« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Congressman Paul Ryan explains pro-growth tax reform

fair, competitive, simple

Wisconsin Congressman, and Chairman of the House Budget Committee, released the following  video this morning, in which he explains common sense ideas about pro-growth tax reforms that are fair, competitive, simple, and that have bipartisan support:

It’s that simple.

Full transcript of the video:

Pro-growth Tax Reform -

America’s economy has been hit really hard. A lot of people have lost their jobs. More borrowing and spending and higher taxes are not going to bring jobs back to America. The last thing we need to be doing is to complicate job creation in America with this complicated tax code that we have today.

A tax code should be fair, competitive and simple, and the US tax code fails on all three counts.  Here are common-sense ideas we’ve advanced before…ideas that have bipartisan support.

First, we have to make our tax code fair.

It’s full of deductions, credits and special carve-outs – otherwise known as “loopholes” – that let politically-connected companies avoid paying taxes. Every dollar that businesses spend lobbying for a better tax deal, is a dollar they’re not spending on making a better product.

And, since every dollar hidden in a loophole doesn’t get taxed – politicians make up for this lost revenue by increasing overall tax rates. So we need to close these loopholes.

But if we just close loopholes, then our federal corporate tax rate is 35 percent, which is really high.

Add in state and local taxes, the rate climbs to 39.2 percent – the second highest tax rate among developed countries.

On top of sending almost 40 cents out of every dollar earned, straight to the government, businesses pay investment taxes, payroll taxes, and a handful of other taxes our government makes job creators pay.

In the 21st century global economy – and when American families need jobs – this approach just doesn’t make any sense.

We need to make our tax code competitive.

The budget we passed in the House of Representatives calls for closing the loopholes and lowering the rates.

The President’s bipartisan Fiscal Commission proposed something similar.

Its plan would reduce the corporate tax rate to as low as 26 percent, and to lower the top individual rate that many small businesses pay to as low as 23 percent.

So if we lower tax rates, does that mean the wealthy pay less in taxes? Not if we do it by closing loopholes. Because the people who use most of the loopholes are those in the top tax brackets. For all the money that’s parked in these tax loopholes, all that money’s taxed at zero. Take away the tax loophole; lower everybody’s tax rates – that money’s now taxed. But its taxed at a fair more simple, more competitive way so the small business men and women who are out there striving and competing have a better tax rate so they can compete in this global economy.

Third, let’s make the tax code simple.

All together, individuals and businesses spend over six billion hours and 160 billion dollars, every year, just trying to understand and comply with the tax code.

Let’s simplify the code, not just by closing loopholes, but also by decreasing the number of different tax brackets taxpayers fall in.

Fewer brackets, along with lower individual rates, will make the tax code less complicated, and let more people keep more of the money they earn.

There’s a reason this approach has attracted bipartisan support: It’s Fair, It’s Competitive, and It’s Simple.

America’s been knocked down before. We’ve had tough recessions before, and we know that the secret to growing jobs and prosperity in America are through the ingenuity and the hard work of our businesses – of our small businesses, of our large businesses, of job creators. We don’t want a tax system that rewards people for coming to Washington and getting special favors. We want a tax system that rewards Americans for hard work, risk taking, entrepreneurship , investment and innovation. These are the kinds of things that have made America great in the past. And these are the kinds of ideas the we’re going to need if want to grow our economy in the future and compete in the 21st century global economy.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • APA Guy

    No deductions…no loopholes…just a simple, fair tax levied on income at all levels. I think that’s a great place to start, and we’ll be amazed how many will scream for tax cuts after that once they have a chip in the game.

    • Jim Tomasik

      and stop taxing income all together.

      • APA Guy

        …politically. One LARGE step at a time :)

  • JSobieski

    and more importantly, speaking on this topic.

    There is bipartisan support for revenue neutral rate reductions coupled with closing loopholes. This is the one meaningful and substantive thing that could happen even though Obama is in office.

    Not only is the substance worthwhile, but politically speaking, it is a way for the R’s to avoid being classified as the party of “no”.

    Many casual observers of politics don’t realize that the Republican’s do have ideas to get the economy moving. Revenue neutral tax reform should be the focus of Congress for the next 13 months.

    • APA Guy

      nt

    • APA Guy

      nt

    • Death_of_the_Donkey

      I think there is a lot of support for the theory, but less for the reality. The reality (as shown in Simpson-Bowles) is that we would have to give in on unearned income (ie cap gains/dividends) and the D’s would have to give in on overall lower marginal rates for the “wealthy” AND the lobbyists would have to give in on mortgage interest/local taxes/etc. I simply do not have confidence in any of our legislators to complete truly meaningful and free market tax reform anytime soon.

      • JSobieski

        Its not going to take on the big personal deductions such as mortgage or charitable donations. The deductions being addressed are on the corporate side.

        Have a loaf is better than nothing.

        I realize that you really want to get rid of dividend/capital gains rates, but doing so will impact competitiveness which will impact jobs.

        One reason that I am not even a libertarian on economic issues is that those folks want to get the perfect system. Don’t shoot down the good (or at least the better) because it isn’t the best.

        Given who the President is, tax neutral tax reform is the best bang for the buck that we have. That and regulatory reform (presuming Obama is at least 1% sincere).

        • Death_of_the_Donkey

          as a stand alone. In a perfect world the corp rate would be as close to zero as possible (since corps just pass on virtually all taxes anyways), but I would take it as a first step.

          As for cap gains/dividends, it isn’t just those. I want to eliminate ALL deductions/special rates/loopholes and have an extremely pro-free market tax code that gets government completely out of decision influencing and winner picking.

          • JSobieski

            that may or may not ever come to pass. I would be happy to at least get moving in the right direction.

            You get corporate income taxes to 0%, and I promise to dedicate my efforts to putting unearned income and earned income in the same tax bucket and the elimination of all deductions (including deductions for kids).

            I don’t think we will ever get close to any of that though.

  • oldbird77

    I can say as an American, this is a great plan. I can say as an accountant, this is a terrible plan. Opaque tax laws and reams of regulation keep demand for my profession high.

    • Jim Tomasik

      There will be an Armey of lobbyists to work night and day getting rich giving you back your job security at the expense of the working American people.

      The income tax is a blood sucking, social engineering, wealth redistributing, leech on our society.

      • aesthete

        Norquist, yes, but I haven’t heard anything like that about Armey when it comes to taxes.

        • Jim Tomasik

          that Dick Armey honestly wants the tax code changed?

          If so, why?

          • aesthete

            Armey has bucked the Bush administration on Medicare Pt D and the other Bush-era atrocities, fought to get the PATRIOT Act’s most controversial clauses sunsetted, and has been in favor of the flat tax for as long as I can remember. He has at least as much credibility and sincerity to his name as the FairTax folks at the top of the movement (not that I see any reason to doubt the sincerity of either group, just the effectiveness).

          • Jim Tomasik

            Not to be argumentative but who are the names at the top of the FairTax movement? I’m really curious as to who you think that might be.

    • Russ Martin

      Those against simplification of the tax code:

      1. Accountants
      2. Lawyers
      3. Lobbyists
      4. Businesses large enough to hire #’s 1, 2, and 3 above.
      4. Politicians beholden to #’s 3 and 4 above.

      Those supporting simplification of the tax code:

      The rest of the American people.

      • Death_of_the_Donkey

        also against simplification would be:

        5) any American who pays an effective rate (through current code loopholes/deductions) that is lower than what the new proposed simplified rates would be. Remember for every winner in tax reform through the lowered rates there will be a loser (since it is revenue neutral).

        • JSobieski

          in calculating their taxes.

          Besides, the loopholes Paul Ryan is addressing are on the corporate side, not the personal side. This I suspect is specifically to avoid contentious battles such as the mortgage deduction, state taxes, etc. on the personal side.

    • DerKrieger

      The US tax code IS a jobs plan. How many jobs depend on our complicated tax code? How many companies depend on it? I wrote a diary on this a few weeks ago. What would become of tax lawyers, accountants, entire corporate tax divisions, H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt et al, and the IRS if we simplified the tax code? How would Congress exercise power without the tax code? What would happen to the army of lobbyists who depend on our complex tax code? Our tax code is inefficient, expensive, manipulative, and a waste of otherwise productive people. But I suspect that too many people are dependent on it for there to be true reform. Unless we get a conservative Congress and president.

  • lineholder

    Good video!! Simple. Direct. Straightforward. Focuses on how and why. I hope we see more of it.

  • spaceforthepoppa

    We are at a critical time, and no step can be small. Wecneed large, sure-footed steps towards reform and recovery.

  • ss396

    Talk, talk, talk.

    Great ideas, all of them. They were great ideas 10 years ago. They were great ideas 20 years ago. They were great ideas 30 years ago.

    Maybe this time Lucy will not snatch the ball away?
    Maybe this time the tree will not eat the kite?

  • fmaidment

    …in a way that is “revenue neutral” would essentially be a $160,000,000,000 stimulus that costs the government absolutely nothing?

    HECK YEAH!

  • lastgopinillinois

    SC=Super-committee. The hearings aired on C-Span.
    Members of the committee used the hearing to ask questions of a panel of economists.
    There appeared to by bi-partisan support for some form of “Ryanomics”. It was mentioned that a bi-partisan bill had been drafted, but they wanted to work with panelists more to achieve the best results on the tax rates.
    It all SOUNDED promising, but I doubt that a bill will be introduced this year and I have less confidence that anything resembling “Ryanomics” will be included in the super-committee recommendations to congress.
    That would just be too good to be true.

  • Pingback: Liberal Bias - European austerity weirdly contradicts conservative values

  • Pingback: European austerity weirdly contradicts conservative values