« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama’s bodacious gay marriage straddle

More politics of expediency.

In yet another attempt to be on both sides of a controversial issue, President Obama refuses to be straight about his position on gay marriage.

During the 2008 presidential campaign Obama said he did not support same-sex marriage and believed “marriage is between a man and a woman.” You can watch Obama say it here.

Two years later, on Oct. 27, 2010, Obama revealed that his views on gay marriage are evolving.

“I have been to this point unwilling to sign on to same-sex marriage primarily because of my understandings of the traditional definitions of marriage. But I also think you’re right that attitudes evolve, including mine.”

Last year Obama instructed the Justice Department to no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, the legal prohibition on federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

Then, on Sunday, in an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Vice President Biden said that he is “absolutely comfortable” with gay couples having the same rights as heterosexual couples. On Monday Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said he believes gay marriage should be legal in the United States.

That got the White House press corps so hot and bothered that White House press secretary Jay Carney had to obfuscate president Obama’s evolving position on same-sex marriage more than 50 times during yesterday’s press briefing. Watch a video of Carney’s ordeal:

The reason Obama goes to such lengths to try and be perceived on both sides of the gay marriage controversy is simple –it is his politics of expediency.

Today Gallup reported that 50 percent of Americans believe same-sex marriages should be recognized by law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages. That’s down from 53 percent  last year.  Forty-eight percent say such marriages should not be legal. According to Gallup:

President Obama’s campaign strategy team obviously is continuing to grapple with how to handle it — with the vice president on the one hand essentially endorsing legalized gay marriage, while the administration on the other hand stops just short of the same pronouncement.

Two core Obama constituencies -– young voters and African-Americans — are on opposite sides of the gay marriage divide. Today North Carolina, one of this year’s critical swing states, is voting on a constitutional ban on gay marriage. So Obama, even more nuanced than Senator John Kerry, continues to try and be perceived as if he is both for and against gay marriage.

COMMENTS

  • zachv

    Young voters aren’t going to be big player this year. They were all rallied in 2008, but now that’s pretty much died and gone away. To make up for it Obama will need to capture the older vote, which the gay marriage tends to alienate.

    I can almost guarantee that Obama’s going to ditch his after November, for better or for worse.

  • jaykali

    Oh by the way everybody, I’ve evolved!!! LGBT!!

    Hopefully he’ll be evolving as an ex-president.

  • jaykali

    This is a textbook case of how to be on both sides of an issue.

  • johnt

    except when it comes to wiping out an economy. The VP on the other hand is a real devolver, as in going backwards.

  • kipling

    He does not say so verbally but his actions make it quite clear. He refuses to defend traditional marriage. Dan Savage seems to think the President will make it official after the election. My guess is that the recent overt support from within the administration is a way of signaling change – but only once the second term is secure.

    • westcoastpatriette

      the father of lies and he will contort himself into any image he thinks will work to get reelected.

  • clintonformccain

    He used it at the candidate forum for the gay Human Rights Council, the event where Bill Richardson famously said that being gay was a choice and got the “wrong anser” buzzer from questioner Melissa Ethredge.

    • acat

      Or maybe horns…

      (Cheshire grin)

  • jakeofalltrades
  • Paul Zahorecz

    http://www.redstate.com/pzahorecz/2012/05/08/gay-marriage-left-vs-right/

  • RichmondG30

    Weasels, weasels, weasels. No shame.

  • checkmate2012

    If people on either side of the aisle can’t see how disingenuous this imposter is on this issue and so many more like his remarks in to the Russians, then they are stupid.

    And I would like to add that it should be illegal for Congress to pass any bill that doesn’t take effect until after they’re long gone and that goes for executive orders as well. Don’t pass O’care and start handing out the candy to gain votes and then delay the poison like the tax increases and medicare reductions unitl after the 2012 elections.

    I cry fowl and this gay marriage issue is just one more thing King O wants to address after the election. Take your stance now, and own it like a man Mr. Obama, like anyone with real convictions does by their actions, not their empty words.

  • SoFiMil

    .

    • westcoastpatriette

      he’s just evolving, okay? :)