government resources, but both parties can share in the blame.  If the federal government does not make government smaller and less intrusive, then there may not be much private sector wealth creation for government bureaucrats to take to redistribute to dependent Americans. 

American are relying on government handouts rather than hard work for many of the necessities of life.  One in five Americans rely on the federal government for housing, health care, food, college tuition and retirement resources.  The 10th year of The Heritage Foundation government dependency study, the 2012 Index of Dependence on Government, proves that members of both parties need to take a hard look in the mirror and figure out a way to slow, then end, the creeping expansion of the federal government into every aspect of our lives.

John Merline of Investor’s Business Daily writes that that the Obama presidency can take credit for 23% of the surge in dependency. 

The American public’s dependence on the federal government shot up 23% in just two years under President Obama, with 67 million now relying on some federal program, according to a newly released study by the Heritage Foundation.

Merline points out that the Obama increase is the largest two-year jump since the Presidency of Jimmy Carter.  The reason for the stimulus in government dependency was President Obama’s and Congress’ efforts to increase housing subsidies, expand Medicaid and more welfare spending including food stamps. 

If more people become reliant on government, expect Americans to go down the road of our European friends who have relied on big welfare states for years.  With a big welfare state and less people working to pay for big government, the federal government’s natural inclination is to raise taxes on job creators to engage in wealth redistribution.  The take away from this study is that big government and a shift to a dependent society will be the death of free markets and the idea of a relatively unencumbered version of capitalism.  Get ready for the slow walk to socialism that we can see every day destroying Europe.

As Patrick Tyrrell of The Heritage Foundation, my employer, puts it “Dependence on Government at All-Time High.”  Tyrrell points to some facts in the new study that should shock Americans.

  • Dependent Americans – One in five Americans—the highest in the nation’s history—relies on the federal government for everything from housing, health care, and food stamps to college tuition and retirement assistance. That’s more than 67.3 million Americans who receive subsidies from Washington.
  • Government Stimulus for Dependency – Government dependency jumped 8.1 percent in the past year, with the most assistance going toward housing, health and welfare, and retirement.
  • Record High Dependency Spending – The federal government spent more taxpayer dollars than ever before in 2011 to subsidize Americans. The average individual who relies on Washington could receive benefits valued at $32,748, more than the nation’s average disposable personal income ($32,446).
  • Almost 50% of Americans Don’t Pay Income Tax – At the same time, nearly half of the U.S. population (49.5 percent) does not pay any federal income taxes.
  • Future Dependency Spending Projected to Explode – In the next 25 years, more than 77 million baby boomers will retire. They will begin collecting checks from Social Security, drawing benefits from Medicare, and relying on Medicaid for long-term care.
  • 70% of  Federal Budget Dedicated to Dependency – As of now, 70 percent of the federal government’s budget goes to individual assistance programs, up dramatically in just the past few years. However, research shows that private, community, and charitable aid helps individuals rise from their difficulties with better success than federal government handouts. Plus, local and private aid is often more effectively distributed.

Government debt stands at about $15.2 trillion; a number higher than the economic output of the United States for an average year.  Dependency is growing as government grows.  These trends are bad for freedom and the future of America.

Although this trend toward government dependency has accelerated under President Obama, he is not wholly to blame.  Both parties have supported a massive expansion of welfare programs over the past few years.  The food stamp program is the fourth largest entitlement program and stands at about $89 billion for this year.  There are 72 means tested welfare programs that grow in size and scope every year. 

Bailouts have made big corporate America dependent on government money when they can’t make ends meet.  Medicare Part D was a creation of a Republican administration that expanded dependency of the elderly on government subsidized prescription drugs.  If both parties don’t stop promising more government largess in an effort to buy off American voters, our nation is endanger of insolvency.

COMMENTS

  • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com punditpawn

    How on this Earth did obama survive not getting the credit downgraded after the debt commission imploded?

    These forced defense cuts will never happen.

    • dfinch

      The last 2 days I’m hearing more and more about another possible downgrade.

  • DerKrieger

    …used to describe the source of federal largesse. Instead of using “government resources” as in the first paragraph let’s use “taxpayer resources”.

    One thing the Left has mastered is twisting the language to mean whatever they want it to mean. Too many people believe the government has money that didn’t come from taxpayers so let’s point out that ‘Obama money’ is really our money and that Liberal generosity is purchased with OPM, other people’s money.

    • uselogic

      Excellent. I will start using this on a regular basis.

  • jaykali

    It’s frustrating to me that people don’t understand that nothing is free.

    Okay so birth control has to be fully covered by the insurance company now. So it’s free right? You were paying $50/mo now it’s zero…except that they are going to include that cost in the PREMIUMS as they do everything. But people don’t think about that.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Why the Birth-Control Mandate Makes Sense
      It can cost $600 a year for prescription contraceptives. That’s a lot of money..

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204136404577207482497075436.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion

      Has anyone given serious thought to auto-eroticism or keeping their flies zipped?

      • sharrondeer

        married men should keep their flies zipped? Kind of takes a lot of the fun out of a marriage.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          NT.

        • Juggernaut

          care centers all across the USA. Idiot liberal fools plus idiot media trolls infested the news with lies pretending insurance coverage is a must because Obama said its so.

          No its not. Just another liberal crime to loot money for rich liberals who will run those silly programs and give money to dem campaigns.

        • Uma Richie

          family planning thermometer that measures to 1/100th of a degree Fahrenheit and is accurate to 1/10th of a degree. I buy a new one every January just to be safe. Get yours here:

          http://www.walmart.com/ip/Reli-On-60-Second-Basal-Thermometer/10161099

          I don’t have to keep it out of reach of children. I don’t have to get a glass of water to use it. My husband is in charge of recording the numbers, and he is so sweet and tender about handing me the thermometer every morning. I am grateful that he doesn’t look at birth control as my responsibility alone.

          I don’t have any side effects. I don’t have to load my body with carcinogens.

          http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/oral-contraceptives

          Oh, and we only have to keep it zipped 10 days out of the month. Last chance lovin’ and first night back, kind of keeps the fun in a marriage.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            Just because you celebrate the joys of marriage and shared the goodness of your husband. A little self-control never hurt anyone, and surely most folks in this country could stand to exercise control a little more.

            I wish my doctor had recommended this as an option at the time I needed it, or that I had done the research on a purely health level to see the benefits (I’m not Catholic), but I will be sharing this with younger family members. Thank you.

          • Uma Richie

            it’s simply not polite conversation and it should be a private matter. The past two weeks have been brutal, between PP’s shakedown of Komen and the unmasked liberal expectation that artificial birth control is a right and a public good, the cost of which should be burdened by all. I am feeling persecuted and defensive right now.

            I won’t be organizing any fertilesexual awareness days or pride marches, but I am not going to be silent on the subject when it comes up ever again.

            Thank you for letting your family know that there are alternatives.

          • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

            you just have to go where the conversation leads. What I see women say and do today, especially in front of men, just makes me cringe. No respect for the mystery of love and romance at all or for the joy that can be found within the bounds of marriage. I was just happy to see you acknowledge that joy!

            Here’s a little good news for you. I received an email from Komen today that they’ve issued a full refund of my little donation in response to my telephone calls and emails requesting said refund. I’ll be sending that $ to the American Breast Cancer Foundation which advised that they use all of their money to actually help women who have breast cancer.

        • gsatt

          PULL OUT

    • sbm1

      because everybody wants an all you can eat buffet….and then you have lobbyists for the Chiropractors who want to include chiropractic, and if you want to blow all costs out of the stratosphere, then include psych in the plans…..this is what the discrepency in costs state to state is largely based on, what a state requires be covered.

      The birth control/abortion aspect is on a whole different moral plane, and from what I understand birth control pills are available in generic form at walmart for under $10 a month.

      I am sure if you got a lot of the democrats in a room and got them high on marijuana and they started pontificating on what a perfect world would be for them, most would want to see sterilisation of all they deemed not worthy to have children….or a license to have kids, or whatever strange perversion that plays into their entire mindset that they, as representatives of the smart and reasonable know better how you should live your life, than you yourself.

      • jaykali

        Nanny govt is an alligator. It keeps growing.

        Ya the pill is $50/mo give or take. That doesn’t mean we need to force insurance to pay for it. The costs are just passed to the purchaser of the insurance and so if their costs go up that means they have to find that money from some place. Nothing is free. If premiums go up $600 a year, companies will need to take it out of another bucket. Democrats love the idea of promising goodies as rights. Remember in 08 they were asking everybody if healthcare is a right? You do not hear this as often bc it brings up the fact that Obamacare and govt run healthcare tends to be crappy.

        What govt giveth it can taketh away. I just feel like in the idiocracy world we live in, more goodies will win out in the end. If you can promise ppl enough free stuff they’ll vote for you.

  • adamcarralejo

    Really? A Heritage Foundation employee posting about a “new study” from the Heritage Foundation that … surprise! Obama is a bad president. OK, you’re preaching to the choir hear, plus, no one needs the Heritage Foundation to tell us that ‘government dependency’ is up.

    This isn’t a study or a legit post – it’s a press release from the Heritage Foundation.

    More interestingly, though, is that there is no explanation for WHY more people depend on the government. I guess the implication is that when Obama got elected, everyone saw a socialist in the White House, got really lazy, and demanded government handouts. Is that the story of the economy since 2008?

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I’d say you raising it as an objection is rather petty. Dare I say it, disgraceful?

    • streiff

      to RedState. Fortunately for us, unfortunately for you, we are in a position to rectify this offense your presence offers.

      • eddie74

        It is a reminder to us that there will alway be those folks that don’t or cannot properly understand the issue discussed.. Not everyone has the necessary crainal Marbles to logically process and must resort to emotional outbursts..
        Thank God that my Children grew out of that emotional immaturity ..
        There is always something to be learned from those who just Blow Smoke.. Let Adam blow his smoke until he himself finds no FIRE in his huffings & puffings.

    • Leon H. Wolf

      in this economy should not troll political blogs from work. You want to trust me on this one.

    • Brian Darling

      I don’t hide the fact that I work for Heritage. I am proud of this study and wanted to share it with other conservatives. You clearly are not part of the team over here so you should migrate back to the Daily KOS where people will care about your liberal opinions.
      The cause of dependency is big government.

  • tplan

    The post is a disgrace to redstate indeed. Let’s focus more on specific policies that helped cause this. Let’s look at underlying facts like a rapidly aging workforce with more and more people retiring at an ever faster rate. A recession wiping out massive amounts of jobs and putting people in a position to require aid from the federal government.

    Then, when we understand the nature of the beast a little better, discuss honest solutions.

    We have as a nation are facing problems as big as any other generation before us, and until we are honest about the size, scope, and true source of the problems, we will never overcome them..

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Yeah, the retirement argument that Karl Denniger disembowels in this post here…

      http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=201689

      The problem with the thesis in the letter, of course, is that most of the decline happened all at once, but the boomers don’t retire all at once. They do so over time. In fact the big “step function” took place over the space of less than two years, which is rather dramatic — and doesn’t mesh with a “demographics” explanation.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        Running a regression line through an S-Curve is a cynical act of mathematical aliteracy.

      • sharrondeer

        For example, in the fourth quarter of 2008, GDP contracted by around 9%. That’s a pretty big shock to the system.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          that was picked up in the regression equation that proported to explain where the workforce went. I would have loved to have seen the deleted residules on Q4 2008. Take that leverage point out of the regression and you may well find yourself with an Rsq(Adj) well below significance.

    • streiff

      but the preponderance of the evidence suggests you are sockpuppet.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        I wanted to poke the troll first…

    • Brian Darling

      Do you see any waste, fraud and abuse in these programs? Do you agree that government spending more than it receives is a problem? Do you agree that government dependency is bad for society?
      The source of our current debt crisis is Congress and the Trillion Dollar President. He is expected to run trillion dollar debts for every year ofnhis 4 years in office.

    • Juggernaut

      care centers all across the USA. Idiot liberal fools plus idiot media trolls infested the news with lies pretending insurance coverage is a must because Obama said its so.

      No he’s not. Just another liberal crime to loot money for rich liberals who will run those silly programs and give money to dem campaigns.

  • joeyjojoshabadoo79

    Unvarnished propaganda will not help us unseat Barry. Nor will preaching to the choir. Heritage et al have to better going forward.

    • Brian Darling

      Read the Heritage study before you dismiss the findings. the study is well documented.

  • renl57

    “I believe the best social program is a job.”
    — Ronald Reagan

    This economic slump has been the worst since the Great Depression. Both deeper and longer, in terms of job losses. Take a look at this chart of job losses in the current and past recessions:

    http://tinyurl.com/7pjk4v2

    One reason why so many people ended up on public assistance is that in 2009-2010, nationally there were an average of 5 applicants for every job opening–the highest ratio since the 1930s. The jobs just dried up in many parts of the country that had formerly been prosperous, like NV.

    Another problem has been the lack of mobility of Americans who are upside-down on their mortgages. Someone living in Ohio or Nevada can’t easily move to North Dakota to take a job there, because he can’t sell his house as long as he owes more on it than it’s worth. (Even if he didn’t take a subprime mortgage, even if he paid his monthly payments faithfully, the value of his home was dragged down by all the others who weren’t as conscientious.)

    Fix the economy, create the jobs (say by expanding our domestic energy sources), and you’ll have fewer people on food stamps.

    • sharrondeer

      Or people still won’t be able to move to take a new job.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        which now own the MBS notes…

    • demsaresatanic

      My recollection is that an improving economy slows down the increase in food stamps but never reverses it. I’d like to see the evidence, one way or the other.

  • deVere

    http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/67302
    “Even the worst of presidents cannot stop the best of times, and it’s beginning to look as if an unprecedented energy boom just might save President Barack Obama’s re-election, despite his undying efforts to thwart energy development.”

  • mediaproofyourvote

    Obama’s protective shield media blocks any historical evidence that communism doesn’t work. With as much as 50% of U.S. voters not even understanding what words like: socialism, communism, and Marxist even mean, all Obama has to do is stay positive and deliver media and Hollywood professional tested theatrics to get elected. Republicans are going to have to get smart and speak directly to the vast uneducated public, explaining conservative principles like they were talking to a 5 year old. Media Proof Your Vote!