« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

McMahon wins debate – Blumenthal stumped on how to create a job

Left-leaning main stream media pundits called last night’s debate between Linda McMahon and Dick Blumenthal a draw. It wasn’t. Political neophyte McMahon not only held her own against career politician Blumenthal. She whipped Connecticut’s longtime attorney general.

The decisive moment in last night’s debate between Connecticut’s U.S. Senatorial candidates Linda McMahon and Dick Blumenthal came when McMahon asked Blumenthal a simple question:

“How do you create a job?”

Well, it is a simple question unless you are a Democrat who believes in government intervention above all else. You know, like believing spending $800-odd billion on a so-called stimulus boondoggle will allow you to guarantee unemployment will remain below 8½ percent.

In response to McMahon’s question, Blumenthal went all deer in the headlights. He stammered, hemmed and hawed about standing up for jobs with government intervention.

I hate to break it to Blumenthal, a guy who lied about serving in Vietnam, but job creation isn’t rocket science. In her rebuttal McMahon explained job creation to Blumenthal:

“Government, government, government. Government does not create jobs. It’s very simple how you create jobs. An entrepreneur takes risk. He or she believes that they create or good or service that is sold for more than it costs to create it. If an entrepreneur thinks he can do that he creates a job.”

Watch the video:

COMMENTS

  • Dan McLaughlin

    The best Blumenthal could come up with was ways to use government to restrain businesses from eliminating unproductive jobs. But that’s a rearguard action. He has no clue how jobs come into being in the first place, when you don’t have enough of them.

    • realvoice2010

      This clueless prevaricator is a perfect example of all of the democratic administration. They are all idealistic, clueless losers who will destroy us if we do not remove them starting this November and continuing beyond 2012 on a 24×7 basis. Even if we prevail in the next two elections the Left, supported by billionaire Globalists, will continue to eat away at our freedoms. We the true American People, need to continually find new ways to defeat them, their ilk, and their ideology.(the ideology, at least, has been proven over and over again to be a LIE.

  • alaskaescapeartist

    In this corner, hailing from the Republican Party in the teal colored business suit…. “The Employer”…… “The Employer”.

    Her opponent, in the Armani knockoff… “Clue Hunter”.

    • promise

      You are so right!! He sure knows how to “talk down” to a person & he must have gotten his “OBAMA SHOT” he sounds just like the “nobody from nowhere that’s done nothing” that lives in my house, eats my food, wears my clothes, uses my money for destruction of my country!! PITIFUL!
      I just hope they keep on underestimating us.
      Power to the REAL people!!!

  • smitch61

    My cousin lives in the great state of CT, she was a lifelong Dem until recently. She is voting for Linda and believes she will win…. I will take it!

    • earlgrey

      It is surprising to me the areas of the country where we are seeing party switchers. Wouldn’t expect to see it in CT. In TN, I am surprised about the lack of enthusiasm for voting R (at least in some of my GOTV calling).

  • sundesy

    Isn’t the conventional wisdom of the libs that democrats are smarter than the republicans. In that one minute of responding to the question Blumenthal demonstrated his lack of knowledge and lack of fundamental common sense. His incoherence was the worst I have ever seen.

    Even for a liberal he will be an embarrassment. Who Am I kidding libs have no bottom.

  • mboyle1988

    We all know what happened then.

  • comtbike

    Reminds me of:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww

  • powertothepeople

    such an urge to deposit shoe leather in someones hind quarters.That fake smile and the fist pump that is common among liars when trying to make people believe them makes my foot get itchy. Maybe Linda will do it for us real soon…….

  • southernpatriots

    Like all Democrats, the answer is government. Are we as Americans going to wake up and see that the difference is private enterprise, private section businesses, not government as the answer. Democrats believe the whole purpose of private business, which is to the tolerated, is the generate money to support the government. Polls show a tightening of races, where the Democrats are catching up to the conservative candidates. Whose polls? to what end polls? Are they polling dead people (ala Chicago, New Orleans, etc)? What a clear choice we have this November!

  • jcmooreusnret

    Well said, concise response to blowhard Blumenthal by McMahon. She has gone up immensely in my estimation.

  • mirac777

    The irresponsible begging for others to support them class, and over here we have The working class who are actually paying for the begging class and the Con Artist liberals to continue to take hard earned money and give it to useless non-productive freeloaders of society. Which side are you on?

    Its that simple.Working class people of all nationalities against Liberal elitists buying the common begger welfare votes. Personal responsibility against having fatherless babies that the working people have to support. Equal opportunity for those who work hard in school and acquire skills that will move the nation forward against the race-baced Social Justice that demands people get hired whether they are qualified or not. Legal immigration for people who are willing to abide by our laws, or Illegal criminals dropping babies with the sole purpose of sucking the system dry.
    Its your choice.

  • The Moat

    When tasked with coming up with real policies for economic growth, all he could come up with was PROTECTIONISM!?!?!?

    Open a history book before you start mucking with our nation. At the very least, go wiki “Smoot-Hawley.”

    What always amazes me the most about liberals is how blind they are to the long, storied history of failure that follows every one of their policies, be it fighting global trade, higher taxes or increasing the size and scope of governmental power.

    Failures, failures, failures.

    • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

      When Results are what counts, Democrats keep telling you how good their Intentions were. They need to have their feet held to the fire based on the Results. Intentions are irrelevant in the real world.

  • Crowe

    After McMahon nailed him to the wall his retort was, “I’m not going to be an entrepreneur as a senator!”

    Indeed not. And that’s a further clarification of the problem: men and women with no business sense and no entrepreneurial clue think that they are able to “create jobs” from their marble palace in Washington just because they say that’s what they are there to do. What sort of demi-gods do they think they are?

  • Common_Cents

    Of fact checkers and investigative bloggers to vet his past lies about military service.

    Create jobs? He once remembered seeing that in a book in school.

  • ghflynt

    DO YOU WANT A JOB OR ANOTHER GOVERNMENT PROGRAM. The people in Connecticut have a very simple choice here. It is a choice between economic prosperity or a continuation of the current malaise we find ourselves in.

  • dajeeps

    I understand this is post is more about the candidates, but I thought I’d offer a little bit of a detour to show the extent to which ordinary Americans were duped.

    We were told that the $800B stimulus package would create or save 3M jobs and/or with it the unemployment rate would not exceed 8.5%. Obama and his cohorts knowingly made false statements about the Federal Reserve becoming impotent when interest rates hit zero, and that fiscal policy was the only thing left to stimulate the economy as a justification for the massive spending.

    The fact is that the customary tool used by the Fed to adjust monetary policy, interest rate setting, had become impotent at the zero bound. Obviously, when the Federal funds rate is at or near zero, it can no longer be an effective easing tool but that does NOT mean the Fed is out of ammunition. There are plenty of other things to target besides interest rates at the zero bound to ensure that the supply/demand for money is balanced and the economy is not becoming either strangled or overinflated. The Fed has always had an assortment of other tools in the shed to deal with falling NGDP, disinflation/deflation and the devastating macroeconomic effects it brings.

    So just how bad did they LIE? Well, if one considers the stimulus package, all of the miscellaneous intended stimulus bills that were renamed to something else, like jobs bills, and unemployment extensions, and the $450B omnibus bill of 2009, it equals upwards of $2T (not counting TARP or Fannie and Freddie debt), the majority of which was simply added on to the public debt. It is as almost as much as what was spent on the war on terror, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, hence doubling of the debt in less than a month in office. The congress and executive were intent to do the job that the Fed is supposed to do, and it was all completely unnecessary.

    Why they LIED: If the Fed were to use its other macroeconomic management tools to deal with disinflation/deflation, the effects would be nonspecific and raise all boats – everyone would benefit. But, if the government were to pass out the money, it can be directed to persons/groups it deems worthy while everyone else if left to fend for themselves. The same is true with the ‘tax cuts for everyone’ approach, which they hate because they cannot reward the dancing bears and enjoy all the power that wielding the wealth of future generations brings. They implement policies that induce suffering somewhere, most everywhere, and the only way to get any relief is to play their game and submit to the One.

    • jdlitwiller

      At the risk of you and/or I getting our hands slapped for deviating from the forum subject, I would like to know what other tools the Fed possesses. Like any good sales man, I believe they were the most open to their favorite solution – the printer.

    • ceili_dancer

      You can carry on the discussion there.

    • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

      It’s clear that Democrats never meant to stimulate anything other than their campaign chests and union coffers (same thing). But what is interesting is the other tools in the Fed’s toolbox.

  • dave2131

    Mrs. McMahon laid the Smackdown on Blumenthal!

    I just couldn’t resist.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    It’s a frightening shame that so many Americans wouldn’t have any more of a clue as to where jobs come from than Blumenthal. This election, and the Great Recession itself, is a prime and desperately-needed opportunity to do some heavy teaching on the facts of economic life. Goodness knows folks aren’t getting it in school or from the media.

    • edwlstr

      If I can get enough money, I will add another truck and trailer. This will require a driver ($35,000/yr. minimum) and keep his family well above the poverty line. I will also make money, too. Goods will be transported, products will be sold, jobs will increase. Fees and permits will be paid, diesel fuel will be expended, tires will be replaced. Mechanics will maintain my trucks. Many people will benefit.This will allow, later on, another one , then another one. I cannot however because I already pay more taxes than I can keep up with on what I get to keep. So, I may retire in 2 years, sell the truck and my home, and vegetate until the grim reaper pays me a call. Before Obama we were swimming upstream. Now we’re swimming up a waterfall. But if we can fire all these liberals, I will persopnally create five jobs. If not, there’s no point in me working as a tax slave.

  • Spartan4Life

    Great, well thought out question. And her response to Blumenthal’s idiotic answer was perfect, too.

    “Government, Government, and more Government.” That ought to be the slogan for the Democrat Party.

  • texasjohn

    should have followed it up with a chair shot and body slam into the desk…

    I, too, tried to resist. :)

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack
  • morstar150

    McMahon is the best choice, for so many reasons.

  • http://www.thepurpleheart.com/recipient/RecipientDetails.aspx?wid=7f39cbbe-5213-4983-9702-50132a1c73 rsmith7042

    Blumenthal violated the Stolen Valor Act. He claimed military combat service for which bampaign and service medals were awarded to real combatveterans, He benefited by making those false claims in that he promoted himself as more qualified to serve in public office based in part on his false claims. He should have been forced to resign or impeached, and should be prosecuted.

    As a veteran of Iraq, with a Purple Heart, I am deeply offended by anyone who lies about military service and attempts to reap the good will and appreciation of the American people, that has been earned by better men than themselves.

    Are Connecticut voters pro-lying and pro-coward? I hope not.

    Russell A. Smith
    LieutenantColonel, U.S. Army, Retired

    • renny

      Quinnipiac had Blumenthal 49 and McMahon 46 on September 28. And that’s within the margin of error. So, it is a virtual dead heat in a deep cobalt indigo blue state where Bloomy should be waltzing into a home stretch.

      Not only: Gallup, whose polls have not been as strong for Reps. as Rasmussen, says its generic is the heaviest for Republicans as it has ever been since G. started polling in 1942.

      It ain’t over until the fat lady sings, and I have not tuned up yet.

  • mypalfish

    This race is lost. Energy should be spent on WA, where Rossi still has a shot.

    • IJB
    • http://slcliberty.blogivists.com randy streu

      If ONLY there weren’t a month to turn it around… oh, wait.

      Dire predictions by people with no record (read: very little credibility – sorry… credibility around here starts at zero and goes up as you prove yourself) aren’t instructive or particularly useful.

  • jaykali

    Every politician should be asked this question. While it did look like it startled him a little bit bc he didn’t have a pat answer he kind of bailed himself with the typical liberal speak. But hopefully independents won’t buy it, great question.

  • aesthete

    and he combines the worst parts of both parties’ freedom-curtailing agendas. His stint as AG was of the typical bullying variety, and the man truly is one of the most loathsome snakes in politics today (that’s saying something). I was hopeful that Peter Schiff would win, but McMahon appears to be doing very well: hopefully, her voting record matches her rhetoric. Even if it doesn’t, if it gets rid of Blumenthal as a politician, it will be a net plus.