« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

ClaireAir Crash Lands in Missouri

Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill reminds me of the Seinfeld episode “The Opposite“, where George decides that in order to succeed, he must do the opposite of every instinct he ever had.  For years now, just like George Castanza, Claire McCaskill has said one thing and done the opposite.  Missouri GOP executive director Lloyd Smith notes:

“Time after time, Missourians have watched as Claire McCaskill says one thing and does the opposite. McCaskill complained about excessive government spending—then she voted for the failed stimulus bill, Obamacare, and bailout after bailout. She criticized cap-and-trade legislation—then she voted to allow the EPA to impose draconian regulations on carbon dioxide. She condemned extravagant taxpayer-funded travel by members of Congress—then she billed taxpayers for her own travel on her husband’s private plane. Although she pretends to be different, Claire McCaskill is exactly the kind of double-speaking Washington politician that Missourians are sick and tired of. “

But now Claire has a problem.  After trumpeting a message of “common sense reform” to congressional travel practices, Ms. Castanza McCaskill has apparently been doing exactly the opposite: flying around the country in a private plane owned by her own husband and charging the expenses to the taxpayers.  This story broke last week, when Politico reported that she had billed us for over $76,000 spent on at least 89 different trips.  And this isn’t the first time Claire has been caught with her hands in the aviation cookie jar.  During the 2006 Senate campaign, she and her millionaire husband were nailed for using a $3M plane that was registered in Delaware, a state that, unlike Missouri, has no personal property tax on private planes.

Apparently Claire and her husband didn’t learn that lesson about personal property taxes back in 2006.  Today McCaskill admitted that they have not paid those taxes on their plane for the last four years.  Grand total of four years of “avoided” personal property taxes on this $3M plane:  $287,273. (And yes, this is apparently the same plane that was questioned in 2006, so it’s not like they haven’t heard this before.)  Pleading ignorance isn’t an acceptable excuse either:  Mr. Shepard paid over $1000 in taxes on their two vehicles in 2010, and (at least in my county) personal property tax declaration forms are issued every year – forms that clearly document the types of property that must be declared.  To McCaskill’s credit, she will be paying back the money she bilked out of taxpayers and the dodged taxes – to the tune of over $300,000.  How nice that she’s able to write a check that big…unsurprising for one of Washington’s wealthiest politicians – she and her husband were worth an estimated $15.5M in 2009.

This wouldn’t be big news if not for McCaskill’s tendency to say one thing and do the other, as Mr. Smith noted in the quote above.  Back in February, she co-sponsored a bill “that would fire federal employees if they are “seriously delinquent” in paying their own federal taxes.”, and Politico reports that back in 2009, she

…blasted the House Appropriations Committee for approving nearly $200 million for three Gulfstream 550 jets to carry members of Congress, military leaders and top administration officials.

The Opposite.

The Missouri GOP has filed a complaint with the Senate’s “Select Committee on Ethics”, asking them to look at possible violations of Senate Rule 37 and how she has potentially misused taxpayer funds for her own interests.  Lloyd Smith concludes the complaint document with a quote from McCaskill’s own web site:

Nothing irritates Americans more than the fact that some members of Congress think that they are entitled to their own set of rules.  And it’s true – too many people in Washington live in an alternate reality.  It’s time for that to stop.

Why yes, Claire, it is.  It’s time for you to stop ripping off taxpayers and come out of your alternate reality world where you can say one thing, do another, and expect us to ignore your hypocrisy.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    If this were a Republican, the media and the Democrats would sink their teeth in like a pitbull and use this to taint the entire GOP with the “culture of corruption” label, refusing to let go until careers were destroyed and/or the offender was sent to prison. Since it is a Democrat, they’ll run cover to the extent they’re able, and push this off the front page as quickly as possible.

    And of course, the double-standard cuts both ways. The GOP is guilty of it as well – only in reverse. They will refuse to use this for political advantage, allowing the Democrats to avoid guilt-by-association, and likely allowing McCaskill to avoid the harshest penalty available.

  • izoneguy

    Are unraveling America.

  • AceInTX
  • izoneguy

    on the sale of her 2.2 Million dollar aircraft.

    Maybe she will start reading all the tax laws the democrats pass…
    Nah….

  • Locked and Loaded

    but this makes me wonder, how many senators right now owe their very existence to the 17th Amendment?

  • http://www.ArchitecturalShots.com mdyou

    If you were married to her, you’d want her on plane to somewhere else, too.

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    Claire McCaskill goes in so many different directions, it’s amazing she hasn’t drawn and quartered herself.

    I pray we can defeat her in 2012, but I don’t think Steelman is the candidate to do it.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    It’s always great to hammer libs on their hypocrisy, never a shortage of targets there. John Kerry and his Rhode Island yacht comes to mind.

    However, if the plane was legally registered in Delaware and any fees due were paid there, it doesn’t sound like she’s violated the law. I would assume they don’t actually “own” the plane, like most rich people’s toys it’s probably “owned” by a corporation registered somewhere convenient (like Delaware).

    So, a fine case study on how the rich and powerful exempt themselves from the oppressive taxes they impose on normal people who don’t have the resources to properly play the game. But I think that’s (legal) tax avoidance, not (illegal) tax evasion.

  • controse

    Democrat leaders. Time and again she says one thing but does exactly the opposite. Obama has taken saying one thing and doing exactly the opposite to Swiss chronometer regularity. Stupid is as stupid does.

  • bay0wulf

    Hypocritical Rhetoric from a Politician.

    We need to keep the pressure on the system for many of the coming years. We need to continue to hold the feet of those we have elected to the fire. We have to beat back over 70 years of “Smoke & Mirrors” and we have to do it diligently. We have to do all this with a quickly shrinking core of truly conservative voters.

    I don’t wish to disillusion you, there are many years of struggle ahead of us.

    We need immigration control. We need to stop illegal immigration,

    We need some sort of controls put on voting. The masses are taking over the polls and many of them are not contributing members of society … they can vote themselves “Bread and Circuses” because they have the numbers.

    YOU must get out to vote. YOU must let your voices be heard by your friends, family and neighbors. YOU must try to persuade them that voting “feel good” people into power and “feel good” items into being is not only NOT a solution but guaranteed to bite them in the posterior in the near future.

    “A Chicken In Every Pot” basically means that no-one will get to eat steak or pot roast and, soon enough, the chickens will begin to resemble pigeons.

    VOTE. YOUR life depends on it. VOTE. YOUR child’s life depends on it. VOTE. YOUR 401K and Social Security Benefits Depend on it.