« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Searching for Clues in Obama’s Latest Executive Order

On Friday, someone emailed me with a link to this story about a “compromise” executive order issued by President Obama pertaining to conscience protections for workers in the health care industry, and asked for my opinion. The only answer I could give at the time was that I was not sure what the effect of the executive order would be, but that I would try to ruminate on it over the weekend to see if I came up with anything. After spending the weekend doing just that, I am afraid that I am no closer to the answer. I suspect, as with many Executive Orders, that the critical details will be answered in the course of implementation. Given the Obama Administration’s general hostility towards the views of honest pro-lifers, this is not a comforting prospect.

By way of background, nurses and doctors working in facilities receiving federal funding have long received theoretical statutory conscience protection preventing them from being forced to participate in abortions and similar procedures. I say “theoretical” because the law has been horribly enforced over the years. In an effort to combat this, the Bush administration issued an executive order in the waning days of Bush’s Presidency which expanded this conscience protection to all health care workers and expanded the range of procedures to which health care workers could (in essence) conscientiously object.

The Washington Post article notes the usual lines of attack that were employed against this Executive Order, claiming that it would have shielded workers who, for example, refused to provide fertilization treatments for single women, or (somewhat ridiculously) hospital janitors who refused to clean a hospital room after an abortion. Although the Order was certainly not that broad, it was definitely intended to expand coverage to people such as CNAs, Pharmacists, pharmacy techs, and the like, and would have at least arguably encompassed dispensing birth control pills, etc. From what I can tell, the new Obama Executive Order strips all these extra protections away and reduces the coverage of the Executive Order only to doctors and nurses, and covered procedures only to abortions and sterilizations.

Of course, wrangling over the precise language in the Executive Order is most likely a circus sideshow to where the real fight will lie, which is in the enforcement. For instance, the immigration laws we have on the books right now are quite strict; however, they are widely (and correctly) viewed as a joke because of decades of lax enforcement. And given what we know about the Obama administration’s hostility to honest pro-life convictions, it seems inevitable that health care workers will honest conscientious objections to participating in abortion or the distribution of arbortifacient medications will continue to live in fear of their jobs, despite clear Federal law indicating that they should not.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://kindlingforcandles.wordpress.com/ INC

    http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/12/hhs_enacts_cons.html

    She also had this from Thursday:

    Calls needed to Congress TODAY on two pro-life amendments

    Conscience Protection, Amendment #54 submitted by Rep. John Fleming (R-LA) would prevent any funds made available under the CR from being used to rescind or otherwise alter the conscience protection regulations currently in effect. These regulations implement existing conscience laws and provide an opportunity for individuals who have been discriminated against to file a complaint with the HHS Office of Civil Rights. If the regulations are rescinded it will be more difficult for individuals to seek protection under existing conscience laws.

    I haven’t yet been able to find what happened with it.

    • Adjoran

      and protesting the EO change.

      If the Obama Regime is to be judged on its record on issues of conscience, they will not be enforcing any provisions protecting it.

  • http://kindlingforcandles.wordpress.com/ INC

    CMA physicians, former HHS Asst. Secretary decry Obama administration’s regulatory action on conscience and discrimination.

    Dr. J. Scott Ries, a board-certified family physician and CMA’s vice president for Campus & Community Ministries, said, “The administration has made changes in a vital civil rights regulation without evidence or justification. The administration presented no evidence of any problems in healthcare access, prescriptions or procedures that have occurred in the two years since the original regulation’s enactment that would justify any change in this protective regulation.

    “The administration, for example, contends that a rule change is necessary to protect access to contraception, but absolutely no evidence is presented to justify any such concern. In the process, the administration blatantly ignores the scientific evidence that certain controversial prescriptions that abortion advocates promote as contraception are actually potential abortifacients, ending the life of a living, developing human embryo. This is a critical concern for pro-life patients, healthcare professionals and institutions

    “The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services indicated in 2008 in its final rule, “We have found no evidence that these regulations will create new barriers in accessing contraception unless those contraceptives are currently delivered over the religious or moral objections of the provider in such programs or research activities.”

    This rule was one of the last to come from GWB’s administration.

    There’s also a quote from Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Health Dr. Joxel Garcia who the article says oversaw the development and implementation of the 2008 regulation.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    You say “would have shielded…. (somewhat ridiculously) janitors who refused to clean a hospital room after an abortion.”

    Why do you say that’s ridiculous? If I were a janitor in a hospital, I sure would not want to be forced to clean up after an abortion.

    And if I were a pharmacist, I would not want to be forced to dispense oral contraceptives, which operate by three pharmacological mechanisms, one of which is abortifacient. (“Breakthrough ovulation” occurs in 2 to 10 percent of monthly cycles, but any embryo resulting from that is killed at a very early stage by being unable to implant in the Pill-altered uterine lining.)

    If I were a nurse, I would not want to be forced to participate in a sterilization, or a transplant of tissues taken from an aborted fetus, or an “assisted suicide.”

    In other words, believing, practicing Catholics are now, de facto, to be banned from working in any capacity in many if not most medical environments.

    If that’s not religious discrimination, I don’t know what is.

    Not to mention that the medical field itself will suffer since there are a lot of gifted, brilliant, caring Catholics whose talents will be excluded from the medical professions. We’ve already got a family-practitioner shortage and a nursing shortage; shutting out faithful Catholics will not help that situation.