« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Romney explains Obama’s ‘all of the above’ energy policy

Obama’s for all the sources of energy that come from above the ground. Wind and solar. He just doesn’t like the things that come from below the ground. — Mitt Romney

Speaking at Consol Energy’s Research and Development Facility in South Park Township, Pennsylvania the day before that state’s presidential primary, Mitt Romney took on President Obama’s energy policies, blaming them for increasing energy prices:

“The onslaught of regulations — holding off on drilling in the Gulf; holding off on drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf; holding off on drilling in Alaska; trying to impose the federal government into fracking regulations…all the regulations relating to coal,” Mr. Romney said, ticking off a list of policy decisions made or continued by the Obama Administration. “These things have made the cost of energy go up.”

Romney went on to explain what Obama means when he talks about “all of the above” when it comes to energy. Watch the video:

Transcript of the video clip:

MITT ROMNEY: “The road we’re on, as Mr. Axelrod described it, the road we’re on is one that says that energy’s going to become more and more expensive. It’s going to be harder and harder to get coal; harder and harder to use it here of course. It’ll be sent to other nations around the world and used. But the cost here will go up. Harder to use natural gas.

You saw the President kicked off the regulation, re-regulation of natural gas until after the election. Harder and harder to use oil. How in the world the President says, as he did the other day, he’s for ‘all of the above’ when it comes to energy? I couldn’t figure that out given his policies. And then it struck me: he’s for all the sources of energy that come from above the ground. Wind and solar. He just doesn’t like the things that come from below the ground.

That’s the course he’s on. The course I’ll put us on is to take advantage of what comes from above the ground as well as what comes from below the ground so that America can finally become energy secure and independent of the oil cartel.”

Obama’s policies are raising energy prices and blocking American energy independence. Obama has never had a problem with higher energy prices.

Obama wasn’t bothered by the prospect of higher gas prices. Energy Secretary, Stephen Chu, revealed the administration’s support for support for higher gasoline prices when he told the Wall Street Journal, “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.” This week the national average price of regular gasoline is $3.87 per gallon. It was $1.838 the week Obama became president.

Obama wasn’t concerned that his Cap-and-Trade plan would have raised energy prices. During the 2008 presidential campaign Obama admitted that: “[U]nder my plan of a Cap-and-Trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” In a January 17, 2008 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, Obama said his Cap-and-Trade plan would bankrupt anyone that built a coal-powered plant.

From Right Side Politics.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    and common sense as to energy policy.

    • tritopic

      There was a lot of common sense in this article. It is rediculous for one that cap and trade was opened in Obama illegable presidency. I seen first hand that cap and trade was to be used in repriations first and foremost. The secretary of deffense should have known all about it. The money in tarp was first found and cap and trade would have come. The openning to the supreme court would have been nulified by its expenditures wealthy men decided in its deturency to save money and band it together as brothers. For the slave trade or repriations for Africans to return to Africa.

      It is rediculous as well what I heard on cnn today that gas will dry up. So to find a diffrent type of energy.

      The coal scares me that its well drone uses will be forgotten. Yeah free the drone as a way of energy.

      • tritopic

        Where suppose to open up cap and trade as you can see in this visual aide Obama nah he was not an American politician.

  • johnt

    it becomes explicable. The environment thing is a fig leaf, granted there are ample loons who believe it, and more than a few who profit from it. But the group of the morally destitute whose sole belief is in their grasping & wielding power, exercised in the cause of deliberate hardship inflicted on the public, have that as their sole reason.
    Others, outside the circles of power, the LittleLiberals burdened with severe encephalitis but blessed with an insuperable ignorance, go along for the orgiastic ride, the vicarious thrills of second hand aggression and first hand vituperation.

  • Neal Kahn

    Taking it to Obama.
    That’s what I want to see.

    • acat

      bleach? Works on mildew…

      Romney isn’t “growing on me”, but he seems to get that he can’t run McCain’s “let’s have a civil debate” playbook against Team Obama.

      To borrow from Moe Lane, I can forgive much for a candidate who fights.

      Mew

  • funwithknives

    of our United States ship coal to China. Hard to get? H A R D L Y !!!

  • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    …who think there is little space between Mitt and the President on policy, you need look no further than energy to see that it’s just not true.

    Obama is an unmitigated disaster on energy policy. He’s surrounded himself with hard core greenies and Lefties. I don’t think a single person in his administration knows anything about energy policy.

    Romney, on the other hand, would govern like an adult.

    IF there were no other differences (and there are plenty), Romney is clearly the better choice. I have not an ounce of patience with anyone who would argue with that.

    • davesinsanantonio

      “it’s okay for me, but not for you.” That it their policy. So, their goal is to make it more expensive for you and me and exempt themselves. Just as it is their policy in so many other areas. After all, they are the entitled elite and we are just the great unbelieving mass of serfs who must be “nudged” into doing what the true believers know is right.

  • snowshooze

    And he even came off as amusing.
    If absolutely nothing else, he has some good writers.
    A bit of polish is needed on delivery…
    All in all, nice hit.

    • APA Guy

      His policies will move to the right…they’ll pretty much have to if we control congress next year. But none of that matters if he isn’t elected in the first place. Hammering Obama like this on POLICY helps the country forget how much they may “like” him and remember how much they HATE his crappy policies.

      It’s game on already…and thank the Lord for that.

  • mirac777

    Argentina just took over the Spanish oil and gas company Repsol. Stole it and it’s resources and equipment lock stock and barrel.

    And they say Socio-Communism is NOT in South America. Nothing to see here sheep, move along.

  • ag8tor

    that at least he’s firing a few salvos across the administration’s bow. I agree with acat that the McCain “Reach across the aisle” will NOT work against a group that has no scrupples. If Mitt has to get down in the dirt occasionally then so be it. You can bet that this administrations campaign will stoop to new lows to get re-elected. I am glad to see the Reps finally start to hammer obamas record. He has nothing of substance to run on. No accomplishments of merit. So expect their campaign to be about personal things like Romneys religion, family, money etc. Romney needs to go ahead and get on message about how obama has ruined this country with his lefty policies and stay on it. A good start with energy. He needs to get the message out about how the EPA and all the ecofreaks that obama has in his group are regulating us into $5/gal gas. The public can really relate to that!

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      it taught us that Mitt is not afraid of getting “down and dirty”. I wouldn’t sweat that.

  • remalimo

    again selected their lib. rep. and I have not had a chance to have a say in the selection process. I am from TX and we might as well have our opportunity to vote for the Republican Candidate after the Republican Convention. The East Coast and some of the almost Coast has selected the Republican Candidate for as long as I have had the opportunity to vote. When are we going to let the rest of the nation have a vote in who is going to be the Republican Candidate?